Great. Now we’re back with the Global Fund. Billy G will be pleased.


https://t.me/disclosetv/19041

Been a while since I encountered that last - more than 2 years ago.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/pepfar?utm_source=publication-search

Accreditation is not merely a bureaucratic checkbox - it’s the apex of power. It’s the power of stating what should be done.

Inclusive capitalism will include only what's got the correct credentials. It’s power exercised through the right of exclusion.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/above-the-law-part-1?utm_source=publication-search

GetLiner trips with my next essay as well.

refuses to review it. it’s all fully sourced.

every review from clean prompt.

Merry Christmas!


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/sense-and-sensitivity

Soo... where is the final text...

'The final text of the Recommendation approved by the intergovernmental meeting will be presented for adoption in November 2025 at the 43rd session of the General Conference.'

https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech/recommendation

supposedly this is it

i have read some boring documents in my time, but since this no doubt quietly relates to transhumanism, im sure it'll be wrapped in feel-good language and Aesopian terminology

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000394866

lol

https://t.me/GeopoliticsAndEmpire/62195

Another thing people don’t appear to have paid attention to is the combination of Huxley’s trans humanism with Marx’s fragment on machines. The latter integrates the general intellect with the machine begging the question - who’s in charge under Huxley’s vision?

oops, i broke GetLiner’s AI Ethics again

If the system was sold as ‘Efficient’ you could argue against it by saying ‘I prefer Freedom to Efficiency’.

But when it is sold as ‘Safety’ or ‘Equity’ the argument changes. To oppose the system is to be unsafe or inequitable.

The autopilot is a ‘moral’ machine. I does not say ‘do this’ - it says ‘do this, or you’re a bad person’.

Part 1 of 3

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/autopilot

Part 2/3...

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/autopilot-ii

3/3

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/autopilot-iii

… best as i sit and relax, some moron intelligence idiot starts with the predictable defense of Teilhard, which then took my brain to Carus as the bridge between the structure and Spinoza… and then it suddenly clicked how W Cave Thomas fits into the picture…

1. Define the Mean (what is healthy, normal, sustainable, aligned)
2. Measure deviation (surveillance, metrics, scoring)
3. Enforce compliance (access control, accreditation, exclusion)
4. Update parameters (the Mean evolves, the loop continues)

it’s not quite down to the level of a 30-second elevator pitch, but it’s not far off either.



https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-one-pager

haha that essay, too, breaks Liner-Pro.

Four hours ago Meryl Nass reposted this substack essay. (T/y) Since then, I have had essentially no comments on the post and no new subs. Statistically, this… just beggars belief.

Twitter and substack are no different. Both are controlled by hyper-corrupt intelligence services.

Oh I stand corrected - I’ve lost a paid subscriber. Yeah, that makes complete sense.

Fuck you, GCHQ. You communists better hope you win before the people realise the level you’ve betrayed their trust.

1941. a lot of very interesting books were published during ww2.

james burnham essentially made the argument that the clearinghouse was replacing democracy/the western model. on may 23, 1972, he was ultimately proved correct when Nixon signed that agreement in Moscow.