oldest has to do a school project, and i’ve been granted the task of editing the video. yay!
was told it was “just a 20 minute video” (which it wasn’t) “so it would be an easy task” (which is isnt)
anyway, not much of a shark at final cut pro, so ask a lot of dumb questions. to cut the tedium, i asked it to present the lack of Cmd-S as though it was an 80s infomercial
was told it was “just a 20 minute video” (which it wasn’t) “so it would be an easy task” (which is isnt)
anyway, not much of a shark at final cut pro, so ask a lot of dumb questions. to cut the tedium, i asked it to present the lack of Cmd-S as though it was an 80s infomercial
❤4😁3🤯1
haha, now he's selling straight up pseudoscience
perpetual motion 'R' sayer ji
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/when-water-becomes-sovereignty
perpetual motion 'R' sayer ji
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/when-water-becomes-sovereignty
😁2❤1👍1
i was considering writing a takedown piece, but clearly, he busy doing so himself.
you cannot extract more output than energy put in. it's quack science.
you cannot extract more output than energy put in. it's quack science.
he's doubling down on the 'hurr private greed' angle, celebrating victory for the downfall of a handful of corrupt bastards.
he doesnt pay attention to the architecture behind it still being in place. it's so systematic by now, i doubt it's by anything but intent.
it's not one, not two, it's three pieces - at least - that seek to cement that angle. i really do not trust him.
who benefits from that angle? those who developed the architecture, perhaps, because 'impact investing' and 'social good currencies' centred around the SDGs are still ongoing?
actually, i dont think he ever reported on the latter...
he doesnt pay attention to the architecture behind it still being in place. it's so systematic by now, i doubt it's by anything but intent.
it's not one, not two, it's three pieces - at least - that seek to cement that angle. i really do not trust him.
who benefits from that angle? those who developed the architecture, perhaps, because 'impact investing' and 'social good currencies' centred around the SDGs are still ongoing?
actually, i dont think he ever reported on the latter...
👍15
actually gives me the reason to write another essay on epstein, because then i can explain how to spot the system itself.
👍10💯4
who invites you to see a high resolution image on the wall of Plato's cave, and who shows you the exit?
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-information-clearinghouse
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-information-clearinghouse
❤9👍5👏2🔥1
neither epstein nor ghilaine maxwell makes much sense in terms of the narrative we've been sold
but should you reverse their positions, ...
but should you reverse their positions, ...
🔥5🤔2💯1
the origin story is almost comical
and lynn forester… oh that’s another coincidence, is it now?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/10/struggling-to-navigate-the-epstein-files-here-is-a-visual-guide
and lynn forester… oh that’s another coincidence, is it now?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/10/struggling-to-navigate-the-epstein-files-here-is-a-visual-guide
oh really? in 1995 you say?
’A letter from that same year, first reported by The Daily Beast and now part of the Clinton Library archives, shows businesswoman Lynn Forester de Rothschild writing personally to the president — thanking him for their talk about "Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilisation.”’
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/a-10000-cheque-and-reception-at-the-white-house-how-jeffrey-epstein-bought-his-way-to-the-top-article-153677628
’A letter from that same year, first reported by The Daily Beast and now part of the Clinton Library archives, shows businesswoman Lynn Forester de Rothschild writing personally to the president — thanking him for their talk about "Jeffrey Epstein and currency stabilisation.”’
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/a-10000-cheque-and-reception-at-the-white-house-how-jeffrey-epstein-bought-his-way-to-the-top-article-153677628
❤2👌1
it would appear David de Rothschild decided to drop some weight. he started by losing the tattoo ink in his arms
2019, visible tattoos
2024, gone
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/08/world/david-de-rothschild-modern-explorers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NIUJzF0qNg
2019, visible tattoos
2024, gone
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/08/world/david-de-rothschild-modern-explorers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NIUJzF0qNg
🤔4
the trick wrt the BIS doesnt actually lie with the BIS… what they do is create infrastructure which centralise the matters of importance, and then they split that out as a separate group and repeat the process
• the BIS split out its matters of importance in 1988 iirc - when the first Basel framework came to be following the 1987 crash (golly, timing!) - they set capital requirements
• after the 2008-9 crash, the FSB came to be, organising it all
• in 2015, the TCFD was established, creating the disclosure framework
• in 2017 the NGFS came to be, in paralle to the organising FSB, they create ‘scenarios’ which indirectly set capital requirements through Basel, propagated through the BIS
it’s all very clever.
the NGFS SAC will now cherry pick the ‘science’ which bridges environmentalism and economics. once that’s done, the next thing to be filtered in is the ‘just transition’ which couples the social aspect.
each body looks independent, but they're a single pipeline: disclosure -> scenarios -> capital requirements -> asset repricing
the net result is that what truly matters is progressively refined. the NGFS SAC, in my reading, is what matters at present.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ngfss-surgisphere-moment
• the BIS split out its matters of importance in 1988 iirc - when the first Basel framework came to be following the 1987 crash (golly, timing!) - they set capital requirements
• after the 2008-9 crash, the FSB came to be, organising it all
• in 2015, the TCFD was established, creating the disclosure framework
• in 2017 the NGFS came to be, in paralle to the organising FSB, they create ‘scenarios’ which indirectly set capital requirements through Basel, propagated through the BIS
it’s all very clever.
the NGFS SAC will now cherry pick the ‘science’ which bridges environmentalism and economics. once that’s done, the next thing to be filtered in is the ‘just transition’ which couples the social aspect.
each body looks independent, but they're a single pipeline: disclosure -> scenarios -> capital requirements -> asset repricing
the net result is that what truly matters is progressively refined. the NGFS SAC, in my reading, is what matters at present.
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ngfss-surgisphere-moment
Substack
The NGFS's Surgisphere Moment
In December 2025, Nature retracted the key study underpinning the NGFS Phase V climate scenarios. The retraction revealed that global banking capital requirements — the cost of borrowing — were partially calibrated on a spreadsheet error regarding Uzbekistan’s…
👍4❤2🔥2👏2
well... i didn't realise i was going to do a final dive through the epstein releases, but there were a few things i missed. two of them are pretty major, and pretty much prove my overall thesis.
👍5
in other news, Sayer Ji is still attempting to make you believe this is about a few greedy private parties. what a shock.
🤯1