Aether Force
[The RIFE Research Labs 1 of 5](https://t.me/gonzojourneys/51270)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Here's the original in one piece. I got John Crane in the studio in 1986 with his 16mm film of Rife, he narrated as it ran.
👍3🔥3
Man or Matter Quote by Ernst Lehrs
pp. 19-20.
“Almost every scientific advance is bought at the cost of renunciation, almost every gain in knowledge sacrifices important standpoints and established modes of thought. As facts and knowledge accumulate, the claim of the scientist to an understanding of the world in a certain sense diminishes. Our justifiable admiration for the success with which the unending multiplicity of natural occurrences on earth and in the stars has been reduced to so simple a scheme of laws — Heisenberg implies — must therefore not make us forget that these attainments are bought at the price ‘of renouncing the aim of bringing the phenomena of nature to our thinking in an immediate and living way'.
In the course of his exposition, Heisenberg also speaks of Goethe, in whose scientific endeavours he perceives a noteworthy attempt to set scientific understanding upon a path other than that of progressive self-restriction.
The renouncing of life and immediacy, which was the premise for the progress of natural science since Newton, formed the real basis for the bitter struggle which Goethe waged against the physical optics of Newton. It would be superficial to dismiss this struggle as unimportant: there is much significance in one of the most outstanding men directing all his efforts to fighting against the development of Newtonian optics. There is only one thing for which Heisenberg criticises Goethe: 'If one should wish to reproach Goethe, it could only be for not going far enough — that is, for having attacked the views of Newton instead of declaring that the whole of Newtonian Physics Optics, Mechanics and the Law of Gravitation were from the devil.'
Although the full significance of Heisenberg's remarks on Goethe will become apparent only at a later stage of our discussion, they have been quoted here because they form part of the symptom we wish to characterise. Only this much may be pointed out immediately, that Goethe if not in the scientific then indeed in the poetical part of his writings did fulfil what Heisenberg rightly feels to have been his true task.
We mentioned Heisenberg's speech as a symptom of a certain tendency, characteristic of the more recent phase in science, to survey critically its own epistemological foundations. A few years previous to Heisenberg's speech, the need of such a survey found an eloquent advocate in A.N. Whitehead, in his book Science and the Modern World, where, in view of the contradictory nature of modern physical theories, he insists that 'if science is not to degenerate into a medley of ad hoc hypotheses, it must become philosophical and enter upon a thorough criticism of its own foundations'.”
pp. 19-20.
“Almost every scientific advance is bought at the cost of renunciation, almost every gain in knowledge sacrifices important standpoints and established modes of thought. As facts and knowledge accumulate, the claim of the scientist to an understanding of the world in a certain sense diminishes. Our justifiable admiration for the success with which the unending multiplicity of natural occurrences on earth and in the stars has been reduced to so simple a scheme of laws — Heisenberg implies — must therefore not make us forget that these attainments are bought at the price ‘of renouncing the aim of bringing the phenomena of nature to our thinking in an immediate and living way'.
In the course of his exposition, Heisenberg also speaks of Goethe, in whose scientific endeavours he perceives a noteworthy attempt to set scientific understanding upon a path other than that of progressive self-restriction.
The renouncing of life and immediacy, which was the premise for the progress of natural science since Newton, formed the real basis for the bitter struggle which Goethe waged against the physical optics of Newton. It would be superficial to dismiss this struggle as unimportant: there is much significance in one of the most outstanding men directing all his efforts to fighting against the development of Newtonian optics. There is only one thing for which Heisenberg criticises Goethe: 'If one should wish to reproach Goethe, it could only be for not going far enough — that is, for having attacked the views of Newton instead of declaring that the whole of Newtonian Physics Optics, Mechanics and the Law of Gravitation were from the devil.'
Although the full significance of Heisenberg's remarks on Goethe will become apparent only at a later stage of our discussion, they have been quoted here because they form part of the symptom we wish to characterise. Only this much may be pointed out immediately, that Goethe if not in the scientific then indeed in the poetical part of his writings did fulfil what Heisenberg rightly feels to have been his true task.
We mentioned Heisenberg's speech as a symptom of a certain tendency, characteristic of the more recent phase in science, to survey critically its own epistemological foundations. A few years previous to Heisenberg's speech, the need of such a survey found an eloquent advocate in A.N. Whitehead, in his book Science and the Modern World, where, in view of the contradictory nature of modern physical theories, he insists that 'if science is not to degenerate into a medley of ad hoc hypotheses, it must become philosophical and enter upon a thorough criticism of its own foundations'.”
👍3
Process and Reality | Alfred North Whitehead
p. 145
“Descartes asserts one principle which is the basis of all philosophy: he holds that the whole pyramid of knowledge is based upon the immediate operation of knowing which is either an essential (for Descartes), or a contributory, element in the composition of an immediate actual entity. This is also a first principle for the philosophy of organism. But Descartes allowed the subject-predicate form of proposition, and the philosophical tradition derived from it, to dictate his subsequent metaphysical development. For his philosophy, ‘actuality’ meant ‘to be a substance with inhering qualities.’ For the philosophy of organism, the percipient occasion is its own standard of actuality. If in its knowledge other actual entities appear, it can only be because they conform to its standard of actuality. There can only be evidence of a world of actual entities, if the immediate actual entity discloses them as essential to its own composition. Descartes’ notion of an unessential experience of the external world is entirely alien to the organic philosophy. This is the root point of divergence; and is the reason why the organic philosophy has to abandon any approach to the substance-quality notion of actuality. The organic philosophy interprets experience as meaning the ‘self-enjoyment of being one among many, and of being one arising out of the composition of many.’ Descartes interprets experience as meaning the ‘self-enjoyment, by an individual substance, of its qualification by ideas.’”
p. 145
“Descartes asserts one principle which is the basis of all philosophy: he holds that the whole pyramid of knowledge is based upon the immediate operation of knowing which is either an essential (for Descartes), or a contributory, element in the composition of an immediate actual entity. This is also a first principle for the philosophy of organism. But Descartes allowed the subject-predicate form of proposition, and the philosophical tradition derived from it, to dictate his subsequent metaphysical development. For his philosophy, ‘actuality’ meant ‘to be a substance with inhering qualities.’ For the philosophy of organism, the percipient occasion is its own standard of actuality. If in its knowledge other actual entities appear, it can only be because they conform to its standard of actuality. There can only be evidence of a world of actual entities, if the immediate actual entity discloses them as essential to its own composition. Descartes’ notion of an unessential experience of the external world is entirely alien to the organic philosophy. This is the root point of divergence; and is the reason why the organic philosophy has to abandon any approach to the substance-quality notion of actuality. The organic philosophy interprets experience as meaning the ‘self-enjoyment of being one among many, and of being one arising out of the composition of many.’ Descartes interprets experience as meaning the ‘self-enjoyment, by an individual substance, of its qualification by ideas.’”
⚡1👍1
The Apocalypse, The Transformation of The Earth: an Esoteric Mineralogy | Friedrich Benesch
pg. 67.
“Life can be experienced and investigated only by life itself. To grasp life, as such, methods and organs are required that are themselves life. These methods need to be schooled accordingly, just as the methods for the nonliving, mechanical-atomistic do. Approaches to such a science of the living have been developed in the past already.”
pg. 67.
“Life can be experienced and investigated only by life itself. To grasp life, as such, methods and organs are required that are themselves life. These methods need to be schooled accordingly, just as the methods for the nonliving, mechanical-atomistic do. Approaches to such a science of the living have been developed in the past already.”
Friedrich Benesch, Apocalypse: The Transformation of the Earth: an esoteric mineralogy
“This fundamental question of knowledge, regarding our modern consciousness, can be structured into sub-questions in the following way:
1. The primacy of the spirit or of substance, of matter. Either the spirit is the origin and all that is material is a densified or condensed manifestation of the spirit, or else matter is what comes first and all that is spiritual but a function of matter, a product of material processes of sublimation.
2. The primacy of life or of death. Either life is the origin, and what is dead is a precipitation of the living; or the dead, mechanical is what comes first, and life a more complicated mechanism of the dead.
3. The primacy of the gestalt or of the atom. Either the gestalt—the living, organic structure, the whole, the unity—is the origin, and dust—the atom, the particle, the quantum—is a decimated gestalt, or the atom is the origin, and the whole is the mere result of mutual interaction of a sum of atoms according to structural laws, probabilities.
4. Primacy of the meaningful and harmonious or of the meaningless and coincidental. Either harmony, context and unison, the meaningful idea, the cosmic plan—including preestablished harmony in the Leibnizian sense—is the origin, or meaningless coincidence stands at the beginning (atomic theory's ‘Big Bang’).
5. The primacy of the essential or of the objective. Beings, persons, and ‘I’-beings are the origin, or else objects and circumstances come first, and essences are merely appearance, or mere illusions of self-experience.
6. The primacy either of natural law as the actual law of the cosmos, or of the ethical world order proceeding from a soul and spiritual world that is the basis of the whole of world events and active within them, and through which natural law becomes provident—that is, assumes ‘higher meaning.’
Of these two-times-six possibilities, one can take either the first or the second of each pair as a postulate and make it the premise for one's thinking about the world. If one takes spirit, life, unity, meaning, essence, and providence as the origin, one will find in matter, death, particle, coincidence, and object the appearance of the former in the latter. One will find the outer manifestation of something spiritual, living, and essential in every sensory phenomenon; and one will endeavor, based on this knowledge, to ascend through the veil of the sensory to an understanding of this essence.”
“This fundamental question of knowledge, regarding our modern consciousness, can be structured into sub-questions in the following way:
1. The primacy of the spirit or of substance, of matter. Either the spirit is the origin and all that is material is a densified or condensed manifestation of the spirit, or else matter is what comes first and all that is spiritual but a function of matter, a product of material processes of sublimation.
2. The primacy of life or of death. Either life is the origin, and what is dead is a precipitation of the living; or the dead, mechanical is what comes first, and life a more complicated mechanism of the dead.
3. The primacy of the gestalt or of the atom. Either the gestalt—the living, organic structure, the whole, the unity—is the origin, and dust—the atom, the particle, the quantum—is a decimated gestalt, or the atom is the origin, and the whole is the mere result of mutual interaction of a sum of atoms according to structural laws, probabilities.
4. Primacy of the meaningful and harmonious or of the meaningless and coincidental. Either harmony, context and unison, the meaningful idea, the cosmic plan—including preestablished harmony in the Leibnizian sense—is the origin, or meaningless coincidence stands at the beginning (atomic theory's ‘Big Bang’).
5. The primacy of the essential or of the objective. Beings, persons, and ‘I’-beings are the origin, or else objects and circumstances come first, and essences are merely appearance, or mere illusions of self-experience.
6. The primacy either of natural law as the actual law of the cosmos, or of the ethical world order proceeding from a soul and spiritual world that is the basis of the whole of world events and active within them, and through which natural law becomes provident—that is, assumes ‘higher meaning.’
Of these two-times-six possibilities, one can take either the first or the second of each pair as a postulate and make it the premise for one's thinking about the world. If one takes spirit, life, unity, meaning, essence, and providence as the origin, one will find in matter, death, particle, coincidence, and object the appearance of the former in the latter. One will find the outer manifestation of something spiritual, living, and essential in every sensory phenomenon; and one will endeavor, based on this knowledge, to ascend through the veil of the sensory to an understanding of this essence.”
❤2
Harmonics of Light| Bruce L. Cathie
Bruce Cathie began investigating UFO phenomena in 1952 after witnessing prolonged sightings during his work as a New Zealand airline pilot. Over decades of research, he developed a mathematical system demonstrating that physical reality operates through geometric light harmonics encoded in a planetary grid structure.
Physical reality emerges from geometric harmonies of light wave-forms operating at a fundamental harmonic of 144,000 minutes of arc per grid second relative to Earth's surface, calculated on 97,200 grid seconds per complete planetary rotation (where one grid second equals approximately 0.37 standard seconds). Light velocity operates as a variable rather than constant, shifting according to observer position in space, with core harmonic values manifesting as 1439 for light velocity, 6950 for anti-light reciprocal, 2546.5 for gravity acceleration, and 3930 for anti-gravity acceleration. Space and time function as emergent properties of light wave-motion geometrics, where altering light frequencies directly manipulates both spatial position and temporal flow.
Three spiraling waves intersecting at 90-degree angles create electrons, with each 360-degree spiral producing one manifestation pulse. Matter and antimatter form through identical spiraling wave motions alternating between positive and negative pulses. When these pulses alternate at varying frequencies, they directly control both time flow and light velocity at any spatial position. Changing the manifestation pulse rate effectively repositions matter within the space-time matrix, enabling space travel through geometric frequency shifts rather than physical distance traversal.
Nikola Tesla demonstrated this principle in 1931 by installing an electric motor powered by an energy receiver containing 12 vacuum tubes and a 5.914441183-foot antenna in a Pierce Arrow automobile. The vehicle achieved 90 miles per hour at 1,800 revolutions per minute without conventional fuel. The antenna length divided by 6 seven times then by 3 yields the reciprocal gravitational value 143791.364 minutes of arc per grid second, creating harmonic resonance with Earth's gravitational field to extract electrical energy directly from space.
Earth's energy grid consists of interlocking great circles creating polar squares around geographic poles, with main lattice patterns at 30-minute arc intervals (30 nautical miles) oriented north-south at 006 degrees true and 24-minute arc intervals (24 nautical miles) east-west at 276 degrees true. These subdivide into sixteen sections of 7.5 by 6 minute-arc units totaling 45 square nautical miles each. Grid measurements in minute-of-arc values reveal direct harmonic correlations to light velocity, gravitational acceleration, and mass equivalents, representing natural energy flow patterns.
Volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and atomic detonations occur at geometric grid intersections through harmonic energy concentrations at nodal points. The 1968 Tonga volcano emerged at latitude 19 degrees 11 minutes south (1151 minutes of arc—precisely the square of harmonic 3393 incorporating gravity reciprocal 393) and longitude 174 degrees 51.5 minutes west (5091.5 minutes of arc, matching grid polar diagonal length and twice gravity acceleration harmonic 2546.5). This precise correlation demonstrates that geological events follow predictable geometric patterns. Ancient structures including the Great Pyramid at Giza, Stonehenge, and Chinese pyramids in Shensi Province occupy precise grid coordinate positions.
Bruce Cathie began investigating UFO phenomena in 1952 after witnessing prolonged sightings during his work as a New Zealand airline pilot. Over decades of research, he developed a mathematical system demonstrating that physical reality operates through geometric light harmonics encoded in a planetary grid structure.
Physical reality emerges from geometric harmonies of light wave-forms operating at a fundamental harmonic of 144,000 minutes of arc per grid second relative to Earth's surface, calculated on 97,200 grid seconds per complete planetary rotation (where one grid second equals approximately 0.37 standard seconds). Light velocity operates as a variable rather than constant, shifting according to observer position in space, with core harmonic values manifesting as 1439 for light velocity, 6950 for anti-light reciprocal, 2546.5 for gravity acceleration, and 3930 for anti-gravity acceleration. Space and time function as emergent properties of light wave-motion geometrics, where altering light frequencies directly manipulates both spatial position and temporal flow.
Three spiraling waves intersecting at 90-degree angles create electrons, with each 360-degree spiral producing one manifestation pulse. Matter and antimatter form through identical spiraling wave motions alternating between positive and negative pulses. When these pulses alternate at varying frequencies, they directly control both time flow and light velocity at any spatial position. Changing the manifestation pulse rate effectively repositions matter within the space-time matrix, enabling space travel through geometric frequency shifts rather than physical distance traversal.
Nikola Tesla demonstrated this principle in 1931 by installing an electric motor powered by an energy receiver containing 12 vacuum tubes and a 5.914441183-foot antenna in a Pierce Arrow automobile. The vehicle achieved 90 miles per hour at 1,800 revolutions per minute without conventional fuel. The antenna length divided by 6 seven times then by 3 yields the reciprocal gravitational value 143791.364 minutes of arc per grid second, creating harmonic resonance with Earth's gravitational field to extract electrical energy directly from space.
Earth's energy grid consists of interlocking great circles creating polar squares around geographic poles, with main lattice patterns at 30-minute arc intervals (30 nautical miles) oriented north-south at 006 degrees true and 24-minute arc intervals (24 nautical miles) east-west at 276 degrees true. These subdivide into sixteen sections of 7.5 by 6 minute-arc units totaling 45 square nautical miles each. Grid measurements in minute-of-arc values reveal direct harmonic correlations to light velocity, gravitational acceleration, and mass equivalents, representing natural energy flow patterns.
Volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and atomic detonations occur at geometric grid intersections through harmonic energy concentrations at nodal points. The 1968 Tonga volcano emerged at latitude 19 degrees 11 minutes south (1151 minutes of arc—precisely the square of harmonic 3393 incorporating gravity reciprocal 393) and longitude 174 degrees 51.5 minutes west (5091.5 minutes of arc, matching grid polar diagonal length and twice gravity acceleration harmonic 2546.5). This precise correlation demonstrates that geological events follow predictable geometric patterns. Ancient structures including the Great Pyramid at Giza, Stonehenge, and Chinese pyramids in Shensi Province occupy precise grid coordinate positions.
🔥3⚡1
Atomic bombs operate as geometric space-time devices requiring geometric construction, placement on geometric grid positions, and activation at calculated times relative to solar system geometries. This makes all-out atomic war mathematically impossible since detonation locations can be precalculated and only certain geometric positions permit explosions. The same principles allow controlled energy extraction, demonstrating that conventional power infrastructure with its transmission losses, pollution, and centralized control could become obsolete.
UFO propulsion harmonically manipulates gravitational forces to create space-time geometric imbalances. These craft reposition themselves by restoring force equilibrium through controlled frequency alteration of matter-antimatter manifestation cycles, essentially shifting between grid positions instantaneously rather than traversing intervening space. Harmonic 695 represents the reciprocal geometric equivalent of light speed harmonic 1439, harmonic 288 equals twice the maximum light-speed harmonic of 144,000, and harmonic 371244 denotes the bridge value connecting unified field equations. Laser action initiates at 6943 angstrom wavelength (the light reciprocal harmonic), while sound propagates through mercury at 0.696461 minutes of arc per grid second at 20 degrees Celsius and through iron at 14389.64947 grid feet per grid second at 25 degrees Celsius, suggesting sonic-electromagnetic conversion possibilities.
The Great Pyramid Kings Chamber dimensions measure 412.132 pyramid inches in length with diagonal of 515.165 inches and cross-sectional area of 169,646 square inches. These measurements generate harmonic 1694.4 (ten times maximum light reciprocal 16944) and gravity harmonic 2545, while the coffer volume of 1166.4 pyramid inches cubed produces harmonic 1694.4 through geometric relationships. Electromagnetic propagation relative to pyramid latitude calculates as 143583.33 minutes of arc per grid second, differing from maximum light speed 144000 by 416.666, which reduces to harmonic 69.44444, the maximum speed-of-light harmonic reciprocal. This mathematical precision demonstrates that ancient civilizations embedded complete understanding of light harmonics into architectural dimensions as permanent records for future discovery.
Bibliography (To be added to the Private Chat Archives soon)
Cathie, Bruce L. Harmonic 33. 1968.
Cathie, Bruce L. Harmonic 695: The UFO and Anti-Gravity, 1971.
Cathie, Bruce L. Bridge to Infinity: Harmonic 371244. 1983.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Pulse of the Universe: Harmonic 288. 1977.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Energy Grid. 1990.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Harmonic Conquest of Space. 1995.
UFO propulsion harmonically manipulates gravitational forces to create space-time geometric imbalances. These craft reposition themselves by restoring force equilibrium through controlled frequency alteration of matter-antimatter manifestation cycles, essentially shifting between grid positions instantaneously rather than traversing intervening space. Harmonic 695 represents the reciprocal geometric equivalent of light speed harmonic 1439, harmonic 288 equals twice the maximum light-speed harmonic of 144,000, and harmonic 371244 denotes the bridge value connecting unified field equations. Laser action initiates at 6943 angstrom wavelength (the light reciprocal harmonic), while sound propagates through mercury at 0.696461 minutes of arc per grid second at 20 degrees Celsius and through iron at 14389.64947 grid feet per grid second at 25 degrees Celsius, suggesting sonic-electromagnetic conversion possibilities.
The Great Pyramid Kings Chamber dimensions measure 412.132 pyramid inches in length with diagonal of 515.165 inches and cross-sectional area of 169,646 square inches. These measurements generate harmonic 1694.4 (ten times maximum light reciprocal 16944) and gravity harmonic 2545, while the coffer volume of 1166.4 pyramid inches cubed produces harmonic 1694.4 through geometric relationships. Electromagnetic propagation relative to pyramid latitude calculates as 143583.33 minutes of arc per grid second, differing from maximum light speed 144000 by 416.666, which reduces to harmonic 69.44444, the maximum speed-of-light harmonic reciprocal. This mathematical precision demonstrates that ancient civilizations embedded complete understanding of light harmonics into architectural dimensions as permanent records for future discovery.
Bibliography (To be added to the Private Chat Archives soon)
Cathie, Bruce L. Harmonic 33. 1968.
Cathie, Bruce L. Harmonic 695: The UFO and Anti-Gravity, 1971.
Cathie, Bruce L. Bridge to Infinity: Harmonic 371244. 1983.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Pulse of the Universe: Harmonic 288. 1977.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Energy Grid. 1990.
Cathie, Bruce L. The Harmonic Conquest of Space. 1995.
Forwarded from Orgone Channel Telegram (ned)
Hermann Fricke (1876–1949) occupies a unique niche as a bridge between
Kelvin’s fluid-based "vortex atom" theory and Todeschini’s later "psychobiophysics." Fricke’s work often focused on a mechanical, aether-based explanation for gravity and magnetism that intentionally bypassed Maxwell's abstract fields.
Hermann Fricke’s Terms for Unpolarized Flux
Fricke viewed magnetism not as a static field, but as a dynamic energetic movement within a medium.
Aetherstrom (Aether Stream): Fricke's primary term for what we call "magnetic flux." He viewed magnetism as a literal flow or "wind" of aether particles.
Widerstand (Resistance/Drag): Fricke described unpolarized states as the result of "internal drag" where these aether streams are blocked or randomized by the material’s structure.
Gravitation-Magnetismus: A hybrid term Fricke used to explain how non-polarized, massive bodies (like planets) exert a magnetic-like pull through aetheric pressure rather than standard dipolar alignment.
Potential-Differez (Potential Difference): In Fricke’s view, "unpolarized" just means the potential is balanced; "polarized" is a disturbed equilibrium.
Intermediary Concepts (Linking Kelvin to Todeschini)
Hermann Fricke refined the mechanical models that the other two used:
From Kelvin: He took the concept of the vortex ring (the "smoke ring" atom) but applied it to the macroscopic scale of planetary motion and magnetic "eddies" in space.
To Todeschini: He paved the way for the idea that space is a fluid (Space-Vortex theory). While Todeschini focused on the "feeling" and biological impact of these fluids, Fricke provided the "harder" mechanical formulas for how aether pressure creates what we perceive as magnetism.
Unicode Symbols for SMS (Fricke/Vortex Style)
Since Fricke rejected Maxwell's B and H, these symbols represent his more mechanical/fluid approach:
𝔄 : Aether (The primary medium; often denoted with a Fraktur 'A').
𝐯 : Velocity (Fricke used velocity of the aether stream to define magnetic strength).
𝐩 : Pressure (In his theory, magnetic attraction is actually a "pressure drop" between two bodies).
⟳ : Circulation (Used to represent the "eddy" or vortex nature of the field).
≡ : Equilibrium (His term for a non-polarized or "standard" state where aether flows are balanced).
♒︎ : Fluid Flow (Symbolizing the aetheric "currents" he believed caused magnetism).
SMS-ready summary for "Unpolarized Eddy Flux" in Fricke’s style:
"It’s an Aetherstrom (A) in Equilibrium (≡), creating a Vortex (⟳)
Kelvin’s fluid-based "vortex atom" theory and Todeschini’s later "psychobiophysics." Fricke’s work often focused on a mechanical, aether-based explanation for gravity and magnetism that intentionally bypassed Maxwell's abstract fields.
Hermann Fricke’s Terms for Unpolarized Flux
Fricke viewed magnetism not as a static field, but as a dynamic energetic movement within a medium.
Aetherstrom (Aether Stream): Fricke's primary term for what we call "magnetic flux." He viewed magnetism as a literal flow or "wind" of aether particles.
Widerstand (Resistance/Drag): Fricke described unpolarized states as the result of "internal drag" where these aether streams are blocked or randomized by the material’s structure.
Gravitation-Magnetismus: A hybrid term Fricke used to explain how non-polarized, massive bodies (like planets) exert a magnetic-like pull through aetheric pressure rather than standard dipolar alignment.
Potential-Differez (Potential Difference): In Fricke’s view, "unpolarized" just means the potential is balanced; "polarized" is a disturbed equilibrium.
Intermediary Concepts (Linking Kelvin to Todeschini)
Hermann Fricke refined the mechanical models that the other two used:
From Kelvin: He took the concept of the vortex ring (the "smoke ring" atom) but applied it to the macroscopic scale of planetary motion and magnetic "eddies" in space.
To Todeschini: He paved the way for the idea that space is a fluid (Space-Vortex theory). While Todeschini focused on the "feeling" and biological impact of these fluids, Fricke provided the "harder" mechanical formulas for how aether pressure creates what we perceive as magnetism.
Unicode Symbols for SMS (Fricke/Vortex Style)
Since Fricke rejected Maxwell's B and H, these symbols represent his more mechanical/fluid approach:
𝔄 : Aether (The primary medium; often denoted with a Fraktur 'A').
𝐯 : Velocity (Fricke used velocity of the aether stream to define magnetic strength).
𝐩 : Pressure (In his theory, magnetic attraction is actually a "pressure drop" between two bodies).
⟳ : Circulation (Used to represent the "eddy" or vortex nature of the field).
≡ : Equilibrium (His term for a non-polarized or "standard" state where aether flows are balanced).
♒︎ : Fluid Flow (Symbolizing the aetheric "currents" he believed caused magnetism).
SMS-ready summary for "Unpolarized Eddy Flux" in Fricke’s style:
"It’s an Aetherstrom (A) in Equilibrium (≡), creating a Vortex (⟳)
❤2
Forwarded from Orgone Channel Telegram (ned)
Orgone Channel Telegram
Hermann Fricke (1876–1949) occupies a unique niche as a bridge between Kelvin’s fluid-based "vortex atom" theory and Todeschini’s later "psychobiophysics." Fricke’s work often focused on a mechanical, aether-based explanation for gravity and magnetism that…
To describe unpolarized magnetism or eddy flux through the specialized lenses of Kelvin, Fricke, and Todeschini, use the following terms and symbols. These avoid Maxwell’s standard nomenclature in favor of their specific historical or theoretical frameworks. Lord Kelvin (Sir William Thomson) Kelvin focused heavily on the mechanical analogies of magnetism and the correction of "deviations." Quadrantal Deviation: Kelvin’s specific term for the interference caused by unpolarized (soft) iron on a ship's hull.Isotropic Induction: How Kelvin described the uniform, non-directional magnetic response in substances like soft iron spheres (often called Kelvin’s Balls).Foucault Currents: Kelvin frequently used this term (rather than "eddy") to describe circulating currents in conductors.Mechanical Efflux: A literary/scientific term Kelvin used to describe the "flow" of magnetic force as if it were an incompressible fluid. Hugo Fricke Fricke is renowned for his work on the conductivity and impedance of biological and heterogeneous suspensions, which is highly relevant to eddy flux in complex materials. Isotropic Suspension: A term for a medium where "magnetic" or electrical particles are randomly oriented, resulting in no net polarization.Complex Admittance (\(Y\)): Fricke’s technical symbol used to describe how unpolarized flux and eddy losses behave in non-homogeneous materials.Eddy-Loss Coefficient: A specialized Fricke term for the energy dissipated by internal circulating currents in a material's "shell" or "boundary." Marco Todeschini Todeschini’s "Psychobiophysics" and Fluid-Dynamic Theory of the universe offer a highly specialized, non-standard vocabulary. Universal Fluid (Aether) Vortices: Todeschini viewed all magnetism as literal physical "eddies" or whirlpools in a universal fluid. Unpolarized magnetism is described as a disordered fluid state.Space-Vortex (S): His specific conceptual symbol for a localized magnetic eddy.Fluid Pressure Gradient: Instead of "flux," Todeschini used the term "pressure differences" within the aether to explain magnetic attraction.Centrifugal Magnetic Force: A technical term in his theory for the "outward" push of an unpolarized eddy. Unicode Symbols for SMS \(S\) : Todeschini’s Space-Vortex (use standard Latin S).\(\gamma \) : Often used for Conductivity in Fricke's impedance equations.\(\kappa \) : Kelvin’s preferred symbol for Magnetic Susceptibility (Isotropic).\(\text{Z}\) : Impedance (used by Fricke to describe eddy-flux resistance).🌀 : Vortex/Eddy (The most accurate amateur/literary emoji for Todeschini’s theory). Would you like to see how to format one of Kelvin’s compass correction tables or Fricke’s impedance formulas for a text?
❤1