Twitter и TikTok
7.34K subscribers
254K photos
74.8K videos
19 files
285K links
Стриминг твитов о российско-украинской войне в ТГ; иногда сообщения также постятся и редактируются вручную
Download Telegram
IgorGirkin (Twitter)

"Варто відзначити, що росіяни суттєво збільшили застосування дронів-камікадзе - 114 ударів за минулу добу; це найбільший показник з початку лютого"

Тарнавський
😱4🤬4
IgorGirkin (Twitter)

RT @deaidua: Three new interesting details about Rheinmetall's new 155 mm factory in Unterlüß! In addition to Chancellor Scholz and Minister of Defence Pistorius, Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen will also be present at the ground-breaking ceremony on Monday.

I hope that this means that the new framework contract for 155 mm ammunition for Ukraine will be announced on the spot and that this is a joint procurement by Denmark and Germany (would not be the first time: Leopard 1A5, M113, Zuzana 2, Bergepanzer 2).

It was also announced today that Rheinmetall intends to produce not only 155 mm ammunition but also explosives and “rocket motors” at the new plant in Unterlüß!
👍7
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @MT_Anderson: 🇷🇺MED SEA FLOTILLA🇷🇺
Sentinel 2📸 from the port of 🇸🇾Tartus. The following vessels are in port:
Orekhovo-Zuyevo (Buyan-M)
Merkury (Steregushchiy)
Ufa (KILO)
Kama (Oiler)
Ursa Major (weapons runner)

Admiral Grigorovich appears to be near the anchorage but underway.
Status-6 (Twitter)

@commander206: Remember this one very well, kind of disturbed me back then
Def Mon (Twitter)

For me it's pretty simple. There should be one goal for the politicians, that is to defend Ukraine the best way possible. That part should then be up to the military to decide. There are ofc a few exceptions to this.
Def Mon (Twitter)

This is not how it's been working. Several times the military decided to withdraw. That later got overruled by politicians. Severodonetsk and Bakhmut are two examples. I dont think it's healthy for the military to be run that way.
Def Mon (Twitter)

Ukraine did not fight in Bakhmut because it was the best strategy or to kill of wagner. They fought there because the politicians did not want to let it go because it wasn't popular to lose a city and they thought it would look bad in the eyes of the west.
🥱2
Def Mon (Twitter)

@ellenripley_: That's not true. The politicians bypassed Zaluzhnyi for some things and went straight to Syrskyi.
Def Mon (Twitter)

@y_redrum0376: Yeah. You might wasn't to ask your self why. Was it because the goals set by the politicians were unrealistic or was it because he didn't have the tools to do it.
Def Mon (Twitter)

@FolgendenFolgen: It's not favorable to be surrounded on 3 sides, without counter battery or air defense. I wanted them to pull out. The Russians chose to fight in the city because it did not cost them a lot. They used expendable prisoners against UA regular units.
💯2
Def Mon (Twitter)

@aardvak1313: On paper, not always in reality.
Def Mon (Twitter)

@bgdnvl: I definitely can.
Def Mon (Twitter)

@aardvak1313: Why dont you ask those who fought in Bakhmut?
Def Mon (Twitter)

@TomUnknown21: Yes. In prepared positions where you are not surrounded, where you have working medevac and you can use counter battery and air defense. In places where dismounted Wagner infantry has a greater disadvantage against Ukrainian mechanized units.
Def Mon (Twitter)

RT @OSINTua: One year ago the RUAF were pushing near Vuhledar. Different Russian units tried to breakthrough but didn’t manage, suffered heavy losses and were stoped.

Apart from that direction RUAF we’re pushing near Avdiivka. And my brigade was defending the city from the South🧵