💬 maflcko commented on pull request "Clear out space on GHA jobs":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514#issuecomment-3548426978)
Can this be closed, or is there something left to be done here?
Looks like a lot of hassle/bike-shedding for something that hasn't happened for about a month now.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514#issuecomment-3548426978)
Can this be closed, or is there something left to be done here?
Looks like a lot of hassle/bike-shedding for something that hasn't happened for about a month now.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538838043)
Fixed in 95a8297d481e96d65ac81e4dac72b2ebecb9c765.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538838043)
Fixed in 95a8297d481e96d65ac81e4dac72b2ebecb9c765.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538842194)
Done in 838d7e3553661cb6ba0be32dd872bafb444822d9
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538842194)
Done in 838d7e3553661cb6ba0be32dd872bafb444822d9
📝 pinheadmz converted_to_draft a pull request: "Introduce SockMan ("lite"): low-level socket handling for HTTP"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32747)
Introduces a new low-level socket manager `SockMan` as an abstract class with virtual functions for implementing higher-level networking protocols like HTTP. This is the next step in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31194
This is a minimal, alternative version of #30988 ("Split CConnman") without any changes to working code (P2P is not affected). It adds a stripped-down version of the `SockMan` introduced in that pull request that implements only what is needed for the HTTP server im
...
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32747)
Introduces a new low-level socket manager `SockMan` as an abstract class with virtual functions for implementing higher-level networking protocols like HTTP. This is the next step in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31194
This is a minimal, alternative version of #30988 ("Split CConnman") without any changes to working code (P2P is not affected). It adds a stripped-down version of the `SockMan` introduced in that pull request that implements only what is needed for the HTTP server im
...
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538844903)
Took this wording in 34e32985e811607e7566ae7a6caeacdf8bd8384f
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538844903)
Took this wording in 34e32985e811607e7566ae7a6caeacdf8bd8384f
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538847018)
Updated the comment in 47ab32fdb158069d4422e0f92078603c6df070a6.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538847018)
Updated the comment in 47ab32fdb158069d4422e0f92078603c6df070a6.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538849747)
Took this comment and incorporated in 21b5cea588a7bfe758a8d14efe90046b111db428.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538849747)
Took this comment and incorporated in 21b5cea588a7bfe758a8d14efe90046b111db428.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538850474)
Done.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538850474)
Done.
💬 pinheadmz commented on pull request "Introduce SockMan ("lite"): low-level socket handling for HTTP":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32747#issuecomment-3548455862)
rebased on master to fix conflict but also converted to draft.
The plan is now to integrate this I/O loop directly with the new http server. So I will rebase #32061 on this branch to include the feedback the socket stuff has received, and then combine this sockman with the http server and remove the abstraction.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32747#issuecomment-3548455862)
rebased on master to fix conflict but also converted to draft.
The plan is now to integrate this I/O loop directly with the new http server. So I will rebase #32061 on this branch to include the feedback the socket stuff has received, and then combine this sockman with the http server and remove the abstraction.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538851944)
I swapped the commits, and verified that every commit in the branch I just pushed compiles.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538851944)
I swapped the commits, and verified that every commit in the branch I just pushed compiles.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538853181)
Squashed.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538853181)
Squashed.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538858278)
Fixed this commit message (8e49477e86b3089ea70d1f2659b9fd3a8a1f7db4).
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538858278)
Fixed this commit message (8e49477e86b3089ea70d1f2659b9fd3a8a1f7db4).
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538862686)
Fixed in b9a2039f51226dce2c4e38ce5f26eefee171744b.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538862686)
Fixed in b9a2039f51226dce2c4e38ce5f26eefee171744b.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538863183)
Squashed.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538863183)
Squashed.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538865118)
Done.
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538865118)
Done.
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538866223)
Thanks, fixed this wording in e031085fd464b528c186948d3cbf1c08a5a8d624
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538866223)
Thanks, fixed this wording in e031085fd464b528c186948d3cbf1c08a5a8d624
✅ willcl-ark closed a pull request: "Clear out space on GHA jobs"
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514)
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514)
💬 willcl-ark commented on pull request "Clear out space on GHA jobs":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514#issuecomment-3548476975)
Closing for now
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33514#issuecomment-3548476975)
Closing for now
💬 sdaftuar commented on pull request "Cluster mempool":
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538870170)
I moved this commit much earlier in the PR (to right before the commit: "Select transactions for blocks based on chunk feerate").
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33629#discussion_r2538870170)
I moved this commit much earlier in the PR (to right before the commit: "Select transactions for blocks based on chunk feerate").
💬 maflcko commented on pull request "Remove HD seed reference from blank wallet tooltip":
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/908#issuecomment-3548479257)
lgtm ACK 929f69d0ff29cb803769a423035fdcf675f40b78
(https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/908#issuecomment-3548479257)
lgtm ACK 929f69d0ff29cb803769a423035fdcf675f40b78