These are shared so far.
The rest will be shared soon.
Read, reread, revise and use them in Your Paper 2 answers.
Expected questions are also provided. Practice them all by yourself and check your progress by comparing with model answers.


Remember

Your answers are not strictly supposed to be like model answers.
Focus on presentation, structure, multidimensional, 5D, creativity, simplicity and connectedness of your answers. NOT JUST FACTS.

BEST WISHES....😊

- Dr. Prashant Jagtap

🔥12 Model solved expected Essays CAPF 2025 by Jagtap sir 🔥

🔥Essay: Terrorism in Kashmir: Need for Befitting Reply to Pakistan🔥🔥

India’s heart bleeds in Kashmir, where the serene Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam turned crimson on April 22, 2025. Twenty-six civilians, mostly Hindu tourists, fell to the bullets of Pakistan-backed terrorists, a grim reminder of the neighbor’s unyielding proxy war. “The strength of a nation lies in the unity of its people,” said Mahatma Gandhi, yet Pakistan’s designs sow discord. India’s resolute response, Operation Sindoor, struck nine terrorist sites across Pakistan and its occupied Kashmir, a justified act to punish perpetrators. This essay narrates why India must deliver a befitting reply to Pakistan’s terror sponsorship, weaving resilience into its security fabric.

Kashmir, India’s crown, has endured Pakistan’s shadow since 1947. The Pahalgam attack, claimed by The Resistance Front, an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, targeted tourists to shatter the region’s reviving tourism, which welcomed 3.5 million visitors in 2024. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), long accused of arming militants, fuels this violence, as evidenced by global condemnations from leaders like US President Donald Trump. Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, 2025, was no reckless escalation but a precise strike, avoiding Pakistani military targets to uphold restraint. India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and diplomatic expulsions further signaled zero tolerance, justified by Pakistan’s admitted history of harboring terrorists, as confessed by its own leaders like Pervez Musharraf.

Yet, a reply must transcend retaliation. Pakistan’s strategy thrives on India’s restraint, exploiting porous borders and radicalized youth. Long-term resilience demands indigenization—India’s 68% domestic defense procurement, including BrahMos missiles, powers strikes like Sindoor. Startups, like those developing AI-driven surveillance, fortify borders. Innovation, such as DRDO’s drone countermeasures, counters Pakistan’s narco-terrorism. Strategic treaties, like the Quad’s Indo-Pacific framework, isolate Pakistan diplomatically, while FATF scrutiny curbs its terror funding. Community deradicalization, inspired by Kashmir’s protests against the attack, can heal local wounds.

India’s reply is not vengeance but duty. “A nation’s security begins with the vigilance of its citizens,” an adage holds true as India strengthens its resolve. By blending precision strikes, indigenous technology, and global alliances, India can silence Pakistan’s terror symphony, ensuring Kashmir blooms as a haven of peace, not a battlefield.

Kamayabi.....Afsar ban🔥🔥

🔥Science and Technology notes CAPF by Jagtap sir🔥

🔥IR and Foreign policy Notes for CAPF 2025 by jagtap sir🔥

MODEL ESSAY

🔥Technology: A Useful Servant but a Dangerous Master🔥
In the symphony of human progress, technology plays a melody both enchanting and perilous. From Silicon Valley’s algorithms to India’s satellite-strewn skies, it transforms lives, yet whispers warnings. As A.P.J. Abdul Kalam cautioned, “Science is a beautiful gift to humanity; we should not distort it.” A faithful servant, technology uplifts societies, but unchecked, it risks mastering our destinies. This essay weaves a tale of technology’s dual nature, balancing its promise with its perils.

Across the globe, technology’s service shines. In India, UPI empowers millions with seamless transactions, while Kenya’s M-Pesa banks the unbanked, fostering inclusion. AI predicts floods in Bangladesh, saving villages, and powers SpaceX’s reusable rockets, slashing launch costs. Biotech breakthroughs, like CAR-T therapy, cure cancer from Boston to Bengaluru, while green hydrogen fuels Japan’s cities, easing climate burdens. These marvels, driven by global innovation hubs, bridge divides—rural farmers access markets, and urban poor gain healthcare.

Yet, technology’s shadow looms large. AI’s algorithms, shaping social media in California, spread misinformation, fueling unrest from Delhi to London. Facial recognition, used in China’s surveillance, erodes privacy, echoing fears in Europe’s cities. Cyberattacks, targeting Ukraine’s grids and India’s banks, threaten stability. Automation displaces workers—US factories and India’s IT hubs face job cuts. Unregulated drones, misused by terror groups, endanger peace, while biotech’s gene-editing, like CRISPR, stirs ethical storms over designer babies.

The challenge is governance. Silicon Valley’s monopolies hoard data, while developing nations lag in AI skills. Bureaucratic inertia delays global norms, leaving technology’s reins loose. Solutions gleam with hope: EU’s AI Act sets ethical standards, inspiring India’s MeitY guidelines. Public-private partnerships, like UPI’s model, democratize tech, while UNESCO’s AI ethics push unites nations. Skilling youth, from Nairobi to Noida, harnesses innovation, ensuring technology serves, not subjugates.

Humanity’s wisdom, rooted in ethical duty, must guide this dance. By blending innovation with responsibility, we can tame technology’s dangers. The future shines—a world where technology empowers every soul, crafting societies that thrive under its gentle hand, not its iron grip, harmonizing progress with humanity’s heart.

Must read and use in essays.


❤️🔥Operation Sindoor: A Decisive Victory in Modern Warfare🔥❤️

-John Spencer


India has not declared Operation Sindoor completely over. What exists now is a sensitive halt in operations—some may call it a ceasefire, but military leaders have deliberately avoided that word. From a warfighting perspective, this is not merely a pause; it is a strategic hold following a rare and unambiguous military victory.After just four days of calibrated military action, it is objectively conclusive: India achieved a massive victory. Operation Sindoor met and exceeded its strategic aims—destroying terrorist infrastructure, demonstrating military superiority, restoring deterrence, and unveiling a new national security doctrine. This was not symbolic force. It was decisive power, clearly applied.India was attacked. On April 22, 2025, 26 Indian civilians were massacred in Pahalgam, Jammu & Kashmir. The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), claimed responsibility. As has been the case for decades, the group is backed by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).But unlike previous attacks, this time India didn’t wait. It didn’t appeal for international mediation or issue a diplomatic demarche. It launched warplanes.On May 7, India initiated Operation Sindoor, a swift and precisely calibrated military campaign. The Indian Air Force struck nine terrorist infrastructure targets inside Pakistan, including headquarters and operational hubs for Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The message was clear: terror attacks launched from Pakistani soil will now be treated as acts of war.Prime Minister Narendra Modi made the new doctrine unmistakable: "India will not tolerate any nuclear blackmail. India will strike precisely and decisively at the terrorist hideouts developing under the cover of nuclear blackmail."More than a retaliation, this was the unveiling of a strategic doctrine. As Modi said, “Terror and talks can’t go together. Water and blood can’t flow together.”Operation Sindoor was executed in deliberate phases: · May 7: Nine precision strikes were launched deep into Pakistani territory. Targets included key terror training camps and logistics nodes in Bahawalpur, Muridke, Muzaffarabad, and elsewhere. · May 8: Pakistan retaliated with a massive drone swarm across India’s western states. India’s multi-layered air defense network—domestically built and augmented by Israeli and Russian systems—neutralized nearly all of them. · May 9: India escalated with additional strikes on six Pakistani military airbases and UAV coordination hubs. · May 10: A temporary halt in firing was reached. India did not call it a ceasefire. The Indian military referred to it as a “stoppage of firing”—a semantic but deliberate choice that reinforced its strategic control of the situation.This wasn’t just tactical success. It was doctrinal execution under live fire.Strategic Effects AchievedA New Red Line Was Drawn—and Enforced
Terror attacks from Pakistani soil will now be met with military force. That’s not a threat. It’s precedent.Military Superiority Demonstrated
India showcased its ability to strike any target in Pakistan at will—terror sites, drone coordination hubs, even airbases. Meanwhile, Pakistan was unable to penetrate a single defended area inside India. That is not parity. That is overwhelming superiority. And that is how real deterrence is established.Restored Deterrence
India retaliated forcefully but stopped short of full war. The controlled escalation sent a clear deterrent signal: India will respond, and it controls the pace.Asserted Strategic Independence
India handled this crisis without seeking international mediation. It enforced doctrine on sovereign terms, using sovereign means.Operation Sindoor was not about occupation or regime change. It was limited war executed for specific objectives. Critics who argue India should have gone further miss the point.

Strategic success isn’t about the scale of destruction—it’s about achieving the desired political effect.India was not fighting for vengeance. It was fighting for deterrence. And it worked.India’s restraint is not weakness—it is maturity. It imposed costs, redefined thresholds, and retained escalation dominance. India didn’t just respond to an attack. It changed the strategic equation.In an age where many modern wars spiral into open-ended occupations or political confusion, Operation Sindoor stands apart. This was a demonstration of disciplined military strategy: clear goals, aligned ways and means, and adaptive execution in the face of unpredictable escalation. India absorbed a blow, defined its objective, and achieved it—all within a contained timeframe.The use of force in Operation Sindoor was overwhelming yet controlled—precise, decisive, and without hesitation. That kind of clarity is rare in modern war. In an era defined by "forever wars" and cycles of violence without strategic direction, Sindoor stands apart. It offers a model of limited war with clearly defined ends, matched ways and means, and a state that never relinquished the initiative.The India of 2008 absorbed attacks and waited. This India hits back—immediately, precisely, and with clarity.Modi’s doctrine, India’s advancing domestic defense industry, and the professionalism of its armed forces all signal a country no longer preparing for the last war. It is preparing for the next one.The halt in operations is not the end of Operation Sindoor. It is a pause. India holds the initiative. If provoked again, it will strike again.This is deterrence restored. This is a new doctrine revealed. And it should be studied by all nations confronting the scourge of state-sponsored terrorism.Operation Sindoor was a modern war—fought under the shadow of nuclear escalation, with global attention, and within a limited objective framework. And by every measure that matters, it was a strategic success—and a decisive Indian victory.



John Spencer is executive director of the Urban Warfare Institute. He is the coauthor of Understanding Urban Warfare.

Learn more at www.johnspenceronline.com
You can also follow him on 'X' at: @SpencerGuard

Day 1 to One Day....