Dan (Twitter)
@NobodyK83030025 @IntelCrab @Military_oO The first one has received damage to its turret. The others I don't know but your point makes sense and is possible.
@NobodyK83030025 @IntelCrab @Military_oO The first one has received damage to its turret. The others I don't know but your point makes sense and is possible.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
Other than the North Kherson front and Svatove front, Which battle front map should I make? 🇺🇦
Other than the North Kherson front and Svatove front, Which battle front map should I make? 🇺🇦
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
4 ATACMS were launched into the East Sea today, and it changed nothing. Just a waste of missiles
Kim Jong Un will keep doing his missile tests no matter how many ATACMS we shoot into the Sea
4 ATACMS were launched into the East Sea today, and it changed nothing. Just a waste of missiles
Kim Jong Un will keep doing his missile tests no matter how many ATACMS we shoot into the Sea
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@nintendobenzo That was a different Missile launched by South Korea. The four ATACMS didn’t malfunction.
@nintendobenzo That was a different Missile launched by South Korea. The four ATACMS didn’t malfunction.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@coolidge4life I think you interpreted my comment the complete opposite way than it was supposed to be interpreted.
I am advocating for giving Ukraine ATACMS instead of launching them into the East Sea, and wasting them.
@coolidge4life I think you interpreted my comment the complete opposite way than it was supposed to be interpreted.
I am advocating for giving Ukraine ATACMS instead of launching them into the East Sea, and wasting them.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@VonClownsewitz Who is advocating for that? It looks like you either accidentally or purposefully misinterpreted my comment.🇺🇦
My comment clearly intends to not waste ATACMS by launching them into the East Sea, and instead give them to Ukraine so they can use them on Russian Targets in Ukraine.
@VonClownsewitz Who is advocating for that? It looks like you either accidentally or purposefully misinterpreted my comment.🇺🇦
My comment clearly intends to not waste ATACMS by launching them into the East Sea, and instead give them to Ukraine so they can use them on Russian Targets in Ukraine.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@us_nato How do you think? Give them to Ukraine instead of launch them into the sea.
@us_nato How do you think? Give them to Ukraine instead of launch them into the sea.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@JohnTruth17 Just because they might have been given 1-3 ATACMS doesn’t mean they have them and are using them now. And giving 3 ATACMS wouldn’t change anything, more than 100 would need to be supplied.
@JohnTruth17 Just because they might have been given 1-3 ATACMS doesn’t mean they have them and are using them now. And giving 3 ATACMS wouldn’t change anything, more than 100 would need to be supplied.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@haunaho_ The Four ATACMS Missiles did not malfunction, it was another South Korean Missile which did that. I think instead of launching them into the Sea, they should be given to Ukraine to use on the battlefield.
@haunaho_ The Four ATACMS Missiles did not malfunction, it was another South Korean Missile which did that. I think instead of launching them into the Sea, they should be given to Ukraine to use on the battlefield.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
It would have been better to give Ukraine the 4 ATACMS to use against Russian Targets in Ukraine.
Rather than launching them into the East Sea. Because it’s a waste and it doesn’t solve any problems.
It would have been better to give Ukraine the 4 ATACMS to use against Russian Targets in Ukraine.
Rather than launching them into the East Sea. Because it’s a waste and it doesn’t solve any problems.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@VonClownsewitz No, this has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un. You understand my point, you’re just trying to misinterpret it and take it out of context.
It would be better to give Ukraine the ATACMS to use against Russian Military Targets in Ukraine and not wasted on a missile test into the Sea.
@VonClownsewitz No, this has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un. You understand my point, you’re just trying to misinterpret it and take it out of context.
It would be better to give Ukraine the ATACMS to use against Russian Military Targets in Ukraine and not wasted on a missile test into the Sea.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@igorkh43 I would disagree that it’s deterrence. North Korea will not be firing any nukes on USA or South Korean. It does matter if we launch 1 or 100 ATACMS into the Sea. There will still be another North Korean missile test. ATACMS is much more need for Ukraine now then on today’s drill.
@igorkh43 I would disagree that it’s deterrence. North Korea will not be firing any nukes on USA or South Korean. It does matter if we launch 1 or 100 ATACMS into the Sea. There will still be another North Korean missile test. ATACMS is much more need for Ukraine now then on today’s drill.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@igorkh43 Ukraine needs ATACMS now significantly more than Korea needs to fire them into the Sea.
@igorkh43 Ukraine needs ATACMS now significantly more than Korea needs to fire them into the Sea.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@VonClownsewitz Because I didn’t think it was going to be misinterpreted like that. I’ve elaborated on the post just now.
I thought it was obvious by now that I am for Ukraine getting ATACMS.
@VonClownsewitz Because I didn’t think it was going to be misinterpreted like that. I’ve elaborated on the post just now.
I thought it was obvious by now that I am for Ukraine getting ATACMS.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@AndrewH15918999 But Ukraine is not getting any. When it will help them a lot in the war and would only be used against Russian targets in Ukraine like HIMARS has.
@AndrewH15918999 But Ukraine is not getting any. When it will help them a lot in the war and would only be used against Russian targets in Ukraine like HIMARS has.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Ric_Hawke I don’t think that is predictable. Because the Kerch Bridge is very big. They could severely damage it but not fully destroy it, or they could just put a bigger hole in the bridge than HIMARS GMLRS does.
@Ric_Hawke I don’t think that is predictable. Because the Kerch Bridge is very big. They could severely damage it but not fully destroy it, or they could just put a bigger hole in the bridge than HIMARS GMLRS does.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@JohnTruth17 It’s obvious they are not being used right now on the battlefield. And the Saki strike may not have been an ATACMS it could’ve been a Grom-2. So it’s a difference in opinion.
@JohnTruth17 It’s obvious they are not being used right now on the battlefield. And the Saki strike may not have been an ATACMS it could’ve been a Grom-2. So it’s a difference in opinion.