Goethe's Scientific Method and Paradigm Change: The Example of Projective Geometry
https://www.academia.edu/105137678/Goethes_Scientific_Method_and_Paradigm_Change_The_Example_of_Projective_Geometry
"No phenomenon can explain itself through or out of itself; only many, seen together, systematically ordered, eventually give what could be considered a theory.” - J.W. von Goethe
"By training the scientist “not to reduce phenomena to a scheme but, rather, to remain inwardly mobile”, Goethe’s method provides “the ground from which all our Vorstellungsarten – all scientific ‘paradigms’ – arise”. Goethe focused his scientific activity on botany and chromatics “above all because of their propaedeutic value”. The propaedeutic value of these examples is to lead the scientist to what “moves between the paradigms, the source of the revolutions themselves” and thereby develop the “mobility of one’s thinking and imagination, upon which the ‘metamorphosis of the scientist’ and, with it, the growth of science depend”. "
Goethe's Methods is 3 steps according to Projective Geometric Principles:
"1) In the first stage we collect observations within a particular domain. We transition to the second stage when we see a lawfulness to our observations, in this case a polarity between point and plane.
2) In the second stage we look systematically for instances of this lawfulness. In doing so we also become aware of the paradigm in which we are operating. In particular, at some point we find that the lawfulness we discovered contradicts
elements of the current paradigm, here the parallel postulate. This lawfulness is thus not a higher principle in the current paradigm. We have now reached as far as we can go in the current paradigm.
3) In order to reach the third stage, we need to hold on to the idea of polarity – and shape a new paradigm around this lawfulness, making it into a higher principle in the new paradigm. An aspect of the old paradigm is rejected and the old paradigm is transformed into the new paradigm. In this example Euclidian geometry is transformed into projective geometry by rejecting the parallel postulate, which then leads to the plane at infinity being included as a geometrical element.
The example of the transition from Euclidean to projective geometry considered here illustrates what happens when we progress from the second to the third stage of Goethe’s method: we change the paradigm. This example also shows that this transition is a transformation of the old paradigm, not its rejection. Amrine rightly notes that scientific revolution requires a new way of seeing and thereby the metamorphosis of the scientist. But if there is to be growth in science, this revolution also needs to be a metamorphosis of the paradigm."
https://www.academia.edu/105137678/Goethes_Scientific_Method_and_Paradigm_Change_The_Example_of_Projective_Geometry
"No phenomenon can explain itself through or out of itself; only many, seen together, systematically ordered, eventually give what could be considered a theory.” - J.W. von Goethe
"By training the scientist “not to reduce phenomena to a scheme but, rather, to remain inwardly mobile”, Goethe’s method provides “the ground from which all our Vorstellungsarten – all scientific ‘paradigms’ – arise”. Goethe focused his scientific activity on botany and chromatics “above all because of their propaedeutic value”. The propaedeutic value of these examples is to lead the scientist to what “moves between the paradigms, the source of the revolutions themselves” and thereby develop the “mobility of one’s thinking and imagination, upon which the ‘metamorphosis of the scientist’ and, with it, the growth of science depend”. "
Goethe's Methods is 3 steps according to Projective Geometric Principles:
"1) In the first stage we collect observations within a particular domain. We transition to the second stage when we see a lawfulness to our observations, in this case a polarity between point and plane.
2) In the second stage we look systematically for instances of this lawfulness. In doing so we also become aware of the paradigm in which we are operating. In particular, at some point we find that the lawfulness we discovered contradicts
elements of the current paradigm, here the parallel postulate. This lawfulness is thus not a higher principle in the current paradigm. We have now reached as far as we can go in the current paradigm.
3) In order to reach the third stage, we need to hold on to the idea of polarity – and shape a new paradigm around this lawfulness, making it into a higher principle in the new paradigm. An aspect of the old paradigm is rejected and the old paradigm is transformed into the new paradigm. In this example Euclidian geometry is transformed into projective geometry by rejecting the parallel postulate, which then leads to the plane at infinity being included as a geometrical element.
The example of the transition from Euclidean to projective geometry considered here illustrates what happens when we progress from the second to the third stage of Goethe’s method: we change the paradigm. This example also shows that this transition is a transformation of the old paradigm, not its rejection. Amrine rightly notes that scientific revolution requires a new way of seeing and thereby the metamorphosis of the scientist. But if there is to be growth in science, this revolution also needs to be a metamorphosis of the paradigm."
⚡2
The Periodic Table of Tarot: A Goethean Inquiry into the Elements as Archetypes | A. McKee
https://www.academia.edu/145719390/The_Periodic_Table_of_Tarot_A_Goethean_Inquiry_into_the_Elements_as_Archetypes
"Alchemy, tarot, and the periodic table of elements are often understood as distinct systems—one mystical, one divinatory, and one scientific. Yet, each functions as a structured map of fundamental forces that govern transformation. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s phenomenological method—an approach that emphasizes direct perception, holistic relationships, and dynamic observation—this paper explores how the periodic table can be reimagined as an esoteric system akin to tarot’s archetypal structure.
Goethe rejected mechanistic scientific methods in favor of immersive, direct engagement with natural phenomena. His method aligns with Indigenous knowledge systems, which, as Tyson Yunkaporta describes in Sand Talk, emphasize relational thinking rather than strict categorization. Similarly, C.G. Jung saw symbols in alchemy, mythology, and modern psychology as living, evolving representations of unconscious forces. In C.G. Jung and the Sioux Traditions, Vine Deloria describes Jung’s approach as one in which “the descent into matter requires the identity of the outside with the inside” (Deloria, p. 78).
This paper incorporates perspectives from Alva Noë’s Strange Tools and W.J.T. Mitchell’s What Do Pictures Want?, arguing that the periodic table and tarot function as living symbolic systems rather than static classifications. I explore how matter, archetypes, and consciousness intersect by shifting from a reductionist view of elements to a dynamic, relational understanding."
https://www.academia.edu/145719390/The_Periodic_Table_of_Tarot_A_Goethean_Inquiry_into_the_Elements_as_Archetypes
"Alchemy, tarot, and the periodic table of elements are often understood as distinct systems—one mystical, one divinatory, and one scientific. Yet, each functions as a structured map of fundamental forces that govern transformation. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s phenomenological method—an approach that emphasizes direct perception, holistic relationships, and dynamic observation—this paper explores how the periodic table can be reimagined as an esoteric system akin to tarot’s archetypal structure.
Goethe rejected mechanistic scientific methods in favor of immersive, direct engagement with natural phenomena. His method aligns with Indigenous knowledge systems, which, as Tyson Yunkaporta describes in Sand Talk, emphasize relational thinking rather than strict categorization. Similarly, C.G. Jung saw symbols in alchemy, mythology, and modern psychology as living, evolving representations of unconscious forces. In C.G. Jung and the Sioux Traditions, Vine Deloria describes Jung’s approach as one in which “the descent into matter requires the identity of the outside with the inside” (Deloria, p. 78).
This paper incorporates perspectives from Alva Noë’s Strange Tools and W.J.T. Mitchell’s What Do Pictures Want?, arguing that the periodic table and tarot function as living symbolic systems rather than static classifications. I explore how matter, archetypes, and consciousness intersect by shifting from a reductionist view of elements to a dynamic, relational understanding."
🔥4
Proteus | Benjamin D Schluter
https://www.academia.edu/161281990/Proteus_Proteus_
"In this entry to the Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, I situate Goethe’s “protean” model of metamorphosis vis-à-vis his engagement with maritime environments and literature, specifically Homer’s Odyssey, during the period of the Italian journey. As a symbol, I argue, Proteus played an especially important role in Goethe’s dynamic reconception of natural forms as well as his rebuttal to the “terrestrially biased” imagery of Carl Linnaeus, who construed the formal characteristics of plants through metaphors of geographical enclosure. Additionally, I consider how Goethe’s “protean” botany informed his theory of natural types (Typen) and prepared his theory and practice of science as “zarte Empirie." By reading the mythical figure of Proteus back into the adjective “protean,” which is used to characterize Goethe’s view of nature in his scientific and poetic writings, we can uncover a uniquely Goethean conception of metamorphosis and creativity."
https://www.academia.edu/161281990/Proteus_Proteus_
"In this entry to the Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, I situate Goethe’s “protean” model of metamorphosis vis-à-vis his engagement with maritime environments and literature, specifically Homer’s Odyssey, during the period of the Italian journey. As a symbol, I argue, Proteus played an especially important role in Goethe’s dynamic reconception of natural forms as well as his rebuttal to the “terrestrially biased” imagery of Carl Linnaeus, who construed the formal characteristics of plants through metaphors of geographical enclosure. Additionally, I consider how Goethe’s “protean” botany informed his theory of natural types (Typen) and prepared his theory and practice of science as “zarte Empirie." By reading the mythical figure of Proteus back into the adjective “protean,” which is used to characterize Goethe’s view of nature in his scientific and poetic writings, we can uncover a uniquely Goethean conception of metamorphosis and creativity."
👍2
Goethe's Phenomenology of Nature: A Juvenilization of Science | Trond Skaftnesmo
https://www.academia.edu/1206949/Goethes_Phenomenology_of_Nature_A_Juvenilization_of_Science?rhid=38084254222&swp=rr-rw-wc-105137678&nav_from=3780bfca-559f-4cb0-8ba7-9bd401735e1c
"Empirical science is not a mere collection of facts. It builds theories and frames hypotheses within those theories. Empirical theories are stated as plausible answers to questions we pose to nature. According to the Galilean-Baconian tradition within science, these questions should basically explore the causes of observed phenomena, and further be restricted to the measurable and quantitative realm. Thus, the answers are generally expected to explain the effective causes behind the actual phenomena. By framing falsifiable hypotheses, the theories are tested against the empirical foundation on which they rest. In this way we try to relieve science from false theories. Thus, we have two epistemological levels: First, the theoretical level; the scientific theory explaining the phenomena, and second, the empirical level; the phenomena or facts verifying or falsifying those theories. According to the poet and multi-scientist Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), there is however another way of science, namely an approach where these two levels fuse and become one. Goethe intended this approach to be a complementation of the Galilean-Baconian method, more than an alternative. He considered his "hypothesis-free method" to be a more comprehensive and secure way to understand nature. Whereas the Galilean-Baconian method aimed at explaining the effective causes of natural phenomena, in order to control and exploit nature for technical and industrial purposes, Goethe aimed at an exposition of the inherent meaning of the phenomena.We will explore, exemplify and discuss this approach with reference to the inherently Goethean phenomenology of evolution credited to the Dutch anatomist Louis Bolk (1866-1930), later commented and complemented by Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002) and Jos Verhulst (1949 ). In the course of this presentation we will outline the Goethean approach as a method representing a juvenilization or in Bolk's terms, a fetalization of science."
https://www.academia.edu/1206949/Goethes_Phenomenology_of_Nature_A_Juvenilization_of_Science?rhid=38084254222&swp=rr-rw-wc-105137678&nav_from=3780bfca-559f-4cb0-8ba7-9bd401735e1c
"Empirical science is not a mere collection of facts. It builds theories and frames hypotheses within those theories. Empirical theories are stated as plausible answers to questions we pose to nature. According to the Galilean-Baconian tradition within science, these questions should basically explore the causes of observed phenomena, and further be restricted to the measurable and quantitative realm. Thus, the answers are generally expected to explain the effective causes behind the actual phenomena. By framing falsifiable hypotheses, the theories are tested against the empirical foundation on which they rest. In this way we try to relieve science from false theories. Thus, we have two epistemological levels: First, the theoretical level; the scientific theory explaining the phenomena, and second, the empirical level; the phenomena or facts verifying or falsifying those theories. According to the poet and multi-scientist Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), there is however another way of science, namely an approach where these two levels fuse and become one. Goethe intended this approach to be a complementation of the Galilean-Baconian method, more than an alternative. He considered his "hypothesis-free method" to be a more comprehensive and secure way to understand nature. Whereas the Galilean-Baconian method aimed at explaining the effective causes of natural phenomena, in order to control and exploit nature for technical and industrial purposes, Goethe aimed at an exposition of the inherent meaning of the phenomena.We will explore, exemplify and discuss this approach with reference to the inherently Goethean phenomenology of evolution credited to the Dutch anatomist Louis Bolk (1866-1930), later commented and complemented by Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002) and Jos Verhulst (1949 ). In the course of this presentation we will outline the Goethean approach as a method representing a juvenilization or in Bolk's terms, a fetalization of science."
👍4
Newton’s Experimentum Crucis vs. Goethe’s Series of Experiments: Implications for the Underdetermination Thesis
| James Marcum
https://www.academia.edu/110958119/Newton_s_Experimentum_Crucis_vs_Goethe_s_Series_of_Experiments_Implications_for_the_Underdetermination_Thesis
"In the seventeenth century, Isaac Newton conducted experiments to determine the nature of the relationship between sunlight and colored rays. These experiments are reported in a paper presented at the Royal Society of London and published in its Transactions. According to Newton, sunlight is com posed of a “Heterogeneous mixture of differently refrangible Rays.” The theory, he claimed, is established on a single experiment, an experimentum crucis, in which he refracted sunlight with a prism into its color spectrum—each colored ray with a specific angle of refraction. With a second prism, he demonstrated that the refracted rays of color could no longer be dispersed further. Importantly, the crucial experiment permitted Newton to distinguish his theory of light and color from competing theories, such as Descartes’ notion of light as rotating globules.
In a critique of Newton’s experimentum crucis, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe claimed that Newton’s theory of color is an artificial construct of the human intellect and is not derived from nature itself. Goethe argued that Newton constructed experiments based on an artificial order rather than on a natural order. The result of Newton’s artificial method—based on an experimentum crucis—is a distorted view of nature. In contrast, Goethe devised and conducted experiments in which he altered the conditions of the experiments in terms of the prism’s refracting angle, the distance from the subject to the prism, and the object viewed. Whereas Newton concluded that colorless sunlight is primary and colored light secondary or illusory, Goethe concluded that color is not simply secondary but primary.
In a well known essay Der Versuch als Vermittler von Objekt und Subjekt, Goethe argued that experiments act as mediators between the objective and the subjective. According to Goethe, experiments allow scientists to “re-create natural or artificial
phenomena” in an attempt to bridge the gap between their ideas about a natural object and the object itself. As mediators, experiments are the means scientists often use to navigate between how they think nature functions as articulated in their theories and hypotheses (the subjective) and how nature actually functions (the objective). In other words, experiments in general allow scientists to link or connect their epistemic claims— claims that assert something about nature—with the ontological dimension of nature or “the way nature is,” especially within the confines of a laboratory experience. Based on a holistic approach, Goethe pro posed the notion of “series of experiments” as mediators. According to Goethe, an experimental series is “a series of contiguous experiments derived from one another.” In other words, the empirical outcome of one
series of experiments implies the undertaking of another series. Through sequential empirical implications, series of experiments are derived one from another and thereby act as mediators to link scientific theories and hypotheses about natural phenomena with the experience of those phenomena, especially in the laboratory. The derivation of these experiments through their empirical implications forms a singular experiment and unitary evidence for linking nature and theory. “Studied thoroughly and understood as a whole,” concluded Goethe, “these experiments could even be thought of as representing
a single experiment, a single piece of empirical evidence.”
| James Marcum
https://www.academia.edu/110958119/Newton_s_Experimentum_Crucis_vs_Goethe_s_Series_of_Experiments_Implications_for_the_Underdetermination_Thesis
"In the seventeenth century, Isaac Newton conducted experiments to determine the nature of the relationship between sunlight and colored rays. These experiments are reported in a paper presented at the Royal Society of London and published in its Transactions. According to Newton, sunlight is com posed of a “Heterogeneous mixture of differently refrangible Rays.” The theory, he claimed, is established on a single experiment, an experimentum crucis, in which he refracted sunlight with a prism into its color spectrum—each colored ray with a specific angle of refraction. With a second prism, he demonstrated that the refracted rays of color could no longer be dispersed further. Importantly, the crucial experiment permitted Newton to distinguish his theory of light and color from competing theories, such as Descartes’ notion of light as rotating globules.
In a critique of Newton’s experimentum crucis, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe claimed that Newton’s theory of color is an artificial construct of the human intellect and is not derived from nature itself. Goethe argued that Newton constructed experiments based on an artificial order rather than on a natural order. The result of Newton’s artificial method—based on an experimentum crucis—is a distorted view of nature. In contrast, Goethe devised and conducted experiments in which he altered the conditions of the experiments in terms of the prism’s refracting angle, the distance from the subject to the prism, and the object viewed. Whereas Newton concluded that colorless sunlight is primary and colored light secondary or illusory, Goethe concluded that color is not simply secondary but primary.
In a well known essay Der Versuch als Vermittler von Objekt und Subjekt, Goethe argued that experiments act as mediators between the objective and the subjective. According to Goethe, experiments allow scientists to “re-create natural or artificial
phenomena” in an attempt to bridge the gap between their ideas about a natural object and the object itself. As mediators, experiments are the means scientists often use to navigate between how they think nature functions as articulated in their theories and hypotheses (the subjective) and how nature actually functions (the objective). In other words, experiments in general allow scientists to link or connect their epistemic claims— claims that assert something about nature—with the ontological dimension of nature or “the way nature is,” especially within the confines of a laboratory experience. Based on a holistic approach, Goethe pro posed the notion of “series of experiments” as mediators. According to Goethe, an experimental series is “a series of contiguous experiments derived from one another.” In other words, the empirical outcome of one
series of experiments implies the undertaking of another series. Through sequential empirical implications, series of experiments are derived one from another and thereby act as mediators to link scientific theories and hypotheses about natural phenomena with the experience of those phenomena, especially in the laboratory. The derivation of these experiments through their empirical implications forms a singular experiment and unitary evidence for linking nature and theory. “Studied thoroughly and understood as a whole,” concluded Goethe, “these experiments could even be thought of as representing
a single experiment, a single piece of empirical evidence.”
According to Goethe the series of experiments, as mediator between the subjective and objective, provides “empirical evidence of a higher sort.” This notion of higher evidence bridges the gap between the epistemic claims of a theory and the ontological dimension of nature, through the sequence of empirical implications from one experimental series to the next. Just as in mathematics axioms are connected by their logical implications, so, claimed Goethe, in an analogous but not identical fashion, in experimental science empirical implications connect one experimental series to another: “These pieces of evidence may be expressed in concise axioms and set side by side, and as more of them emerge they may be ordered and related. Like mathematical axioms they will remain unshakable either singly or as a whole.” Thus, the greater the number of outcomes from
a variety of different experimental series that are contiguously connected and ordered through their empirical implications and that support the relevant theory, the better substantiated it is. Of course, the gap between nature and theory cannot be completely bridged no matter how many contiguously connected experiments are performed, as Goethe recognized, because no experimental evidence captures completely the complexity of causal interactions present in nature.
Goethe’s notions of series of experiments as mediator and of higher empirical evidence have important implications for the contemporary philosophical underdetermination thesis. Briefly, the thesis states that experimental evidence is inadequate to choose among competing theories. However, in light of Goethe’s notions, empirical evidence can support, to diverse degrees, competing theories because portions of that evidence support each of the competing theories dissimilarly. Although the evidence is shared by the competing theories, it is not quite the same from one researcher or research team to another. Rather, there is generally significant development of empirical evidence as scientists vary the type and increase the number of experiments performed to substantiate or justify a theory.
In light of Goethe’s notions of series of experiments and of higher evidence, then, the issues raised by the underdetermination thesis, at least a weaker version of it, are resolved in terms of the higher evidence from serial experimentation in choosing a
theory over its competitors. Of course, a stronger thesis of underdetermination remains unresolved since, in principle, an empirically equivalent theory can always be pro posed. Furthermore, analysis of Newton’s experiments reveals that his experiments on the nature of light and color also formed a series of experiments, although a limited series, with the generation of higher empirical evidence. For Goethe, “the greatest accomplishments come from those who never tire in exploring and working out every possible aspect and modification of every bit of empirical evidence, every experiment.” Only then can scientists choose with confidence, although only provisionally, a theory.
a variety of different experimental series that are contiguously connected and ordered through their empirical implications and that support the relevant theory, the better substantiated it is. Of course, the gap between nature and theory cannot be completely bridged no matter how many contiguously connected experiments are performed, as Goethe recognized, because no experimental evidence captures completely the complexity of causal interactions present in nature.
Goethe’s notions of series of experiments as mediator and of higher empirical evidence have important implications for the contemporary philosophical underdetermination thesis. Briefly, the thesis states that experimental evidence is inadequate to choose among competing theories. However, in light of Goethe’s notions, empirical evidence can support, to diverse degrees, competing theories because portions of that evidence support each of the competing theories dissimilarly. Although the evidence is shared by the competing theories, it is not quite the same from one researcher or research team to another. Rather, there is generally significant development of empirical evidence as scientists vary the type and increase the number of experiments performed to substantiate or justify a theory.
In light of Goethe’s notions of series of experiments and of higher evidence, then, the issues raised by the underdetermination thesis, at least a weaker version of it, are resolved in terms of the higher evidence from serial experimentation in choosing a
theory over its competitors. Of course, a stronger thesis of underdetermination remains unresolved since, in principle, an empirically equivalent theory can always be pro posed. Furthermore, analysis of Newton’s experiments reveals that his experiments on the nature of light and color also formed a series of experiments, although a limited series, with the generation of higher empirical evidence. For Goethe, “the greatest accomplishments come from those who never tire in exploring and working out every possible aspect and modification of every bit of empirical evidence, every experiment.” Only then can scientists choose with confidence, although only provisionally, a theory.
🔥2
You know this channel has been around since August 2021?
Since then I have made over 4000 posts.
If you want to start from the beginning you can start here: https://t.me/aetherforceposts/13
Share the Aether Force channel with your friends and similar groups if they may be interested in the material:
t.me/aetherforceposts
Since then I have made over 4000 posts.
If you want to start from the beginning you can start here: https://t.me/aetherforceposts/13
Share the Aether Force channel with your friends and similar groups if they may be interested in the material:
t.me/aetherforceposts
Telegram
Aether Force
Black Waves – Their Meaning & Value by Gerry Vassilatos
BLACK WAVES — THEIR MEANING & VALUE
by Gerry Vassilatos
The messages engraved in the heart of certain discoveries and inventions, many times, may take years of earnest search to unlock. I believe this…
BLACK WAVES — THEIR MEANING & VALUE
by Gerry Vassilatos
The messages engraved in the heart of certain discoveries and inventions, many times, may take years of earnest search to unlock. I believe this…
❤4🔥1
Metamorphic Leaves | Sabri Gokmen
https://www.academia.edu/113350908/Metamorphic_Leaves
"This article introduces an algorithm influenced by Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis capable of generating a wide range of parametric leaf forms. Metamorphosis is defined as alternating stages of expansion and contraction that are observable during the development of flowering plants. This principle is extended toward leaf morphology, where two main developmental trajectories are outlined. By formulating simple two-dimensional geometric rules, the author tests the concept of metamorphosis on parametric leaf forms."
https://www.academia.edu/113350908/Metamorphic_Leaves
"This article introduces an algorithm influenced by Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis capable of generating a wide range of parametric leaf forms. Metamorphosis is defined as alternating stages of expansion and contraction that are observable during the development of flowering plants. This principle is extended toward leaf morphology, where two main developmental trajectories are outlined. By formulating simple two-dimensional geometric rules, the author tests the concept of metamorphosis on parametric leaf forms."
👍2
Rediscovering Goethe’s Concept of Polarity: A New Direction for Architectural Morphogenesis | Sabri Gokmen
https://www.academia.edu/113351469/Rediscovering_Goethe_s_Concept_of_Polarity_A_New_Direction_for_Architectural_Morphogenesis
"This paper will introduce Goethe’s concept of polarity to discuss its theoretical and computational implications on natural and architectural morphogenesis. Polarity, as a dualist principle, is found in most of Goethe’s body of works, particularly in his treatise on colour and botanical writings. This concept is explored from a morphogenetic perspective to reconsider Goethe’s engagement with natural sciences during Enlightenment where he transfers his ideas on form and growth to architecture. In the first part, morphogenesis as a concept for the study of organic growth is discussed that combines modern research in biology and architecture. In the second part, Goethean morphology as a unified science founded on polar principles is presented to discuss a historical perspective to morphogenesis. Here, Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis is highlighted as a principle founded on polarity, formulated with alternating cycles of expansion and contraction. These concepts are explicated using an algorithmic study of leaf development to discuss its morphogenetic application to the study of form and growth in natural morphogenesis. In the last part, Goethe’s morphological views are extended towards architecture within the framework of organicism where his ideas on the polarity are directed towards the aesthetic reception and formal development of the built environment. Comparing the form of two Gothic cathedrals, Laon and Noyon, the paper will offer a developmental model based on the concept of metamorphosis as an alternative trajectory for morphological research in architecture."
...
"As a transdisciplinary and theory-laden concept, polarity is not only limited to natural sciences but is extendable towards an architecture where aspects of growth, symmetry and computation could be investigated in a morphogenetic framework. As a preliminary case study, the comparison of Laon and Noyon cathedrals shows how Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis can be extended towards architectural formal computation. This computational study features the utility of abstraction to simplify geometric and stylistic representation and employs sequential morphing techniques that can gradually transform the complexity of a simple form using repetitive and parametric geometric rules. While the presented developmental models use procedural modelling as a technique to visualize metamorphosis of built forms, future models can employ algorithms to further investigate the computational capacity of polarity on various historical examples to develop comprehensive theoretical views to architectural morphology."
https://www.academia.edu/113351469/Rediscovering_Goethe_s_Concept_of_Polarity_A_New_Direction_for_Architectural_Morphogenesis
"This paper will introduce Goethe’s concept of polarity to discuss its theoretical and computational implications on natural and architectural morphogenesis. Polarity, as a dualist principle, is found in most of Goethe’s body of works, particularly in his treatise on colour and botanical writings. This concept is explored from a morphogenetic perspective to reconsider Goethe’s engagement with natural sciences during Enlightenment where he transfers his ideas on form and growth to architecture. In the first part, morphogenesis as a concept for the study of organic growth is discussed that combines modern research in biology and architecture. In the second part, Goethean morphology as a unified science founded on polar principles is presented to discuss a historical perspective to morphogenesis. Here, Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis is highlighted as a principle founded on polarity, formulated with alternating cycles of expansion and contraction. These concepts are explicated using an algorithmic study of leaf development to discuss its morphogenetic application to the study of form and growth in natural morphogenesis. In the last part, Goethe’s morphological views are extended towards architecture within the framework of organicism where his ideas on the polarity are directed towards the aesthetic reception and formal development of the built environment. Comparing the form of two Gothic cathedrals, Laon and Noyon, the paper will offer a developmental model based on the concept of metamorphosis as an alternative trajectory for morphological research in architecture."
...
"As a transdisciplinary and theory-laden concept, polarity is not only limited to natural sciences but is extendable towards an architecture where aspects of growth, symmetry and computation could be investigated in a morphogenetic framework. As a preliminary case study, the comparison of Laon and Noyon cathedrals shows how Goethe’s concept of metamorphosis can be extended towards architectural formal computation. This computational study features the utility of abstraction to simplify geometric and stylistic representation and employs sequential morphing techniques that can gradually transform the complexity of a simple form using repetitive and parametric geometric rules. While the presented developmental models use procedural modelling as a technique to visualize metamorphosis of built forms, future models can employ algorithms to further investigate the computational capacity of polarity on various historical examples to develop comprehensive theoretical views to architectural morphology."
❤2
The Five Platonic Solids in Radiesthesia Practice | José Melo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ome5DAAjpbc
Professor José Melo, a radiesthesist and radionic practitioner teaches the practical use of sacred geometry within radionic treatment work.
The five Platonic solids, each assigned to a classical element, are placed directly within radionic treatment setups as energetic tools. Each solid carries a distinct function, and that function does not change based on size. A piece the size of a fingernail moves the same energy as one that fills a palm.
The hexahedron, or cube, holds the Earth element. It speaks to materiality, fixation, and things made concrete. When a practitioner wants to ground a process or move a goal from intention into physical reality, the cube goes alongside the treatment graphic and the written intention. The cube fixes things.
The tetrahedron carries Fire: desire, will, and the drive to act. A stagnant family, a couple at odds, a company that has stopped moving; all of these call for the tetrahedron. It gets things flowing again.
The octahedron governs Air. Creativity, mental clarity, the ability to breathe through a problem. In practice, a pendulum determines the optimal position for placing it over a treatment graphic. An anti-depressor chart is one clear example, where psychological and mental concerns need that kind of oxygenating quality. The practitioner reads the pendulum, finds the position, and places the octahedron there.
The icosahedron, with 20 faces, holds Water: transformation, fluidity, emotional rebalancing. Practitioners reach for it in health treatments, emotional re-equilibration work, Chartres labyrinth sessions, and Tree of Life cleansing processes. Water, as Melo describes it, is usable in nearly everything.
The dodecahedron, with 12 faces, corresponds to Ether, the Self, the perception of cosmos and spiritual development. Practitioners use it with Fiat Lux and Cosmos 2000 graphics for deepening that work. One point made in the video warrants a direct correction: a widespread misconception places the dodecahedron inside the Flower of Life alongside the other four solids. It does not belong there. The remaining four can be geometrically located within the Flower of Life, which serves as the foundational reference for that portion of the system.
On a radionic table, all five solids together maintain a continuous balance of Earth, Fire, Air, Water, and Ether around the operator. When a table is focused on a specific area such as health, relationships, or business, the practitioner selects only the solids relevant to that work. The principle holds across every configuration: size changes nothing. Function stays constant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ome5DAAjpbc
Professor José Melo, a radiesthesist and radionic practitioner teaches the practical use of sacred geometry within radionic treatment work.
The five Platonic solids, each assigned to a classical element, are placed directly within radionic treatment setups as energetic tools. Each solid carries a distinct function, and that function does not change based on size. A piece the size of a fingernail moves the same energy as one that fills a palm.
The hexahedron, or cube, holds the Earth element. It speaks to materiality, fixation, and things made concrete. When a practitioner wants to ground a process or move a goal from intention into physical reality, the cube goes alongside the treatment graphic and the written intention. The cube fixes things.
The tetrahedron carries Fire: desire, will, and the drive to act. A stagnant family, a couple at odds, a company that has stopped moving; all of these call for the tetrahedron. It gets things flowing again.
The octahedron governs Air. Creativity, mental clarity, the ability to breathe through a problem. In practice, a pendulum determines the optimal position for placing it over a treatment graphic. An anti-depressor chart is one clear example, where psychological and mental concerns need that kind of oxygenating quality. The practitioner reads the pendulum, finds the position, and places the octahedron there.
The icosahedron, with 20 faces, holds Water: transformation, fluidity, emotional rebalancing. Practitioners reach for it in health treatments, emotional re-equilibration work, Chartres labyrinth sessions, and Tree of Life cleansing processes. Water, as Melo describes it, is usable in nearly everything.
The dodecahedron, with 12 faces, corresponds to Ether, the Self, the perception of cosmos and spiritual development. Practitioners use it with Fiat Lux and Cosmos 2000 graphics for deepening that work. One point made in the video warrants a direct correction: a widespread misconception places the dodecahedron inside the Flower of Life alongside the other four solids. It does not belong there. The remaining four can be geometrically located within the Flower of Life, which serves as the foundational reference for that portion of the system.
On a radionic table, all five solids together maintain a continuous balance of Earth, Fire, Air, Water, and Ether around the operator. When a table is focused on a specific area such as health, relationships, or business, the practitioner selects only the solids relevant to that work. The principle holds across every configuration: size changes nothing. Function stays constant.
YouTube
E agora José? Como usar Sólidos Platônicos em Radiestesia?
Sou José Mello, Radiestesista e Radionicista, falando à partir do Espaço Revivver.
Nosso trabalho está diretamente ligado a área de Harmonização de Seres vivos e seus ambientes, tratando de temas como: Saúde, Espiritualidade, Negócios, Relacionamentos, entre…
Nosso trabalho está diretamente ligado a área de Harmonização de Seres vivos e seus ambientes, tratando de temas como: Saúde, Espiritualidade, Negócios, Relacionamentos, entre…
❤3👍2
Energetic Observations on a Chestahedron | Frank Silvis
Frank Silvis is a Dutch radiesthesist whose work focuses on measuring the qualitative properties of geometric forms, particularly the chestahedron, through pendulum and dowsing rod techniques rooted in the Anthroposophic tradition.
A beechwood chestahedron, held near a person's body, raised that individual's life energy reading sharply. This kind of measurement falls under radiesthesia, from the Latin radius (ray/radiation) and the Greek aesthanomai (to feel, to perceive, to sense), practiced here through pendulum and dowsing rod within a shielded energetic space prepared through a spiritual tuning process. Assessed across life energy content, positivity, the maker's intention, negative information, and electromagnetic load, the form read clean across every category: life energy far above ordinary objects, the maker's intention near the highest possible mark, and both negative information and electromagnetic load close to zero.
In a cleared conservatory, Hartmann and Curry grid lines improved measurably after the chestahedron was placed at the room's west center, then reverted fully within roughly ninety seconds of removal. When held in various orientations, the dowsing rods opened outward well beyond arm's reach, the distance shifting depending on how the form was turned, the rods tracing the shape of what the field was doing.
That controlled setting gave way to something more ordinary: a neighbor's home, a WiFi router inside a meter cupboard, and the chestahedron placed directly on top of it. At the cupboard itself, the Bovis reading shifted from deep negative to strongly positive, and the third chakra, identified as the chakra most burdened by electromagnetic radiation, moved from heavily loaded to calm. Across the living room and the Hartmann grid's west lines, negative polarity dropped to zero, the pathological score fell by more than half, and the dowsing rod angle tuned to electromagnetic load widened considerably, indicating reduced burden throughout the home.
Bibliography
- Energetic Observations on a Chestahedron, Frank Silvis, December 28, 2020
https://www.chestahedron.nl/images/pdf/2020.12.28%20Energetic%20observations%20on%20a%20Chestahedron%20definitive.pdf
- The Energetic Effect of a Chestahedron Part 2, Frank Silvis, January 13, 2021
https://www.chestahedron.nl/images/pdf/2021.01.13%20Energetic%20observations%20on%20a%20Chestahedron%20part%202%20definitive.pdf
Frank Silvis is a Dutch radiesthesist whose work focuses on measuring the qualitative properties of geometric forms, particularly the chestahedron, through pendulum and dowsing rod techniques rooted in the Anthroposophic tradition.
A beechwood chestahedron, held near a person's body, raised that individual's life energy reading sharply. This kind of measurement falls under radiesthesia, from the Latin radius (ray/radiation) and the Greek aesthanomai (to feel, to perceive, to sense), practiced here through pendulum and dowsing rod within a shielded energetic space prepared through a spiritual tuning process. Assessed across life energy content, positivity, the maker's intention, negative information, and electromagnetic load, the form read clean across every category: life energy far above ordinary objects, the maker's intention near the highest possible mark, and both negative information and electromagnetic load close to zero.
In a cleared conservatory, Hartmann and Curry grid lines improved measurably after the chestahedron was placed at the room's west center, then reverted fully within roughly ninety seconds of removal. When held in various orientations, the dowsing rods opened outward well beyond arm's reach, the distance shifting depending on how the form was turned, the rods tracing the shape of what the field was doing.
That controlled setting gave way to something more ordinary: a neighbor's home, a WiFi router inside a meter cupboard, and the chestahedron placed directly on top of it. At the cupboard itself, the Bovis reading shifted from deep negative to strongly positive, and the third chakra, identified as the chakra most burdened by electromagnetic radiation, moved from heavily loaded to calm. Across the living room and the Hartmann grid's west lines, negative polarity dropped to zero, the pathological score fell by more than half, and the dowsing rod angle tuned to electromagnetic load widened considerably, indicating reduced burden throughout the home.
Bibliography
- Energetic Observations on a Chestahedron, Frank Silvis, December 28, 2020
https://www.chestahedron.nl/images/pdf/2020.12.28%20Energetic%20observations%20on%20a%20Chestahedron%20definitive.pdf
- The Energetic Effect of a Chestahedron Part 2, Frank Silvis, January 13, 2021
https://www.chestahedron.nl/images/pdf/2021.01.13%20Energetic%20observations%20on%20a%20Chestahedron%20part%202%20definitive.pdf
⚡3❤2🔥1
Aether Force pinned «You know this channel has been around since August 2021? Since then I have made over 4000 posts. If you want to start from the beginning you can start here: https://t.me/aetherforceposts/13 Share the Aether Force channel with your friends and similar…»
Microbial Transmutation | Vladimir I. Vysotskii & Alla A. Kornilova
https://rexresearch.com/VysotskiiTransmutation/VysotskiiBiolTransmutation.html
For over three decades, Vladimir I. Vysotskii, nuclear physicist and Head of the Theoretical Radiophysics Department at Kiev National Shevchenko University, and microbiologist Alla A. Kornilova of Lomonosov Moscow State University have been accumulating experimental and theoretical evidence that growing microbial cultures drive low-energy nuclear transmutation of both stable and radioactive isotopes. Two centuries of precursor observations by Vauquelin, Von Herzeele, Baranger, and Kervran had already documented anomalous elemental shifts in living organisms, but none of them had access to the isotopic analytical methods that nuclear physics actually requires, and Kervran in particular proposed reversible reactions and enzyme-driven nucleon transfers that are incompatible with energy conservation laws. Vysotskii and Kornilova broke from that tradition by designing experiments around reactions whose rare daughter isotopes are unambiguously identifiable by Mössbauer spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The underlying logic is biological as much as physical: transmutation only proceeds when the organism needs the product element and cannot find it in the growth medium, making the reaction both metabolically motivated and thermodynamically favorable. The shift from single-strain pure cultures to syntrophic microbiological associations, communities of thousands of organism types that function collectively as a single macroorganism with shared metabolic defense, raised transmutation efficiency by up to 100 times. These associations sustain active growth for weeks under high-radiation, high-acidity conditions where no monoculture survives. The benchmark result is the transmutation of Cs¹³⁷ into stable Ba¹³⁸: a natural half-life of 30 years, compressed first to 310 days with an optimal association and calcium salt additive, and subsequently to complete deactivation within 30 to 50 days through further optimization, with a 70% concentration drop recorded in just 14 days under the best experimental conditions.
What makes these numbers physically possible is the central question, and the answer cuts against the standard assumption that nuclear reactions at low energy are negligibly improbable. In any actively growing biological object, at cell division, DNA replication, ion-channel entry, and inside mitochondria, non-stationary potential nano-wells form continuously and spontaneously. Particles localized in these wells behave as non-stationary oscillators. Under the modified Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relations (rather than the standard Heisenberg relations), the correlation coefficients governing energy and momentum fluctuations can approach unity, generating kinetic energy fluctuations in the range of tens to hundreds of keV. These coherent correlated states raise the transparency of the Coulomb barrier (the repulsive nuclear force that ordinarily prevents low-energy particles from reaching each other) from negligibly small values to ranges consistent with the measured transmutation rates. No radioactive daughter isotopes form, and gamma radiation is strongly suppressed, distinguishing these reactions entirely from classical high-energy nuclear products. The growth front of a living biological object is, from this standpoint, a self-renewing system of disposable nanoreactors. Each one is a transient site of nuclear catalysis, operating automatically wherever growth occurs. What has historically been called "biological transmutation" is not a mystical or enzymatic process. It is ordinary nuclear physics, running in a dynamic environment that happens to continuously generate the exact structural conditions required for coherent correlated states to form.
https://rexresearch.com/VysotskiiTransmutation/VysotskiiBiolTransmutation.html
For over three decades, Vladimir I. Vysotskii, nuclear physicist and Head of the Theoretical Radiophysics Department at Kiev National Shevchenko University, and microbiologist Alla A. Kornilova of Lomonosov Moscow State University have been accumulating experimental and theoretical evidence that growing microbial cultures drive low-energy nuclear transmutation of both stable and radioactive isotopes. Two centuries of precursor observations by Vauquelin, Von Herzeele, Baranger, and Kervran had already documented anomalous elemental shifts in living organisms, but none of them had access to the isotopic analytical methods that nuclear physics actually requires, and Kervran in particular proposed reversible reactions and enzyme-driven nucleon transfers that are incompatible with energy conservation laws. Vysotskii and Kornilova broke from that tradition by designing experiments around reactions whose rare daughter isotopes are unambiguously identifiable by Mössbauer spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The underlying logic is biological as much as physical: transmutation only proceeds when the organism needs the product element and cannot find it in the growth medium, making the reaction both metabolically motivated and thermodynamically favorable. The shift from single-strain pure cultures to syntrophic microbiological associations, communities of thousands of organism types that function collectively as a single macroorganism with shared metabolic defense, raised transmutation efficiency by up to 100 times. These associations sustain active growth for weeks under high-radiation, high-acidity conditions where no monoculture survives. The benchmark result is the transmutation of Cs¹³⁷ into stable Ba¹³⁸: a natural half-life of 30 years, compressed first to 310 days with an optimal association and calcium salt additive, and subsequently to complete deactivation within 30 to 50 days through further optimization, with a 70% concentration drop recorded in just 14 days under the best experimental conditions.
What makes these numbers physically possible is the central question, and the answer cuts against the standard assumption that nuclear reactions at low energy are negligibly improbable. In any actively growing biological object, at cell division, DNA replication, ion-channel entry, and inside mitochondria, non-stationary potential nano-wells form continuously and spontaneously. Particles localized in these wells behave as non-stationary oscillators. Under the modified Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relations (rather than the standard Heisenberg relations), the correlation coefficients governing energy and momentum fluctuations can approach unity, generating kinetic energy fluctuations in the range of tens to hundreds of keV. These coherent correlated states raise the transparency of the Coulomb barrier (the repulsive nuclear force that ordinarily prevents low-energy particles from reaching each other) from negligibly small values to ranges consistent with the measured transmutation rates. No radioactive daughter isotopes form, and gamma radiation is strongly suppressed, distinguishing these reactions entirely from classical high-energy nuclear products. The growth front of a living biological object is, from this standpoint, a self-renewing system of disposable nanoreactors. Each one is a transient site of nuclear catalysis, operating automatically wherever growth occurs. What has historically been called "biological transmutation" is not a mystical or enzymatic process. It is ordinary nuclear physics, running in a dynamic environment that happens to continuously generate the exact structural conditions required for coherent correlated states to form.
👍3
Important Information on Magnet Therapy | OmegaZZ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlMCLBssNDI
Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls tested each magnetic pole on living systems, plants and animals alike, and found that the two poles produce fundamentally opposite biological effects. The south pole, which Davis and Rawls called "biomagnetic north," heals. The north pole, which they called "biomagnetic south," harms under prolonged or intense exposure. That naming reversal trips up nearly everyone who encounters their work, so for clarity: every reference to the healing pole means scientific south, the negative pole, the one that does not point toward geographic north.
The south pole heals reliably. The north pole stimulates, sometimes usefully, but overexposure to it, particularly near the head, produces the kind of wired sleeplessness you'd expect from three cups of coffee at midnight. It is not a pole to use casually or at high field strength without knowing exactly what you are doing.
When it comes to selecting a magnet for therapeutic use, field strength at the target tissue matters most. A clinician with decades of successful practice puts the minimum effective threshold at 25 gauss measured at the treatment site, not at the magnet surface. A large ferrite magnet reaches that threshold at roughly 15 cm of distance. Large neodymium magnets are stronger at the surface but their field drops off faster, and they are genuinely dangerous around metal objects. For most people, the ferrite magnet is the right starting point.
Hemispherical bowl arrays built from densely packed cube magnets extend the 25-gauss threshold considerably further and feel energetically distinct from flat magnets of equivalent surface strength. The geometry follows the golden ratio half-sphere, which produces a field shaped like the top of an egg, and the field self-balances into a single coherent vortex regardless of minor misalignments between individual magnets. Magnet density inside the bowl matters far more than precise arrangement. The denser the pack, the stronger and deeper the field reaches. For treating inner organs or large surface areas, that depth is the point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlMCLBssNDI
Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls tested each magnetic pole on living systems, plants and animals alike, and found that the two poles produce fundamentally opposite biological effects. The south pole, which Davis and Rawls called "biomagnetic north," heals. The north pole, which they called "biomagnetic south," harms under prolonged or intense exposure. That naming reversal trips up nearly everyone who encounters their work, so for clarity: every reference to the healing pole means scientific south, the negative pole, the one that does not point toward geographic north.
The south pole heals reliably. The north pole stimulates, sometimes usefully, but overexposure to it, particularly near the head, produces the kind of wired sleeplessness you'd expect from three cups of coffee at midnight. It is not a pole to use casually or at high field strength without knowing exactly what you are doing.
When it comes to selecting a magnet for therapeutic use, field strength at the target tissue matters most. A clinician with decades of successful practice puts the minimum effective threshold at 25 gauss measured at the treatment site, not at the magnet surface. A large ferrite magnet reaches that threshold at roughly 15 cm of distance. Large neodymium magnets are stronger at the surface but their field drops off faster, and they are genuinely dangerous around metal objects. For most people, the ferrite magnet is the right starting point.
Hemispherical bowl arrays built from densely packed cube magnets extend the 25-gauss threshold considerably further and feel energetically distinct from flat magnets of equivalent surface strength. The geometry follows the golden ratio half-sphere, which produces a field shaped like the top of an egg, and the field self-balances into a single coherent vortex regardless of minor misalignments between individual magnets. Magnet density inside the bowl matters far more than precise arrangement. The denser the pack, the stronger and deeper the field reaches. For treating inner organs or large surface areas, that depth is the point.
YouTube
Important informations on Magnet Therapy 🧲
In this video I give you important information on what magnets to use for magnet therapy and how to use them correctly.
Link to the 3D printing files for the bowls:
thingiverse.com/thing:6821428
MY SHOP: etsy.com/shop/Omegazz
CONTACT: omegazz111@gmail.com…
Link to the 3D printing files for the bowls:
thingiverse.com/thing:6821428
MY SHOP: etsy.com/shop/Omegazz
CONTACT: omegazz111@gmail.com…
🙏5❤3
The Language Nature Writes in Water | Thomas Joseph Brown
https://substack.com/home/post/p-189105669
Water is not a passive solvent. Ernst Lehrs noticed in nature, hydrogen and oxygen do not pre-exist water. They are what breaks free when water is forced apart. The dissociation products of a thing are not necessarily its causes.
Water's molecular architecture is built on the golden ratio, the same geometry that keeps pentagonal forms from closing into solid crystal and keeps water perpetually fluid, dynamic, and responsive. Martin Chaplin's structural synthesis shows this φ-based organization cascading from clusters of five molecules upward into fractal hierarchies, while Del Giudice and Preparata's coherent domain theory explains how electromagnetic fields hold that geometry together far longer than any individual molecular bond survives. Together, those two bodies of work describe a liquid that is simultaneously structured and sensitive to its electromagnetic environment.
Giorgio Piccardi spent decades showing that water's chemical behavior shifts with solar flares and geomagnetic events, with the strongest anomaly tied to Earth's alignment with the Galactic Center. Lily Kolisko tracked crystallization patterns transforming during solar eclipses. Theodor Schwenk measured the same disruptions in chemically pure water used to germinate wheat seeds. None of these effects operated through temperature or chemistry. All three pointed towards water being structurally tuned to cosmic electromagnetic conditions.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-189105669
Water is not a passive solvent. Ernst Lehrs noticed in nature, hydrogen and oxygen do not pre-exist water. They are what breaks free when water is forced apart. The dissociation products of a thing are not necessarily its causes.
Water's molecular architecture is built on the golden ratio, the same geometry that keeps pentagonal forms from closing into solid crystal and keeps water perpetually fluid, dynamic, and responsive. Martin Chaplin's structural synthesis shows this φ-based organization cascading from clusters of five molecules upward into fractal hierarchies, while Del Giudice and Preparata's coherent domain theory explains how electromagnetic fields hold that geometry together far longer than any individual molecular bond survives. Together, those two bodies of work describe a liquid that is simultaneously structured and sensitive to its electromagnetic environment.
Giorgio Piccardi spent decades showing that water's chemical behavior shifts with solar flares and geomagnetic events, with the strongest anomaly tied to Earth's alignment with the Galactic Center. Lily Kolisko tracked crystallization patterns transforming during solar eclipses. Theodor Schwenk measured the same disruptions in chemically pure water used to germinate wheat seeds. None of these effects operated through temperature or chemistry. All three pointed towards water being structurally tuned to cosmic electromagnetic conditions.
www.alkemix.art
The Language Nature Writes in Water
The Pentagonal Molecular Architecture Connecting Solar Flares, Galactic Alignment, & Your Living Cells
🏆6❤1
Goethe's Theory of Colors | Rudolf Steiner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omuNawyELGM
Color is defined as an elementary phenomenon in nature adapted to the sense of sight, arising from the interplay of light and darkness. Yellow appears next to light, blue next to darkness, and red is produced when those two poles are intensified and drawn together, with green emerging from their equal mixture. Colors fall into three classes: physiological colors belonging to the eye itself, physical colors produced through colorless mediums, and chemical colors residing in specific material substances, arranged from most fleeting to most permanent yet always forming a continuous series. The eye is not a passive receiver but a solar organ, formed by and for light, and knowing color means knowing the living relationship between that organ and the world it perceives.
Goethe's Theory of Colors begins from a single premise: light does not need to be defined before colors can be understood, because the full history of color's effects is itself a sufficient account of light's nature. Colors are acts of light, its active and passive modifications, and nature speaks through them to the sense of sight the way sound speaks to hearing. Newton built his theory on a single, complex, secondary phenomenon and forced all other observations to fit it. Goethe treats that as a closed path and moves on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omuNawyELGM
Color is defined as an elementary phenomenon in nature adapted to the sense of sight, arising from the interplay of light and darkness. Yellow appears next to light, blue next to darkness, and red is produced when those two poles are intensified and drawn together, with green emerging from their equal mixture. Colors fall into three classes: physiological colors belonging to the eye itself, physical colors produced through colorless mediums, and chemical colors residing in specific material substances, arranged from most fleeting to most permanent yet always forming a continuous series. The eye is not a passive receiver but a solar organ, formed by and for light, and knowing color means knowing the living relationship between that organ and the world it perceives.
Goethe's Theory of Colors begins from a single premise: light does not need to be defined before colors can be understood, because the full history of color's effects is itself a sufficient account of light's nature. Colors are acts of light, its active and passive modifications, and nature speaks through them to the sense of sight the way sound speaks to hearing. Newton built his theory on a single, complex, secondary phenomenon and forced all other observations to fit it. Goethe treats that as a closed path and moves on.
YouTube
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe - Colour Theory By Rudolf Steiner
part 2 - 0:21:30
part 3 - 0:42:15
part 4 - 1:13:00
part 5 - 1:47:21
part 6 - 2:12:34
part 7 - 2:46:14
part 8 - 3:19:14
part 9 - 3:55:40
part 10 - 4:29:50
part 11 - 4:58:30
part 12 - 5:28:11
part 13 - 5:55:18
part 14 - 6:20:34
part 15 - 6:43:32
part 16…
part 3 - 0:42:15
part 4 - 1:13:00
part 5 - 1:47:21
part 6 - 2:12:34
part 7 - 2:46:14
part 8 - 3:19:14
part 9 - 3:55:40
part 10 - 4:29:50
part 11 - 4:58:30
part 12 - 5:28:11
part 13 - 5:55:18
part 14 - 6:20:34
part 15 - 6:43:32
part 16…
🔥4❤1👍1🙏1
"Since, however, matter can never exist and act without spirit [Seele], nor spirit without matter, matter is also capable of undergoing intensification, and spirit cannot be denied its attraction and repulsion."
- From Polarity by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
https://archive.org/details/johann-wolfgang-von-goethe-scientific-studies
- From Polarity by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
https://archive.org/details/johann-wolfgang-von-goethe-scientific-studies
Internet Archive
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe Scientific Studies : Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
❤4
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe & Platonic Forms | Faust Color Theory and Neoplatonic Vision
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZelLSp_oMo
"Johann Wolfgang von Goethe was one of the greatest literary and intellectual figures of the Napoleonic Age. Poet, playwright, scientist, and philosopher, Goethe bridged art and science in a way few thinkers ever have.
While famous for Faust, Goethe also challenged the scientific orthodoxy of Isaac Newton with his own Theory of Colours. But beyond literature and science lies another fascinating dimension — Goethe’s engagement with Neoplatonism and Platonic Forms.
In this video, we explore:
✔️ Goethe’s relationship to Platonic and Neoplatonic thought
✔️ How Faust reflects the struggle between eternal ideals and human limitation
✔️ Goethe vs. Newton on the nature of light and perception
✔️ The unity of science, poetry, and metaphysics
✔️ The philosophical depth behind Goethe’s symbolism
Was Goethe rejecting pure abstraction — or reinterpreting Platonic ideals through lived experience and imagination?
If you’re passionate about philosophy, literature, and the history of ideas, this deep dive into Goethe will expand your perspective."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZelLSp_oMo
"Johann Wolfgang von Goethe was one of the greatest literary and intellectual figures of the Napoleonic Age. Poet, playwright, scientist, and philosopher, Goethe bridged art and science in a way few thinkers ever have.
While famous for Faust, Goethe also challenged the scientific orthodoxy of Isaac Newton with his own Theory of Colours. But beyond literature and science lies another fascinating dimension — Goethe’s engagement with Neoplatonism and Platonic Forms.
In this video, we explore:
✔️ Goethe’s relationship to Platonic and Neoplatonic thought
✔️ How Faust reflects the struggle between eternal ideals and human limitation
✔️ Goethe vs. Newton on the nature of light and perception
✔️ The unity of science, poetry, and metaphysics
✔️ The philosophical depth behind Goethe’s symbolism
Was Goethe rejecting pure abstraction — or reinterpreting Platonic ideals through lived experience and imagination?
If you’re passionate about philosophy, literature, and the history of ideas, this deep dive into Goethe will expand your perspective."
YouTube
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe & Platonic Forms | Faust, Color Theory, and Neoplatonic Vision
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe & Platonic Forms | Faust Color Theory and Neoplatonic Vision
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe was one of the greatest literary and intellectual figures of the Napoleonic Age. Poet, playwright, scientist, and philosopher, Goethe bridged…
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe was one of the greatest literary and intellectual figures of the Napoleonic Age. Poet, playwright, scientist, and philosopher, Goethe bridged…
👍4❤1
An infinite sphere would appear to us as nothing but straight lines | Ernst Lehrs - Man or Matter
“The following exercise will help us towards further clarity concerning the nature of geometrical infinity.
We imagine ourselves in the centre of a sphere which we allow to expand uniformly on all sides. Whilst the inner wall of this sphere withdraws from us into ever greater distances, it grows flatter and flatter until, on reaching infinite distance, it turns into a plane. We thus find ourselves surrounded every-where by a surface which, in the strict mathematical sense, is a plane, and is yet one and the same surface on all sides. This leads us to the conception of the plane at infinity as a self-contained entity although it expands infinitely in all directions….
To create a terminology which is equally valid for both spatial systems, we need first of all a qualitative expression, free from any reference to distance, for the relation between the point and the plane at infinity. Let us remember that this plane represents, in relation to the point, the extreme form of a sphere. As such it surrounds the point as does any other sphere on all sides. But whereas all other spheres comprise always only some part of the world spreading round the point, the plane at infinity, seen as such a sphere, comprises the entirety of this world. This suggests the expression, all-embracing plane, as a suitable term for this plane. A similar consideration leads us to the term, all-relating point, for the exceptional point in relation to the plane.”
“The following exercise will help us towards further clarity concerning the nature of geometrical infinity.
We imagine ourselves in the centre of a sphere which we allow to expand uniformly on all sides. Whilst the inner wall of this sphere withdraws from us into ever greater distances, it grows flatter and flatter until, on reaching infinite distance, it turns into a plane. We thus find ourselves surrounded every-where by a surface which, in the strict mathematical sense, is a plane, and is yet one and the same surface on all sides. This leads us to the conception of the plane at infinity as a self-contained entity although it expands infinitely in all directions….
To create a terminology which is equally valid for both spatial systems, we need first of all a qualitative expression, free from any reference to distance, for the relation between the point and the plane at infinity. Let us remember that this plane represents, in relation to the point, the extreme form of a sphere. As such it surrounds the point as does any other sphere on all sides. But whereas all other spheres comprise always only some part of the world spreading round the point, the plane at infinity, seen as such a sphere, comprises the entirety of this world. This suggests the expression, all-embracing plane, as a suitable term for this plane. A similar consideration leads us to the term, all-relating point, for the exceptional point in relation to the plane.”
🔥3