Brother in law is a chartered accountant in nation in EU - he says if the authorities find as much as a common in the wrong place then they send a van out and copy all their data. Even medium sized enterprise are put in a position where data privacy in essence no longer exists.

All due to KYC/AML and of course the EU.

GDPR is essentially yet another scam because it exempts law enforcement, security, etc. meanwhile, AML directives developed a mandatory surveillance architecture which the GDPR doesn’t protect against.

It’s fraud and lies the entire way and those responsible need to be held to account.

Article 23 of GDPR, and AMLD4-6

They’re the ones which matter

DAC worth mentioning here as well

https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation/tax-transparency-cooperation/administrative-co-operation-and-mutual-assistance/directive-administrative-cooperation-dac_en

so how do the FATF combat money laundering?

simple. through surveillance, though you don't call it that.

you call it 'monitoring'. it just sounds better, and attracts less attention.

and never mind the FATF operates completely without a shred of accountability.


https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf

... back to Erich Jantsch.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-self-organising-universe

PDF

this is too easy.

oil executives - read the fine print. it’ll probably be some ‘ethic’ obligation.

of course, no executive can afford to be left behind. that’s the catch.

and then, years down the line when they least expect it, the ‘ethic’ will come back to haunt them.


https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/169894

When you see the term ‘financial exclusion’, what they really refer to is onboarding the billions around the world who aren’t formally in the global financial system.

Incidentally, the IMF has positioned CBDCs as an entry point to that ‘inclusion’.

Do not expect honesty out of them - ever.

‘Woke’ and ‘comedian’ in the same sentence. Your story does not hold water.

The pattern follows a simple three-part structure:

A standard — someone defines what counts as ‘true’, ‘compliant’, or ‘trustworthy’

A gatekeeper — authorised parties verify whether you meet the standard

Conditional access — If you pass, you can participate; if you fail, you’re excluded

This pattern appears everywhere


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/a-pattern-hidden-in-plain-sight

right, those 2 posts lost me 17 substack subscribers, let's see if the next one will do the same amount in one.

substack is the new twitter.

'So if IIASA is the black box modeller creating the science-based ethic, and the BIS is the main organisation relating to the base monetary substrate... where's the connection between the two?'

Well, that's where the NGFS enters the game...

incidentally, did you know that the NGFS came to be at the first One Planet Summit?


https://oneplanetsummit.fr/en/coalitions-82/network-greening-financial-system-ngfs-179

also, did you know that the One Planet Summit was launched by Emmanuel Macron?

https://oneplanetsummit.fr/sites/default/files/2019-05/19027_OPS_fiches%2010%20points-RV_A4_GB_26_04.pdf

my oh my - so many coincidences.


https://www.biography.com/political-figures/emmanuel-macron

let's see how many rothschild's i can add to the next essay.

i wonder how many substack followers that'll cost me.

there are just so many coincidences.


https://www.wealthbriefing.com/html/article.php/Rothschild-Snaps-Up-Former-Finance-Minister