7am live: Biology 28 Thursday
https://unacademy.com/course/jiv-shastra-20-biology-of-general-science-for-capfcdsafcat/IAMBPU0G?liveclass=JD9A9443

7am live: Biology Saturday

https://unacademy.com/course/jiv-shastra-20-biology-of-general-science-for-capfcdsafcat/IAMBPU0G?liveclass=L1ICY9O4

7am live: Biology
https://unacademy.com/course/jiv-shastra-20-biology-of-general-science-for-capfcdsafcat/IAMBPU0G?liveclass=D66Y4VWM

Total Suicides in 2022Total Suicides: 171,000.Men: Approximately 122,000 (71.4% of total suicides).Women: Approximately 48,000 (28.1% of total suicides).Male-to-Female Ratio: Roughly 72.5:27.4, consistent with prior years where men accounted for a higher proportion.Age-Wise BreakdownThe NCRB data and related studies (e.g., The Lancet, WHO) highlight that suicides peak in certain age groups, with distinct patterns for men and women. Below is the age-wise distribution based on 2022 data and trends from 2014–2021, as specific 2022 age breakdowns are not fully detailed in my sources but follow similar patterns.Men15–29 Years:High suicide rate, estimated at ~25.6 per 100,000 in 2021, likely similar in 2022.Accounts for ~40% of male suicides.Key factors: Unemployment, family problems, economic stress.30–44 Years:Highest suicide rate among men, ~27.2 per 100,000 in 2021, expected to remain high.Roughly 30–35% of male suicides.Driven by economic pressures (e.g., daily wage earners saw a 170.7% rise in suicides from 2014–2021) and health issues.45–59 Years:Significant proportion, with rates around 20–25 per 100,000.Contributes ~15–20% of male suicides.Linked to family issues, health, and societal expectations.60+ Years:Lower but notable, ~10–15% of male suicides.Rate ~30.2 per 100,000 in older studies, possibly underreported.Illness and social isolation are key drivers.Women15–29 Years:Highest risk group for women, ~24.9 per 100,000 in earlier data, likely similar.~56% of female suicides occur here.Major causes: Marriage-related issues (e.g., dowry disputes), domestic violence, family problems.30–44 Years:Lower than younger group, ~15–20% of female suicides.Rate ~13–15 per 100,000.Family issues and mental health challenges persist.45–59 Years:Notable rate, ~11–13 per 100,000, highest among older women in some studies.~10–15% of female suicides.Linked to health issues and social pressures.60+ Years:Smallest group, ~5–10% of female suicides.Underreporting likely, especially in rural areas.Key ObservationsMen vs. Women:Men’s suicide rate is ~2.5 times higher than women’s (34.6 vs. 13.1 per 100,000 in 2021 trends).Men dominate across all age groups, especially 30–44, due to economic and societal pressures.Women have higher rates in younger ages (15–29), driven by social issues like dowry and domestic violence.Age Trends:The 15–29 age group is critical for both genders, with ~63% of total suicides in this range.Men’s rates peak in middle age (30–44), while women’s decline after 30, possibly due to shifts in family roles.Methods:Hanging is the most common method for both (~77% rise in men, 51% in women, 2014–2021).Women also use self-immolation and poisoning, often misclassified, leading to underreporting.Underreporting:NCRB data may underestimate suicides by 27% for men and 50% for women, especially in younger (15–29) and older (60+) groups.

🔥Notes for essays CAPF AC 2025 Political. If you like them and find them useful then encourage us and share with friends 🔥

1. Constitutional Framework and Foundational Concepts
• Constitution: The supreme legal document of India, adopted on November 26, 1949, and enforced on January 26, 1950.
• Preamble: The introductory statement outlining the Constitution’s objectives—Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic—and values like justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.
• Sovereignty: The absolute authority of the state to govern itself, free from external control.
• Socialist: A Preamble value aiming for equitable distribution of resources, added by the 42nd Amendment (1976).
• Secular: The state’s neutrality toward all religions, ensuring equal treatment (Articles 25–28).
• Democratic: A system where the government derives legitimacy from the people through free and fair elections.
• Republic: A state with an elected head (President), as opposed to a monarchy.
• Federalism: The division of powers between the Union and States, with India described as a "Union of States" (Article 1).
• Quasi-Federalism: India’s federal structure with a unitary bias, as noted by K.C. Wheare, due to the Centre’s overriding powers.
• Unitary Features: Central dominance in emergencies, single Constitution, and integrated judiciary.
• Separation of Powers: The division of governmental functions among the legislature, executive, and judiciary to prevent concentration of authority.
• Checks and Balances: Mechanisms ensuring mutual oversight among the three branches of government.
• Basic Structure Doctrine: A judicial principle (from Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, 1973) that protects core constitutional features (e.g., democracy, secularism, federalism) from amendment.
• Amendability: The process of altering the Constitution under Article 368, balancing rigidity and flexibility.
• Supremacy of the Constitution: The Constitution as the highest law, binding on all authorities (Article 13).
• Constitutionalism: The principle that governmental power must be exercised within constitutional limits.
• Constitutional Morality: A concept emphasized by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, referring to adherence to constitutional values in governance and public life.
• Rule of Law: A principle (A.V. Dicey) ensuring equality before the law, supremacy of law, and protection of individual rights.
• Living Document: The Constitution’s ability to adapt to changing times through judicial interpretation and amendments.

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: Need, Challenges, and Suggestions (Essay for CAPF AC 2025)
The introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to replace the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC) marks a pivotal moment in India's legal renaissance. Rooted in the values of Nyaya (justice) rather than mere punishment, this reform seeks to decolonize Indian criminal law and align it with the constitutional vision of justice, dignity, and human rights.
The IPC, drafted in 1860, was a tool of imperial control—detached from Indian social realities. The BNS aims to reflect Indian ethos by emphasizing justice delivery over procedural rigidity, and victim-centricity over state-centricity. Concepts like zero-FIR, timelines for investigation and trial, community service as punishment, and the criminalization of mob lynching are significant reforms. The BNS also incorporates digital and cybercrime definitions, which were missing in the IPC.
Yet, the road to transformation is riddled with challenges. Critics point out ambiguities in definitions, scope for executive overreach, and lack of wider public and stakeholder consultations. Provisions related to sedition (now reworded but still present), expanded police powers, and retention of certain colonial mindsets have raised alarm bells.
Operationalizing the BNS would also require capacity-building across the judiciary, police, and legal profession. Translation into vernacular languages, training of personnel, digitization of legal infrastructure, and public legal awareness campaigns are essential. Without this, reform may remain only on paper.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar once said, “Justice is the lifeblood of democracy.” For BNS to deliver on this promise, it must be implemented with constitutional morality, transparency, and citizen engagement.
Let the spirit of “Dharma” guide this transformation—not as blind legality, but as compassionate and swift justice (“Samasya ka samadhan, nyaya ke saath, tvarit roop se ho”).
As we decolonize the mind and modernize our laws, the BNS must become a symbol of Nyaya, Naitikta (ethics), and Navachar (innovation)—an instrument not of fear, but of fairness.

🔥Essay writing CAPF 2025🔥
live 9pm : https://unacademy.com/course/seema-prahari-20-capf-ac-2025-paper-2-essays/6S0R6TON?liveclass=951Y88Y5


Role of Civil Services in a Democratic Polity

Civil services form the steel frame of India, envisioned by Sardar Patel as impartial, efficient, and ethical administrators. Their role in policy implementation, public service delivery, and crisis management is indispensable.
In a democracy, civil servants must balance political responsiveness with administrative neutrality. They must act as both facilitators and watchdogs—advising ministers, enforcing laws, and upholding constitutional values.
However, issues of politicization, corruption, and bureaucratic red-tapism plague the system. Reforms such as lateral entry, performance appraisal, capacity building (Mission Karmayogi), and citizen charters aim to revive public trust.
Ethical leadership, as taught by Chanakya in Arthashastra, remains timeless: “The king’s man must be wise, loyal, and free from avarice.”
As we move towards a digital and participatory governance model, civil services must evolve into agile, empathetic, and visionary institutions. Let them become sewaks, not masters—lok sevak, not power brokers.
A vibrant democracy demands not just electoral representation but also administrative dedication. Civil servants are silent sentinels of this democratic dream.

Environmental essay notes & value addition material