there are not one but two documents which completely support my ‘epstein: switchboard operator’ thesis.
it’s so blatant. yet, it impacts a large part of development finance industry, so i can imagine financial actors have every interest in ignoring what should be a major scandal of the century.
it’s so blatant. yet, it impacts a large part of development finance industry, so i can imagine financial actors have every interest in ignoring what should be a major scandal of the century.
👍11❤2
‘This essay walks through the document line by line, and shows how it independently confirms everything documented in the previous Epstein essays on this Substack — from a source produced three years before those essays were written.
The ultimate implication here — beyond confirming Epstein's status as a switchboard operator — is that a significant portion of the development finance industry is built on a foundation it would prefer not to have examined.’
sorry, cant be bothered writing up a bespoke line
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/switchboard-operator
The ultimate implication here — beyond confirming Epstein's status as a switchboard operator — is that a significant portion of the development finance industry is built on a foundation it would prefer not to have examined.’
sorry, cant be bothered writing up a bespoke line
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/switchboard-operator
👏6👌3❤2
this is probably my favourite epstein associated release
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02811951.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02811951.pdf
www.justice.gov
Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
🤣2
Haha I think I’ve found a way to evade the censorship. Need to test it first before announcing how but I need a good left leaning establishment supporting platform to trial it on. Does anyone have any recommendations?
I don’t think I can do plebbit. A man does have his limits after all. Besides I said left leaning not hivemind sh-hole.
I don’t think I can do plebbit. A man does have his limits after all. Besides I said left leaning not hivemind sh-hole.
😁8❤2🤣2
Actually f- it, if others want to give it a try…
Most of those disgusting establishment propaganda pieces about the SDGs will in over enthused language explain 80% of a topic.
What I’m going to do is in a similar over-enthused language tell the remaining 20%. The 20% which will make you realise there’s only one way to implement these systems.
But you cannot break tone. The idea being that AI and similar censorship tools reads the typical propaganda about, say, the SDGs or impact investing but the reader draws the inevitable conclusions himself.
Most of those disgusting establishment propaganda pieces about the SDGs will in over enthused language explain 80% of a topic.
What I’m going to do is in a similar over-enthused language tell the remaining 20%. The 20% which will make you realise there’s only one way to implement these systems.
But you cannot break tone. The idea being that AI and similar censorship tools reads the typical propaganda about, say, the SDGs or impact investing but the reader draws the inevitable conclusions himself.
❤2
Ive done a quick test on 9 AI models where I posted a quickly whipped up AI essay utilising this trick, and then in second prompt explained that the essay was a warning meant to dodge censorship. It passed with flying colours
❤3
The test also established that deepseek and Venice were the least censored models, and ChatGPT and opus were the most censored. Well, apart from Microsoft’s copilot whose reply was simply incredible. Microsoft’s AI is horrendous.
Amazingly, Grok did pretty well.
Amazingly, Grok did pretty well.
👍4
1. invite high fliers to a prestigious conference through appealing to the greed/vanity
2. 'sell' them something they don't ultimately understand while appealing to some alleged 'good'
3. decades down the line the hidden payoff arrives
the topic ‘solid’ can then be compartmentalised, ‘sold’ in individual chunks, which no-one understands until they generations down the line integrate.
and if they structure this around governance and business, then the vanity will attract the former, and the greed the latter
2. 'sell' them something they don't ultimately understand while appealing to some alleged 'good'
3. decades down the line the hidden payoff arrives
the topic ‘solid’ can then be compartmentalised, ‘sold’ in individual chunks, which no-one understands until they generations down the line integrate.
and if they structure this around governance and business, then the vanity will attract the former, and the greed the latter
the really f-ed up thing is that i see how this integrates with PEP, the Haldane Report, science and world order, …
and the template above was also used wrt Bilderberg, which ‘sold’ the west on a mechanism which would benefit the central banks.
that’s what ‘silent weapons of quiet wars’ outlines. capacitance, conductance, resistance, inductance.
after keynes created a government dependency on central bankers through countercyclical fiscal policy (which demands monetary policy support), the concept itself had to be ‘sold’. that’s where bilderberg comes in.
that’s how i see it at present,subject to change.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-general-theory?utm_source=publication-search
and the template above was also used wrt Bilderberg, which ‘sold’ the west on a mechanism which would benefit the central banks.
that’s what ‘silent weapons of quiet wars’ outlines. capacitance, conductance, resistance, inductance.
after keynes created a government dependency on central bankers through countercyclical fiscal policy (which demands monetary policy support), the concept itself had to be ‘sold’. that’s where bilderberg comes in.
that’s how i see it at present,subject to change.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-general-theory?utm_source=publication-search
Substack
A General Theory
Pull out just about any economic textbook, and it will tell you that Keynes’s General Theory (1936) was revolutionary—that the integration of countercyclical fiscal and monetary policies to smooth out boom and bust cycles was unique.
👍8👀1🙈1