the point being: in order to establish this 'balance' what do you need? control.

and how do you judge this lack of balance? through surveillance and audits

incidentally, Lenin preferred the term 'accounting and control'.

ergo, by taking a myopic stance on bribery and the CIA you miss the fundamental architecture which makes this possible.

if it didn't require systems theory where the general intellect was absorbed by machinery - ie, artificial intelligence - it would have happened earlier.

also, read up on Marx's Fragment on Machines.

Trump is about getting the Genesis Mission to the finish line. Everything else is a distraction. That’s my take.

Cut down on service and replace lack by AI.

It’s so obvious what they’re doing.

https://t.me/disclosetv/19365

what's also significant - beyond its integration with finance and central banks - is that it proposes indicator governance, in essence.

it's a perfect illustration of 'Imperialism as Efficiency'

but i don't know if i can be bothered, because it doesn't really add anything new.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/imperialism-as-efficiency

in fact, there's an entire annex in this regard. it's obviously exactly what they do.

associate these indicators with performance of grants and loans. result-based management with KPIs associated with GEF-arranged blended finance projects.

and it's all framed as 'planetary stewardship' - an 'ethical' imperative.

ethics, systems theory, and it even links to central banks.

thanks, IUCN.

ah, we have a dash of anticipatory governance in there as well.

that IUCN document is the embodiment of the Convention on BioDiv's Ecosystem Approach.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ecosystem-approach?utm_source=publication-search

... of course, i didn't know at the time of writing, but the structure of the governance model can also be called 'subsidiarity'...

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/subsidiarity?utm_source=publication-search

hard to ignore when there's such a perfect example showing off all that i documented

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-nature-based-solution

PDF

apart from UNFAO which i’ve only discussed lightly i think i’ve covered the lot now, but find it hard to step away. it’s been 2 years and 8 months of really rather intense effort (counting from the jikkyleaks tweet on heidi larson, which gave me the first proper node to ‘hold on to’), all consuming at times, frustrating at others. in fact, there’s been a lot of the latter.

wasn’t expecting that IUCN report to be as perfect as the case was, but thankful that i found it.

i did start an essay on epstein a while back but deleted it because it began to smell a tad like ‘gain of function’ to me - intended to waste time, regardless of who did what.

The global governance crooks play chess the way Karpov did in his heyday - building a position slowly, slowly, slowly until you find yourself suffocated.

What we need is an Ivanchuk on a good day.

If you’re into chess I recommend agadmator on YouTube.

forget if i've already covered this one.

i bet you didn't realise the biosphere is part of the central banks' mandates, eh?

holy moly... i do believe i called this.

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op380.lv.pdf

Nature Value at Risk (NVaR). that's their term. not completely the same, but there's been a wealth of reports published on this since 2021 which have progressively developed the concept.

a few more papers and my 'inverse leontief' trick should more or less be there.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-ghost-of-wassily-leontief?utm_source=publication-search

no need for a lengthy breakdown.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/codex-alimentarius

PDF