GeoConfirmed (Twitter)
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Velyka Novosilka axis.
These where the days that pro-Russian accounts were claiming that "everything was repelled".
Just look to the amount of vehicle columns in this axis.
Not by far is this comparable with the footage of destroyed vehicles.
-----------
@GeoConfirmed:
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Velyka Novosilka axis.
"Russians tracking Ukrainian columns and repelling a few Ukrainian attacks with the help of OBTF Kaskad."
note: This footage is from around 05 JUN. The beginning of the Velyka Novosilka axis.
GeoLocated by @sirfloriank https://t.co/BqByPSleTs
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Velyka Novosilka axis.
These where the days that pro-Russian accounts were claiming that "everything was repelled".
Just look to the amount of vehicle columns in this axis.
Not by far is this comparable with the footage of destroyed vehicles.
-----------
@GeoConfirmed:
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Velyka Novosilka axis.
"Russians tracking Ukrainian columns and repelling a few Ukrainian attacks with the help of OBTF Kaskad."
note: This footage is from around 05 JUN. The beginning of the Velyka Novosilka axis.
GeoLocated by @sirfloriank https://t.co/BqByPSleTs
Twitter
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Velyka Novosilka axis.
"Russians tracking Ukrainian columns and repelling a few Ukrainian attacks with the help of OBTF Kaskad."
note: This footage is from around 05 JUN. The beginning of the Velyka Novosilka axis.
GeoLocated by…
"Russians tracking Ukrainian columns and repelling a few Ukrainian attacks with the help of OBTF Kaskad."
note: This footage is from around 05 JUN. The beginning of the Velyka Novosilka axis.
GeoLocated by…
👍3🔥1
The Lookout (Twitter)
Despite what Lukashenko says, any nuclear warheads deployed to Belarus will remain Russian, highly likely under 12th GUMO control as with all Russian non-strategic nukes.
IMO, if such a deployment indeed becomes reality, very little changes.
Don't fall for the propaganda.
Despite what Lukashenko says, any nuclear warheads deployed to Belarus will remain Russian, highly likely under 12th GUMO control as with all Russian non-strategic nukes.
IMO, if such a deployment indeed becomes reality, very little changes.
Don't fall for the propaganda.
GeoConfirmed (Twitter)
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Tokmak axis.
"Russians drone spots 2x Leopard 2 tanks, 1 was attacked with a Lancet afterwards."
note: from before 10 JUN
1) 47.507836, 35.825509
2) Struck with Lancet = 47.506803, 35.824286
GeoLocated by @doppelot https://t.co/3dP9AJoemQ
GeoConfirmed UKR - CO - Tokmak axis.
"Russians drone spots 2x Leopard 2 tanks, 1 was attacked with a Lancet afterwards."
note: from before 10 JUN
1) 47.507836, 35.825509
2) Struck with Lancet = 47.506803, 35.824286
GeoLocated by @doppelot https://t.co/3dP9AJoemQ
The Lookout (Twitter)
@krakek1 If I remember correctly, this has been in the making for some time, well before Feb 24th last year.
@krakek1 If I remember correctly, this has been in the making for some time, well before Feb 24th last year.
The Lookout (Twitter)
I wrote this two weeks ago , worth repeating:
1:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
2/4
As long as warheads are kept by 12th GUMO, the difference between storing them in Belarus, Bryansk or Kaliningrad for than matter, is to me academic.
I wrote this two weeks ago , worth repeating:
1:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
2/4
As long as warheads are kept by 12th GUMO, the difference between storing them in Belarus, Bryansk or Kaliningrad for than matter, is to me academic.
Twitter
2/4
As long as warheads are kept by 12th GUMO, the difference between storing them in Belarus, Bryansk or Kaliningrad for than matter, is to me academic.
As long as warheads are kept by 12th GUMO, the difference between storing them in Belarus, Bryansk or Kaliningrad for than matter, is to me academic.
The Lookout (Twitter)
2:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
3/4
Even if there's a general change in Russian non-strategic nuclear posture, such as uploading Iskanders and placing them on alert, I don't see a presence in Belarus being any sort of game-changer compared to doing so in Kaliningrad or mainland Russia.
2:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
3/4
Even if there's a general change in Russian non-strategic nuclear posture, such as uploading Iskanders and placing them on alert, I don't see a presence in Belarus being any sort of game-changer compared to doing so in Kaliningrad or mainland Russia.
Twitter
3/4
Even if there's a general change in Russian non-strategic nuclear posture, such as uploading Iskanders and placing them on alert, I don't see a presence in Belarus being any sort of game-changer compared to doing so in Kaliningrad or mainland Russia.
Even if there's a general change in Russian non-strategic nuclear posture, such as uploading Iskanders and placing them on alert, I don't see a presence in Belarus being any sort of game-changer compared to doing so in Kaliningrad or mainland Russia.
The Lookout (Twitter)
3:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
4/4
In the event of general war, it has always been a possibility that nuclear warheads would accompany in Western MD units deploying to Belarus as part of the Joint Grouping of Forces.
The nukes to Belarus story seems to mainly be an information operation. Don't fall for it.
3:
-----------
@The_Lookout_N:
4/4
In the event of general war, it has always been a possibility that nuclear warheads would accompany in Western MD units deploying to Belarus as part of the Joint Grouping of Forces.
The nukes to Belarus story seems to mainly be an information operation. Don't fall for it.
Twitter
4/4
In the event of general war, it has always been a possibility that nuclear warheads would accompany in Western MD units deploying to Belarus as part of the Joint Grouping of Forces.
The nukes to Belarus story seems to mainly be an information operation.…
In the event of general war, it has always been a possibility that nuclear warheads would accompany in Western MD units deploying to Belarus as part of the Joint Grouping of Forces.
The nukes to Belarus story seems to mainly be an information operation.…
👍3