Digital SAT practice tests
1 subscriber
Download Telegram
Channel photo updated
Assessment©️: SAT
TestπŸ“: Reading and WritingπŸ“–
DomainπŸ“: information and ideasπŸ’‘
SkillπŸ“Š: inferencesπŸ”—
DifficultyπŸ“ˆ: HardπŸ”³πŸ”³πŸ”³

❓Question 1

Marta Coll and colleagues’ 2010 Mediterranean Sea biodiversity census reported approximately 17,000 species, nearly double the number reported in Carlo Bianchi and Carla Morri’s 2000 censusβ€”a difference only partly attributable to the description of new invertebrate species in the interim. Another factor is that the morphological variability of microorganisms is poorly understood compared to that of vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and algae, creating uncertainty about how to evaluate microorganisms as species. Researchers’ decisions on such matters therefore can be highly consequential. Indeed, the two censuses reported similar counts of vertebrate, plant, and algal species, suggesting that ___

Which choice most logically completes the text?


πŸ”€ Coll and colleagues reported a much higher number of species than Bianchi and Morri did largely due to the inclusion of invertebrate species that had not been described at the time of Bianchi and Morri’s census.
πŸ”€ some differences observed in microorganisms may have been treated as variations within species by Bianchi and Morri but treated as indicative of distinct species by Coll and colleagues.
πŸ”€ Bianchi and Morri may have been less sensitive to the degree of morphological variation displayed within a typical species of microorganism than Coll and colleagues were.
πŸ”€ the absence of clarity regarding how to differentiate among species of microorganisms may have resulted in Coll and colleagues underestimating the number of microorganism species.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‘1
Assessment©️: SAT
TestπŸ“: Reading and WritingπŸ“–
DomainπŸ“: information and ideasπŸ’‘
SkillπŸ“Š: central ideas and details πŸ”Ž
DifficultyπŸ“ˆ: mediumπŸ”³πŸ”³β¬œοΈ

❓Question 2

A common assumption among art historians is that the invention of photography in the mid-nineteenth century displaced the painted portrait in the public consciousness. The diminishing popularity of the portrait miniature, which coincided with the rise of photography, seems to support this claim. However, photography’s impact on the portrait miniature may be overstated. Although records from art exhibitions in the Netherlands from 1820 to 1892 show a decrease in the number of both full-sized and miniature portraits submitted, this trend was established before then invention of photography

Based on the text, what can be concluded about the diminishing popularity of the portrait miniature in the nineteenth century?


πŸ”€ Factors other than the rise of photography may be more directly responsible for the portrait miniature’s decline
πŸ”€ Although portrait miniatures became less common than photographs, they were widely regarded as having more artistic
merit
πŸ”€ The popularity of the portrait miniature likely persisted for longer than art historians have assumed
πŸ”€ As demand for portrait miniatures decreased, portrait artists likely shifted their creative focus to photography
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
πŸ‘1