The only solution to the so-called “Jewish question” really is Catholicism

Papal policy for centuries simultaneously fought against two excesses: violence/malice against Jews and subversion of Catholic social order by Jews

The Popes took great pains to prevent overzealous Christians from attacking Jews or making attempts to forcibly convert them, so much so that Jews would often actively seek out the Pope’s special protections

On the other hand they had to yield themselves to the Catholic structure of the social order

This is the only way to achieve lasting peace in this matter until the Eschaton

i am married now

at this point, while I’d disagree with it, there would be far more integrity in saying “Jews have to remain in power so that antisemitism doesn’t lead to another Holocaust” than denying the existence of Jewish power altogether *as* it’s being wielded for all to plainly see

those who choose Islam over Christianity mostly do so because they are carnal people and the paradise of Islam is more carnal than the spiritual paradise of the beatific vision offered exclusively by and through Christ

anyone who joins a religion solely because they think it’s more “based” is not really becoming religious so much as a different kind of idolator, almost worse than if they had simply remained secular

God may very well use this in someone as a springboard for genuine conversion, I’m not denying that this happens

But if you’re considering religion, specifically Catholicism, it should be because you have come to believe that it is the only true and authentic way to achieve intimate union with the Divine, any other reasons must be wholly subordinate to this

general rule of thumb for me: keep your philosophical/religious worldview relatively stable for at least 3 years then I’ll seriously listen to what you have to say

it was never necessary for God to create, but it was always fitting according to His wisdom and inner fecundity for Him to freely do so, and so He did

ultimately the act of creation stems from the same inner divine act of self-manifestation and tripersonal communion

It’s just that this inner act of divine union and love in its infinite generosity did not see fit to withhold itself from beings outside of Himself

hence, Creation

“yet no one spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews” - John 7:13

Trump surged into office on the back of an open rebellion against all of politics— I am not going to enthusiastically get behind some wet blanket establishment Republican politician as my "second choice" just in case the revolution fails. The whole system is corrupt, if it's not Trump it's nothing.

in some sense. Jesus Christ *is*, in His own Person united with the whole cosmos as summed up in a human nature, the best of all possible worlds

He is the fullness of God’s self-outpouring into Creation which, by virtue of the hypostatic union, cannot be outdone

Reminder that the Catholic Church as recently as the year 2000, taught by an ex cathedra magisterial pronouncement against any doctrine that could be harmonized with dual-covenant theology in Dominus Iesus:

«Above all else, it must be firmly believed that “the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mk 16:16; Jn 3:5), and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through baptism as through a door”‌.77 This doctrine must not be set against the universal salvific will of God (cf. 1 Tim 2:4); “it is necessary to keep these two truths together, namely, the real possibility of salvation in Christ for all mankind and the necessity of the Church for this salvation”‌.»

Problems with in-person voting on election day disproportionately affect Republican voters, hard to see how this new "system" was not created by design.

if it’s even true (and I don’t believe that it is) that the only way to win elections is to drop our anti-infanticide stance, we shouldn’t want to “win” elections

This doesn’t mean that as a politician you have to immediately rush to the most unpopular anti-abortion public policy stance imaginable (per Evangelium vitæ), but it does mean that protecting the unborn from systematic slaughter in the womb must remain a non-negotiable electoral priority

That, or be a pawn of the Devil, plain and simple

universal suffrage is in itself a species of voter fraud