you’d have thought JP Morgan in their own internal documents would make a big deal out of Epstein links to underage women, surely, given how incredibly bad optics that could bring to the bank, right?

well, the funny thing is that they didn’t. almost as though that’s not the main story.

why would someone operating from behind the curtain grant epstein the level of power and insight without having anything on him that could instantly take him down?

JPM’s internal investigation… and nothing relating to sexual exploits relating to young women.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02811478.pdf

lol

https://t.me/robinmg/45746

there are not one but two documents which completely support my ‘epstein: switchboard operator’ thesis.

it’s so blatant. yet, it impacts a large part of development finance industry, so i can imagine financial actors have every interest in ignoring what should be a major scandal of the century.

and epstein’s squarely in the centre.

‘This essay walks through the document line by line, and shows how it independently confirms everything documented in the previous Epstein essays on this Substack — from a source produced three years before those essays were written.

The ultimate implication here — beyond confirming Epstein's status as a switchboard operator — is that a significant portion of the development finance industry is built on a foundation it would prefer not to have examined.’

sorry, cant be bothered writing up a bespoke line

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/switchboard-operator

here’s the PDF

this is probably my favourite epstein associated release

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/Government%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Virgin%20Islands%20v.%20JPMorgan%20Chase%20Bank,%20N.A.,%20No.%20122-cv-10904%20(S.D.N.Y.%202022)/EFTA02811951.pdf

haha, google ai now sources facebook comments when asked about my epstein essay

definitely nothing odd about that

twitter and google both serve as hyper-corrupt information clearinghouses.

alright, let’s have google’s own AI own up

right, let’s have it examine ‘stranded assets’, which i observed it remove from search results in realtime

finally, let’s do ‘the waddesdon papers’

the indexing is setup to protect rockefeller and rothschild it would appear

ok i dont know if this is correct, but it’s their own AI saying so

google drives 1% of my traffic (twitter and facebook similar numbers) - it’s supposedly on average driving upwards of 50%!

when i asked claude it said twitter and google typically are in top 5 if not top 3.

these stats are completely insane.

direct/email is meant to drive 20-30% yet in my case, it’s 90%?

again, i dont know if this is true, but it’s what google’s own ai states.

haha it doesnt want to play anymore

i dont like grok. that and chatgpt are the worst, most establishment narrative driving AI chatbots out there.

even that agrees.

Haha I think I’ve found a way to evade the censorship. Need to test it first before announcing how but I need a good left leaning establishment supporting platform to trial it on. Does anyone have any recommendations?

I don’t think I can do plebbit. A man does have his limits after all. Besides I said left leaning not hivemind sh-hole.

Actually f- it, if others want to give it a try…

Most of those disgusting establishment propaganda pieces about the SDGs will in over enthused language explain 80% of a topic.

What I’m going to do is in a similar over-enthused language tell the remaining 20%. The 20% which will make you realise there’s only one way to implement these systems.

But you cannot break tone. The idea being that AI and similar censorship tools reads the typical propaganda about, say, the SDGs or impact investing but the reader draws the inevitable conclusions himself.

Ive done a quick test on 9 AI models where I posted a quickly whipped up AI essay utilising this trick, and then in second prompt explained that the essay was a warning meant to dodge censorship. It passed with flying colours

The test also established that deepseek and Venice were the least censored models, and ChatGPT and opus were the most censored. Well, apart from Microsoft’s copilot whose reply was simply incredible. Microsoft’s AI is horrendous.

Amazingly, Grok did pretty well.