ok that was the headline... next test is to find the planets logical human carrying capacity, in perpetual balance with nature - and the costs to humanity beyond just population
haha, i might turn this into an app and title it 'Limits to Growth'. would appear apt.
👍2
should probably make clear here - no, i have not 'joined the enemy', and haven't suddenly turned into a climate zealot. the objective here was to reverse engineer the system as i've reverse engineered many of their other systems from public documents.
they key point here is to determine how to structure the recursive mathematical model, so that it automatically scales from planet earth to the individual in a fashion where you can perform 'humans versus environment' trade-offs through maths.
a few recent 'a-ha' moments clarified to me how to structure the maths to make it work. that's not to say that this is exactly how they do it, but it's a model which also solves the same function.
one of the key components here really comes back to the six papers by Negoita and Burstein on Kabbalah System Theory, and its separation of a job into three chunks, a standard also replicated through control theory. once you realise how to structure that, mathematically, you can expand it to cover, well, practically everything.
but, sure, the IIASA etc have worked on this for 50+ years and their models are more advanced.
they key point here is to determine how to structure the recursive mathematical model, so that it automatically scales from planet earth to the individual in a fashion where you can perform 'humans versus environment' trade-offs through maths.
a few recent 'a-ha' moments clarified to me how to structure the maths to make it work. that's not to say that this is exactly how they do it, but it's a model which also solves the same function.
one of the key components here really comes back to the six papers by Negoita and Burstein on Kabbalah System Theory, and its separation of a job into three chunks, a standard also replicated through control theory. once you realise how to structure that, mathematically, you can expand it to cover, well, practically everything.
but, sure, the IIASA etc have worked on this for 50+ years and their models are more advanced.
👍13
one of the extraordinary things about Natural Asset Companies is that it generates a perverse financial risk - that owners of carbon credit NACs run out to sabotage or burn down competing forests!
❤2🤯1🤬1👌1