Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@squatsons: “They released their own numbers that clearly showed they were intercepting 1/5 to 1/4 of the missiles and drones over the country. “
Where is the credible report that 1/5 were intercepted? What are you making up? First, learn what air defense systems Ukraine has before speaking
@squatsons: “They released their own numbers that clearly showed they were intercepting 1/5 to 1/4 of the missiles and drones over the country. “
Where is the credible report that 1/5 were intercepted? What are you making up? First, learn what air defense systems Ukraine has before speaking
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@squatsons: “They released their own numbers that clearly showed they were intercepting 1/5 to 1/4 of the missiles and drones over the country”
Where is the report from Ukraine of 1/5 being intercepted? What are you making up? First learn what air defense systems Ukraine has before speaking
@squatsons: “They released their own numbers that clearly showed they were intercepting 1/5 to 1/4 of the missiles and drones over the country”
Where is the report from Ukraine of 1/5 being intercepted? What are you making up? First learn what air defense systems Ukraine has before speaking
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @squatsons: The report you maybe referring to doesn’t show 1/5 being intercepted. It shows all missiles throughout the war since the start of the war including daily frontline strikes. 77% X-101s intercepted, 55% of Kalibrs, 25% of Kinzhals since Feb 24, 2022. That’s nothing new or different
@ukraine_map @squatsons: The report you maybe referring to doesn’t show 1/5 being intercepted. It shows all missiles throughout the war since the start of the war including daily frontline strikes. 77% X-101s intercepted, 55% of Kalibrs, 25% of Kinzhals since Feb 24, 2022. That’s nothing new or different
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
RT @partizan201415: С 2х ночи был артобстрел разных районов Константиновки...по центру опять летело
RT @partizan201415: С 2х ночи был артобстрел разных районов Константиновки...по центру опять летело
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @squatsons: You being a Russian-sponsored military expert, I thought you’d use a couple of brain cells to figure that one out, but apparently, you can’t do that and had to mischaracterize the report. Take some time to look at the air defenses Ukraine has including F-16s which are helping now
@ukraine_map @squatsons: You being a Russian-sponsored military expert, I thought you’d use a couple of brain cells to figure that one out, but apparently, you can’t do that and had to mischaracterize the report. Take some time to look at the air defenses Ukraine has including F-16s which are helping now
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
The air defense systems Ukraine 🇺🇦 used to intercept over 200 missiles and drones yesterday
NASAMS SAM Systems
IRIS-T SLM Systems
Patriot SAM Systems
SAMP-T SAM Systems
S-300 SAM Systems
Hawk SAM Systems
Buk SAM Systems
RIM-7 Modified Buks
F-16 Fighter Jets
MiG-29, Su-27 Fighter Jets
Gepard, Skynex Anti-Aircraft Guns
Small Arms Anti-Drone Teams
Vampire APKWS Launchers
S-125, Strela SAM Systems
9K22 Osa SAM Systems
Avenger, Crotale, Aspide Launchers
Stinger, Stormer, Other MANPADS
Several different Anti-Air Gun Systems
The air defense systems Ukraine 🇺🇦 used to intercept over 200 missiles and drones yesterday
NASAMS SAM Systems
IRIS-T SLM Systems
Patriot SAM Systems
SAMP-T SAM Systems
S-300 SAM Systems
Hawk SAM Systems
Buk SAM Systems
RIM-7 Modified Buks
F-16 Fighter Jets
MiG-29, Su-27 Fighter Jets
Gepard, Skynex Anti-Aircraft Guns
Small Arms Anti-Drone Teams
Vampire APKWS Launchers
S-125, Strela SAM Systems
9K22 Osa SAM Systems
Avenger, Crotale, Aspide Launchers
Stinger, Stormer, Other MANPADS
Several different Anti-Air Gun Systems
❤2
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@small_hat1 @squatsons: Wasn’t able to do what exactly? Israel received help from UK, US, France, and Jordan in April.
Start by learning about what air defenses Ukraine has before making comments
Ukraine has the most modern systems in the world, NASAMS and IRIS-T being the best against cruise missiles
@small_hat1 @squatsons: Wasn’t able to do what exactly? Israel received help from UK, US, France, and Jordan in April.
Start by learning about what air defenses Ukraine has before making comments
Ukraine has the most modern systems in the world, NASAMS and IRIS-T being the best against cruise missiles
❤1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ChristLover_12 @squatsons: It’s the same thing every time. He’s just seeking attention with these comments; almost every other Pro-Ukraine account blocked him long ago. In his mind, Ukrainian NASAMS, Patriot, IRIS-T, and F-16s don’t exist, and 1% to 20% of missiles were intercepted, he’s paid to write this
@ChristLover_12 @squatsons: It’s the same thing every time. He’s just seeking attention with these comments; almost every other Pro-Ukraine account blocked him long ago. In his mind, Ukrainian NASAMS, Patriot, IRIS-T, and F-16s don’t exist, and 1% to 20% of missiles were intercepted, he’s paid to write this
❤1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@___MarcoPolo___ @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: And he just decided to make up a claim in his comment about Ukranian reports showing 20% being intercepted, except that report doesn’t exist, and he likely mischaracterized the report from a week ago, which shows the opposite of what he is saying for cruise missile strikes https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m
@___MarcoPolo___ @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: And he just decided to make up a claim in his comment about Ukranian reports showing 20% being intercepted, except that report doesn’t exist, and he likely mischaracterized the report from a week ago, which shows the opposite of what he is saying for cruise missile strikes https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@boris2top10 @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: This is the same report they are referring to. It shows all missiles intercepted during the war. It does not show 1/4 or 1/5 interception rates for Kalibr and X-101 cruise missiles. The rates are a bit lower because, in 2022, Ukraine had worse air defenses https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m
@boris2top10 @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: This is the same report they are referring to. It shows all missiles intercepted during the war. It does not show 1/4 or 1/5 interception rates for Kalibr and X-101 cruise missiles. The rates are a bit lower because, in 2022, Ukraine had worse air defenses https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@OlgaBazova @squatsons: This is referring to Ukraine’s report on all missiles launched since February 24, 2022
It shows overall, since 2022, a 77% interception rate of X-101s, 55% of Kalibrs, and 25% of Kinzhals. It includes daily frontline strikes throughout the war with guided missiles and Iskanders. It does not indicate a 1/5 or 1/4 interception of Kalibr and X-101s like you are claiming.
If you would have used a bit of your brain and read the report in detail before making this post, you’d realize it includes all missiles of all types launched since February 24th, 2022, which in 2022 Ukraine had significantly worse air defenses than it has now, so the overall interception rates factor in the 2022 strikes making them lower overall, that’s how averages work.
Around 3,000 of the 6,291 missiles launched in the war, excluding Kalibr, X-101, and others, were specifically S-300 missiles used on the frontline, of which almost none were intercepted for obvious reasons. That is not the same as Kalibrs or X-101s being launched and intercepted like yesterday. So read before making these misleading comments.
The same report you are referring to states that the interception for each missile throughout the entire war was:
Kinzhals 25% (111)
Kalibr 55% (804)
X-101 78% (1884)
Iskander-M 4% (1300)
Onyx 5.6% (211)
S-300/400 0.3% (3,008)
What you are trying to do is take the overall rates of missiles launched, which exceeds 12,000 in the war, and claim that Ukraine cannot shoot down over 25% of them. When you take the 12,000 number, you are not mentioning that it includes thousands of S-300s, Iskanders, and other missiles launched at the frontline or in cities where almost none have been intercepted. While purposefully excluding that, the same report shows interception of cruise missiles like Kalibr and X-101 at over 55% to 78% throughout the war in that same report.
S-300s and Iskanders are entirely different from X-101s; Kalibrs were used mainly yesterday. One Ukraine can more easily intercept, and the other is much harder or, in most cases, impossible. You are trying to combine all of those and characterize all as having the same interception rate. Learn about how air defenses work first.
@OlgaBazova @squatsons: This is referring to Ukraine’s report on all missiles launched since February 24, 2022
It shows overall, since 2022, a 77% interception rate of X-101s, 55% of Kalibrs, and 25% of Kinzhals. It includes daily frontline strikes throughout the war with guided missiles and Iskanders. It does not indicate a 1/5 or 1/4 interception of Kalibr and X-101s like you are claiming.
If you would have used a bit of your brain and read the report in detail before making this post, you’d realize it includes all missiles of all types launched since February 24th, 2022, which in 2022 Ukraine had significantly worse air defenses than it has now, so the overall interception rates factor in the 2022 strikes making them lower overall, that’s how averages work.
Around 3,000 of the 6,291 missiles launched in the war, excluding Kalibr, X-101, and others, were specifically S-300 missiles used on the frontline, of which almost none were intercepted for obvious reasons. That is not the same as Kalibrs or X-101s being launched and intercepted like yesterday. So read before making these misleading comments.
The same report you are referring to states that the interception for each missile throughout the entire war was:
Kinzhals 25% (111)
Kalibr 55% (804)
X-101 78% (1884)
Iskander-M 4% (1300)
Onyx 5.6% (211)
S-300/400 0.3% (3,008)
What you are trying to do is take the overall rates of missiles launched, which exceeds 12,000 in the war, and claim that Ukraine cannot shoot down over 25% of them. When you take the 12,000 number, you are not mentioning that it includes thousands of S-300s, Iskanders, and other missiles launched at the frontline or in cities where almost none have been intercepted. While purposefully excluding that, the same report shows interception of cruise missiles like Kalibr and X-101 at over 55% to 78% throughout the war in that same report.
S-300s and Iskanders are entirely different from X-101s; Kalibrs were used mainly yesterday. One Ukraine can more easily intercept, and the other is much harder or, in most cases, impossible. You are trying to combine all of those and characterize all as having the same interception rate. Learn about how air defenses work first.
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@small_hat1 @squatsons: Do you understand the concept of cruise missiles vs ballistic missiles? And an Iskander-M destroying a NASAMS launcher when NASAMS is for cruise missiles, not ballistic missiles. There are very few recorded destruction of NASAMS, IRIS-T, or Patriots throughout the war, a handful.
@small_hat1 @squatsons: Do you understand the concept of cruise missiles vs ballistic missiles? And an Iskander-M destroying a NASAMS launcher when NASAMS is for cruise missiles, not ballistic missiles. There are very few recorded destruction of NASAMS, IRIS-T, or Patriots throughout the war, a handful.
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@OlgaBazova @UkrWillBeFree23 @squatsonsReplying to @OlgaBazova @squatsons: How about you read the details and use some common sense before making these misleading comments 🤡
@OlgaBazova @UkrWillBeFree23 @squatsonsReplying to @OlgaBazova @squatsons: How about you read the details and use some common sense before making these misleading comments 🤡
vxTwitter / fixvx
Ukraine Battle Map (@ukraine_map)
@OlgaBazova @squatsons This is referring to Ukraine’s report on all missiles launched since February 24, 2022
It shows overall, since 2022, a 77% interception rate of X-101s, 55% of Kalibrs, and 25% of Kinzhals. It includes daily frontline strikes throughout…
It shows overall, since 2022, a 77% interception rate of X-101s, 55% of Kalibrs, and 25% of Kinzhals. It includes daily frontline strikes throughout…
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@AMK_Mapping_ @MobikMeatCube @DaldoWaldo: Do you know what happens when a Surface-to-air missile strikes a cruise missile? An explosions. 40 explosions do not mean 40 successful hits; talk to anyone in Ukraine; there are different explosions based on interception or hits. A lot of assuming you did in that thread.
@AMK_Mapping_ @MobikMeatCube @DaldoWaldo: Do you know what happens when a Surface-to-air missile strikes a cruise missile? An explosions. 40 explosions do not mean 40 successful hits; talk to anyone in Ukraine; there are different explosions based on interception or hits. A lot of assuming you did in that thread.