Churches are now apparently hosting drag queen events.

www.dailyveracity.com

Follow @RealVincentJames

God permits Episcopalians to exist so that less Catholics will despair over the state of modern Catholicism

Going live in about a half hour on cozy.tv/classicaltheist continuing my Catholic integralism series plus addressing Pope Francis’ comments in Canada

Send any q&a’s either here classicaltheistmedia@protonmail.com or powerchat.live/classicaltheist

Going live in about a minute or so!
cozy.tv/classicaltheist

I don’t think Pope Francis will say anything against the doctrine of the Church on contraception, but it’s statements like this that underscore the importance of recognizing that Pius XI spoke infallibly when he condemned contraception in Casti connubii, in case a future pope ever dares to teach otherwise

imagine thinking this condemnation of contraception by Pius XI isn’t ex cathedra and therefore infallible

Pius XI a) speaks by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority b) defines a matter of morals, and c) manifests an intention to bind all the faithful absolutely to hold this doctrine

“let’s hear from everyone no one wants to hear form so we can’t hear anything from the guy everyone wants to hear from” the debate

Last night was a decisive victory for America First:

Paul Gosar: W
Wendy Rogers: W
Mark Finchem: W
Blake Masters: W
Kari Lake: W
John Gibbs: W
Kris Kobach: W
Joe Kent: L

Tonight at 10pm est on Logos Triumphant we will be discussing metaphysics with special guest Classical Theist. Be sure to follow on cozy.

Cozy.tv/speckzo

if you don’t believe contraception is intrinsically evil you can’t really argue against homosexuality beyond calling it gross and unhealthy, which are persuasive reasons to oppose it to be sure but aren’t exactly airtight or universally binding

bruh https://twitter.com/theosisp/status/1556013316778123265?s=21&t=U2x7ReFEuGkcpQrIzkbulA

very important and excellent article regarding the emerging political climate among the College of Cardinals that could shape the next Conclave and how the outcome could impact the wider word

https://catholicherald.co.uk/erdo-vs-tagle-the-battle-to-be-the-next-pope/

my cozy streams will be returning next week, along with regular YouTube content

this month has been very busy for me

all Protestant led attempts at merging Christianity with the State are insufferably cringe and lame, without exception https://twitter.com/rightwingwatch/status/1558110314599694336?s=21&t=ERm-AR5XV_mOKFt6UvYcYA

if “Christian Nationalism” just means reviving the Tea Party post-Trump, please leave me out of it

“Christian nationalism” should evoke images of crucifixes, rosary rallies, and liturgical processions, not the constitution, billy graham and cowboy hats

lol

“Concerning secular power we declare that without mortal sin it is possible to exercise a judgment of blood as long as one proceeds to bring punishment not in hatred but in judgment, not incautiously but advisedly.” - Pope Innocent III’s Professio fidei proscribed to the Waldensians

professions of faith, btw, are largely considered categorically infallible by virtue of the manifest intention for the sake of which they’re promulgated, ie informing the universal Church of what conditions are necessary to remain Catholic

Innocent III’s magisterium is just as “living” as Francis’

Therefore, the question is not which pope currently wields the Magisterium, but which magisterial teaching is taught at a higher level across time, should there exist a contradiction at the non-definitive level

This should be an axiom: the living magisterium ≠ the current magisterium

Perhaps there exists no contradiction between the current Pope and any of his predecessors. One could make that case, but if there exists one, this would be the way to navigate those waters

One thing is for certain: the Divine promise given to Peter ensures there will never exist a contradiction between a Pope’s definitive, ex cathedra teaching and another’s definitive ex cathedra teaching

What is possible however is for there to exist rare instances (relative to Church history) of non-infallible, merely authoritative papal teachings contradicting

Therefore, there must be an intelligible way to discern the way in which a Catholic must act in such instances

don’t let the judaizers win!

https://twitter.com/aapologetics/status/1560203280587919363?s=21&t=nNeiMhy_kCxtdmSmsjFxhg