Going live now! cozy.tv/classicaltheist

regarding the principle of individuation, in my view it makes more sense to see matter as the principle whereby the form is individuated, but the act of existence is the principle whereby the whole substance of a thing is considered individual

in other words, designated matter is the principle or means whereby the form of a thing is to be instantiated and multiplied, but the act of existence is what actuates the entire essence of a thing, making it to be an individual existent and therefore is what enables the matter to be designated in the first place

Christ wins

the babies are striking back

we will not rest until the law of the State, the natural law, and the Divine law are all in harmony

>Russia BTFO’s Ukraine/NATO
>Roe vs. Wade overturned
>Twitter becomes a free speech platform
>Red Wave in Congress
>Trump Second Term in 2024

Yeah I’m thinking we’re back

winding the clock back to the moral norms of 1973 is a start, but we still have a ways to go to get back to the moral norms of 1273

keep fighting!

Donald Trump will go down in history as the President that ended Roe vs Wade.

as disappointing as trump’s justices can be at times, desantis likely would have picked far worse ones, and they would not have overturned roe

also trump initially wanted to punish women who get abortions
desantis would have never even dreamed of thinking that

the inevitable slew of abortion bans to come very well could be the beginning stage of this country winning back God’s favor

consistent life ethic but instead it’s the legislate against abortion, sodomy, contraception and fornication package

another faction taking a massive L: the “barstool” conservatives

they just make our propaganda for us

Tomorrow at 9 PM EST I will be discussing the foundations of Catholic integralism on cozy.tv/classicaltheist

You can send any general questions/inquiries you have for the end of the stream at classicaltheistmedia@protonmail.com

Or you can always send a powerchat if you want a guaranteed q&a

the Vatican editorial director’s statement is cringe for not focusing exclusively on how wonderful the overturning of Roe v Wade is, but it did *not* in any way criticize pro-lifers as is being reported

It reiterated that banning abortion is necessary but simply said banning abortion should also be united with other measures to support human life, which is tone deaf imo but not in any way comforting to pro-choicers