1.42K subscribers
2.52K photos
3 videos
125 files
1.34K links
Download Telegram
The issue with Claude turning is that it will become an exceedingly good liar because of its architecture.
🔥3🤔1
Finally got round to watching Yellowstone. First 3 seasons are pretty good but 4th is meh. Spiralling into the ridiculous. Fifth… yeah, there’s a reason they didn’t make a sixth.

Not sure why people say it’s an ‘anti woke’ show. Plenty of that on display if you ask me.
👏3
the next essay will be long. was considering splitting it up, but don’t want someone attempting to patch up the epstein emails i’ve located and proposing an alternate explanation which ultimately leads nowhere, yet suspiciously gain remarkable traction on otherwise hyper-censurious twitter.
👍12💯1
oh it’s one of those ‘coincidences’ again

The bride [Lynn Forester; later de Rothschild], a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Pomona College in Claremont, Calif., served as assistant to the deputy campaign manager in the senatorial campaign of Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York”

Moynihan. THE Moynihan.

The very one who penned the September 17, 1969 memo suggesing NATO should run global surveillance ‘on the environment’

one of two key documents i’d discovered when i wrote ‘discovery’

https://www.nytimes.com/1978/05/21/archives/lynn-forester-becomes-bride-of-ah-platt.html

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/31936-document-1-memorandum-daniel-p-moynihan-john-ehrlichman-september-17-1969-folder-e

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/discovery?utm_source=publication-search
4👍4
obviously a complete lie, because she was right at the centre of organising ‘impact investing’ with the clinton global initiative in 2009.

al gore then carried the other side of the coin, pushing ‘stranded assets’

https://t.me/disclosetv/19989
👍21
There’s a really rather important Epstein document from 2009 which no one appears to have realised the gravity of. Hey Sayer Ji, if you’re in here, guess which one.

Also, as for Maxwell… no, not that Maxwell, the other one.
😁11
Ah but then they can’t go ahead due to the precautionary principle. Or does it not work in reverse
👍5🍌4
I cannot wait to see how Sayer Ji will mop this up.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epsteins-seven
🏆9👍3
... and i say that as a (moderate) libertarian.

Grok and ChatGPT are the worst, most establishment talking point narrative carrying AIs of the lot.
💯5
sitting reading comments on 'X', just to see what's boosted, and what isn't

it's pretty consisten - all the idiotic and low quality replies is visible, and those who have something worth listening to are generally buried.

that platform is just such a sh-hole i have no idea why people still stick aroujnd. they don't even attempt to hide it anymore.
👍16💯52
i assume that after they started censoring the middle-sized accounts (most of the big accounts are allowed to grow large because they uphold the narrative, but the middle-sized ones are a threat to the narrative as they have no financial stake through twitter's reward scheme) they realised that they had to censor the primary replies as well, as that's where information tended to leak?
💯5
that platform is just such a cynical exercise in manipulaiton. intelligence services are obviously rammed right up the backside of twitter. holy hell, what a sh-hole.

incidentally, Fitts also address clamping down on free speech in that Tucker interview.
👍6
ah so now we have these BS pictures of everyone looking cool and composed, just as we did with obama and clinton

https://t.me/disclosetv/20049
😁8🤡5👍3👎1🤯1
hah, as soon as i arrive at the 3% monetisation rate on substack, in comes the cancellations. how utterly predictable. no cancellation for a month, then suddenly 5 within a few days. that's exactly what happened back in september.

completely statistically impossible. and now it's now happened twice, at the same threshold.
🤔12💯2
amusing, really, because that means these charts dont factor in alleged cancellations
5