The TFCD led to the NGFS.

The NGFS led to the NGFS SAC.

Eventually, the NGFS SAC will lead to working groups.

The working groups will establish methodology, and the even the NGFS will be a remnant of the past.

It’s continuous recursion. That’s what it is.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ngfss-surgisphere-moment?utm_source=publication-search

I assume this is a scam

I mean the website alone looks totally legit

extraordinary. i posted this just 10 days ago, and they’ve taken it down in the meantime.

here’s the wayback version.

https://web.archive.org/web/20250113025251/https://www.kabbalah.info/eng/layout/set/trans_page/content/view/full/3811


https://t.me/c/2210881734/13715

this page is what they removed.

laitman’s ‘altruistic communism’ is identical to communism 1.0.

they renamed the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ stage to ‘egoistic communism’ to be more aligned with moses hess

the zohar says?

https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/67146

the reason i find this noteworthy is not because of the idiot on display, but rather, because i think i can explain how it’ll come to pass - and how that idiot will be bitterly disappointed when it does take place

michael laitman makes clear that ‘israel’ is not a geographic territory, nor even an ethnic one.

laitman redefines 'Israel' as a state of consciousness achieved through correction of egoism

over here

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-rosetta-stone?utm_source=publication-search

and the ‘correction’ of egoism incidentally was explicitly moses hess’s objective.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-social-blood?utm_source=publication-search

the end objective, as i have repeatedly stated, is not a world with two or more religions. just one.

the baha’i faith.

a faith which is just extraordinarily aligned with what’s taking place at present.

all other religions and faiths will be retired, willingly or not.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/one-world-one-religion?utm_source=publication-search

they havent yet closed the loop, there's still time to stop it from happening.

don’t allow anyone to ‘black-pill’ you. it’s not a done deal.

[cognitive - evaluative - behavioural]

remember this. it’s pivotal. and it recurses.

read the burstein/negoita papers.

Spinoza closed the tree of life at the top - Burstein and Negoita at the bottom.

the system is closed, without Malkuth there can be no repair.

general systems theory modelling [cognitive]
input-output analysis of flows [evaluative]
cybernetic actuation [behavioural]

but it was not meant to be closed at either end

yeah here it is

this is the system haldane brought in, this reverberated through science and into the ICSU in 1931… scary how well it all aligns…

https://t.me/c/2210881734/13691

• a division specialising in thought [cognitive]
• its systematic application to the settlement of policy [evaluative/clearing]
• its subsequent administration [behavoiral/settlement]

so it moved into finance through the Bank of England (1844 Bank Charter Act and the london bank clearinghouse model)
into 'peace' through Carnegie
into international politics through Woolf/Zimmern (international government/league of nations)
into science through Haldane (leading to the IRC -> ICSU development)
...
all of them instantiate the same structure: cognitive - evaluative (clearing) - behavioural (settlement)

• the cognitive synthesises a ‘standard’ on basis of an ‘ethic’. that’s the trick. ‘sustainable development’, ‘planetary stewardship’, ‘intergenerational equity’, … becomes some technical document of which few are even aware exists.
• the clearinghouse applies that ‘standard’, utilising global real-time surveillance run through an input output analysis - a digital twin
• the settlement carries out the verdict of the clearinghouse

this is the universal model implemented literally everywhere, soon to be implemented in CBDCs with conditionality as well

it originates in the Zohar, Spinoza perverted it, Ashlag/Laitman further developed it, and Burstein eliminated Malkuth, thus removing the possibility of repair

moses hess said he wanted to reform economics, to eliminate the ‘egoism’ - ashlag/laitman stated that ‘egoistic communism’ is the transitional step towards ‘altruistic communism’… and laitman’s website deleted it when i came sniffing.

laitman’s ‘altruistic communism’ is no different to communism 1.0, which also had a ‘transitional’ step - the dictatorship of the proletariat, which would ‘wither away’…

that will happen when it’s integrated into infrastructure, when the ‘general intellect’ is absorbed by the machine (fragment on machines, marx)