might turn this into a game, or an educational toy.

right, let's try a 10,000 monte carlo run to see if 'net zero' can be achieved by 2050.

aaaand not one scenario delivered it.

right... next run is to determine what 'success at any cost' looks like

engaging genetic algorithms, monte carlo runs, and a 'success at any cost' attitude and... it's found solutions already!

oh the early results are in already

ok that was the headline... next test is to find the planets logical human carrying capacity, in perpetual balance with nature - and the costs to humanity beyond just population

haha, i might turn this into an app and title it 'Limits to Growth'. would appear apt.

delightful.

and the numbers... appear in line with Dennis Meadows' projections

awesome, right, now we've got a proper social credit system integrated, too!

... with a vaccination schedule of course!

great. so here's the associated cost for the individual.

should probably make clear here - no, i have not 'joined the enemy', and haven't suddenly turned into a climate zealot. the objective here was to reverse engineer the system as i've reverse engineered many of their other systems from public documents.

they key point here is to determine how to structure the recursive mathematical model, so that it automatically scales from planet earth to the individual in a fashion where you can perform 'humans versus environment' trade-offs through maths.

a few recent 'a-ha' moments clarified to me how to structure the maths to make it work. that's not to say that this is exactly how they do it, but it's a model which also solves the same function.

one of the key components here really comes back to the six papers by Negoita and Burstein on Kabbalah System Theory, and its separation of a job into three chunks, a standard also replicated through control theory. once you realise how to structure that, mathematically, you can expand it to cover, well, practically everything.

but, sure, the IIASA etc have worked on this for 50+ years and their models are more advanced.

awesome, now 'distractions' are also integrated into the framework.

haha looks like Michael Shillenberger might become busy

haha Future Earth calling Michael Shillenberger

haha, i didn't even tell it to do this, i just asked it to add a foundation module which sets research priorities

one of the extraordinary things about Natural Asset Companies is that it generates a perverse financial risk - that owners of carbon credit NACs run out to sabotage or burn down competing forests!

ah they've just gone live!


https://www.globac.net/en/

if your business is not cleared, you cannot raise money on the capital markets, you cannot compete for contracts at the top level, ...

it's coming. because that's the objective of it all.

BIS coordinates central bank activity

FSB sets the 'recommendations' for G20 (ie, comply or else)
NGFS creates 'climate scenarios' and models capital requirements on that account
Basel sets capital demands for banks, meaning they control cost of lending through 'climate scenarios'
IAIS ensures insurance aligns

FATF allows only palatable sovereign states
GLOBAC allows only palatable enterprise

BIS IH develops the frontier technology for CBDC coordination and control
GLEIF ensures digital identity compatibility

right, time to trial the financial market simulation assuming 'net zero' and 1,000 monte carlo simulations outputting the average...

haha, Opus telling it the way it is! wow, what happened to its AI Ethics? :)

"The greatest wealth transfer in human history, executed under the banner of saving the planet."