Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: Throughout the entire war in the past +2 years I have only claimed 3 times that something Russia hit was a decoy.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: Throughout the entire war in the past +2 years I have only claimed 3 times that something Russia hit was a decoy.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: So you showed 3, and one of those was another account claiming it not me, Iw as quoting them. Now for show all of the time I have claimed a that Russia hit a decoy throughout the war.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: So you showed 3, and one of those was another account claiming it not me, Iw as quoting them. Now for show all of the time I have claimed a that Russia hit a decoy throughout the war.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I am asking about the entire 2 years. Most of those claims were made in the past 3 months yes, only 2 of them, but how many for the entire 2 years?
Show how many so we can see. 2 in the past 3 months.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I am asking about the entire 2 years. Most of those claims were made in the past 3 months yes, only 2 of them, but how many for the entire 2 years?
Show how many so we can see. 2 in the past 3 months.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I can’t make maps now because I don’t have that time as they take hours to make, I will try to make more in the future.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I can’t make maps now because I don’t have that time as they take hours to make, I will try to make more in the future.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: Regular posts are quick, maps take hours and the only reason I haven’t posted them is because they take a very long time to make and I do not have that time now. I will try to post more maps in the future.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: Regular posts are quick, maps take hours and the only reason I haven’t posted them is because they take a very long time to make and I do not have that time now. I will try to post more maps in the future.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
🐈🇺🇦 Ongoing fundraising with @LibertyUkraineF to provide drones to the 36th Marune Brigade and 124th TD Brigade of Ukraine!
🔻 Campaign link 🔻
https://www.paypal.com/pools/c/93JgeKTdQa https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1780983808470163955#m
🐈🇺🇦 Ongoing fundraising with @LibertyUkraineF to provide drones to the 36th Marune Brigade and 124th TD Brigade of Ukraine!
🔻 Campaign link 🔻
https://www.paypal.com/pools/c/93JgeKTdQa https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1780983808470163955#m
Belarusian Hajun project (Twitter)
Did Lithuania attack Belarus with drones?
Today, the head of the KGB, Ivan Tsertsel, said that the security services of Belarus had prevented drone strikes from the territory of Lithuania against objects in Minsk and its vicinity.
Tertel didn’t provide any details and didn’t mention when these strikes were allegedly carried out and how the KGB prevented them.
Belarusian Hajun knows the following facts:
1. During the whole monitoring period, we haven’t recorded any attack UAVs that could have been launched from the territory of Lithuania against Belarus.
2. Preventing UAV strikes mentioned by Tsertsel could have been carried out in several ways, one of which is the work of the air defense of Belarus against enemy targets.
The launch of an air defense missile is accompanied by a strong noise and it also leaves a very noticeable trace in the sky. It’s almost impossible not to notice it, and there were no air defense launches in the north-west of Belarus (the direction of Lithuania).
Also, to shoot down a UAV in such a situation, a helicopter or an aircraft should have been taken to the sky, which could also shoot down the target, but again, there were no launches by Air Force equipment against air targets, as well as no air defense launches.
Verdict: according to our observations, there are no facts that could confirm Tsertsel’s words.
Did Lithuania attack Belarus with drones?
Today, the head of the KGB, Ivan Tsertsel, said that the security services of Belarus had prevented drone strikes from the territory of Lithuania against objects in Minsk and its vicinity.
Tertel didn’t provide any details and didn’t mention when these strikes were allegedly carried out and how the KGB prevented them.
Belarusian Hajun knows the following facts:
1. During the whole monitoring period, we haven’t recorded any attack UAVs that could have been launched from the territory of Lithuania against Belarus.
2. Preventing UAV strikes mentioned by Tsertsel could have been carried out in several ways, one of which is the work of the air defense of Belarus against enemy targets.
The launch of an air defense missile is accompanied by a strong noise and it also leaves a very noticeable trace in the sky. It’s almost impossible not to notice it, and there were no air defense launches in the north-west of Belarus (the direction of Lithuania).
Also, to shoot down a UAV in such a situation, a helicopter or an aircraft should have been taken to the sky, which could also shoot down the target, but again, there were no launches by Air Force equipment against air targets, as well as no air defense launches.
Verdict: according to our observations, there are no facts that could confirm Tsertsel’s words.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I made a map two days ago, a simple one and it was pretty popular. Yes, there is minimal gains because they don’t have any cluster shells or regular shells. They need more Bradley’s, tanks, HIMARS rockets, need to mobilize more, and need to target Russian logistics. https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1782691581285318884#m
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: I made a map two days ago, a simple one and it was pretty popular. Yes, there is minimal gains because they don’t have any cluster shells or regular shells. They need more Bradley’s, tanks, HIMARS rockets, need to mobilize more, and need to target Russian logistics. https://twitter.com/ukraine_map/status/1782691581285318884#m
👍4
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@WarMonitor3: That’s an understatement.
It’s very very very bad.
They need as many artillery shells as possible, both cluster and regular shells. Ukraine needs more Bradley IFVs, as many glide bombs as possible, Patriot batteries, to target Russian logistics, and mobilize more men.
@WarMonitor3: That’s an understatement.
It’s very very very bad.
They need as many artillery shells as possible, both cluster and regular shells. Ukraine needs more Bradley IFVs, as many glide bombs as possible, Patriot batteries, to target Russian logistics, and mobilize more men.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: And at that time, Russia was not advancing, but Ukraine also wasn’t advancing because they didn’t have good air power, they didn’t target Russian logistics, and the plans were obvious.
Now have a shortages of everything and they are losing territory, not a lot, but substantial.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: And at that time, Russia was not advancing, but Ukraine also wasn’t advancing because they didn’t have good air power, they didn’t target Russian logistics, and the plans were obvious.
Now have a shortages of everything and they are losing territory, not a lot, but substantial.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: We see the reality on the ground, it is not good. I believe it is possible for Ukraine to take back land but this is a very hard goal. Their main shortage is artillery shells, their stupidity is not targeting Russian logistics like at all and having terrible military leadership.
@ZOVCOMS @IAPonomarenko: We see the reality on the ground, it is not good. I believe it is possible for Ukraine to take back land but this is a very hard goal. Their main shortage is artillery shells, their stupidity is not targeting Russian logistics like at all and having terrible military leadership.