Haha I think I’ve found a way to evade the censorship. Need to test it first before announcing how but I need a good left leaning establishment supporting platform to trial it on. Does anyone have any recommendations?
I don’t think I can do plebbit. A man does have his limits after all. Besides I said left leaning not hivemind sh-hole.
I don’t think I can do plebbit. A man does have his limits after all. Besides I said left leaning not hivemind sh-hole.
😁8❤2🤣2
Actually f- it, if others want to give it a try…
Most of those disgusting establishment propaganda pieces about the SDGs will in over enthused language explain 80% of a topic.
What I’m going to do is in a similar over-enthused language tell the remaining 20%. The 20% which will make you realise there’s only one way to implement these systems.
But you cannot break tone. The idea being that AI and similar censorship tools reads the typical propaganda about, say, the SDGs or impact investing but the reader draws the inevitable conclusions himself.
Most of those disgusting establishment propaganda pieces about the SDGs will in over enthused language explain 80% of a topic.
What I’m going to do is in a similar over-enthused language tell the remaining 20%. The 20% which will make you realise there’s only one way to implement these systems.
But you cannot break tone. The idea being that AI and similar censorship tools reads the typical propaganda about, say, the SDGs or impact investing but the reader draws the inevitable conclusions himself.
❤2
Ive done a quick test on 9 AI models where I posted a quickly whipped up AI essay utilising this trick, and then in second prompt explained that the essay was a warning meant to dodge censorship. It passed with flying colours
❤3
The test also established that deepseek and Venice were the least censored models, and ChatGPT and opus were the most censored. Well, apart from Microsoft’s copilot whose reply was simply incredible. Microsoft’s AI is horrendous.
Amazingly, Grok did pretty well.
Amazingly, Grok did pretty well.
👍4
1. invite high fliers to a prestigious conference through appealing to the greed/vanity
2. 'sell' them something they don't ultimately understand while appealing to some alleged 'good'
3. decades down the line the hidden payoff arrives
the topic ‘solid’ can then be compartmentalised, ‘sold’ in individual chunks, which no-one understands until they generations down the line integrate.
and if they structure this around governance and business, then the vanity will attract the former, and the greed the latter
2. 'sell' them something they don't ultimately understand while appealing to some alleged 'good'
3. decades down the line the hidden payoff arrives
the topic ‘solid’ can then be compartmentalised, ‘sold’ in individual chunks, which no-one understands until they generations down the line integrate.
and if they structure this around governance and business, then the vanity will attract the former, and the greed the latter
the really f-ed up thing is that i see how this integrates with PEP, the Haldane Report, science and world order, …
and the template above was also used wrt Bilderberg, which ‘sold’ the west on a mechanism which would benefit the central banks.
that’s what ‘silent weapons of quiet wars’ outlines. capacitance, conductance, resistance, inductance.
after keynes created a government dependency on central bankers through countercyclical fiscal policy (which demands monetary policy support), the concept itself had to be ‘sold’. that’s where bilderberg comes in.
that’s how i see it at present,subject to change.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-general-theory?utm_source=publication-search
and the template above was also used wrt Bilderberg, which ‘sold’ the west on a mechanism which would benefit the central banks.
that’s what ‘silent weapons of quiet wars’ outlines. capacitance, conductance, resistance, inductance.
after keynes created a government dependency on central bankers through countercyclical fiscal policy (which demands monetary policy support), the concept itself had to be ‘sold’. that’s where bilderberg comes in.
that’s how i see it at present,subject to change.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-general-theory?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
A General Theory
Pull out just about any economic textbook, and it will tell you that Keynes’s General Theory (1936) was revolutionary—that the integration of countercyclical fiscal and monetary policies to smooth out boom and bust cycles was unique.
👍8👀1🙈1
and that ‘sir bani yas’ event, i mean, look, they even discuss the place of iran in the middle east. they have the ‘ethic’ peace institute (war clearinghouse), and it’s an event for business and government. to finish off, it's named after a christian monastery.
Rome and Jerusalem, Moses Hess, 1862, meets the Interfaith Declaration on International Business Ethics, 1984-1993.
Rome and Jerusalem, Moses Hess, 1862, meets the Interfaith Declaration on International Business Ethics, 1984-1993.
❤2
what the rothschild did, was to create private intelligence. they’re famous for it. and it’s a pattern which repeats today. that’s where epstein comes in.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/agents-for-the-rothschilds?utm_source=publication-search
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/agents-for-the-rothschilds?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
Agents for the Rothschilds
In 2016, the publisher De Gruyter released an essay by Rainer Liedtke titled Agents for the Rothschilds: A Nineteenth-Century Information Network.
👏5👍4❤1
standards created by a hidden power dictate the outcomes of the clearinghouse, typically through input constraint. that's the secret in few words.
👍12
it is so obviously rothschild that inspecteur closeau would say it cannot possibly be rothschild
😁9👍2
in the event it’s not obvious - when Israel blow up Iran’s energy production, Iran blows up Middle Eastern energy production… and ‘Ukraine’ blows up the NordStream pipeline… Europe loses.
stop celebrating the mutually assured destruction in the ME. sure, the first round of attacks might not affect you, but they will down the line.
stop celebrating the mutually assured destruction in the ME. sure, the first round of attacks might not affect you, but they will down the line.
👍9💯2
why the hell do you think treasonous European left-wing politicians have been so desperate to destroy our own energy production?
because shortages leads to demands for management.
management leads to control.
because shortages leads to demands for management.
management leads to control.
👍16💯7🔥4
oh look, it’s another meta-organisation which seeks to infuse their ‘values’ into your life without a democratic mandate
https://web.archive.org/web/20130311220125/http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us/our-vision
https://web.archive.org/web/20130311220125/http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us/our-vision
🔥1😁1
and - golly gee - it’s a third way/third system/trisectoral network/new economic policy/bernsteinian cooperative yet again
https://web.archive.org/web/20130311215335/http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us/our-governance/our-stakeholder-council
https://web.archive.org/web/20130311215335/http://www.isealalliance.org/about-us/our-governance/our-stakeholder-council
❤1