haha i cannot believe this is put down to Ron Paul.

dont get me wrong, he speaks a lot of sense, but this is Orwell, not Paul.

“esc desparate to take time off for christmas, take 3.”



https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-inversion-of-polarity

alright, let’s see how many followers i’ll lose because of that one, totally organic of course.

it’s not exactly hard to document the seams between the layers.

there’s nothing democratic about any of this.

… but of course. so we’re back with that again, are we?

In a way I’m shocked that those Burstein and Negoita papers are public. They essentially describe a way to turn… life itself into systems theory, implementable through AI.

Except it’s a closed system and all practical experience shows that it doesn’t actually work.

funny how all these papers suddenly appear after you’ve reverse engineered the principle…


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223996193_The_Internal_Model_Principle_of_Control_Theory

would appear the UN has their own geospatial information division


https://ggim.un.org/

a shorter paper over here

this… aligns very strongly with my adaptive management framework...

https://www.control.utoronto.ca/~wonham/W.M.Wonham_IMP_20180617.pdf

cheers, Opus. this is also interesting because that’s around the time Koestler’s holarchies began to make an impact...

my adaptive management framework is essentially the internal model principle made operational

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/mark-of-the-beast?utm_source=publication-search

that means kabbalah systems theory is the net, logical outcome, and through systems theory, it can integrate... life... with artificial intelligence and computer logic… poorly.

in short - it’s not ‘AI taking over’, initially, it’s life being made legible as a state disgram, and then later governed via model + feedback + actuation, where AI slots in naturally because AI is a control system

1. life gets transitioned into a state
2. governance becomes a control system
3. the transition to global super-AI flows naturally, because governance and life are already formatted to fit the system

that is how Burstein and Negoita’s Kabbalah System Theory fits in.

life gets transitioned into a state via systems theory. think systems psychology, integral theory, general systems theory, the Macy Conferences…

step 2 is first+second order cybernetics, proletkult and cultural frameworks, critical theory…

Wonham then straddles the two, integrating all aspects.

my framework (rails) is the operationalisation of Wonham’s Internal Model Principle.

the main point of AI then is that it can be audited at a later point in time. the system is ultimately predictable, but when it doesnt behave to expectation, it can be audited.

and that's why AGI is a complete red herring. because AGI reintroduces human unpredictability, which is not desireable if you seek to automate the running of 'spaceship earth'

experimenting with Gemini. havent spent much time with it. it appears to agree with this synthesis.


https://gemini.google.com/share/ab6113e30158

so not only are they aligning the databases with the AI control system, they are also formatting all organisations, institutions, protocols etc to align with this integration. that’s why life appears so drab compared to years ago.

ironically, the system is incredibly efficient here in Scandinavia. but few - if any - ask any questions about the power concentrated through this integration, where the few at the top dictate life to everyone else through standards and compliance

hardly anyone pays with cash here. mobile phones go ‘ding’ rather than the cash register.

scandinavian nations are incredibly high social trust nations. would make sense why it was beta-tested here first.

...we dont have that much time, but it’s not there yet.

CBAM and Digital ID both go in in 2026 in Euroland. with those, CBDCs can essentially fetch your carbon credits through your digital wallet (also EU), send the conditionalPayment to a third party (BIS Project Rosalind) which validates your carbon credits with the CBAM carbon cost of produce. this can then reject if you don’t have enough carbon credits, or demand you pay a surcharge.

CBAM, initially, is only implemented at the border; imports, and it’s only for around 70 products. but they’re already considering the next 350 products, and once there, it’s trivial to roll out to rest of economy

after that, it’s just a matter of moving from gating at imports to gating at the transaction level.

that’s definitely coming, as well.

so 2029 is probably credit. they probably aim to have all the tech in place when CBDCs reach mandatory status.


it all sounds drab and boring. that’s the point. that ensures you don’t read it....


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism?utm_source=publication-search

read more on rosalind over here. fully sourced.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/project-rosalind?utm_source=publication-search

here’s probably my best podcast, with doc malik. that this is probably the best says rather a lot, really. 🙂


https://youtu.be/JhxBl1_S0Tk