๐•ฌ๐–“๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–™ ๐•ป๐–†๐–™๐–๐–˜
862 subscribers
1.48K photos
405 videos
2 files
1.38K links
๐‹๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐œ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐œ๐ก ๐๐ž๐ž๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง ๐ฐ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ž๐ฒ๐ž.
Download Telegram
Forwarded from it's the Jewsยฎ๏ธ Retard
My King gave it all.
To walk in his footsteps.
We must be willing to as well.

"Think not that I am come to
send peace on earth: I came
not to send peace, but a sword."

- Matthew 10:34
โšก7โค4๐Ÿ‘1
๐”‰๐”ฌ๐”ฏ ๐”ž ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฐ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ถ๐”ข๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”ฐ ๐”ฆ๐”ซ ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ถ ๐”ฐ๐”ฆ๐”ค๐”ฅ๐”ฑ
๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”ข ๐”Ÿ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ ๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ถ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ถ ๐”ด๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ ๐”ญ๐”ž๐”ฐ๐”ฑ,
๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ž ๐”ด๐”ž๐”ฑ๐” ๐”ฅ ๐”ฆ๐”ซ ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐”ค๐”ฅ๐”ฑ.

Psแด€สŸแด 90:4

๐•ฌ๐–“๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–™ ๐•ป๐–†๐–™๐–๐–˜ แด€ส€แด„สœษชแด แด‡
๐Ÿ™6
๐ˆ๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐‚๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐ž๐ฌ

๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ด๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ, ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ด๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข "๐˜‘๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ" ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ข ๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜‘๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ "๐˜๐˜ด๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ" ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข "๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ." Jewish Almanac 1980

๐•ฌ๐–“๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–™ ๐•ป๐–†๐–™๐–๐–˜
๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ˜ˆ2โค1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
When we talk about the pendulum swinging, you probably imagine it swinging in a very simple back and forth: it goes Left, it comes back Right to roughly the same extreme. This is not how the dialectical operative understands or uses the pendulum swing. The gif below (above) is closer.

The pendulum might be moving back and forth in its own reference frame, but the dialectical operators (Hermeticists) are moving the reference frame so that it's going somewhere. The Left-Right swing allows it to avoid resistance that inevitably mounts against either extreme.

This tactic is based off the Hermetic principles of transformation, so it's something they know they're doing with specific intention. The idea is to move history toward its intended end (Platonic perfection) not in a straight line but in a spiral (or by sinusoid, snakey).

The key is understanding that the pendulum is swinging, but the Hermeticists have control of the bob (or reference frame in other ways)...

Full Thread HERE.
๐Ÿ‘ป2
๐”Š๐”ฌ๐”ก ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ฃ๐”ฒ๐”ค๐”ข ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ฐ๐”ฑ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ค๐”ฑ๐”ฅ,
๐”ž๐”ซ ๐”ข๐”ณ๐”ข๐”ฏ-๐”ญ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฑ ๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ญ ๐”ฆ๐”ซ ๐”ฑ๐”ฏ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”Ÿ๐”ฉ๐”ข.

Psแด€สŸแด 46:1

๐•ฌ๐–“๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–™ ๐•ป๐–†๐–™๐–๐–˜ แด€ส€แด„สœษชแด แด‡
๐Ÿ™9โค4
Forwarded from it's the Jewsยฎ๏ธ Retard
Agenda 2030 is right on schedule.
๐Ÿ’ฏ3๐Ÿคฎ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
In a recent interview with VICE, I was asked what I view as the greatest technological threat to privacy and freedom today. My answer ๐Ÿ‘‡

I wouldnโ€™t pin the threat on any single piece of technology. Itโ€™s the entire ecosystem. Facial recognition, predictive algorithms, biometric databases, AI-driven surveillanceโ€”all of that is equally horrifying to anyone who still regards privacy as a virtue.

What concerns me most is the human tendency to outsource accountability, transparency, and decision-making to these systems. Weโ€™re not just automating processes; weโ€™re automating judgment, often in the very moments when human discernment is most critical. By deferring to machines, we create a moral blind spot. The algorithm becomes the scapegoat, the system becomes the excuseโ€”and suddenly, no one is responsible. Not the agency, not the officer behind the screen.

For decades, government has mastered the art of passing the buck and sidestepping blame. But now, with automated systems and outsourced surveillance, the buck doesnโ€™t just get passed, it vanishes altogether.

This isnโ€™t just a technical shift, itโ€™s a cultural oneโ€”a quiet surrender of ethical responsibility, masked in the language of efficiency and innovation.

That's enough to frighten anyone paying attention. โ€“ Source
๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ”ฅ1
๐”…๐”ข ๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ฏ, ๐”Ÿ๐”ข ๐”ณ๐”ฆ๐”ค๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฑ;
๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐” ๐”ž๐”ฒ๐”ฐ๐”ข ๐”ถ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ ๐”ž๐”ก๐”ณ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ฐ๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”ถ ๐”ฑ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ก๐”ข๐”ณ๐”ฆ๐”ฉ,
๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ž ๐”ฏ๐”ฌ๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ฌ๐”ซ, ๐”ด๐”ž๐”ฉ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ฑ๐”ฅ ๐”ž๐”Ÿ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ,
๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ข๐”จ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค ๐”ด๐”ฅ๐”ฌ๐”ช ๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ช๐”ž๐”ถ ๐”ก๐”ข๐”ณ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ.

1 Pแด‡แด›แด‡ส€ 5:8

๐•ฌ๐–“๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–™ ๐•ป๐–†๐–™๐–๐–˜ แด€ส€แด„สœษชแด แด‡
๐Ÿ™9โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ1