Evolutionäre Zelle
64 subscribers
5.49K photos
1.58K videos
138 files
16.6K links
Eigentumsverhältnisse zum Tanzen bringen
Download Telegram
Evolutionäre Zelle
Das wäre die Konsequenz: "Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi meanwhile warned that continued attacks on the plant on Iran’s southern coast could eventually lead to radioactive fallout that would “end life in GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) capitals, not…
Al Jazeera weist auf die Gefahr für die Wasserversorgung der Golfstaaten bei einem direkten Angriff auf das Atomkraftwerk in Bushehr hin:

"There are also fears that damage at Bushehr could contaminate the waters of the entire Gulf region. Radioactive contamination would affect marine life in the area, and the Gulf’s shallowness could see the negative effects remain over a long period, research finds.

It would also affect drinking water supplies. Most Gulf countries lack groundwater and rely heavily on desalination of seawater. But desalination plants are not inherently built to filter radioactive material, and not all plants at the moment have the technologies required."

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/5/why-an-attack-on-bushehr-nuclear-plant-would-be-catastrophic-for-the-gulf
Evolutionäre Zelle
Tucker hat nen Exorzisten interviewt 🍿🍿🍿 https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-chad-ripperger-040326
Da hab ich ja nen echten Kaninchenbau bei YouTube entdeckt:

"Alle Zeit der Welt" ist ein Podcast, der sich auf die Geschichten von Randfiguren konzentriert. Die Folgen beleuchten die Leben und die Auswirkungen von Personen, die in der Vergangenheit oft übersehen wurden.

Durch Recherche und Humor bringen wir diese faszinierenden Geschichten zum Leben und geben ihnen die Aufmerksamkeit, die sie verdienen. Egal ob es sich dabei um mystische, esoterische, faschistische oder einfach nur absurde Ideen handelt, indem wir uns mit unserer Vergangenheit auseinandersetzen, können wir die Gegenwart besser verstehen und verhindern, dass sich die Geschichte wiederholt.

https://www.youtube.com/@allezeitderwelt
Im Alten Testament gibt es ein Korruptionsverbot:

"Du sollst dich nicht durch Geschenke bestechen lassen; denn Geschenke machen die Sehenden blind und verdrehen die Sache derer, die im Recht sind."

Kann das mal jemand dem Bibi sagen?

Und der "C"DU?
Forwarded from Angustam Viam
☀️🌿 Guten Tag – Ostermontag im Licht 🌿☀️

Die Sonne scheint
und trägt eine warme, lebendige Energie über die Erde.

Ostern wirkt noch nach…
eine Zeit der Erneuerung,
der Auferstehung
und des inneren Erwachens.

Dieser Ostermontag lädt dich ein,
das Licht nicht nur zu sehen –
sondern es in dir zu fühlen.

Spüre die Wärme der Sonne,
die Ruhe der Natur
und die Kraft deiner eigenen Seele. 🌿

Was neu begonnen hat,
darf jetzt wachsen.
Sanft, bewusst und geführt.

Gehe diesen Tag mit Leichtigkeit,
mit Dankbarkeit
und mit offenem Herzen.

Das Licht ist da –
in dir und um dich herum. ☀️

Angustam Viam
https://t.me/AngustamViam
https://t.me/boost/AngustamViam

CapelloBiancoQ
https://t.me/CapelloBiancoQ
https://t.me/boost/capellobiancoq

Rabatte und Empfehlungen
https://t.me/ViamEmpfehlungen
Evolutionäre Zelle
Interessant, das spricht erst mal für Version 3: https://tass.com/economy/2104105
Ach nee:

"The US produces a lot of crude. Record amounts, actually - around 13.6 million barrels a day in 2025. Nobody produces more. And yes, the US does export some of that crude to other countries.

But the US also imports crude. A lot of it. 6.2 million barrels a day, to be exact.
Do the math: 6.2 million barrels coming in, 4.0 million barrels going out. The US is a net importer of crude oil by 2.2 million barrels every single day. That’s the EIA’s own numbers - the official US government energy statistics agency.
So how does the “net exporter” story survive? Where does it come from?"

https://no01.substack.com/p/americas-energy-independence

Er beantwortet die Frage im nächsten Absatz:

"Welcome to the wonderful world of official terminology.
When politicians say “petroleum exports,” they don’t mean crude oil. They mean all petroleum products combined. And that definition includes something called natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Think propane, ethane, butane. These are gases that come out alongside natural gas when you drill (and in lesser quantities when you cook it). They’re not oil. You can’t put them in your car. Those are mainly used as feedstocks for plastics and petrochemicals, or for heating in some parts of the world.

The US produces enormous amounts of NGLs - far more than it needs domestically. So it exports them. In 2025, NGL exports hit a record 3.1 million barrels per day. Propane alone: 1.8 million barrels a day, shipped mostly to Asia.
Add all that together - crude exports plus NGL exports plus refined product exports - and suddenly the US looks like a net exporter of “petroleum”. Which is true, in the same way that a country that exports wine and imports grain is technically a ‘net agricultural exporter’. Try eating wine.
That’s the trick. The “net exporter” number is propped up by gas byproducts that have nothing to do with your gas tank."
Evolutionäre Zelle
Ach nee: "The US produces a lot of crude. Record amounts, actually - around 13.6 million barrels a day in 2025. Nobody produces more. And yes, the US does export some of that crude to other countries. But the US also imports crude. A lot of it. 6.2 million…
Das hat ja der Salim schon erklärt:

"The US produces light, sweet crude. “Light” means it flows easily. “Sweet” means low sulphur. It’s actually the good stuff - easier and cheaper to refine. The shale boom that made the US the world’s largest producer? Almost entirely light, sweet crude coming out of places like Texas and North Dakota.
The problem is that American refineries weren’t built for it.
Back in the 1970s and 80s, when the US was deeply dependent on Middle Eastern and Venezuelan oil, it built refineries to handle heavy, sour crude - the thick, high-sulphur stuff that’s harder to process but was widely available cheaply from abroad. Nearly 70% of US refinery capacity is optimised for that heavier crude. Then the shale boom happened, producing an ocean of light crude that most of those same refineries can’t efficiently process."

Die Info ist mir allerdings neu:

"Upgrading a refinery to switch between crude types costs between $100 million and $1 billion per facility. No1’s rushing to do that."
Evolutionäre Zelle
Das hat ja der Salim schon erklärt: "The US produces light, sweet crude. “Light” means it flows easily. “Sweet” means low sulphur. It’s actually the good stuff - easier and cheaper to refine. The shale boom that made the US the world’s largest producer? Almost…
Sein Fazit:

"When supply tightens globally, Europe faces both the higher global price and potential actual physical shortages. The US faces the higher global price but has enough domestic production to keep its refineries running - assuming it can solve the heavy crude gap and the refinery mismatch. It’s a real advantage. Just not the absolute immunity that the phrase “energy independent” implies."

https://no01.substack.com/p/americas-energy-independence

Das mit dem heavy crude & den Raffinerien hat Trump ja elegant mit der Maduro-Entführung gelöst...
Interessant, Moon of Alabama geht davon aus, dass diese "Rettungsmission" im Iran de facto der gescheiterte Versuch war, angereichertes Uran aus den Atomanlagen zu holen:

"The U.S. may have found and retrieved the F-15 officer. But that will have been tens of miles from the place near Isfahan where it lost two HC-130 transport planes and four MH-6 special force helicopters. That special force operation was most likely an attempt to steal enriched Uranian known to be hidden under a mountain somewhere around Isfahan. Such an operation was pre-viewed on April 1 by the Washington Post:

Risky commando plan to seize Iran’s uranium came at Trump’s request (archived)

It seems that the attempt ran into an ambush like situation and had to evacuate.

For details see how Will Schryver and Armchair Warlord are connecting the dots. Iranian analysts agree with their take."

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/04/war-on-iran-failed-special-operation-threat-escalation.html