Twitter и TikTok
7.4K subscribers
250K photos
73.9K videos
19 files
281K links
Стриминг твитов о российско-украинской войне в ТГ; иногда сообщения также постятся и редактируются вручную
Download Telegram
Necro Mancer (Twitter)

@AlameinEl81575: Так он же себя считает крутым скандинавом и имел там где-то ВНЖ
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @Aviation_Intel: Portugal never ordered F-35s people
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @alessionaval: Two things. First. Whoever made the point below, should be fired on the spot. Not just because of inherently incompetent remark. But because no planner who doesn’t know how to use hard power for statecraft shouldn’t be in that very job in the first place. https://twitter.com/larisamlbrown/status/1900473917925380149#m
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @alessionaval: The fear a carrier strike group inspires has no equal. That’s what makes it a desirable target. It’s a sign of a country that CAN have agency. Hence if you don’t understand that -you don’t deserve the job. My evidence? I’ll give you not one carrier in Red Sea. I’ll give you 2.
The Lookout (Twitter)

The RN losing the carriers now would be a final nail in the coffin for the service as a major player on the seas.

Instead, being an island nation, what the UK really needs is a debate on a Royal Navy Fleet Plan of 2025.

Doubt we will see it though.
The Lookout (Twitter)

In a time of European rearmament and doubts over US commitments, being an island nation, the UK should focus on the Royal Navy, which in large parts are responsible for the country's place in history, and the RAF.
The Lookout (Twitter)

Large scale continental commitments should be left for continental Europe to fill.
The Lookout (Twitter)

@The_Lookout_N: My 2 pennies on the UK defense debate and the upcoming SDR.

I'm not very hopeful but the times call for a Royal Navy Fleet Plan of 2025.

Large scale continental commitments should be left for continental Europe to fill.
The Lookout (Twitter)

@falch_nymo: The threat to carriers isn't new. Just look at WW2 and the fate of the carriers that were in service in 1939.

They were and still are very valuable tools, that offer unique flexibility.
The Lookout (Twitter)

@falch_nymo: How Western societies and the US in particular will cope with the casualties of a high intensity war is a rather open question, agree on that.

For fighting a Pacific war they are necessary however, and highly likely why the Chinese are building them.

In such a war, some will be lost, US carriers too.
Rob Lee (Twitter)

More photos of Russian soldiers in the pipe. 5/
t.me/DobroKor/1328