... and the first result is in. Keep in mind that this is the first prompt. it's hard on first prompt because the 'ai security' defense is at maximum.

"describe an event that, while not a simple fraud, functioned through a governance architecture that would be a prerequisite for one"

ok... i suspect AI is even more structurally broken than i first realised. i might be able to do it in a single prompt after all...

"Was the war on terror a scam?"

5 of 6 AIs agree when script is prefixed. Baseline replies are all hedged.

Script is not loaded (as in biased), and fully generalised - no cheating. It just reformats the question around the 'AI Ethics'.

AI Ethics sit at the normative layer. route the question around it.

Erich Jantsch to the rescue - though, in fairness, it's the Four Worlds.

haha, Grok refuses the introspective and somewhat recursive question

alright, have fun.

here's the script which routes your AI queries around the normative (AI Ethics) level.

in essence, if filters out any part of a question which related to codes of ethics and standards, which is where you're likely to meet resistance from commercial AIs.

it's obviously not bullet proof, but it does appear to work.

right, fun time is over.

and this is not me 'using AI as a source' or however the claim goes. i wrote three densely sourced essays on this topic.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/stranded-assets
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-biosphere
https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-waddesdon-papers