A brief article from a medical researcher:

"Medical science has made extensive use of ridicule and directed it against curiosity and open-mindedness. The profession desperately needs to learn humility. Accountability and apology for extensive harms are difficult to find. In the pursuit of truth, less ridicule and more sincerity are required. We must cultivate open dialogue and question narratives. Curiosity and honesty should be valued over conformity, crowd-thought and mass narrative formation."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-thalidomide-and-a-brief-history-of-medical-ridicule/

Metacritique of Influential Studies Purporting COVID-19 Vaccine Successes: Part 2 – Kitano et al

"Kitano et al claim that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines yield net benefits across all demographics in the US, based on a model estimating QALYs gained. However, this analysis is marred by numerous methodological problems, including biased counting windows, exclusion of early adverse events, reliance on short-term and potentially inaccurate data, and assumptions that may significantly overstate benefits while understating risks. The study also omits critical considerations such as the long-term effects of vaccination, negative effectiveness, and nontrivial rates of serious adverse events. "

Congratulations to all petitioners.

"Total DNA ranged 371–1,548 ng/dose and 1,130–6,280 ng/dose in Pfizer and Moderna products, respectively. Specific DNA of multiple plasmid DNA targets ranged 0.22–7.28 ng/dose for Pfizer, and 0.01–0.78 ng/dose for Moderna. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori (0.25–23.72 ng/dose) was only detected in Pfizer vials. Oxford Nanopore sequencing of one vial found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 bp and 3.5 kb, respectively."

"This study emphasizes the importance of methodological considerations when quantifying residual plasmid DNA in modRNA products, considering increased LNP transfection efficiency, and cumulative dosing presents significant and unquantified risks to human health."

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517#abstract

"A Step-by-Step Evaluation of the Claim That COVID-19 Vaccines Saved Millions of Lives"

By Yaakov Ophir*,1, Yaffa Shir-Raz2, Shay Zakov3, Raphael Lataster4, Peter A. McCullough

"To understand how such an unsupported narrative could emerge and dominate, Step 4 traces the direct mechanisms behind its rise: methodological flaws (4.1), misrepresentation and misinterpretation of f indings (4.2, 4.3), and suppression of dissenting voices (4.4). By focusing on transient signals of success while overlooking concerns about efficacy and safety, a fragile assertion appears to have solidified into a widely accepted belief that shaped global health policy."

https://cdn.fortunejournals.com/articles/a-step-by-step-evaluation-of-the-claim-that-covid-19-vaccines-saved-millions-of-lives-6254.pdf

Sign the petition: https://www.mwm-proof.com/de/unterzeichnen/

Read more about it (translation required) https://www.mwm-proof.com/

“In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancer types, including thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancers. Notably, this COVID-19 vaccination-associated cancer risk was likely more elevated among individuals aged ≤ 65 years except in individuals with prostate cancer. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination.”

https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

More evidence of genomic integration in tumour biopsy, a case report:

“Within circulating tumor DNA, a host–vector chimeric read mapped to chr19:55,482,637–55,482,674 (GRCh38), in cytoband 19q13.42, positioned ~367 kb downstream of the canonical AAVS1 safe harbor and ~158 kb upstream of ZNF580 at the proximal edge of the zinc-finger (ZNF) gene cluster. This sequence aligned with perfect 20/20 bp identity to a segment (bases 5905–5924) within the Spike open reading frame (ORF) coding region (bases 3674–7480) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 DNA plasmid reference (GenBank accession OR134577.1), despite the patient only receiving Moderna vaccinations. This apparent paradox is best explained by shared Spike ORF sequences within the expression cassette across both vaccine platforms; because Moderna has not deposited its proprietary plasmid sequence in NCBI, BLAST defaults to Pfizer’s published reference as the nearest available match.”

Who knows, maybe Pfizer will use this as evidence of Moderna using its IP. Concerning in any case.

https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130

Break-down of recent Lancet study from Coverse AU doctor:

"
You may have all seen the latest paper doing the rounds, from The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health: "Vascular and inflammatory diseases after COVID-19 infection and vaccination in children and young people in England: a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked electronic health records” https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00247-0

The study concludes that "higher risk of rare myocarditis or pericarditis … although the risk following vaccination is substantially lower than the risk following infection.”

However, a quick glance at the methods clearly show that they look at Covid infections between 1 January 2020 - 31 March 2022, but vaccines during 6 August 2021 - 31 December 2022.

Those of you with critical thinking skills (hopefully all), will astutely notice that their period of study for Covid infections includes the much more dangerous Wuhan, Alpha, and Delta strains, whereas the bulk of the period of study for the vaccines encompasses the early Omicron era.

Nowhere in the body of the paper do they mention this mismatch. They do elude to having done sensitivity analysis on different Covid eras, but nowhere in the text is this presented or discussed further. You have to go deep into the supplementary material to find this data.

And what does their own data actually show? When they limit the study window for Covid infections to June 2021 - March 2022 (not ideal, but certainly more appropriate than in their main analysis), we see that the risk of mypcarditis/pericarditis from Pfizer’s vaccine is double that from infections.

But even this adverse risk is undercooked, since Omicron did not appear in the UK landscape until late November 2021, hence even their later study window demonstrates an unrealistic risk from Covid infection.

Sadly, usual domestic (Australian) suspects are pushing this study in the media (e.g. https://www.9news.com.au/health/covid-19-vaccines-lower-heart-inflammation-risk-infection/76689039-9ecf-434a-9abb-dd25c2107b5f). Either they didn’t read the paper properly, or they are deliberately lying to the public.

Rado Faletic, PhD.
"

"To properly determine whether COVID-19 vaccines were ultimately net beneficial or harmful—particularly for low-risk populations—long-term studies comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are urgently needed. At present, the evidence suggests that for the young and healthy, these vaccines may have done more harm than good. Until such evidence is thoroughly explored, broad recommendations based on these compromised studies should be approached with great caution. "

https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N04A08

Event Tonight, around Sunshine Coast, QLD.

For those unable to attend, find the book launch recording for public viewing here: https://amps.redunion.com.au/covidthroughoureyesbooklaunch

Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12767256/

“Both vaccine patient groups displayed widespread transcriptional dysregulation. In the nonmalignant adverse event group, hallmark enrichments included mitochondrial dysfunction, proteasome-mediated stress, transcriptomic instability, and systemic inflammation. The cancer group exhibited additional hallmarks of genomic instability and epigenetic reprogramming.”

There was a recent update to the Vax Injury Class Action, they are pushing onwards!

“ Covid Vaccine Class Action

Happy New Year and Brief Update- 5 January 2026
Good afternoon to all of the generous supporters of the Covid class action, 
 
I hope that everyone was able to enjoy a peaceful Christmas and New Year period. 
This email is by way of a brief update on the progress of the class action.

Summary- 
  
The action is ongoing and group members can continue to fill in the expression of interest form to join at the website www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au

The past months have continued to be extremely busy, with work towards completing a new statement of claim, seeking advice from senior counsel and discussions with potential new solicitors.  

The new judge, Justice Owens, has recently made orders for the timetable for this next stage, these orders are attached to this email. 

The orders are:
1. The Applicants are to apply for leave to file any fourth further amended statement of claim by 4pm on 27 February 2026.
2. The proceeding be listed for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 13 March 2026.

Counsel have been engaged to complete the new statement of claim and appear on 13 March.  

For anyone who has recently donated I have made a brief summary below of the matter to date. 

I would like to take this opportunity to again sincerely thank all of the generous donors who have supported and continue to support this important action and it is my great hope that despite all the challenges that this will eventually bring some truth, justice and accountability for what has happened to so many.   This could never have happened without your support- Thank you

Progress to date- (See also listing at https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/NSD349/2023/actions) 

1.  26 April 2023- Case filed in Federal Court.  Three lead applicants (Anthony Rose, Gareth O'Grady and Antonio Derose). Statement of claim alleged negligence and misfeasance against four public officials responsible for the vaccines approval, role-out and related duties- Brendon Murphy, Paul Kelly, John Skerrit and Greg Hunt.  

2.  17 June 2024- The respondents filed an interlocutory application requesting summary dismissal, strike out of the statement of claim and requesting costs security. 

3.  2 December 2024- Hearing held in Sydney for the interlocutory application. 

4.  10 April 2025- Judgement handed down on the interlocutory application; this can be found at  
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0339 
 
The judgement was that the statement of claim was struck out entirely, and the applicants are required to seek leave, or permission from the court, to file a new statement.  The judgement was extremely critical of the claim document, and the next business day NR Barbi solicitors withdrew from representing.   

An opinion was sought regarding appealing the decision of Justice Katzmann but ultimately we did not go ahead with an appeal. 

A new judge has since been allocated to the matter, Justice Owens, following Justice Katzmann's retirement soon after her judgement was handed down.
 
Although it has been difficult to navigate this past 9 months I am confident that it is very close to being able to engage a new legal team and to have a new statement of claim that will be acceptable by the court. 

I am entirely committed to continuing to fund this important legal action and once again my most heartfelt gratitude to all of you who have generously donated to make this all possible- Thank you all so much.

 https://www.nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuries/

I will provide a further update once the leave application is made and after the case management meeting. 

Take care everyone,
 
Warm regards, 
 
Dr Mel “

Please donate and share to help Dr McCann and many injured Aussies

https://www.nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuries/

Study from genomics expert explains why some regulators might be missing the high DNA contamination within the lots.

“Together these results indicate that residual DNA testing which relies on a single qPCR for dsDNA fails to accurately quantify impurities, and that treating vaccine preparations with DNase I-XT during the manufacturing process may improve the quality by reducing contamination due to RNA:DNA hybrids.”

https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v02n01a04/

"Various regions of Australia displaying excess mortality were identified, and then the plausibility of three explanantia were considered in turn: COVID-19, the lockdowns, and COVID-19 vaccines."

"4 of Australia’s 8 major regions excess mortality was present, correlating with rapid and thorough COVID-19 vaccination programs, before mass exposure to COVID-19, and in the absence of lengthy and highly restrictive lockdowns."

The causes of Australian excess deaths in 2021, and beyond: An ecological study considering COVID-19, the lockdowns, and the vaccines

https://doi.org/10.1177/092464792614267

"If regulatory resources are diverted toward policing professional speech rather than investigating unsafe clinical practice, the risk is obvious: the system begins protecting reputations instead of protecting patients."

https://www.spectator.com.au/2026/03/silence-the-doctors-harm-the-children-when-ethics-becomes-dissent/