Status-6 (Twitter)
A destroyed Ukrainian 2S22 Bohdana 155mm self-propelled howitzer on Tatra Phoenix chassis and 155mm shells for it (including Indian-made - yellow ones, and M864 DPICM projectiles) in the area of Russia's Kursk region recently recaptured by the Russian military.
A destroyed Ukrainian 2S22 Bohdana 155mm self-propelled howitzer on Tatra Phoenix chassis and 155mm shells for it (including Indian-made - yellow ones, and M864 DPICM projectiles) in the area of Russia's Kursk region recently recaptured by the Russian military.
Status-6 (Twitter)
🇺🇸🇺🇦 | The US is about to resume supplying Ukraine with Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bombs (GLSDB), after they were "upgraded to better counter Russian jamming," two sources told Reuters.
The news comes amid reports that Ukraine's ATACMS stock has been depleted, Reuters says.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-long-range-bombs-headed-ukraine-atacms-supply-dwindles-2025-03-13/
🇺🇸🇺🇦 | The US is about to resume supplying Ukraine with Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bombs (GLSDB), after they were "upgraded to better counter Russian jamming," two sources told Reuters.
The news comes amid reports that Ukraine's ATACMS stock has been depleted, Reuters says.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-long-range-bombs-headed-ukraine-atacms-supply-dwindles-2025-03-13/
Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)
@madlyr @jurgen142785553: ATACMS is an estimate. Could be a bit higher. All others from the budget.
@madlyr @jurgen142785553: ATACMS is an estimate. Could be a bit higher. All others from the budget.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
P.S.: The first GLSDB appeared in Ukraine more than a year ago, but turned out to be practically useless due to their inability to effectively counter the work of Russian EW systems. I hope that during this time the manufacturers were able to eliminate the shortcomings and now the GLSDB will be able re-appear and better realize its potential. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1757767473988800757#m
P.S.: The first GLSDB appeared in Ukraine more than a year ago, but turned out to be practically useless due to their inability to effectively counter the work of Russian EW systems. I hope that during this time the manufacturers were able to eliminate the shortcomings and now the GLSDB will be able re-appear and better realize its potential. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1757767473988800757#m
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
Торецкое направление: Колегов Вадим Валентинович 56 лет, Алдаров Леонид Степанович 42 года и Безменников Сергей Михайлович 39 лет встретили новый 2025 год в гостях у разведки "Азова"
(полное видео на 14+ минут тут https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCY85FV9OVw) #всрф #потерьнет https://twitter.com/666_mancer/status/1879594894387474588#m
Торецкое направление: Колегов Вадим Валентинович 56 лет, Алдаров Леонид Степанович 42 года и Безменников Сергей Михайлович 39 лет встретили новый 2025 год в гостях у разведки "Азова"
(полное видео на 14+ минут тут https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCY85FV9OVw) #всрф #потерьнет https://twitter.com/666_mancer/status/1879594894387474588#m
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @Maks_NAFO_FELLA: It would be nice if it were a new development, but it’s not. This was planned months in advance, and the manufacturer has been working for a year to make the needed changes to GLSDB.
GLSDB’s two problems were its jamming capabilities (making it easily susceptible to Russian jamming) and other technical problems. Hopefully, those will be fixed soon.
However, it is not a new action taken by the US Administration. Ukraine is not getting more GLSDBs than were pledged and ordered by the US two years ago. Ukraine would also need a lot more to have an effect, meaning thousands and being allowed to strike 150km inside Russia, but the Trump Administration has not pledged Ukraine any military aid since Trump took office, and there have been no long-range ATACMS missile strikes inside Russia by Ukraine since Trump took office.
@ukraine_map @Maks_NAFO_FELLA: It would be nice if it were a new development, but it’s not. This was planned months in advance, and the manufacturer has been working for a year to make the needed changes to GLSDB.
GLSDB’s two problems were its jamming capabilities (making it easily susceptible to Russian jamming) and other technical problems. Hopefully, those will be fixed soon.
However, it is not a new action taken by the US Administration. Ukraine is not getting more GLSDBs than were pledged and ordered by the US two years ago. Ukraine would also need a lot more to have an effect, meaning thousands and being allowed to strike 150km inside Russia, but the Trump Administration has not pledged Ukraine any military aid since Trump took office, and there have been no long-range ATACMS missile strikes inside Russia by Ukraine since Trump took office.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Maks_NAFO_FELLA: Europe didn’t think Germany would attack all of Europe before WW2, but then they did. Everything Trump does is based on feelings like him thinking it won’t happen. The right thing to do would be to arm Ukraine and send US troops there after a ceasefire, but he’s too weak for that
@Maks_NAFO_FELLA: Europe didn’t think Germany would attack all of Europe before WW2, but then they did. Everything Trump does is based on feelings like him thinking it won’t happen. The right thing to do would be to arm Ukraine and send US troops there after a ceasefire, but he’s too weak for that
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@NOELreports: This shipment has been planned by the manufacturer for months. GLSDB malfunctioned and was practically useless when delivered to Ukraine last year, so it was returned to the manufacturer for upgrades. The company will be sending more regardless since the order was placed two years ago.
Ukraine needs ATACMS. GLSDB warhead is a joke compared to ATACMS. GLSDB is not a replacement for ATACMS. GLSDB does not have the range of the destruction potential that ATACMS has.
GLSDB would be most effective against air defense systems like Buk and Pantsir-S1 and possibly small ammo depots. It has a max range of 150km, which would not be enough to reach Russian air bases. Neither does it have a large enough unitary warhead or hundreds of cluster bomblets like ATACMS has.
It would be nice if it were a new development, but it’s not. This was planned months in advance, and the manufacturer has been working for a year to make the needed changes to GLSDB.
GLSDB’s two problems were its jamming capabilities (making it easily susceptible to Russian jamming) and other technical problems. Hopefully, those will be fixed soon.
However, it is not a new action taken by the US Administration. Ukraine is not getting more GLSDBs than were pledged and ordered by the US two years ago. Ukraine would also need a lot more to have an effect, meaning thousands and being allowed to strike 150km inside Russia, but the Trump Administration has not pledged Ukraine any military aid since Trump took office, and there have been no long-range ATACMS missile strikes inside Russia by Ukraine since Trump took office.
@NOELreports: This shipment has been planned by the manufacturer for months. GLSDB malfunctioned and was practically useless when delivered to Ukraine last year, so it was returned to the manufacturer for upgrades. The company will be sending more regardless since the order was placed two years ago.
Ukraine needs ATACMS. GLSDB warhead is a joke compared to ATACMS. GLSDB is not a replacement for ATACMS. GLSDB does not have the range of the destruction potential that ATACMS has.
GLSDB would be most effective against air defense systems like Buk and Pantsir-S1 and possibly small ammo depots. It has a max range of 150km, which would not be enough to reach Russian air bases. Neither does it have a large enough unitary warhead or hundreds of cluster bomblets like ATACMS has.
It would be nice if it were a new development, but it’s not. This was planned months in advance, and the manufacturer has been working for a year to make the needed changes to GLSDB.
GLSDB’s two problems were its jamming capabilities (making it easily susceptible to Russian jamming) and other technical problems. Hopefully, those will be fixed soon.
However, it is not a new action taken by the US Administration. Ukraine is not getting more GLSDBs than were pledged and ordered by the US two years ago. Ukraine would also need a lot more to have an effect, meaning thousands and being allowed to strike 150km inside Russia, but the Trump Administration has not pledged Ukraine any military aid since Trump took office, and there have been no long-range ATACMS missile strikes inside Russia by Ukraine since Trump took office.