Ehden's Channel
14.3K subscribers
50 photos
15 videos
7 files
60 links
#PfizerLeak central
Download Telegram
to view and join the conversation
NEVER EVER EVER USE THE 👇👇👇 POST!

Dear all,
I accidentally deleted the posts and details of a user today, because that user has used the 👇👇👇 and pointed to another group.

I am sorry for that, and even more for the loss of all of that user's contribution which is now gone and I cannot restore.

The reason I did it is because every day this group like others is being bombarded with spam and I deleted multiple message before I accidentally deleted the messages from that user.


PLEASE DO NOT USE THE 👇👇👇 AND POINT TO OTHER GROUPS. I MIGHT DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT AS A RESULT.


Thank you and sorry,
Ehden
Israel is going into a strike.... on the 3rd of October.
Forwarded from שיר
*שביתה עכשיו*
הורים, רופאות, רופאים, שוטרות ושוטרים, מורות, מורים, תלמידות, תלמידים, מחוסנים.ות או לא, המרגישים שהממשלה עברה גבול,
זה הזמן לארגן את השביתה הגדולה ביותר בתולדות ישראל!
יום ראשון ה3.10 עומד להיות *יום היסטורי, שיזכר לדורות.*
יום בו יותר משליש מאוכלוסיית המדינה לא תגיע לעבודה, במטרה לבטל את תקנות התו הירוק המפלות.
*כולנו מתאחדים יחד לשים לזה סוף!*
https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30syOTA0
תפיצו את ההודעה הזאת בכל דרך אפשרית.
...
* اضرب الآن *
أولياء الأمور والأطباء وضباط الشرطة والمدرسين والطلاب سواء تم تطعيمهم أم لا ، أي شخص يشعر أن الحكومة قد تجاوزت الحدود ،
حان وقت تنظيم أضخم إضراب في تاريخ إسرائيل!
الأحد ، 3 أكتوبر ، سيكون يومًا تاريخيًا ستبقى في الأذهان أجيال. *
يوم لا يأتي فيه أكثر من ثلث سكان البلاد إلى العمل ، بهدف القضاء على التمييز في أنظمة جوازات السفر الخضراء.
* نتحد جميعًا لوضع حد لهذا! *
https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30syOTA0
قم بتوزيع هذه الرسالة بأي طريقة ممكنة.
...
...
* Забастовка сейчас *
Родители, врачи,полицейские, учителя, студенты,  вакцинированные или нет, которые считают, что правительство перешло черту,
Пора организовать самую большую забастовку в истории Израиля!
Воскресенье, 3 октября, станет* историческим днем, который запомнится поколениям *.
День, когда более трети населения страны не выйдет на работу, с целью отмены дискриминационных правил зеленого паспорта.
* Мы все объединяемся, чтобы положить этому конец! *
  https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30syOTA0
Распространите это сообщение любым возможным способом.
......
:
* Strike now *
Parents, Doctors, Police Officers, Teachers, Students, Vaccinated or not, those who feel that the government has crossed a line,
It's time to organize the biggest strike in the history of Israel!
Sunday the 3rd of October is going to be a * historic day, to be remembered for generations. *
A day when more than a third of the country's population will not come to work, with the aim of repealing the discriminating green label regulations.
* We all unite together to put an end to this! *
https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30syOTA0
Distribute this message in any way possible.
.....
* Huelga ahora *
Padres, médicos, policías, maestros, estudiantes, vacunados o no, cualquiera que sienta que el gobierno ha cruzado una línea,
¡Es hora de organizar la huelga más grande de la historia de Israel!
El domingo 3 de octubre será un * día histórico, que será recordado por generaciones. *
Un día en el que más de un tercio de la población del país no vendrá a trabajar, con el objetivo de eliminar la discriminación en la normativa de pasaportes verdes.
* ¡Nos unimos todos para acabar con esto! *
https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30syOTA0
Distribuya este mensaje de cualquier forma posible.
.....
የስራ መቆም አድማ አሁን
መንግስት ፣ መስመር እያለፈ ነው ስለዚህ ጉደይ የሚሰማቸሁ  ወላጆች ፣ ዶክተሮች ፣ ዶክተሮች ፣ የፖሊስ ሴቶች እና ፖሊሶች ፣ መምህራን ፣ መምህራን ፣ ተማሪዎች : ክትባት የወሰዱ ወይም ያልተከተቡ፣
በእስራኤል ታሪክ ውስጥ ትልቁን የስራ መቆም አድማ ለማደራጀት ጊዜው አሁን ነው!
ጥቅምት 3 እሑድ * ታሪካዊ ቀን ፣ ለትውልድ የሚታወስ * ይሆናል።
አድሎአዊ የአረንጓዴ መለያ ስያሜ ደንቦችን ለመሻር በማሰብ ከሀገሪቱ ህዝብ ከሶስተኛ በላይ ወደ ስራ የማይመጣበት ቀን።
* ይህንን በአንድነት ለማቆም ሁላችንም አንድ ነን! *
https://t.me/joinchat/dutOlLZi30sy/\
ይህንን መልእክት በማንኛውም መንገድ ያሰራጩ
Today's censorship news:

1) RT YouTube channel in German has been deleted, due to spreading of misinformation (such as my PfizerLeak coverage).

2) Telegram shuts down an Italian and a German public channel for "inciting harm to medical doctors and other public officials," according to creator Pavel Durov.

What YouTube did was a direct attack on freedom of speech. What Telegram did was legally required, and Pavel Durov was right to take off these channels. Our call is for TRUTH. This channel is dedicated to truth and love, not to hate.

Sending you deep love,
Ehden
Forwarded from Divine Truth
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I spent 5 hours in a cell when landing from a red list country. Check out what happened. I am sharing this só people can understand how we are protected if we know our rights and to show you how we are tricked and feared into decisions that we do not want to make.

This whole covid plandemic is an Act and not Law no matter what people tell you, by law they can not enforce any rules amd restrictions on to us, unless we agree to them

It is also to highlight how we must stick up for our truths and rights and always keep our power, too often we give our rights over when pressured into it

I am now a free man, no quarantine, no £2000 10 day hotel prison service, all charges dropped, and now I will be going after the individuals that harassed me and the officers that went against their oath

This is the clips of me getting arrested
https://t.me/divinetruth1111/644

For more on this story please watch
https://t.me/divinetruth1111/679

Follow me on Instagram @harrythomascoaching
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Knowing your rights as a human being!

@jamesmannioncoaching and @harrythomascoaching share some great information about our rights as a human being.

Original video:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CUSwYD3FfEf/?utm_medium=copy_link
MERCKyBusiness - IS THE CURE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE?

Why today's announcement that #molnupiravir cuts risk of #COVID19 hospitalization and death in half IS NOT GOOD NEWS, but a demonstration of #BigPharma murky business, or in the case of Merck, #MERCKyBusiness.

If you believe, for example, @DrEricDing, a senior fellow of the Federation of American Scientists, it is time to open our Champagne bottles. An antiviral drug can cut hospitalization and death in half in a randomized trial. Finally! It is such great news that the U.S. government already made an advance purchase of 1.7 million doses of the drug at a cost of $1.2 billion. Great news, we are being told.

LET US LOOK AT THE FACTS.
Molnupiravir (AKA MK-4482/EIDD-2801) is not really a new drug, in the sense that it is a prodrug of N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), which means it was designed to improve the bioavailability of how it absorb, distributed, metabolized, and excreted.

"N4-hydroxycytidine was first described in the literature in 1980 as a potent mutagen of bacteria and phage". N4-Hydroxycytidine, N(4)-Hydroxycytidine,
Beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine, and EIDD-1931 are all synonyms.

We now know that Molnupiravir works by promoting SARS-CoV-2 mutagenesis, which means that this drug promotes the genetic information of an SARS_CoV_2 to change by the production of a mutation, and by doing so is supposed to disable it.

But what also do we know about the compound which this product is based upon?
Well, quite a number of alarming things. N4-Hydroxycytidine is TOXIC:
N4-Hydroxycytidine (NHC) "exhibits measurable levels of cytotoxicity, with 50% cytotoxic concentration values … in cell lines"
Also, "β-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (rNHC) and its orally bioavailable prodrug, molnupiravir, does inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in vitro BUT IS MUTAGENIC IN MAMALIAN CELLS…resulting in DNA mutation of dividing mammalian cells."

And also, based on whistleblower charges of cronyism behind the drug, that "some earlier studies suggested EIDD-2801 (#molnupiravir) COULD CAUSE HARMFUL GENETIC MUTATIONS... similar experimental drugs in this class had been shown to cause reproductive toxicity in animals, and OFFSPRING FROM TREATED ANIMALS HAD BEEN BORN WITHOUT TEETH AND WITHOUT PARTS OF THEIR SKULLS"

So quick recap - a drug that can cause DNA damage, AND which is a bioavailable version what exhibits measurable levels of 50% toxicity to cells is considered to be good news that #Merck is asking for emergency authorization FOR THE WORLD?

How by looking at 775 adults who had health problems with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, and with a period of trial of 30 days which resulted in 6.8% reduction in hospitalization or death (14.1% vs 7.3%) Merck wants such authorization? How come @DrEricDing, an Epidemiologist & health economist, Senior Fellow @FAScientists, w/former 16 years @Harvard, a @JohnsHopkins alum is reporting on this drug as if we found the fountain of life? Doesn't he care about the dangers of this drug?

I want to remind everyone that #Merck already in the past has suppressed the clinical trial evidence about the dangers of one product, #VIOXX, that led to the death of many people. The fact a medical product has one desirable effect does not allow us to ignore the other impact of that product on the body. Good example is radiation - it can kill cancer cells, but also is deadly to your body.

A drug that carries zero liability under emergency authorization = goldmine for Merck. This drug might lead to DNA damage and cytotoxicity yet "scientists", media & regulators don't care. We are in a post-modernism era: science is dead, long live scientism!

Take a close look at who is hailing this drug (media, "scientists", "journalists"), and realize that THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH, THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU. Notice how these are the same people who have been "selling" you facemasks, lockdowns & vaccines.

Yours
Ehden

https://twitter.com/eh_den/status/1443971976586989570
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1443971976586989570.html
#MERCKyBusiness - disproved² thread

In this part I will address the claims that Merck has already addressed the genotoxicity concerns, because obviously, the minute you make a claim against #BigPharma you are assured to get "fact checkers" demanding to cancel you.

The whole saga started with a research I've mentioned its results above, entitled "β-D-N 4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) inhibits SARS-CoV-2 through lethal mutagenesis but is also mutagenic to mammalian cells.".

Zhou et al claimed that "rNHC (or molnupiravir) Is Mutagenic in a Mammalian Cell Assay" and that "there are risks for the host in that the same mutagenic activity that impacts viral replication has the potential for incorporation and mutagenesis of host DNA."

They also stated that "mutations in host DNA COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER, , OR CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS EITHER IN A DEVELOPING FETUS OR THROUGH INCORPORATION INTO SPERM PRECURSOR CELLS".

What was even more worrying is that a short therapy would not prevent the host from exposure "because both RNA precursors that affect the virus and DNA precursors that would affect the host pass through the common ribonucleoside diphosphate intermediate."

This started disproved² saga. Let us look at "Developing a direct acting, orally available antiviral agent in a pandemic: the evolution of molnupiravir as a potential treatment for COVID-19" ("Current Opinion in Virology", Oct 2021)

This article (AFAIU) is an editorial by the researchers who developed/worked on molnupiravir, telling the story of their work. It is useful to start with it, even though it is retrospective, as it gives good context.

First, the predecessor of molnupiravir (EIDD-2801) was EIDD-1931, which has the capacity to cross the blood–brain barrier, as it was developed to treat VEEV (Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus).
AFAIU, It means molnupiravir can cross the brain barrier.

"EIDD-1931 was orally bioavailable, widely distributed to organs including the lungs and appeared to be actively transported into the CNS where it was quickly anabolized to the active 5'-triphosphate"

EIDD-1931 inhibits replication of multiple RNA viruses of influenza, various coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), VEEV), Chikungunya and Ebola (in animal models). HOWEVER, it metabolized quickly in non-human primates.

EIDD-2801 (molnupiravir) is a prodrug of EIDD-1931, which "facilitated movement across the gut lining and EFFICIENTLY DELIVERED EIDD-1931 to the circulating volume of all species tested, including non-human primates"

*BREAK*
Notice - molnupiravir is in fact a drug that was designed to deliver EIDD-1931 in an efficient way.

Now comes the interested section - the genotoxicity tests:

"Because of a positive Ames test, the potential for genotoxicity has been thoroughly evaluated for molnupiravir both in vitro and in vivo."

Ames test use a bacteria to test if a given chemical can cause mutations in the DNA of an organism being tested.

(JUST A REMINDR)
In vitro ("in the glass" in Latin) - test performed on living tissue.
In vivo ("in the living" in Latin) - test on an organism, such as a rodent, or human beings.

According to the article, they performed two in vivo rodent mutagenicity assays: the Pig-a mutagenicity assay, and the Big Blue1 (cII Locus) transgenic rodent assay.

MERCKyBusiness.
According to the authors, "in both assays…the impact of molnupiravir treatment on mutation rates was not differentiable from mutation rates observed in untreated historical control animals."

Even better, "molnupiravir was negative for induction of chromosomal damage in in vitro micronucleus (with and without metabolic activation) and in vivo rat micronucleus assays."

Which led the authors to conclude "based on the totality of genotoxicity data molnupiravir is not considered to pose an increased risk of genotoxicity in clinical use."

Problem solved, right?

Not so quick.
Let's dig in a little bit.
#MERCKyBusiness - disproved² thread - PART 2

Digging deeper into the saga.

To learn more about what was actually done, let's head to "Letter to the Editor in Response to Zhou et al" ("The Journal of Infectious Diseases", Troth et al., Jul 2021)

This letter describes the actual disprove activities that were done as a response to the letter I've mentioned above.

As mentioned above, the authors state that they "have conducted a more comprehensive series of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies, which, based on the totality of the data, demonstrate a low risk for genotoxicity with MOV in clinical use."

The authors confess/agree that rNHC (or molnupiravir) is mutagenic in vitro, but claim that this is not relevance in vivo.

And, as was mentioned above, they conducted 2 experiments in 2 distinct rodent mutagenicity in vivo models. (Pig-a mutagenicity assay and Big Blue [cII locus] transgenic rodent assay.

According to the authors, "The impact of MOV (molnupiravir) treatment on mutation rates was not differentiable from mutation rates observed in untreated historical control animals."

Let's zoom in.

The two experiments referenced have not been published nor peer reviewed, and were conducted on rats.

Pig-a was done by Charles River Laboratories
And Big Blue was done by BioReliance

The scientists used Pig-a assay. Let's learn more about this method, from "The Pig-a Gene Mutation Assay in Mice and Human Cells: A Review" (Olsen et al, 2017).

Even though the work summarized in this paper largely avoids rat-based studies, it does raise important points.
Pig-a uses only minute blood volumes, so it is a fast test (rather than killing the rat and doing an analysis of the organs.

HOWEVER, this test "depend on the fact that the compound, or metabolite, of interest is present in the bone marrow in levels reflecting those of target tissues…moreover, understanding the timing of mutation induction…is vital for correct detection"

Another disadvantage to the pig-a method of mutagenic investigation is that unlike alkaline comet assay it does not detect pre-mutagenic DNA lesions.
(Chromosomal aberrations in the form of broken fragments of chromosomes can lead to pre-mutagenic lesions).

The researchers did look at chromosomal damage in micronucleus assays

"The advantages and disadvantages of the cytokinesis-blockmicronucleus method" describes the limitation of this investigation:

"This method does not distinguish between dividing and non-dividing cells … it is unable to provide a measure of more subtle changes, such as balanced translocations."

"IT IS, therefore, WRONG TO ASSUME THAT A MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY CAN REPLACE THE DETAILED ANALYSIS OF CHROMOSOME DAMAGE AFFORDED BY METAPHASE ANALYSIS"

More limitations: "Perhaps the major concern with the use of (this method) is that its use may prevent the detection of chemicals that are also inhibitors of cytokinesis or microfilament polymerisation."

"The prospect of using long-term cultured human lymphocytes in in-vitro testing is likely to be more relevant in predicting human risk than using non-human cell".

Which brings us back to molnupiravir and the Big Blue [cII locus] transgenic rodent assay.

Remember I've mentioned pig-a does not identify pre-mutagenic DNA lesions? The other test that was done was a transgenic rodent mutation assay.

Limitation of the method:

"The transgenic mice models respond to mutagens in a similar manner to endogenous genes and are suitable for the detection of point mutations, insertions and small deletions but not large deletions"

Also, Transgenic Rodent (TGR) mutation assays does not seems to detect pre-mutagenic lesions - at least it is my understanding from the wording of this OECD document.

If I'm wrong, please correct me.

I believe that the claims that genotoxicity has been disproved are weak, due to the limitations of the methods used, plus the lack of visibility to the details of the in vivo mutagenicity tests and the in vitro micronucleus chromosomal damage tests.

#MERCKyBusiness - disproved² thread - END OF PART 2!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The strange trick featuring a key...

Recorded on the 29th of June, 2021.
Audio
This was my night...
Israel's Health Minister Nitzan Horowitz is promoting the expansion of the green class pilot — even for toddlers ages zero to three and not just kindergartens. Note that this is a more complicated course that requires daily tests for infants, but trying to find a suitable outline for dormitories, if the pilot results allow and the morbidity data will be low.

https://twitter.com/yollancohen/status/1448009057239961603
Vaccine Passports in the UK: UPDATE (Labour MP).
Here is the reply I got from my MP:

Thank you for your email about the Government's plans for Coronavirus Status Certification, a.k.a. "Vaccine Passports".

The situation has been very fluid over recent weeks and it has not been at all clear whether the government intended to put any specific proposal to a vote. As Labour and several backbench Conservative MPs have voiced their opposition, any vote in Parliament on them was likely to result in Government defeat - and the Health Secretary has now announced that their introduction has been scrapped. However, the Work and Pensions Secretary, Therese Coffey, has said that vaccine passports "have not been ruled out forever". And we will have to see whether they are brought back, if so, in what form and in what wider public health context.

There has been no clarity from Ministers over recent weeks and I am concerned that the Government has created confusion over the whole concept. I also share the frustration that will be felt by many at their indecision and the stress and confusion that this has caused for businesses and individuals in our constituency.

I firmly believe that vaccines are the most effective public health intervention against COVID-19. However, on current evidence, I do not support a wide-ranging rollout of domestic COVID-19 passports based on vaccination status alone. In my view, the use of COVID-19 passports capturing only vaccination status would be costly and impractical. And being double jabbed does not prove that an individual is not carrying the virus. Testing for access to venues would be more efficient, for example, and it would give people and businesses more certainty.

The Government must do everything possible to avoid a two-tier society in which those who are unable to be vaccinated are blocked from essential services or excluded from other indoor settings. I am concerned that asking people to produce a vaccine certificate to access their workplace, health services, or shops, for example, is discriminatory; it will add an additional burden to businesses, and it may come at a significant cost.

These are all hugely important considerations that I hope Ministers will bear in mind if and when they bring any proposals back later in the year.

Thank you once again for contacting me about this important issue.

Kind regards,

Karen Buck MP