Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

Two destroyed Russian T-62 tanks somewhere at the front.
t.me/russianocontext/4989
t.me/lost_warinua/93132

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

HIMARS cluster munition strike on Russian military training ground in Zaporizhzhia region

Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)

RT @scottlincicome: That MB factory--
- Is in Alabama, not SC (that's BMW)
- Employs 6300 Americans & indirectly supports 10k other US jobs in the region
- Invested more than $6B in the US economy (so far)
- Produced 4M vehicles in the US since 1997
- Buys from almost 200 US-based suppliers https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1846252022385070487#m

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

/2. Some (or actually a lot of) Ukrainian telegram channels have a strong desire to call evry HIMARS cluster munition strike an ATACMS strike, forgetting that M30 cluster missile exists.

First video shows ATACMS strike, other videos show some examples of what is more likely to be M30 cluster munitions strikes. ATACMS has much more bomblets and radius of the area covered.

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

Almost 25% of the campaign goal has been achieved!
https://www.help99.co/patches/special-kherson-cat-10---close-the-sky https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1845757205628252246#m

Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

@TonyaLevchuk: First two are Zala 421, the third one Merlin-VR. Until recently, Merlin was considered a very rare UAV.

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

🔞 Unpleasant situation for ru worms

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

RT @RoubleDestroyer: If Trump wins, I think it will look something like this...

(Several maps in 🧵)

‌Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@MoneyZelensky @ComteDiavoloReplying to @MoneyZelensky: I broke everything else he listed down, it’s like 1% to 2% or NATO’s ground forces. In terms of fighter jets it’s 1/500th or 0.2% of what NATO has.

‌Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@ukraine_map @MoneyZelenskyReplying to @MoneyZelensky: Russia is fighting the equivalent of 1% to 2% of NATO’s ground forces, and the equivalent of 0.2% of NATO’s air forces in Ukraine. And Russia still can’t take anything close to 1% of Ukraine in the past two years

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@MoneyZelensky: When you get proven wrong, you start ignoring me pointing out that Russia is fighting 1-2% of NATO’s ground forces and 0.2% of NATO’s air forces but can’t take more than 1% of Ukraine in the past 2 years.

You’re in dream land. Russia would be completely destroyed by 100% of NATO

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@ukraine_map @MoneyZelensky: So you started to redirect the conversation away from Russia fighting the “whole of NATO” to game changers. 🤡

Try to stay on topic.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@MoneyZelensky: More than 1% to 2%. You think 6 Fighter jets are going to change anything? Or are +200 needed? This is common sense for everyone. I have said this throughout the war, aid must be given in significant numbers even 5% to 10% of NATO’s equipment will make a massive difference.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@MoneyZelensky @ComteDiavolo: In what quantity and what equipment.

Javelins, NASAMS, and Stingers are defensive equipment and had changed the war at the time. Ukraine needs to take its land back. It needs +200 well equipped fighter jets, hundreds of tanks. Not 6 fighter jets and 100 tanks. Use common sense.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@ukraine_map @MoneyZelensky @ComteDiavolo: Each one of those contributed greatly to Ukraine’s defenses in 2022 and even today. Like where Russian ships can no longer go close to Odesa because they will be sunk. That’s due to Harpoons. The next step is taking land back. A lot more offensive equipment is needed for that.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@ukraine_map @MoneyZelensky @ComteDiavolo: I just noticed you’re an America siding with Russia. Get a life, what an embarrassment.