yeah, sure, NOW the fabian parasite is upset, how dare the iranians respond to aggression.

https://t.me/robinmg/45432

apologies if i don’t reply a lot on substack atm, notification counts are a bit overwhelming.

CAF’s TC interview has led to around 400 new subscribers, and has led to a lot of activity.

anyway, this is one realisation i had a few days ago. they compartmentalised everything. i reckon that’s a major flaw in their strategy, because now they have no-one who can argue the cross-disciplinary case.

another of the few recent substack comments of mine.


the origin of the BIS, essentially, comes back to the transnational merchant banks of the 19th century, of which the House of Rothschild was a major one.

what’s also of note is that the first boards were inclusive of representation from large scale enterprise. that enterprise? you got it - transnational merchant banks were included.

those 7 seats were eliminated iirc in 1944 with Bretton Woods/IMF. in essence, the work was largely complete at the BIS (an established, predictable flow of outputs was the outcome), and they now moved to shape international fiscal policy.

that’s in essence what they do, i reckon. they create one organisation, ensure its outouts can be predicted, and then they leave and establish the organisation which take those predictable outputs and shape them further - until one day, those replies also are fully predictable.

that way, you eventually get a small handful of people, controlling everything, while you’re none the wiser.

how can these people just stand there and lie?

normal people have shame. what kind of complete psychopath must you be to just lie like this, continuously?

is there a course to learn these skills, and which part of the fabian society should i contact to enroll?

hah, i see Sayer Ji’s moved the overton window from private greed to the foundations.

he’s still not discussing the role of the intelligence community, rothschild, the meaning of ‘social good’, that ‘impact investing’ isn’t just about pandemics, epstein’s research agenda, …

what really impresses me is the level of boosting he enjoys. because something that says “threat to the establishment” obviously receives that level of boosting on the world’s most controlled platform - twitter.

right, well, i’m not similarly shackled.

t/y Ben Rubin (and Kjell in comments)

also, unrelated to this, can i just say thank you to Mike Yeadon who I’m very happy to be in the trenches with. he’s done extraordinary work, and withstood incredible levels of criticism throughout.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-2nd-march-2026

wasnt originally going to write this, but had to endure a few comments on substack about how this definitely was Truss’s fault.

not that i think her premiership was flawless, in fact, it was a fairly questionable episode on some counts.

but the mini budget was the fault of the Bank of England, who came out calling for even MORE powers as a result of their own failure.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/kwartengs-mini-budget

also, needed bit of a break from the epstein emails.

here’s the PDF

the odd thing about 'Always Sunny in Philadelphia' is that although none of the show's characters have any redeeming qualities, you end up kind of liking them anyway

Netanyahu... doesn't. he's an awful human being, and... he's an awful human being.

https://t.me/disclosetv/20129

immediately after anthropic refuse the demands on the trump admin, they're under continuous 'technical difficulty'?

they couldn't have put together a better advertisement campaign if you ask me.

t/y for posts in the chat, busy working on ‘Maxwell’ will get to them in a bit

holy moly that was a lot of work

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/maxwell

PDF

… that crossed the 1k mark in around 40 minutes. new record.

I am jack’s complete lack of surprise

https://t.me/disclosetv/20191

when idiots attack, don’t respond in kind

rather than engaging directly, expose what they do, so that others can spot it

keep it brief - and don’t take the bait

Pergamon press in the 50s published about physical science
In the early 60s about control theory such as cybernetics
In the late 60s about anticipation, futures and predictions
In the 70s about governance
In the 80s about finance

Put it together and it’s

Governance of anticipatory control theory, applied to physical science, and it’s integration with finance

Makes a lot more sense all of a sudden, no?

I have successfully taken a day off!

Yesterday was the first day in years where I didn’t sneak back and swiftly read a few documents, run them through a few AIs to ensure my understanding was correct, dive through wayback, the CIA archives, or Epstein tranches, post obsessively about it, and start drawing the frames of the next essay.

A number of people have asked me to look into the ‘biodigital convergence’…

biodigital convergence is the integration of surveillance into biology incl humans - everything runs of surveillance, this is where the surveillance moves from 3rd perspective, objective surveillance, to subjective

I’ve spent enough time on surveillance already. It’s the source data sent to the input output evaluative layer.

i spent a few hours on pergamon yesterday, and - holy hell - there’s more to this story.

the scale of treason on display is extraordinary

jd bernal, joseph needham, julian huxley, haldane, … and robert maxwell, though in a different way… for starters.

we could also throw in the cambridge five.

oh yeah, two of whom were members of the cambridge apostles (along with keynes and victor ‘gaia theory’ rothschild)

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-cambridge-apostles?utm_source=publication-search