Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@small_hat1 @squatsons: Wasn’t able to do what exactly? Israel received help from UK, US, France, and Jordan in April.

Start by learning about what air defenses Ukraine has before making comments

Ukraine has the most modern systems in the world, NASAMS and IRIS-T being the best against cruise missiles

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@ChristLover_12 @squatsons: It’s the same thing every time. He’s just seeking attention with these comments; almost every other Pro-Ukraine account blocked him long ago. In his mind, Ukrainian NASAMS, Patriot, IRIS-T, and F-16s don’t exist, and 1% to 20% of missiles were intercepted, he’s paid to write this

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

Kursk day 22 update

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@___MarcoPolo___ @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: And he just decided to make up a claim in his comment about Ukranian reports showing 20% being intercepted, except that report doesn’t exist, and he likely mischaracterized the report from a week ago, which shows the opposite of what he is saying for cruise missile strikes https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@boris2top10 @squatsonsReplying to @ukraine_map @squatsons: This is the same report they are referring to. It shows all missiles intercepted during the war. It does not show 1/4 or 1/5 interception rates for Kalibr and X-101 cruise missiles. The rates are a bit lower because, in 2022, Ukraine had worse air defenses https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1828284645475037540#m

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@OlgaBazova @squatsons: This is referring to Ukraine’s report on all missiles launched since February 24, 2022

It shows overall, since 2022, a 77% interception rate of X-101s, 55% of Kalibrs, and 25% of Kinzhals. It includes daily frontline strikes throughout the war with guided missiles and Iskanders. It does not indicate a 1/5 or 1/4 interception of Kalibr and X-101s like you are claiming.

If you would have used a bit of your brain and read the report in detail before making this post, you’d realize it includes all missiles of all types launched since February 24th, 2022, which in 2022 Ukraine had significantly worse air defenses than it has now, so the overall interception rates factor in the 2022 strikes making them lower overall, that’s how averages work.

Around 3,000 of the 6,291 missiles launched in the war, excluding Kalibr, X-101, and others, were specifically S-300 missiles used on the frontline, of which almost none were intercepted for obvious reasons. That is not the same as Kalibrs or X-101s being launched and intercepted like yesterday. So read before making these misleading comments.

The same report you are referring to states that the interception for each missile throughout the entire war was:

Kinzhals 25% (111)
Kalibr 55% (804)
X-101 78% (1884)
Iskander-M 4% (1300)
Onyx 5.6% (211)
S-300/400 0.3% (3,008)

What you are trying to do is take the overall rates of missiles launched, which exceeds 12,000 in the war, and claim that Ukraine cannot shoot down over 25% of them. When you take the 12,000 number, you are not mentioning that it includes thousands of S-300s, Iskanders, and other missiles launched at the frontline or in cities where almost none have been intercepted. While purposefully excluding that, the same report shows interception of cruise missiles like Kalibr and X-101 at over 55% to 78% throughout the war in that same report.

S-300s and Iskanders are entirely different from X-101s; Kalibrs were used mainly yesterday. One Ukraine can more easily intercept, and the other is much harder or, in most cases, impossible. You are trying to combine all of those and characterize all as having the same interception rate. Learn about how air defenses work first.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@small_hat1 @squatsons: Do you understand the concept of cruise missiles vs ballistic missiles? And an Iskander-M destroying a NASAMS launcher when NASAMS is for cruise missiles, not ballistic missiles. There are very few recorded destruction of NASAMS, IRIS-T, or Patriots throughout the war, a handful.

‌Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@OlgaBazova @UkrWillBeFree23 @squatsonsReplying to @OlgaBazova @squatsons: How about you read the details and use some common sense before making these misleading comments 🤡

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@AMK_Mapping_ @MobikMeatCube @DaldoWaldo: Do you know what happens when a Surface-to-air missile strikes a cruise missile? An explosions. 40 explosions do not mean 40 successful hits; talk to anyone in Ukraine; there are different explosions based on interception or hits. A lot of assuming you did in that thread.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@DaldoWaldo @AMK_Mapping_ @MobikMeatCube: You're talking to a kid right now who has no clue that explosions do not mean successful strikes. Everyone now is a military expert apparently. A guy selling protein shakes to a kid.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@AMK_Mapping_ @DaldoWaldo @MobikMeatCube: I read it and there is an extreme amount of assuming and gernslizarion. How do you account for how many air defense missiles fired vs hit successfully. That’s completely impossible, and you are assuming explosions for hits when they could be anything, strikes or interceptions.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@DaldoWaldo @AMK_Mapping_ @MobikMeatCube: They are generally accurate; they’ve been off several missiles per strike. One strike, they were off like 4-5 missiles when 40 were fired due to X-101s flying one after another. There is an error sometimes; Russian accounts say 100% interception when it was only reported once this year. The interception rates are pretty consistent with the systems they have. Some missiles have terrible interception rates, like Iskanders; others have better interception rates, like Kalibr and X-101s. Ukraine certainly can intercept them after 2.5 years and got tons of air defenses sent to them.

Many Ukrainians believe the reports too, because they report, for example, ten missiles get launched at a city, with seven shot down, residents hear many explosions, and then there are three str...

Перейти на оригинальный пост

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

Дронорез
t.me/ssternenko/32915 #RussianUkrainianWar

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

RT @MobikMeatCube: @squatsons @ukraine_map @OlgaBazova: @squatsons

When someone dismisses your well-supported argument by saying you're "coping" without actually engaging any of your points.

🤡🤡🤡

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@Bernie7Ng: We will probably get a video of F-16s at some point, shooting missiles down maybe, but they could be launching at ranges of +20km to +50km away. Ukraine’s priority is to have OPSEC around F-16s now since there are so few.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@MobikMeatCube @squatsons @OlgaBazova: Basically what he does. I refuted his misleading claim by citing the source in detail, he has nothing as a counter claim because he misrepresented the report. So he makes unrelated comments. He does this always, a well constructed argument is “mental gymnastics” or “cope” for him

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@squatsons @OlgaBazova: When you purposefully misrepresent a report, then get called out on it with a well-constructed argument, you go straight to mental gymnastics, cope, insults...

You’re incapable of engaging in any discussion or constructive debate.