Tonight at 8:30 PM EST I’ll be addressing some common misconceptions about what papal infallibility actually means and entails

cozy.tv/classicaltheist

Due to a technical difficulty I’m going to have to push this to tomorrow at 7 PM EST
My apologies!

Going live in about 45 minutes!

cozy.tv/classicaltheist

Going live momentarily!
Jump in here!

cozy.tv/classcaltheist

didn’t we already defeat the “hispanic natural integralist” larp like 2 years ago?

why does the dichotomy have to be pure WASPism or endless hispanic caravans from the third world who are barely even Catholic in a meaningful sense?

so true supreme pontiff

No stream this Sunday due to Father’s Day, but I will be doing a stream this Wednesday at 7:30 PM EST with Pinesap discussing the current Pontificate, the Novus Ordo, and the overall state of the Church since the Second Vatican Council

Our views slightly differ from one another on these things so it should be an engaging discussion!

it should be obvious that theres something ridiculous about someone with a 75 year lifespan using the last 60 of 2,000 years of Church history as a metric for evaluating the Church as an institution

as difficult as it is we need to think in terms of centuries, not decades

What people misunderstand about the culture war is that trivial issues like bathrooms or sports are just the point of contact for significant issues like whether or not society will have men and women or whether or not we believe in God.

Tonight at 7:30 PM EST, I will be doing a stream with Pinesap discussing the current Pontificate, the Novus Ordo, and the overall state of the Church since the Second Vatican Council

You can send any questions/inquiries you have for the end of the stream at classicaltheistmedia@protonmail.com

Or you can always send a powerchat if you want a guaranteed q&a


Follow the channel!

cozy.tv/classicaltheist

Aristotle’s definition of male and female remains to this day the only one that actually makes sense and refers to an irreducible difference that admits of no real exceptions:

“the active capacity to impregnate (male), and the passive capacity to be impregnated (female)”

any exceptions to this are a result of one or the other capacity being incidentally impeded in some way, not some ontological third option

even chromosomal disorders presuppose the prior existence of one or the other capacity

the development of distinct reproductive organs, secondary characteristics, gender roles, etc, all naturally flow from the concrete, irreducible existence of either capacity in a human person

at the heart of this definition is the commonsensical intuition of “action follows being”, that is, we know the natures of things by virtue of teleological ends a given nature uniquely possesses by virtue of its form

Tonight at 7:30 PM EST, I will be doing a stream with Pinesap discussing the current Pontificate, the Novus Ordo, and the overall state of the Church since the Second Vatican Council

You can send any questions/inquiries you have for the end of the stream at classicaltheistmedia@protonmail.com

Or you can always send a powerchat if you want a guaranteed q&a


Follow the channel!

cozy.tv/classicaltheist

Going live now! cozy.tv/classicaltheist

regarding the principle of individuation, in my view it makes more sense to see matter as the principle whereby the form is individuated, but the act of existence is the principle whereby the whole substance of a thing is considered individual

in other words, designated matter is the principle or means whereby the form of a thing is to be instantiated and multiplied, but the act of existence is what actuates the entire essence of a thing, making it to be an individual existent and therefore is what enables the matter to be designated in the first place

Christ wins

the babies are striking back