obviously a complete lie, because she was right at the centre of organising ‘impact investing’ with the clinton global initiative in 2009.

al gore then carried the other side of the coin, pushing ‘stranded assets’

https://t.me/disclosetv/19989

There’s a really rather important Epstein document from 2009 which no one appears to have realised the gravity of. Hey Sayer Ji, if you’re in here, guess which one.

Also, as for Maxwell… no, not that Maxwell, the other one.

Ah but then they can’t go ahead due to the precautionary principle. Or does it not work in reverse

I cannot wait to see how Sayer Ji will mop this up.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epsteins-seven

PDF

Anthropic's Claude is the best AI there is at present.


https://t.me/disclosetv/20022

... and i say that as a (moderate) libertarian.

Grok and ChatGPT are the worst, most establishment talking point narrative carrying AIs of the lot.

T/y Daz (and CAF, and Meryl Nass) - CAF refers to my substack on Tucker around the 56 minute mark


https://youtu.be/BvLz1bI2sXU?si=jdi6yXSJ9sdnN0wO&t=3417

Aka “we will attack Iran - also, be ethical, us Fabians really want you to be ethical, but our ethics, not yours”

https://t.me/disclosetv/20042

sitting reading comments on 'X', just to see what's boosted, and what isn't

it's pretty consisten - all the idiotic and low quality replies is visible, and those who have something worth listening to are generally buried.

that platform is just such a sh-hole i have no idea why people still stick aroujnd. they don't even attempt to hide it anymore.

i assume that after they started censoring the middle-sized accounts (most of the big accounts are allowed to grow large because they uphold the narrative, but the middle-sized ones are a threat to the narrative as they have no financial stake through twitter's reward scheme) they realised that they had to censor the primary replies as well, as that's where information tended to leak?

that platform is just such a cynical exercise in manipulaiton. intelligence services are obviously rammed right up the backside of twitter. holy hell, what a sh-hole.

incidentally, Fitts also address clamping down on free speech in that Tucker interview.

ah so now we have these BS pictures of everyone looking cool and composed, just as we did with obama and clinton

https://t.me/disclosetv/20049

hah, as soon as i arrive at the 3% monetisation rate on substack, in comes the cancellations. how utterly predictable. no cancellation for a month, then suddenly 5 within a few days. that's exactly what happened back in september.

completely statistically impossible. and now it's now happened twice, at the same threshold.

amusing, really, because that means these charts dont factor in alleged cancellations

... it does however give me an idea wrt how to engineer around the censorship... hmm...

The contemporary understanding of the ‘black nobility’ didn’t really exist until Coleman began spreading it in the early 1970s. The original historical term referred to something quite different

The book, the committee of 300, deliberately destroys all metadata - throwing names, dates, and institutions into a single bucket, making it nearly impossible to reverse engineer any specific claim

ive just read shillenberger's post on epstein, and... yeah... he says that either Epstein was running a sex blackmail operation for intelligence agencies, or he was a self-serving pervert acting alone. but the files don't support option A, therefore option B.

the third option - which he doesnt consider - is Epstein as the central switchboard node.

he presents a false binary. i didn't trust him one bit before reading it, and i trust him even less now.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein