Eric Dollard: Transverse & Longitudinal waves: Space & Counterspace
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RUykeXhO6o

In this video, Fractal Woman reframes Dollard's use of "spatial" and "counter-spatial" as describing a mechanical distinction rather than two literal regions or places. A transverse wave is spatial because it needs an external medium to propagate into. A longitudinal wave is counter-spatial because it does not, traveling through the bulk of a medium parallel to its direction of propagation rather than orthogonal to it. Mainstream physics accepts transverse electromagnetic waves but rejects the existence of longitudinal electromagnetic waves, which Dollard calls magneto-dielectric or dielectro-magnetic waves. The term "counter-space" has generated unnecessary confusion precisely because it sounds like a location rather than a propagation condition.

View the full referenced Borderland video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFa-IymyWHM

Outlaw Technology | Duncan Laurie
- https://www.duncanlaurie.com/writing/outlaw_technology/

Outlaw Technology began as a manual for artists on subtle energy through radionic and psychotronic technology, but evolved into a two-year email exchange between sculptor Duncan Laurie and John Norseen, a Lockheed Martin engineer employed by U.S. intelligence agencies to study the weaponization of the mind. Norseen's theoretical system, the "Norseen Semiotic," holds that 75% of the brain operates in a non-verbal, ineffable state, and that semiotics, the study of signs and symbols, is what bridges that non-verbal world into conscious thought. Every thought, he argues, generates an electromagnetic "brain print" that can be measured, inverted, and retransmitted back into the brain as an artificial signal, a process he calls "BioFusion," with direct applications in interrogation and psychological operations. Laurie observed that art-making, radionics, and BioFusion all perform the same operation: moving stored intent from a source into a receiver and producing a measurable biological response.
​
Running directly beneath the art-radionics convergence is the concept of "Reflexive Control," a state in which a sufficiently powerful semiotic signal overrides free will by triggering the brain's sex, violence, and religious circuits, which are anatomically co-located and cross-firing. Norseen calls the human brain a "sex, violence, religious pump," acutely open to external signals arriving through encrypted media, subliminal audio, electromagnetic frequencies, and drugs, with firing in one circuit automatically igniting the others. He connects this directly to the conditioning of suicide bombers, the Columbine shootings, and the murder of Russian psychologist Andrej Brushlinsky, whose stolen research on psychotronic thought-insertion he believed was immediately weaponized. The entire frequency range below 100 Hz, where all brain electrical activity occurs, remains unregulated, leaving no legal recourse for anyone harmed by technology operating there.
​
Laurie's counter-proposition is that the same mechanisms enabling control can enable liberation, provided the artist understands the technical terrain. His studio experiments, in which small voltages extracted from plants were converted into musical tones that the plants appeared to improvise upon in response to human emotional states, showed that intention operates as a biological signal capable of moving energy across living systems. Cleve Backster's plant consciousness research reinforced this: the plants responded not to raw emotion but to the semiotic structure of intent, the identical information-to-energy transaction at work in radionics and BioFusion. Art, on this reading, is a semiotic battery that stores and releases intent, and the physics governing military perception management can be turned toward expanding consciousness rather than narrowing it.

Other Radionic Writings by Duncan Laurie
- The Radionic Object
- Conversations with Eldon Byrd
- Rock Music
- Applied Radionics
- Celestial Cyberglyphs
- Interview with Duncan Laurie
- Download his main book The Secret Art HERE

The Archetypal Plant and the Living Mind of Nature | Theoria Press
https://theoriapress.wordpress.com/2019/04/16/goethean-science-3-3-the-archetypal-plant/

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe developed a mode of scientific inquiry grounded in direct perceptual experience rather than abstract theorizing. He drew a sharp line between two types of knowers: the speculative type, who thinks about nature from a distance, and the intuitive type, who thinks things directly, as Goethe himself put it: "my perception itself is a thinking, and my thinking a perception." This tension surfaced most visibly in his confrontation with Schiller, who dismissed Goethe's sketch of the Urpflanze as an idea rather than experience. He replied that he was glad to have ideas without knowing it, and to see them with his own eyes. The Urpflanze, or archetypal plant, is not a fixed form but a potency in time. Closer to the melody of a brook than a static shape, it is capable of becoming all plant forms through transformations governed by two principles: Polarität (polarity) and Steigerung (the gradual intensification or enhancement of a living form toward higher expression).

These same principles organize his 1790 work The Metamorphosis of Plants, where the leaf is identified as the "true Proteus" whose plastic potency shifts into every plant organ, from calyx to petal to fruit to seed. Expansion and contraction, light and darkness, flower and seed: the plant's seasonal arc embodies a rhythmic pulse running through the whole of organic life. This way of knowing stands in direct opposition to modern science's distrust of the senses, which Goethe criticized plainly: "Man himself, to the extent that he makes use of his healthy senses, is the greatest and most precise physical apparatus that can exist." Where modern science severs the experiment from the human being, Goethe's zarte Empirie (delicate empiricism) calls for the scientist's own perceptive faculties to undergo the same Steigerung (intensification) as the blossoming plant itself.

Reversal as the Governing Principle of Perception, Light, and Time | Max Leyf of Theoria Press
- Time and the Archetype of Reversal: Peripeteia, or the Flip
- The Archetype of Reversal: On Light and Thought
- The Archetype of Reversal: Peripeteia, or the Flip in Perception and Thinking

In everyday perception, percepts arrive whole: the senses deliver their objects to consciousness without requiring special effort on the subject's part. What the mind must do is supply the concepts that make those percepts intelligible. Rudolf Steiner, in The Philosophy of Freedom, describes what happens when this arrangement inverts. Through an intensified attentiveness to thinking itself, thinking ceases to be only the instrument of cognition and becomes its object. In this "exceptional state," the concepts are already there, given in themselves, but not yet present to consciousness. The "I" must now produce the awareness rather than the content. Steiner marks the pivot: "the object of observation is qualitatively identical with the activity directed upon it." In Aristotelian terms, ordinary cognition delivers the matter and asks the "I" to supply the form; transcendental cognition delivers the form and asks the "I" to supply the matter. Thinking is the inflection point that makes movement between these two states possible.

Light and thinking share a structural parallel that is easy to miss. Light itself never appears to the eye; it becomes visible only when it strikes something and dies in opacity. Goethe named these poles Licht and Finsternis, and colour occupies the living interval between them. Thinking works the same way: it becomes conscious only through its own extinction in a determinate thought. The author uses Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity as a conceptual scaffold here, arguing that light takes 13.8 billion years to cross the visible universe while a thought spans the same distance in an instant, and that at the threshold of light speed, time dilation becomes infinite and the ordinary equation of travel collapses. On this basis, thinking is positioned as operating beyond that threshold, in a dimension orthogonal to physical space where time runs in reverse. What is called "light" on one side of this causal boundary is called "thinking" on the other: light equals the speed of causality quantitatively, while thinking is identical to the essence of causality qualitatively. Time itself, stripped of any concrete substance and left as pure abstracted change, "the ghost of change," operates as a product of distance and desire. Experiential time slows in direct proportion to both, and infinite patience is equivalent to infinite time dilation.

The Redemption of Thinking | Max Leyf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVrIS_fq2Rk

This is Max Leyf's doctoral dissertation defense, and it opens at a paradox: we stand at what looks like the height of scientific knowledge, and yet our relation to truth feels more tenuous by the day. Steven Weinberg observed in 1977 that "the more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it just seems pointless." John Vervaeke calls this the meaning crisis. Part one locates the philosophical root of that crisis in the hard problem of consciousness, as coined by David Chalmers. Brain states are simply what they are: spatially bounded. Mind states are never just what they are; they are always about something. Nothing about the outside of a thing, by itself, explains its inside, and the hard problem is not a puzzle waiting for more data; it is a symptom of the paradigm that poses it, an artifact of a framework that treats brain and mind as equivalent kinds of object when they are not.

Part two proposes Goethe's way of knowledge as a corrective. Goethe wrote in Faust that science must "first seek the spirit to expel" before it can break a living thing into components, and his method moves the other direction: less like accumulating propositions about a thing and more like getting to know a person, where the facts become a vessel for something closer to understanding. His study of plant morphology makes this concrete: a tulip is not only the purple bloom of spring. Half the year it lives underground, the color of dirt, and to know only the spring flower is to know only a noun where Goethe insists on a verb. Getting to know the tulip means following it through every phase of its cycle the way you follow a melody, allowing it to unfold through careful, patient attention.​

Part three carries Goethe's method into history itself. Together with Owen Barfield's work on the evolution of consciousness, the dissertation reads the arc from ancient mythologies through the pre-Socratics and into modernity not as a march of progress but as a gradual contraction. What began as a diffuse, participatory relation to the cosmos, still visible in the way myths speak where the boundary between self and world is porous, slowly condensed into the atomized private centers of modern subjectivity. Mind did not emerge from unconscious matter; what was once cosmic has been individuated inward, and the ancient mythologies, read through that lens, stop looking like primitive error and start looking like a family history. That picture is the antidote to the feeling with which the dissertation began: not a cosmic orphan on a dust speck, but an inheritor of a very long story.

Part four turns to Rudolf Steiner, for whom the fundamental polarity the knower faces is not brain versus mind but percept (Wahrnehmung) and concept (Begriff): what the senses deliver and what thinking supplies. The world is integrally one, and knowledge is the act of reuniting what perception and thought have temporarily pulled apart. Thinking, in this account, is not an activity inside heads; it is the element of the cosmos through which truth is neither simply found nor arbitrarily constructed, but participated in and brought into creation at the same time. The redemption of thinking is the recovery of thought as a living, world-disclosing act.

SCAMMER ALERT:

There is someone who has stolen the username for the public chat and is trying to scam me into buying it back.

His username is @aetherforcepubdiscussion and has Richard as his profile name.

If you click on any links for Aether Force and are redirected to him please notify me immediately at operator@aetherforce.energy

Also, please help report his profile. The more reports the better.

Thank you for your support.

Seems like this is the only way to report:

"If you come across a channel impersonating you, please report it from the channel profile > "⋮" > Scam or Spam > Impersonation.

Individual users can be reported to @notoscam. Please ensure your report includes the username of the impersonating account, a description of the situation, and any evidence you have that the account is fake.

Note that volunteers from the Telegram Support Force can't help with such reports."

"It is no exaggeration to say that the future of civilization depends on the degree to which we can balance the forces of science and religion." - A.N. Whitehead in 1925

Excerpts on the Future of Science from SunSpace by Olive Whicher

NOTE: All of Olive Whicher's books have been scanned by me and made available in the private chate.

"Science, in its materialism, has temporarily lost sight of the human being and of the living aspect of nature, but it has freed itself from mysticism and from the influence of traditional beliefs. Steiner saw the non-Euclidean geometries of the 19th century, and above all modern Synthetic or Projective Geometry, as significant evidence of a new and free activity of modern thinkers . He called for the further development of Synthetic Geometry to provide the necessary mathematical forms of thought to counterbalance the one-sidedly analytical nature of materialistic science."

...

"A scientist well known in the modern world, once his thesis has been to some extent accepted, can afford to write-or let others write-in a popular style about work not always easily accessible to his readers . In a science arising out of Anthroposophy, very great care must be taken, because the borderline between it and what might be termed "pseudo-science" may become confused, and false impressions may arise. Anthroposophy is based on clear thinking and not on any vague mysticism or outworn dogma; it is in this sense that it is modern.

Reductionism is a necessary phase in science, but only a phase; it is a way of thinking which deals efficiently with what has already been created, especially in the field of inanimate nature. Today, however, research into the living organism reveals problems, such as "organisation" in biology-and in other spheres of life-calling forth questions concerning the creative process and the origin of life. Where are the boundaries of Science today? With this question, science is at a threshold.

Rudolf Steiner points the way across this threshold, in terms of modern and future ways of thinking. He does not negate materialism, but shows how to transcend it, while preserving the exactness and clarity of thought upon which the purely materialistic way of thinking is based. This, in itself, belongs to the evolution of human consciousness.

It has provided mankind with great power, in the observation of natural phenomena through the microscope and the telescope in the laboratory, the clinic and in the field. Mathematics is the handmaiden of science, but it is an art, and like all arts, it relates to deep truths of existence. It is a mode of expression which is born of sense-free thinking; among its many aspects is geometry and herein lies its kinship with imagination."

...

"Just as it is when looking back into memories of childhood, so also into our time there shines the light of a Golden Age, a time which was, before mankind had descended into the dust and turmoil of the present materialistic civilisation.

Just as the child in growing up gradually comes out of a dream world to meet the gl4re of everyday ''normality'' , so in the scientific age men throw away poetry and religion and concentrate hard on external, material sides of existence.

This is really as it should be, if all that is left of religion is an empty phrase, depending only on belief. For it is indeed the task of our time to go beyond mere belief and begin to know again . We must regain access to those lost worlds of experience, without losing the hard won footholds of an earthly consciousness. It is an adult, day-waking consciousness which the modern world provides, based as it is on the clear thinking which sustains mechanics and physics.

To turn away from science, however materialistic, seeking consolation and relief only in the beautiful pictures and sayings of the past, is to go to sleep again and will be of little avail. The task is to struggle through, until the pictures and the words come alive again, to be experienced not only as beauty but as truth by the individual. Then it is the individual who knows , and it will not be a question of relying on faith or belief. This will be future science.

The paths to such experiences have always been there in the past and they are still to be found . What is different today is that the search takes its start from the bricks and mortar, the rubble of a fallen citadel. To materialistic science-to the honest thinker in this field-the spirit cannot exist and the soul is a rather puzzling attribute of the body, and yet no-one can deny the presence of life. But what is it, and where does it originate?"

...

"Taking his start from the phenomena. Goethe struggled to grasp the formative principle as such. He reached a certain degree of understanding; what he inaugurated has to be taken further (Dornach 6. IV.1921 ). Rudolf Steiner's conception of the world of formative forces has indeed taken Goethe's steps further, and this must in its turn be developed still further to meet the questions of modern biology.

The etheric or etherea12 world (Aetherwelt)-a realm through which cosmic, formative forces work-has been known since time immemorial in the old instinctive ways of the past. It needs now to become a guiding idea and recognised principle in science. The physical, material body of a living form, which can be studied by means of the physical senses, is permeated by supersensible members, named variously by Eastern teachings.

Rudolf Steiner describes them as the etheric or life-body, the astral body, which is the seat of feeling and sensation, and the ego, or spiritual individuality. Plants are permeated by an etheric world , animals by an ether and an astral body and the human being by both ether body and astral body and also by the individual ego or spirit.

The inhibitions of the materialistic scientist towards ideas of this sort are fully justified, for admittedly, science is based on its analytical and quantitative method of approach to substance, however refined the substance in question may be . The analytical method has led to the concept of the infinitesimal worlds of the atom and its particles, the cell and its minute parts. Every particle of substance, qua substance, is subject in a greater or lesser degree to the law of gravity and other laws of physics.

In fact, however, it is the material body, the so-called physical body, which is subject to the known laws of physics. The corpse lies inert when life and soul and spirit have departed from it. The ether body is subject to laws of an opposite kind, and it is only by virtue of the laws of the ether-body that the astral and ego forces can work into the physical body, for they too are supersensible and not bound to the laws of the material world.

...

It is not yet a very widely known fact that just as ancient geometry gives the mathematical basis by means of which to conceptualise the laws of space and the laws of classical mechanics, so projective or synthetic geometry provides equally clear conceptual access to their polar counterpart, the laws of a world of processes which permeate and take hold of substance.

Rudolf Steiner called on the scientists and particularly the mathematicians in his audiences to think clearly about the forces working in and through what he called ethereal, or negative space (Gegenraum); he described these forces as being polar opposite to the known mechanical forces. He saw the transition from the analytical aspect of mathematics to that which introduces synthesis, as significant for science in that it provides '' an inner way of thinking which leads towards the reality present in an outer realm of nature.'' It does this in such a way that ''the same inner experience is reached as when one rises from the ordinary grasp of a concept to a spiritual imagination. " At the same time he warns of the danger of taking hold of this realm of mathematics
in "the narrow way in which it is still often understood today" (5 IV.21).

Goethe held back from the abstract and quantitative aspect of mathematics because it was qualities he was seeking. Rudolf Steiner, too, was concerned with qualities and he took this view also; it is as an art that the new mathematical approach to morphology inspires ways of thinking and conceiving which are new.

Just as a long and devoted training-or a genius-gives birth to art, so it is with the transformation of natural science and its further development beyond the present materialistic phase.

Since the time of Descartes, modern physics has continued in the Euclidean tradition and based itself on the concept of the point. It has, as it were, delved into the point and reached the infinitesimal worlds! Now it is time to balance things out and bring to bear the polar concepts, the plane and the peripheral aspect of forms. The task is not to contradict, but to complement the findings of science and to begin to look at all the amazing data provided by modern techniques, in ways that will raise science to other dimensions . Not that the answers will be just round the corner, but perhaps the right questions will be asked."

Maurice Consoli's Aether audit, proving Dayton Miller right, Einstein wrong, and that Michelson-Morley found the Aether drag
https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/maurice-consolis-aether-audit-proving?r=2clcce&triedRedirect=true

The historical readings of the Michelson Morley and related ether drift experiments misclassified small but persistent anisotropies as “null results” because they were interpreted through an assumed vacuum, rather than through the possibility of a partially entrained aetheric medium coupled to Earth’s mass. Maurizio Consoli was an auditor of both Michelson Morley and Dayton Miller, claiming he statistically confirmed Miller’s 10 km per second ether wind signal at Mount Wilson as a real stochastic aether background tied to Earth’s motion and correlated with the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background, while also linking the mathematical tools of modern quantum field theory and the Standard Model to an effectively superfluid vacuum that, in practice, re-introduces an aether like substrate under different terminology.

Consoli’s asserts that space is a viscous, high pressure fluid medium rather than a vacuum, that the CMB and redshift are signatures of light interacting with this medium rather than relics of a Big Bang, and that both Consoli’s moving Earth through a dynamic aether and Allais Brahe style stationary Earth with moving aether can fit the same data, thereby rendering relativity, the standard cosmological model, and associated vacuum based assumptions as fraudulent constructs upheld by “Scientism” while experiments like Miller’s, Sagnac’s, GPS and fiber optics engineering are said to presuppose and confirm an anisotropic, mechanical aetheric cosmos.

How an Electrical Map Can Override the DNA Blueprint | Biolumination
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW9xbAo0RYM

"What if anatomy isn’t stored only in DNA?

In this episode, we explore groundbreaking experiments from Michael Levin’s lab showing that regeneration can be permanently altered by manipulating bioelectric communication, without editing a single gene.

Planarian flatworms can regrow entire heads and tails. But when researchers briefly disrupted gap junction signaling, something astonishing happened. Some worms regenerated with two heads. Others looked completely normal, yet carried a hidden state that revealed itself only after being cut again.

The change wasn’t visible in gene markers. It wasn’t visible in stem cell distribution. It showed up in voltage.

Using voltage-sensitive dyes, researchers discovered that “cryptic” worms carried a hidden electrical pattern. That electrical signature predicted future anatomy. And when they deliberately shifted membrane voltage in the opposite direction, some double-headed worms reset back to normal.

This suggests that bioelectric gradients may act as a distributed control layer - a map that stores and modifies anatomical information.

If biology can store pattern memory in voltage, regeneration may be guided not just by genes, but by an editable electrical blueprint."

Publication discussed in the video:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349517304277

The Liquid Crystal Body: The New Physics of Living Matter | BioLumination
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HucZ1AKrzQY

" There is a phase of matter that responds to electric fields, magnetic fields, vibration, and light. It bends light. It converts pressure into voltage. It reorganizes under gentle influence.

And it exists inside you.

Liquid crystals are not just the material behind display screens. They appear in cell membranes, collagen-rich connective tissue, cytoskeletal filaments, and even densely packed DNA. These are not rigid solids, and they are not chaotic liquids. They are aligned, dynamic, and field-sensitive states of matter.

In this episode, we explore what a crystal actually is, what makes a liquid crystal distinct, and where these phases appear in biology. From birefringence to piezoelectric collagen, from membrane voltage to structured water, we follow the physics into living tissue.

When electricity, magnetism, vibration, and light interact with organized biological matter, they are not meeting randomness. They are meeting alignment. And that possibility reshapes how we think about life itself."


Timestamps:
0:00 There is a hidden phase of matter inside you
0:42 What is a crystal? Order, anisotropy, coupling
3:35 What is a liquid crystal? Order without rigidity
7:23 Where liquid crystals appear in the body
13:08 How liquid crystals couple to forces
14:39 Speculation: alignment, coherence, and life

Paramagnetism & DiaMagnetism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u36QpPvEh2c

Paramagnetism and diamagnetism describe how different materials respond when placed in a magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials such as aluminum, oxygen, gadolinium oxide and cupric sulfate are weakly attracted toward the stronger region of the field and lose this behavior once the field is removed. Diamagnetic materials such as water, glass, pyrolytic graphite, bismuth and superconductors are always weakly repelled and tend to move or rotate toward regions where the magnetic field is weaker, regardless of which pole is nearby.