let me guess - what she wants is people ‘without ego’, right?

that would fit right in with moses hess and michael laitman

now on page 109 and there’s STILL NO DEFINITION.

well, i mean, it leans heavily up against ‘rights and responsibilities’ as you’d expect out of a commie.

how the hell can you write SIXTEEN PAGES without a bloody definition of the ‘new laws’ in anything but abstract terms?

haha, she’s pro-NGOs. of course she is.

Surveillance NGO-ism.

‘deeply aware of own subjectivity’ = so a cosmopolitan idiot who abides the ‘global ethic’, then?

come on, just admit it already.

inching closer - now at ‘narcissism’

more on ‘narcissism'

‘producers see us… producers are narcissists’

egoists. come on, admit it.

i mean, what the f- is this bs?

if those firms didn’t produce what people were willing to buy, some other company would - taking the customers with them.

what she’s really trying to say is that SHE decides what ‘value’ is, no doubt.

bored now. i assume she’s on about stakeholder capitalism in renamed form?

final one. it’s not capitalism, it’s not socialism, it’s - yeah - a third… force!

at least she found a new word instead of 'way'.

so she’s an eduard bernstein ‘social democrat’ pretending she’s not in later works.

public-private partnerships for the ‘common good’

which NGO decides what’s for the ‘common good’… and who funds them?

funny… had it not been for ‘Karen’ i wouldn’t have taken this detour through Shoshana ‘Surveillance NGO-ism’ Zuboff, and come to realise that she’s batting for the central banks.

now i start to wonder how many of the ‘warnings’ in book form similarly are corrupt. Harari’s one obviously, and now Zuboff, two.

dont know how i missed this last night. actually, i do. i’d stopped caring, but this is as close as you’ll get to admission that this is about stamping out ‘egoism’


’Today, the “impertinent obstructions” that prevent the many from pur-
suing their new and broader sense of self-interest…’

new and broader?

also, i’m pretty sure she just inverted Adam Smith there, but I don’t care sufficiently to check.

hahahaha this is how she finishes her ‘book’

"Many of the specific manifestations... may never come to life. Its principles, though, can be a beacon."

ie she sells you a dream, not a blueprint

she’s straight up telling you that it won’t work, so don’t hold her to it

it’s like Marxists claiming they’re not responsible for the horrors committed in Marxist regimes

and she’s a harvard professor. oh my dear lord.