Dan (Twitter)
@neonhandrail @RALee85: 3. Myrne - Shcherbaky axis, 16.04.
🇺🇦Main Intelligence Directorate's active operations units shows 2🇷🇺AFVs turn around under fire and retreat south of Shcherbaky.
Also strikes on the 3rd MT-LBM 6MB in tweet 1 + 2 near Myrne.
Scenes from elsewhere I cut out. https://twitter.com/neonhandrail/status/1915279524687991087#m
@neonhandrail @RALee85: 3. Myrne - Shcherbaky axis, 16.04.
🇺🇦Main Intelligence Directorate's active operations units shows 2🇷🇺AFVs turn around under fire and retreat south of Shcherbaky.
Also strikes on the 3rd MT-LBM 6MB in tweet 1 + 2 near Myrne.
Scenes from elsewhere I cut out. https://twitter.com/neonhandrail/status/1915279524687991087#m
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
Who cares about ru worms https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1916155646296150165#m
Who cares about ru worms https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1916155646296150165#m
😁4👍2🥰2
The Lookout (Twitter)
@AlexLuck9: Makes me wonder, is there anyone who actually is capable of timely overhauls of SSNs?
@AlexLuck9: Makes me wonder, is there anyone who actually is capable of timely overhauls of SSNs?
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @Drox_Maritime: 🔺Russia to strengthen mine warfare capability in the Arctic with two new vessels, BT-625 "Afanasiy Ivannikov" & BT-635 "Polyarny"
New Article 🔽
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesdroxford/p/russia-to-strengthen-mine-warfare?r=2p31re&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
RT @Drox_Maritime: 🔺Russia to strengthen mine warfare capability in the Arctic with two new vessels, BT-625 "Afanasiy Ivannikov" & BT-635 "Polyarny"
New Article 🔽
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesdroxford/p/russia-to-strengthen-mine-warfare?r=2p31re&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
🤮2
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @war_student: @shashj: Fortuitous timing. Have brought out this 1966 map comparing conventional strike ranges of F-111A and Buccaneers carrying 10,000lb bombs. https://twitter.com/shashj/status/1915710462303388129#m
RT @war_student: @shashj: Fortuitous timing. Have brought out this 1966 map comparing conventional strike ranges of F-111A and Buccaneers carrying 10,000lb bombs. https://twitter.com/shashj/status/1915710462303388129#m
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @GrangerE04117: 1st Quarter movements and status of Russian Navy major surface vessels.
A lot of vessels are just anchored in their piers (Peter the Great, Nastoychivyy).
While the Gorshkovs and Steregushchiys are doing a lot of long-distance deployments. Which makes the bulk of VMF movements
RT @GrangerE04117: 1st Quarter movements and status of Russian Navy major surface vessels.
A lot of vessels are just anchored in their piers (Peter the Great, Nastoychivyy).
While the Gorshkovs and Steregushchiys are doing a lot of long-distance deployments. Which makes the bulk of VMF movements
The Lookout (Twitter)
Interesting on military related rail transports from Belarus to Russia, in particular the part on reinforced concrete products to 12th GUMO and Strategic Missile Forces bases, arsenals and other's, indicating construction projects. https://twitter.com/belzhd_live/status/1915734530268315976#m
Interesting on military related rail transports from Belarus to Russia, in particular the part on reinforced concrete products to 12th GUMO and Strategic Missile Forces bases, arsenals and other's, indicating construction projects. https://twitter.com/belzhd_live/status/1915734530268315976#m
The Lookout (Twitter)
@JamesBosbotinis: PtG had a little help from this guy in building his Navy, Norwegian born Dutch merchant captain, later Dutch naval officer, Cornelius Cruys.
@JamesBosbotinis: PtG had a little help from this guy in building his Navy, Norwegian born Dutch merchant captain, later Dutch naval officer, Cornelius Cruys.
The Lookout (Twitter)
Unsurprising.
Capability is one thing, the other side is lack of will, called "high risk" here.
For a larger deployment to Ukraine, one has to be ready to go to war with Russia if it comes down to it, and no Western countries, in the past or now, are willing to do so.
Unsurprising.
Capability is one thing, the other side is lack of will, called "high risk" here.
For a larger deployment to Ukraine, one has to be ready to go to war with Russia if it comes down to it, and no Western countries, in the past or now, are willing to do so.
vxTwitter / fixvx
💖 495 🔁 223
💖 495 🔁 223
Larisa Brown (@larisamlbrown)
EXCLUSIVE: Britain is likely to abandon plans to send thousands of troops to protect Ukraine because the risks are deemed “too high", The Times understands. Instead the UK and France will send a training force https://www.thetimes.com/article/5b446875-f8ae…
The Lookout (Twitter)
A thought about Krasnodar:
This deployment could be a trial of the feasibility of conducting SSK ops in the Med without access to a shore base such as- and comparable to Tartus. https://twitter.com/RFNOSBlog/status/1915739416640757961#m
A thought about Krasnodar:
This deployment could be a trial of the feasibility of conducting SSK ops in the Med without access to a shore base such as- and comparable to Tartus. https://twitter.com/RFNOSBlog/status/1915739416640757961#m
The Lookout (Twitter)
@Capt_Navy: In my opinion, these discussions were detached from reality from the beginning, unless the Western countries in question were ready to approach the war in a completely different manner, which was and is unlikely.
Therefore it is good that the risks are acknowledged.
@Capt_Navy: In my opinion, these discussions were detached from reality from the beginning, unless the Western countries in question were ready to approach the war in a completely different manner, which was and is unlikely.
Therefore it is good that the risks are acknowledged.