In the cycle The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA136), it is shown how a material planet actually arises. From the sun, which in reality emanates space by transferring the cosmic forces from the non-spatial into the etheric spatial, the Spirits of Form work in such a way that each one forms his ether sphere, and these all have their common center in the sun. These ether spheres are in reality the planets of our solar system. But now Ahrimanic Spirits of Form from the cosmos throw themselves against the activity of the normal Spirits of Form that emanates from the sun, and at the periphery of the ether sphere, they produce an invagination, which appears to us as the physical planet. Where we see this planet, there is actually a hole in the ether sphere of the normal Spirits of Form that is filled with Ahrimanic forces.
What is true of the physical planet as a “hole in the ether” on a large scale is equally true of every atom of matter on a small scale. The atoms also appear as “holes in the ether” to the imaginative vision that perceives the ether.
...
version b
In the cycle The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA136), it is shown how a material planet actually arises. The cosmos of the normal Spirits of Form would consist only of variously extended etheric spheres, all centered in the sun. These etheric spheres are really the “planets” of our solar system. But now Ahrimanic Spirits of Form throw themselves against these from outside and cause invaginations on the periphery of the etheric spheres, which appear to us as the physical planets. Where we see these, there are in truth holes in the etheric spheres of the normal Spirits of Form that are filled with Ahrimanic forces.
This description in GA136 is also important because it shows us on a large scale what has to be thought of an “atom” on a small scale.
Dr. Steiner also called atoms “holes in the ether.”
1917-08-07-GA176
How does this view compare with what spiritual science has to say? Certainly natural physical phenomena do lead us back to atoms, but what are these atoms? […]
To imaginative cognition atoms are revealed as bubbles and the reality is where the empty space is supposed to be. Atoms are blown up bubbles […], in contrast to what surrounds them they are nothing. You know that where bubbles are seen in soda-water there is no water. Atoms are bubbles in that sense; where they are the space is hollow, nothing is there. And yet it is possible to push against it; impact occurs precisely because, in pushing against hollowness, an effect is produced.
[… A]toms are empty — yet again not empty. [… W]hat exists within the atom bubbles is ahrimanic substance. Ahriman is there. The whole system of atoms consists of ahrimanic substantiality.
Imaginative clairvoyance first perceives only the supersensible, etheric-astral realm but not yet the subsensible, which, as all matter, is perceived by imaginative clairvoyance as a hollow space in the ether. The comparison with water bubbles is quite valid: for in these, too, is air, which is only not seen.
What is true of the physical planet as a “hole in the ether” on a large scale is equally true of every atom of matter on a small scale. The atoms also appear as “holes in the ether” to the imaginative vision that perceives the ether.
...
version b
In the cycle The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA136), it is shown how a material planet actually arises. The cosmos of the normal Spirits of Form would consist only of variously extended etheric spheres, all centered in the sun. These etheric spheres are really the “planets” of our solar system. But now Ahrimanic Spirits of Form throw themselves against these from outside and cause invaginations on the periphery of the etheric spheres, which appear to us as the physical planets. Where we see these, there are in truth holes in the etheric spheres of the normal Spirits of Form that are filled with Ahrimanic forces.
This description in GA136 is also important because it shows us on a large scale what has to be thought of an “atom” on a small scale.
Dr. Steiner also called atoms “holes in the ether.”
1917-08-07-GA176
How does this view compare with what spiritual science has to say? Certainly natural physical phenomena do lead us back to atoms, but what are these atoms? […]
To imaginative cognition atoms are revealed as bubbles and the reality is where the empty space is supposed to be. Atoms are blown up bubbles […], in contrast to what surrounds them they are nothing. You know that where bubbles are seen in soda-water there is no water. Atoms are bubbles in that sense; where they are the space is hollow, nothing is there. And yet it is possible to push against it; impact occurs precisely because, in pushing against hollowness, an effect is produced.
[… A]toms are empty — yet again not empty. [… W]hat exists within the atom bubbles is ahrimanic substance. Ahriman is there. The whole system of atoms consists of ahrimanic substantiality.
Imaginative clairvoyance first perceives only the supersensible, etheric-astral realm but not yet the subsensible, which, as all matter, is perceived by imaginative clairvoyance as a hollow space in the ether. The comparison with water bubbles is quite valid: for in these, too, is air, which is only not seen.
ETHER DOES NOT MEAN RAREFIED SUBSTANCE
Rudolf Steiner - MAN — HIEROGLYPH OF THE UNIVERSE - GA 201 - Lecture Four
https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA201/English/RSP1972/19200416p01.html
"We have, on the one hand, our world as it is generally observed; and we have in addition, the materialistic superstition that, for instance, if we gaze upwards, we see the Sun, a ball of gas, as it is described in books. This is nonsense. The Sun is not a ball of gas; but in that place where the Sun is, there is something less than empty space — a sucking, absorbing body, in fact, while all around it is that which exerts pressure. Consequently in that which comes to us from the Sun we have not to do with anything constituting a product of combustion in the Sun; but all that has been transmitted to the Sun from the Universe is rayed back.
Where the Sun is, is emptier than empty space. This can be said of all parts of the Universe where we find Ether. For this reason it is so difficult for the physicist to speak of Ether, for he thinks that Ether is also matter, though more rarefied than ordinary matter. Materialism is still very busy with this perpetual ‘rarefying’, both the materialism of natural science as well as the materialism of Theosophy. It distinguishes first, dense matter; then etheric matter — more rarefied; then astral matter — still more rarefied; and then there is the ‘mental’ and I do not know what else — always more and more rarefied!
The only difference (in this theory of rarefying) between the two forms of materialism is that the one recognises more degrees of rarefaction than the other. But in the transition from ponderable matter to Ether we have nothing to do with rarefaction. Anyone who believes that in Ether we have to do merely with a ‘rarefying’ process is like a man who says: ‘I have here a purse full of money; I repeatedly take from it and the money becomes less and less. I take away still more till at last none remains.’ Nothing is left — but yet he can go on! The ‘nothing’ can become less still; for if he gets into debt, his money becomes less than nothing. In the same way not only does matter become empty space, but it becomes negative, less than nothing — emptier than emptiness; it assumes a ‘sucking’ nature. Ether is sucking, absorbing. Matter presses. Ether absorbs. The Sun is an absorbing, sucking ball, and wherever Ether is present we have this absorbent force.
Here we step over into the other side, the other aspect of three-dimensional space — we pass from pressure to suction. That which immediately surrounds us in this world, that of which we are constituted as physical man and ether man, is both pressing and sucking or absorbing. We are a combination of both; whereas the Sun possesses the power of suction only, being nothing but ether, nothing but suction. It is the undulating wave of pressure and suction, ponderable matter and ether, that forms in its alternation a living organisation. And the living organism continually breathes in the astral; the breathing expresses itself through the Moon's motion or nutation. And here we begin to divine a second member or principle of the world's construction; the one member — pressure and suction, physical and etheric; the other, the second — astral. The astral is neither physical nor etheric but is continually inhaled and exhaled; and the nutation demonstrates this process."
Rudolf Steiner - MAN — HIEROGLYPH OF THE UNIVERSE - GA 201 - Lecture Four
https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA201/English/RSP1972/19200416p01.html
"We have, on the one hand, our world as it is generally observed; and we have in addition, the materialistic superstition that, for instance, if we gaze upwards, we see the Sun, a ball of gas, as it is described in books. This is nonsense. The Sun is not a ball of gas; but in that place where the Sun is, there is something less than empty space — a sucking, absorbing body, in fact, while all around it is that which exerts pressure. Consequently in that which comes to us from the Sun we have not to do with anything constituting a product of combustion in the Sun; but all that has been transmitted to the Sun from the Universe is rayed back.
Where the Sun is, is emptier than empty space. This can be said of all parts of the Universe where we find Ether. For this reason it is so difficult for the physicist to speak of Ether, for he thinks that Ether is also matter, though more rarefied than ordinary matter. Materialism is still very busy with this perpetual ‘rarefying’, both the materialism of natural science as well as the materialism of Theosophy. It distinguishes first, dense matter; then etheric matter — more rarefied; then astral matter — still more rarefied; and then there is the ‘mental’ and I do not know what else — always more and more rarefied!
The only difference (in this theory of rarefying) between the two forms of materialism is that the one recognises more degrees of rarefaction than the other. But in the transition from ponderable matter to Ether we have nothing to do with rarefaction. Anyone who believes that in Ether we have to do merely with a ‘rarefying’ process is like a man who says: ‘I have here a purse full of money; I repeatedly take from it and the money becomes less and less. I take away still more till at last none remains.’ Nothing is left — but yet he can go on! The ‘nothing’ can become less still; for if he gets into debt, his money becomes less than nothing. In the same way not only does matter become empty space, but it becomes negative, less than nothing — emptier than emptiness; it assumes a ‘sucking’ nature. Ether is sucking, absorbing. Matter presses. Ether absorbs. The Sun is an absorbing, sucking ball, and wherever Ether is present we have this absorbent force.
Here we step over into the other side, the other aspect of three-dimensional space — we pass from pressure to suction. That which immediately surrounds us in this world, that of which we are constituted as physical man and ether man, is both pressing and sucking or absorbing. We are a combination of both; whereas the Sun possesses the power of suction only, being nothing but ether, nothing but suction. It is the undulating wave of pressure and suction, ponderable matter and ether, that forms in its alternation a living organisation. And the living organism continually breathes in the astral; the breathing expresses itself through the Moon's motion or nutation. And here we begin to divine a second member or principle of the world's construction; the one member — pressure and suction, physical and etheric; the other, the second — astral. The astral is neither physical nor etheric but is continually inhaled and exhaled; and the nutation demonstrates this process."
rsarchive.org
Lecture IV — GA 201. Man - Hieroglyph of the Universe (1972) - Rudolf Steiner Archive
Rudolf Steiner Archive: An electronic Library and Archive site for the over 6000 collected works of the Austrian philosopher and founder of Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner
Morphic Resonance : The Theory of Formative Causation | Formscapes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AejwVSMJWYw
04:07 Rupert Sheldrake's Early Life and Academic Journey
- Rupert Sheldrake's upbringing and early interest in zoology and botany.
- Sheldrake's shift from religious beliefs to atheism during his adolescence.
- His academic pursuits, including studying biology, biochemistry, philosophy, and history of science at various prestigious institutions.
08:10 Development of the Theory of Morphic Resonance
- Sheldrake's disillusionment with mechanistic explanations for plant morphogenesis.
- The publication of "A New Science of Life" (1981) and its significance in introducing the theory of morphic resonance.
- Sheldrake's argument against DNA molecules as the primary units of heredity, proposing instead the concept of morphogenetic fields.
10:27 Concept of Morphogenetic Fields in Developmental Biology
- The origin of the concept of morphogenetic fields by Alexander Gurwitsch in 1910.
- Ambiguities and debates surrounding the definition and interpretation of morphogenetic fields in early 20th-century biology.
- Sheldrake's redefinition of morphogenetic fields as causal entities beyond mechanistic explanations.
13:12 Neo-Darwinian Synthesis and Paradigm Shifts in Biology
- The rise of the Neo-Darwinian synthesis, emphasizing DNA as the primary determinant of heredity and evolution.
- The ideological and scientific dominance of Neo-Darwinism in 20th-century biology.
- Critiques of Neo-Darwinism and its challenges from recent developments in epigenetics and developmental biology.
17:08 ️ Michael Levin's Research on Bioelectric Fields and Morphogenetic Fields
- Michael Levin's experiments with planarian flatworms demonstrating the role of bioelectric fields in regeneration and memory retention.
- The inheritance of hereditary mutations through manipulation of morphogenetic fields without altering DNA sequences.
- Insights from Levin's research challenging the exclusive role of DNA in determining phenotypic traits and suggesting a role for morphogenetic fields in organismal development.
24:58 Evolutionary implications of morphogenetic fields
- Genetic characteristics may be alterable through interaction with the environment.
- Macromutation's role in evolution could be more significant than assumed within the neo-Darwinian paradigm.
- Punctuated equilibrium theory challenges gradualism in evolution and suggests rapid speciation.
27:14 ️ Criticism of punctuated equilibrium and fitness landscape model
- Punctuated equilibrium theory proposes periods of rapid speciation punctuated by stability.
- Critics argue against the theory due to the improbability of macromutations and favor gradualism.
- Fitness landscape models depict evolutionary changes based on fitness advantages.
30:14 Organisms as self-organizing systems
- Organisms may self-organize and adapt to mutations purposively.
- Phenotypic characteristics are not solely determined by DNA mutations.
- Organisms exhibit purposive self-organization, unlike computational machines.
35:35 Introduction to morphic resonance theory
- Morphic resonance theory proposes non-local morphogenetic fields' influence across space and time.
- Self-resonance suggests an organism's past influences its present morphic field.
- Morphic resonance extends beyond individual organisms to influence collective behavior.
41:03 Morphogenetic fields and shaping living systems
- Morphogenetic fields condition the likelihood of events, shaping organic systems' development.
- Morphic resonance operates through similarity within multi-dimensional living forms.
- Living processes influence each other's development through morphic resonance.
50:05 Morphic Resonance and Synthetic Chemistry
- Morphic resonance predicts that older morphological structures are more stable than novel ones.
- Synthetic chemical compounds initially face difficulties in formation without past influences.
59:46 Protein Folding Problem and AlphaFold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AejwVSMJWYw
04:07 Rupert Sheldrake's Early Life and Academic Journey
- Rupert Sheldrake's upbringing and early interest in zoology and botany.
- Sheldrake's shift from religious beliefs to atheism during his adolescence.
- His academic pursuits, including studying biology, biochemistry, philosophy, and history of science at various prestigious institutions.
08:10 Development of the Theory of Morphic Resonance
- Sheldrake's disillusionment with mechanistic explanations for plant morphogenesis.
- The publication of "A New Science of Life" (1981) and its significance in introducing the theory of morphic resonance.
- Sheldrake's argument against DNA molecules as the primary units of heredity, proposing instead the concept of morphogenetic fields.
10:27 Concept of Morphogenetic Fields in Developmental Biology
- The origin of the concept of morphogenetic fields by Alexander Gurwitsch in 1910.
- Ambiguities and debates surrounding the definition and interpretation of morphogenetic fields in early 20th-century biology.
- Sheldrake's redefinition of morphogenetic fields as causal entities beyond mechanistic explanations.
13:12 Neo-Darwinian Synthesis and Paradigm Shifts in Biology
- The rise of the Neo-Darwinian synthesis, emphasizing DNA as the primary determinant of heredity and evolution.
- The ideological and scientific dominance of Neo-Darwinism in 20th-century biology.
- Critiques of Neo-Darwinism and its challenges from recent developments in epigenetics and developmental biology.
17:08 ️ Michael Levin's Research on Bioelectric Fields and Morphogenetic Fields
- Michael Levin's experiments with planarian flatworms demonstrating the role of bioelectric fields in regeneration and memory retention.
- The inheritance of hereditary mutations through manipulation of morphogenetic fields without altering DNA sequences.
- Insights from Levin's research challenging the exclusive role of DNA in determining phenotypic traits and suggesting a role for morphogenetic fields in organismal development.
24:58 Evolutionary implications of morphogenetic fields
- Genetic characteristics may be alterable through interaction with the environment.
- Macromutation's role in evolution could be more significant than assumed within the neo-Darwinian paradigm.
- Punctuated equilibrium theory challenges gradualism in evolution and suggests rapid speciation.
27:14 ️ Criticism of punctuated equilibrium and fitness landscape model
- Punctuated equilibrium theory proposes periods of rapid speciation punctuated by stability.
- Critics argue against the theory due to the improbability of macromutations and favor gradualism.
- Fitness landscape models depict evolutionary changes based on fitness advantages.
30:14 Organisms as self-organizing systems
- Organisms may self-organize and adapt to mutations purposively.
- Phenotypic characteristics are not solely determined by DNA mutations.
- Organisms exhibit purposive self-organization, unlike computational machines.
35:35 Introduction to morphic resonance theory
- Morphic resonance theory proposes non-local morphogenetic fields' influence across space and time.
- Self-resonance suggests an organism's past influences its present morphic field.
- Morphic resonance extends beyond individual organisms to influence collective behavior.
41:03 Morphogenetic fields and shaping living systems
- Morphogenetic fields condition the likelihood of events, shaping organic systems' development.
- Morphic resonance operates through similarity within multi-dimensional living forms.
- Living processes influence each other's development through morphic resonance.
50:05 Morphic Resonance and Synthetic Chemistry
- Morphic resonance predicts that older morphological structures are more stable than novel ones.
- Synthetic chemical compounds initially face difficulties in formation without past influences.
59:46 Protein Folding Problem and AlphaFold
⚡2
- The protein folding problem persists despite decades of research and computational attempts.
- AlphaFold, an AI system, achieves some success in predicting protein structures but lacks explanatory power.
01:05:01 Metaphysical Paradigms and Mechanistic Reductionism
- Metaphysical paradigms shape scientific discourse and interpretation of empirical data.
- Mechanistic reductionism, rooted in the metaphor of the machine, dominates scientific thinking.
01:11:10 Dualism in Early Scientific Thinking
- Early scientific thinking bifurcated reality into objective matter and subjective mind.
- Matter was considered deterministic, reducible, and devoid of freedom or subjectivity.
01:14:19 The Evolution of Materialism and Dualism
- Materialist monism emerged as a rejection of mind-matter dualism, advocating that the world consists only of matter.
- Conscious agency and freedom were considered illusory in the materialist monist worldview, reducing consciousness to mechanical processes.
01:16:11 Contrasting Views on Free Will
- Materialistic perspectives often argue that free will is illusory, attributing human behavior solely to deterministic neural processes.
- Morphic resonance proposes a form of formative causation, suggesting that wholes can direct their own development, including cognition and behavior.
01:22:31 Process Philosophy and Whitehead's Metaphysical Framework
- Process philosophy, exemplified by Alfred North Whitehead, offers an alternative to mechanistic materialism by conceptualizing the world as consisting of self-generative events.
- Whitehead's philosophy of organism proposes that the world comprises organic processes, including subjective experiences, at all levels of existence.
01:29:11 Morphic Resonance in the Context of Process Philosophy
- Morphic fields, as proposed by Rupert Sheldrake, align with Whitehead's metaphysical framework, portraying nature as fundamentally organic and self-organizing.
- Animacy is inherent in the basic elements of the world, and morphic fields organize themselves into nested hierarchies to generate complex forms of agency and experience.
01:38:04 Understanding Memory in Different Frameworks
- Memory viewed through mechanistic materialism
- Carl Lashley's experiments on memory storage in the brain
01:43:59 Memory and Consciousness in Bergson's Philosophy
- Henri Bergson's perspective on memory and consciousness
- Mind and matter integration in Bergson's ontology
01:47:24 Understanding Memory through Morphic Resonance
- Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance
- Memory as presence of the past rather than stored information
01:52:36 Parapsychological Phenomena and Morphic Resonance
- Parapsychological phenomena as natural features in a morphic resonance world
- Sheldrake's perspective on telepathy and out-of-body experiences
02:00:17 Sheldrake's Telephone Telepathy Experiment
- Sheldrake conducted telephone telepathy experiments involving nominees and recipients.
- Nominees were asked to call recipients who had to guess who would call them before the call.
02:05:31 Sheldrake's Dog Waiting Experiment
- Sheldrake studied dogs' behavior awaiting their owners' return.
- Dogs exhibited increased anticipation during pre-return and return periods, suggesting non-local interaction.
02:08:17 EEG Correlation Experiments
- EEG correlation experiments demonstrated non-local interaction between human minds.
- Results consistently showed statistically significant correlations between brain activities of sender and receiver subjects.
02:11:06 Extensive Parapsychological Research
- Over 750 studies analyzed indicate evidence comparable to established psychological phenomena.
02:14:03 Collective Unconscious and Morphic Resonance
- The collective unconscious, as described by Carl Jung, suggests a shared psychic realm.
- Morphic resonance offers insights into non-local interactions that shape individual and collective psyches.
02:22:02 Insights into Anomalous Phenomena
- AlphaFold, an AI system, achieves some success in predicting protein structures but lacks explanatory power.
01:05:01 Metaphysical Paradigms and Mechanistic Reductionism
- Metaphysical paradigms shape scientific discourse and interpretation of empirical data.
- Mechanistic reductionism, rooted in the metaphor of the machine, dominates scientific thinking.
01:11:10 Dualism in Early Scientific Thinking
- Early scientific thinking bifurcated reality into objective matter and subjective mind.
- Matter was considered deterministic, reducible, and devoid of freedom or subjectivity.
01:14:19 The Evolution of Materialism and Dualism
- Materialist monism emerged as a rejection of mind-matter dualism, advocating that the world consists only of matter.
- Conscious agency and freedom were considered illusory in the materialist monist worldview, reducing consciousness to mechanical processes.
01:16:11 Contrasting Views on Free Will
- Materialistic perspectives often argue that free will is illusory, attributing human behavior solely to deterministic neural processes.
- Morphic resonance proposes a form of formative causation, suggesting that wholes can direct their own development, including cognition and behavior.
01:22:31 Process Philosophy and Whitehead's Metaphysical Framework
- Process philosophy, exemplified by Alfred North Whitehead, offers an alternative to mechanistic materialism by conceptualizing the world as consisting of self-generative events.
- Whitehead's philosophy of organism proposes that the world comprises organic processes, including subjective experiences, at all levels of existence.
01:29:11 Morphic Resonance in the Context of Process Philosophy
- Morphic fields, as proposed by Rupert Sheldrake, align with Whitehead's metaphysical framework, portraying nature as fundamentally organic and self-organizing.
- Animacy is inherent in the basic elements of the world, and morphic fields organize themselves into nested hierarchies to generate complex forms of agency and experience.
01:38:04 Understanding Memory in Different Frameworks
- Memory viewed through mechanistic materialism
- Carl Lashley's experiments on memory storage in the brain
01:43:59 Memory and Consciousness in Bergson's Philosophy
- Henri Bergson's perspective on memory and consciousness
- Mind and matter integration in Bergson's ontology
01:47:24 Understanding Memory through Morphic Resonance
- Rupert Sheldrake's theory of morphic resonance
- Memory as presence of the past rather than stored information
01:52:36 Parapsychological Phenomena and Morphic Resonance
- Parapsychological phenomena as natural features in a morphic resonance world
- Sheldrake's perspective on telepathy and out-of-body experiences
02:00:17 Sheldrake's Telephone Telepathy Experiment
- Sheldrake conducted telephone telepathy experiments involving nominees and recipients.
- Nominees were asked to call recipients who had to guess who would call them before the call.
02:05:31 Sheldrake's Dog Waiting Experiment
- Sheldrake studied dogs' behavior awaiting their owners' return.
- Dogs exhibited increased anticipation during pre-return and return periods, suggesting non-local interaction.
02:08:17 EEG Correlation Experiments
- EEG correlation experiments demonstrated non-local interaction between human minds.
- Results consistently showed statistically significant correlations between brain activities of sender and receiver subjects.
02:11:06 Extensive Parapsychological Research
- Over 750 studies analyzed indicate evidence comparable to established psychological phenomena.
02:14:03 Collective Unconscious and Morphic Resonance
- The collective unconscious, as described by Carl Jung, suggests a shared psychic realm.
- Morphic resonance offers insights into non-local interactions that shape individual and collective psyches.
02:22:02 Insights into Anomalous Phenomena
- Anomalous phenomena and experiences are widespread and challenging to explain solely through mechanistic causation.
- Experiences with substances like Noo-noo offer insights into dissociating mental processes from immediate sensory orientations, potentially allowing connection with surrounding environments.
02:23:25 Understanding Noo-noo's Effects
- Noo-noo may dissociate mental processes from immediate sensory stimuli, enabling practitioners to connect with surrounding environments.
- Environmental contexts, like religious buildings, can influence mental processes, guiding them into morphological spaces shaped by collective experiences.
02:25:41 Exploring Clairvoyance and Telepathy
- Gorman's experience with wild boars suggests a form of clairvoyance, where he perceived future events.
- Substances like Noo-noo might induce experiences that tap into animals' intentions or memories, offering insights into future events.
- Experiences with substances like Noo-noo offer insights into dissociating mental processes from immediate sensory orientations, potentially allowing connection with surrounding environments.
02:23:25 Understanding Noo-noo's Effects
- Noo-noo may dissociate mental processes from immediate sensory stimuli, enabling practitioners to connect with surrounding environments.
- Environmental contexts, like religious buildings, can influence mental processes, guiding them into morphological spaces shaped by collective experiences.
02:25:41 Exploring Clairvoyance and Telepathy
- Gorman's experience with wild boars suggests a form of clairvoyance, where he perceived future events.
- Substances like Noo-noo might induce experiences that tap into animals' intentions or memories, offering insights into future events.
YouTube
Morphic Resonance; The Theory of Formative Causation
Rupert Sheldrake Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation
https://www.amazon.com/Morphic-Resonance-Nature-Formative-Causation/dp/1594773173
Peter Gorman Sapo In My Soul: The Matsés Frog Medicine
https://www.amazon.com/Sapo-My-Soul-Mats%C3%A9s…
https://www.amazon.com/Morphic-Resonance-Nature-Formative-Causation/dp/1594773173
Peter Gorman Sapo In My Soul: The Matsés Frog Medicine
https://www.amazon.com/Sapo-My-Soul-Mats%C3%A9s…
👍1
Stanley Jordan Plays the Periodical Table (Ionization Energies)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnMEOD4zZDc
The ionization energy is the amount of energy required to remove a single electron from an atom. If the atom has more than one electron, each one requires more energy than the previous one. The result is a series of increasing energy levels, and in the quantum world these energies correspond to frequencies, as in a musical scale.
This raises an interesting question: if we could hear these frequencies how would they sound? I created an app to find out, and in this video I used my app to share what I learned. As it turns out, the results are quite musical.
Important note: This audio includes some very low frequencies, which you might not hear through typical cell phone or laptop speakers. I recommend listening with headphones or a high-quality playback system.
The app was created using the APL programming language.
This video was uploaded in 2021, and changed from unlisted to listed in July 2024.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnMEOD4zZDc
The ionization energy is the amount of energy required to remove a single electron from an atom. If the atom has more than one electron, each one requires more energy than the previous one. The result is a series of increasing energy levels, and in the quantum world these energies correspond to frequencies, as in a musical scale.
This raises an interesting question: if we could hear these frequencies how would they sound? I created an app to find out, and in this video I used my app to share what I learned. As it turns out, the results are quite musical.
Important note: This audio includes some very low frequencies, which you might not hear through typical cell phone or laptop speakers. I recommend listening with headphones or a high-quality playback system.
The app was created using the APL programming language.
This video was uploaded in 2021, and changed from unlisted to listed in July 2024.
YouTube
Stanley Jordan Plays the Periodical Table (Ionization Energies)
The ionization energy is the amount of energy required to remove a single electron from an atom. If the atom has more than one electron, each one requires more energy than the previous one. The result is a series of increasing energy levels, and in the quantum…
A Cartoon Introduction to Whitehead's Organic Cosmology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwxOTAr0e2Y
Whitehead's organic cosmology is best described through the analogy of Indra's net, where reality is composed of interconnected nodes or dew drops, each reflecting the whole infinitely. Whitehead's cosmology aligns more with Buddhist understanding than traditional Western thought, emphasizing the mutual reflection and dependent origination of these nodes, or drops of experience. He calls these drops "actual occasions of experience," which are interrelated through "prehensions," the simplest form of non-conscious feeling. Whitehead's universe is a web of these occasions, interconnected in a fractal or holographic manner, all participating in a process he terms the "creative advance." Creativity, for Whitehead, is the ultimate principle, with God emerging from it, not as a creator but as a creature of creativity, providing order and direction towards beauty. Whitehead challenges the traditional subject-object relationship, proposing that subjects emerge from the interrelations of objects. His cosmology incorporates both the spatial and temporal contexts of our existence, suggesting that every moment of experience enfolds the entire universe. This view demands a metaphysical approach that deepens and elucidates our experience, acknowledging the creativity and interconnectedness underlying all of nature.
#whitehead #processontology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwxOTAr0e2Y
Whitehead's organic cosmology is best described through the analogy of Indra's net, where reality is composed of interconnected nodes or dew drops, each reflecting the whole infinitely. Whitehead's cosmology aligns more with Buddhist understanding than traditional Western thought, emphasizing the mutual reflection and dependent origination of these nodes, or drops of experience. He calls these drops "actual occasions of experience," which are interrelated through "prehensions," the simplest form of non-conscious feeling. Whitehead's universe is a web of these occasions, interconnected in a fractal or holographic manner, all participating in a process he terms the "creative advance." Creativity, for Whitehead, is the ultimate principle, with God emerging from it, not as a creator but as a creature of creativity, providing order and direction towards beauty. Whitehead challenges the traditional subject-object relationship, proposing that subjects emerge from the interrelations of objects. His cosmology incorporates both the spatial and temporal contexts of our existence, suggesting that every moment of experience enfolds the entire universe. This view demands a metaphysical approach that deepens and elucidates our experience, acknowledging the creativity and interconnectedness underlying all of nature.
#whitehead #processontology
YouTube
A Cartoon Introduction to Whitehead's Organic Cosmology
Some images to help orient you in the midst of Whitehead's categoreal forest.
Space in Whitehead's Process-Relational Philosophy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2el8H7M7Dc
Whitehead's view of space or space-time was influenced by Einstein's theory of relativity, yet he differed by questioning the implicit metaphysics rather than the physics. Unlike Einstein, who related space and time to material bodies, Whitehead's ontology was event-based, with space and time being abstractions from relationships among events. For Whitehead, events are concrete experiences, and space and time emerge from the relationships between these events, serving as a field of potential that holds events in tension. He envisioned the universe as a network of events, each contributing to a dynamic process of creativity, where the many become one and are increased by one. Whitehead saw space as woven from bonds of feeling and experience, shaped by social relationships and emotional vectors, and viewed the quantum vacuum as a creative plenum full of potential. Space, in Whitehead's understanding, is not pre-given but brought forth through collective experience, continually recreating the universe in new ways through each unique event.
Supplemental Articles:
1. https://footnotes2plato.com/2015/10/19/the-interrupted-irruption-of-time-towards-an-integral-cosmology-with-help-from-bergson-and-whitehead-abstract-for-gebser-society-conference-ciis-october-16-18-2015/
2. https://footnotes2plato.com/2014/04/21/latours-space-time-experiment/
#whitehead #processontology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2el8H7M7Dc
Whitehead's view of space or space-time was influenced by Einstein's theory of relativity, yet he differed by questioning the implicit metaphysics rather than the physics. Unlike Einstein, who related space and time to material bodies, Whitehead's ontology was event-based, with space and time being abstractions from relationships among events. For Whitehead, events are concrete experiences, and space and time emerge from the relationships between these events, serving as a field of potential that holds events in tension. He envisioned the universe as a network of events, each contributing to a dynamic process of creativity, where the many become one and are increased by one. Whitehead saw space as woven from bonds of feeling and experience, shaped by social relationships and emotional vectors, and viewed the quantum vacuum as a creative plenum full of potential. Space, in Whitehead's understanding, is not pre-given but brought forth through collective experience, continually recreating the universe in new ways through each unique event.
Supplemental Articles:
1. https://footnotes2plato.com/2015/10/19/the-interrupted-irruption-of-time-towards-an-integral-cosmology-with-help-from-bergson-and-whitehead-abstract-for-gebser-society-conference-ciis-october-16-18-2015/
2. https://footnotes2plato.com/2014/04/21/latours-space-time-experiment/
#whitehead #processontology
YouTube
Space in Whitehead's Process-Relational Philosophy
More on Space and Spacetime in Whitehead:
https://footnotes2plato.com/2015/10/19/the-interrupted-irruption-of-time-towards-an-integral-cosmology-with-help-from-bergson-and-whitehead-abstract-for-gebser-society-conference-ciis-october-16-18-2015/
https…
https://footnotes2plato.com/2015/10/19/the-interrupted-irruption-of-time-towards-an-integral-cosmology-with-help-from-bergson-and-whitehead-abstract-for-gebser-society-conference-ciis-october-16-18-2015/
https…
Participatory Research and the Cosmology of the Future
By Ashton Kohl Arnoldy and Matthew David Segall
https://footnotes2plato.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/toward-a-particpatory-cosmology.pdf
Whitehead's organic cosmology is elucidated through the analogy of Indra's net, depicting reality as an interconnected web where each dew drop reflects the entirety of the net. This cosmology aligns more closely with Buddhist thought, emphasizing the mutual reflection and dependent origination of these nodes, or "actual occasions of experience." In Whitehead's view, these occasions are interrelated through "prehensions," which are the simplest forms of non-conscious feeling. The universe, thus, is a dynamic web of these occasions, engaged in a continuous "creative advance." Central to Whitehead's philosophy is the concept of creativity, with God emerging not as a creator but as a creature of creativity, providing order and a lure toward beauty. Whitehead redefines the traditional subject-object dichotomy, proposing that subjects emerge from the interrelations of objects. His cosmology integrates both spatial and temporal contexts, suggesting that every moment of experience contains the entire universe, thereby advocating for a metaphysical approach that deepens and elucidates our experience, recognizing the creativity and interconnectedness inherent in nature.
By Ashton Kohl Arnoldy and Matthew David Segall
https://footnotes2plato.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/toward-a-particpatory-cosmology.pdf
Whitehead's organic cosmology is elucidated through the analogy of Indra's net, depicting reality as an interconnected web where each dew drop reflects the entirety of the net. This cosmology aligns more closely with Buddhist thought, emphasizing the mutual reflection and dependent origination of these nodes, or "actual occasions of experience." In Whitehead's view, these occasions are interrelated through "prehensions," which are the simplest forms of non-conscious feeling. The universe, thus, is a dynamic web of these occasions, engaged in a continuous "creative advance." Central to Whitehead's philosophy is the concept of creativity, with God emerging not as a creator but as a creature of creativity, providing order and a lure toward beauty. Whitehead redefines the traditional subject-object dichotomy, proposing that subjects emerge from the interrelations of objects. His cosmology integrates both spatial and temporal contexts, suggesting that every moment of experience contains the entire universe, thereby advocating for a metaphysical approach that deepens and elucidates our experience, recognizing the creativity and interconnectedness inherent in nature.
PERIODIC FRACTAL OF ELEMENTS
https://superliminal.com/pfractal.htm
The article presents an alternative version of the Periodic Table of the Elements developed by the author, who critiques the standard table for its artificial row breaks and gaps. The author’s version arranges elements in a spiral, starting with Hydrogen at the center, to maintain an unbroken linear list of atomic numbers while aligning element families along radial arcs. This approach highlights the periodicity and self-similarity in the elements more clearly than the standard chart, revealing patterns of repetition at periods of 8, 18, and 32. Named the "periodic fractal of the elements," this representation is compared with other alternate diagrams, such as Emil Zmaczynski's triangular form and Professor Theodor Benfey's spiral treatment, with discussions on their predictions for new element positions. The article concludes by emphasizing the educational value and philosophical discussions surrounding these alternative representations.
https://superliminal.com/pfractal.htm
The article presents an alternative version of the Periodic Table of the Elements developed by the author, who critiques the standard table for its artificial row breaks and gaps. The author’s version arranges elements in a spiral, starting with Hydrogen at the center, to maintain an unbroken linear list of atomic numbers while aligning element families along radial arcs. This approach highlights the periodicity and self-similarity in the elements more clearly than the standard chart, revealing patterns of repetition at periods of 8, 18, and 32. Named the "periodic fractal of the elements," this representation is compared with other alternate diagrams, such as Emil Zmaczynski's triangular form and Professor Theodor Benfey's spiral treatment, with discussions on their predictions for new element positions. The article concludes by emphasizing the educational value and philosophical discussions surrounding these alternative representations.
🌩 UPDATE: It started raining right when I was about to have internet installed this morning. Had to redchedule for Thursday morning. Will do my best to post from phone, but link descriptions may be fairly limited.
Full-time astrophotographer! Trying to capture unique views of the night sky and help others do the same.
https://www.astrobin.com/users/astrofalls/
Image Processing Guide: https://astrofalls.com/\
Discord: https://discord.gg/vm7ZvrRH
Website: https://astrofalls.com
https://www.astrobin.com/users/astrofalls/
Image Processing Guide: https://astrofalls.com/\
Discord: https://discord.gg/vm7ZvrRH
Website: https://astrofalls.com
AstroBin
Bray Falls's gallery
Astrophotography by Bray Falls on AstroBin
👍1
Michael Clarage: Solar Filaments and You! | Thunderbolts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JA38XKOVpA
"There are filaments originating from the Sun that connect matter, energy, and information out and back to every planet in the solar system. These coronal filaments have been known for decades, but only recently it was discovered that they encompass our entire solar system.
Everything in the solar system lives inside the Body of the Sun—including you. If you traveled to that bright orb in the sky, you would arrive at the Heart, or the Brain, or nucleus of the Sun.
The Body of the Sun stretches to the Heliopause—but may even stretch further. Every year new data shows more connection between the stars, so if someone says the science is settled how stars are aligned in the galaxy, do not feel obliged to believe them.
Astrophysicist Michael Clarage, PhD, describes solar filaments as plasma structures. When plasma is imbued with electromagnetic fields and currents—membranes and tubes are formed. This fact of nature occurs both in our biological Human Body—and in the Body of the Sun."
Supporting Article: https://michaelclarage.substack.com/p/those-pesky-solar-filaments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JA38XKOVpA
"There are filaments originating from the Sun that connect matter, energy, and information out and back to every planet in the solar system. These coronal filaments have been known for decades, but only recently it was discovered that they encompass our entire solar system.
Everything in the solar system lives inside the Body of the Sun—including you. If you traveled to that bright orb in the sky, you would arrive at the Heart, or the Brain, or nucleus of the Sun.
The Body of the Sun stretches to the Heliopause—but may even stretch further. Every year new data shows more connection between the stars, so if someone says the science is settled how stars are aligned in the galaxy, do not feel obliged to believe them.
Astrophysicist Michael Clarage, PhD, describes solar filaments as plasma structures. When plasma is imbued with electromagnetic fields and currents—membranes and tubes are formed. This fact of nature occurs both in our biological Human Body—and in the Body of the Sun."
Supporting Article: https://michaelclarage.substack.com/p/those-pesky-solar-filaments
YouTube
Michael Clarage: Solar Filaments and You! | Thunderbolts
There are filaments originating from the Sun that connect matter, energy, and information out and back to every planet in the solar system. These coronal filaments have been known for decades, but only recently it was discovered that they encompass our entire…
Man as Embryo between Heavens and Earth by Jaap van der Wal
/https://www.embryo.nl/en/notes-man-as-embryo-between-heavens-and-earth-2005-en/
Lecture notes applied for the First International Working Conference on Anthroposophical Physiotherapy, Goetheanum, Dornach, Switzerland, 2. and 3. Mai 1997.
"Man as Embryo between Heaven and Earth", explores the dynamic morphology of human posture development through the lens of anthroposophical physiology. It describes human embryonic development as a unified process where growth and body functions are pre-exercised before actual physical realization. The development is marked by four phases—mineral, plant, animal, and human—each with distinct characteristics. The text emphasizes the polarity between head and pelvis, and the significant role of upright posture in human evolution, describing it as a spiritual effort to maintain an erect position against animal specialization. It also highlights the importance of retardation, where human features are retained from the embryonic stage, allowing for unique human traits and spiritual development. The extremities (arms and legs) serve as mediators between heaven and earth, with a significant focus on the anatomical and functional differences between upper and lower extremities. The lectures argue that understanding these developmental gestures provides insight into the archetypical images and creative principles behind human morphology.
More resources on "Embryosophy": https://www.embryo.nl/en/articles-embryosophy/
/https://www.embryo.nl/en/notes-man-as-embryo-between-heavens-and-earth-2005-en/
Lecture notes applied for the First International Working Conference on Anthroposophical Physiotherapy, Goetheanum, Dornach, Switzerland, 2. and 3. Mai 1997.
"Man as Embryo between Heaven and Earth", explores the dynamic morphology of human posture development through the lens of anthroposophical physiology. It describes human embryonic development as a unified process where growth and body functions are pre-exercised before actual physical realization. The development is marked by four phases—mineral, plant, animal, and human—each with distinct characteristics. The text emphasizes the polarity between head and pelvis, and the significant role of upright posture in human evolution, describing it as a spiritual effort to maintain an erect position against animal specialization. It also highlights the importance of retardation, where human features are retained from the embryonic stage, allowing for unique human traits and spiritual development. The extremities (arms and legs) serve as mediators between heaven and earth, with a significant focus on the anatomical and functional differences between upper and lower extremities. The lectures argue that understanding these developmental gestures provides insight into the archetypical images and creative principles behind human morphology.
More resources on "Embryosophy": https://www.embryo.nl/en/articles-embryosophy/
Forwarded from Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)
"There is only the Field" - Konstantin Meyl
The equations of Konstantin Meyl are the best description of existing physical reality that we have.
They do not and cannot extend outside of their remit and so do not describe spirituality, God, the Origins, Creation, multiple universes, 'conscious 'experience' or any possible holographic projection. All of these may or may not be true totally independently of the equations themselves. You can have them or reject them, it is up to you. Meyl himself believes in God as a primal cause.
When Meyl says "There is only the Field" he means that there is no need to think of the Field embedded within a larger framework such as space or the aether. Moreover, there is no need to think of 'time' as being a fundamental property ticking away somewhere at the foundations of the universe.
Both time and distance are emergent properties of the Field itself. Clocks will run faster or slower and yard-sticks will shrink or expand depending upon ambient field strength.
The universe is not expanding as such since there is nothing to expand into and no absolute reference of size. In a sense, our galaxy is shrinking which makes it seem that the rest of the universe is expanding relative to us.
There are such things as 'local frames of reference' but these are not the same as those in relativity. There is no quantum indeterminism, entanglement or action at a distance and no randomness as such. The boundaries between physical reality and 'something else' are therefore very well defined. This should put a stop to much philosophical musings but no doubt give rise to more but of a different sort.
The equations of Konstantin Meyl are the best description of existing physical reality that we have.
They do not and cannot extend outside of their remit and so do not describe spirituality, God, the Origins, Creation, multiple universes, 'conscious 'experience' or any possible holographic projection. All of these may or may not be true totally independently of the equations themselves. You can have them or reject them, it is up to you. Meyl himself believes in God as a primal cause.
When Meyl says "There is only the Field" he means that there is no need to think of the Field embedded within a larger framework such as space or the aether. Moreover, there is no need to think of 'time' as being a fundamental property ticking away somewhere at the foundations of the universe.
Both time and distance are emergent properties of the Field itself. Clocks will run faster or slower and yard-sticks will shrink or expand depending upon ambient field strength.
The universe is not expanding as such since there is nothing to expand into and no absolute reference of size. In a sense, our galaxy is shrinking which makes it seem that the rest of the universe is expanding relative to us.
There are such things as 'local frames of reference' but these are not the same as those in relativity. There is no quantum indeterminism, entanglement or action at a distance and no randomness as such. The boundaries between physical reality and 'something else' are therefore very well defined. This should put a stop to much philosophical musings but no doubt give rise to more but of a different sort.
🙏2
Forwarded from Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)
What is heat? (Meyl)
Atoms are complicated vortex structures within electromagnetic fields and the 'vortex radius' is what is taken to be the size of the atom.
The vortex structure theoretically extends to infinity and so the 'space' between atoms is not empty but consists of an extended field structure which serves to keep atoms at a distance from each other and is the basis of 'pressure'.
A photon of light or infra-red is a sort of linear vortex that can roll up into a spherical vortex at any time or become absorbed into an existing atomic vortex. In this way, gases, liquids and solids can absorb arbitrary amounts of energy, there is no 'quantum' of energy needed.
As vortices increase their energy they can expand meaning the liquid or solid may also expand owing to increased repulsive forces. This stored energy is latent heat. Heat transfer is by vortex gains and losses as field energy moves from one vortex to the next.
Vortices can 'oscillate', they can expand and contract rhythmically. Whole domains of the substance can vibrate in synchrony and form large areas of coherent oscillations. In gases and liquids this can give rise to Brownian motion.
This is not the same as the kinetic theory if gases where long distance movement of molecules is assumed. Vortex may account for Brownian motors if they exist but not suitable as an explanation for ion channel function or the DNA replication cartoons.
Measured temperature is 'rate' of heat loss and is via vortex losses. Stirring water reputedly makes it cooler which means that although there is greater energy stored, it is losing energy more slowly as the vortices somehow retain the energy on a semi-permanent basis. Again, energy is stored as a field structure and not as the kinetic energy described by mainstream physics.
Shining light into a liquid may have a similar effect if a single wavelength causes coherent oscillations on a macro scale and retains the extra energy instead of dissipating it.
High energy vortices can lose energy in the form of quanta which can unroll into photons and be measured as infra-red radiation. The point here is that matter, energy, light, vortices are all the same substance; there is no need to wonder how kinetic energy can be converted to a photon for example.
Meyl uses the term 'heat' to describe the amplitude of vortex oscillation and the term 'temperature' to refer to the frequency of oscillation. The two are quite different.
A spinning vortex can absorb a photon of a particular frequency but emit one of a different frequency (and energy), thereby acting as a transducer. This is used in biological systems according to quantum physicists.
To see energy transfer from vortex to vortex, just stare at a river for a while.
Atoms are complicated vortex structures within electromagnetic fields and the 'vortex radius' is what is taken to be the size of the atom.
The vortex structure theoretically extends to infinity and so the 'space' between atoms is not empty but consists of an extended field structure which serves to keep atoms at a distance from each other and is the basis of 'pressure'.
A photon of light or infra-red is a sort of linear vortex that can roll up into a spherical vortex at any time or become absorbed into an existing atomic vortex. In this way, gases, liquids and solids can absorb arbitrary amounts of energy, there is no 'quantum' of energy needed.
As vortices increase their energy they can expand meaning the liquid or solid may also expand owing to increased repulsive forces. This stored energy is latent heat. Heat transfer is by vortex gains and losses as field energy moves from one vortex to the next.
Vortices can 'oscillate', they can expand and contract rhythmically. Whole domains of the substance can vibrate in synchrony and form large areas of coherent oscillations. In gases and liquids this can give rise to Brownian motion.
This is not the same as the kinetic theory if gases where long distance movement of molecules is assumed. Vortex may account for Brownian motors if they exist but not suitable as an explanation for ion channel function or the DNA replication cartoons.
Measured temperature is 'rate' of heat loss and is via vortex losses. Stirring water reputedly makes it cooler which means that although there is greater energy stored, it is losing energy more slowly as the vortices somehow retain the energy on a semi-permanent basis. Again, energy is stored as a field structure and not as the kinetic energy described by mainstream physics.
Shining light into a liquid may have a similar effect if a single wavelength causes coherent oscillations on a macro scale and retains the extra energy instead of dissipating it.
High energy vortices can lose energy in the form of quanta which can unroll into photons and be measured as infra-red radiation. The point here is that matter, energy, light, vortices are all the same substance; there is no need to wonder how kinetic energy can be converted to a photon for example.
Meyl uses the term 'heat' to describe the amplitude of vortex oscillation and the term 'temperature' to refer to the frequency of oscillation. The two are quite different.
A spinning vortex can absorb a photon of a particular frequency but emit one of a different frequency (and energy), thereby acting as a transducer. This is used in biological systems according to quantum physicists.
To see energy transfer from vortex to vortex, just stare at a river for a while.
Forwarded from Hypersanity Infinitus
#nikolatesla #electromagnetism #hypersanity
TESLA COIL BUILDERS HINTS
http://amasci.com/tesla/tc.html
WHERE'S THE GOOD TC INFO?
http://amasci.com/tesla/where.html
ELECTRICALLY SHORT 'ENERGY-SUCKING' RADIO ANTENNAS N. TESLA'S POWER RECEIVER AND THE PHYSICS OF THE CAVITY-PROBE
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
ON THE POSSIBILITY THAT KNOWN PHENOMENA REGARDING THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NEARFIELD REGION CONTAINS A BLATANT VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF PHYSICS
http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vectFE.html
Gee ya think
COLER/SWEET DEVICES EXPLAINED?!
http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vect2.html
Possibly Tesla car
ON THE POSSIBILITY THAT ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION LACKS QUANTA OF ANY KIND - OR - PHOTON DIES SCREAMING
http://amasci.com/freenrg/sukdynam.html
"No photons"
'INVISIBLE WALL' ACOUSTIC PHENOMENON
http://amasci.com/freenrg/audwall.html
😂 Future experiment ideas, used to think hard light walls or super strong magnetic fields but invisible acoustic shields that also push away non magnetic items would clearly be even better 🧙♂️
Back to more calculators, less crackpot 🤣
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/solenoid-inductance
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/ideal-transformer
TESLA COIL BUILDERS HINTS
http://amasci.com/tesla/tc.html
WHERE'S THE GOOD TC INFO?
http://amasci.com/tesla/where.html
ELECTRICALLY SHORT 'ENERGY-SUCKING' RADIO ANTENNAS N. TESLA'S POWER RECEIVER AND THE PHYSICS OF THE CAVITY-PROBE
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
ON THE POSSIBILITY THAT KNOWN PHENOMENA REGARDING THE ELECTROMAGNETIC NEARFIELD REGION CONTAINS A BLATANT VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF PHYSICS
http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vectFE.html
Gee ya think
COLER/SWEET DEVICES EXPLAINED?!
http://amasci.com/freenrg/a-vect2.html
Possibly Tesla car
ON THE POSSIBILITY THAT ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION LACKS QUANTA OF ANY KIND - OR - PHOTON DIES SCREAMING
http://amasci.com/freenrg/sukdynam.html
"No photons"
'INVISIBLE WALL' ACOUSTIC PHENOMENON
http://amasci.com/freenrg/audwall.html
😂 Future experiment ideas, used to think hard light walls or super strong magnetic fields but invisible acoustic shields that also push away non magnetic items would clearly be even better 🧙♂️
Back to more calculators, less crackpot 🤣
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/solenoid-inductance
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/ideal-transformer
Forwarded from Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)
Stuart Hameroff
"The brain is a quantum orchestra with 12 orders of frequency in microtubules inside neurons acting collectively."
So the bio-field acts through the myelin sheath at the macro scale and through microtubules at the sub-cellular scale.
Meyl mentions a German professor who says that microtubules are constructed when needed and then dismantled when not needed.
Geesink and Meijer found that an input of any of the 12 frequencies was beneficial to health.
Conjecture: The bio-field consists of standing scalar waves of the specified frequencies which act as carrier waves for information in the form of magnetic vortices.
Input of the 12 frequencies is not information of itself but instea strengthens the carrier wave infra-structure.
Hameroff says consciousness is quantum collapse. Meyl says "Information is the structure of a scalar wave"
https://x.com/StuartHameroff/status/1811641001594737145
"The brain is a quantum orchestra with 12 orders of frequency in microtubules inside neurons acting collectively."
So the bio-field acts through the myelin sheath at the macro scale and through microtubules at the sub-cellular scale.
Meyl mentions a German professor who says that microtubules are constructed when needed and then dismantled when not needed.
Geesink and Meijer found that an input of any of the 12 frequencies was beneficial to health.
Conjecture: The bio-field consists of standing scalar waves of the specified frequencies which act as carrier waves for information in the form of magnetic vortices.
Input of the 12 frequencies is not information of itself but instea strengthens the carrier wave infra-structure.
Hameroff says consciousness is quantum collapse. Meyl says "Information is the structure of a scalar wave"
https://x.com/StuartHameroff/status/1811641001594737145
X (formerly Twitter)
Stuart Hameroff (@StuartHameroff) on X
No, the brain is a quantum orchestra with 12 orders of frequency in microtubules inside neurons acting collectively.
In Alzheimer’s microtubules fall apart, neurons, brain shrink.
Instead of attacking the stupid amyloid plaques, treat the microtubules! …
In Alzheimer’s microtubules fall apart, neurons, brain shrink.
Instead of attacking the stupid amyloid plaques, treat the microtubules! …
Forwarded from Alkemix
best online sundial construction instructions
Based on the search results, here are some of the best online resources for sundial construction instructions:
1. Sundial Construction by the North American Sundial Society[7] - This page provides detailed graphical instructions from Clem Rutter on how to construct horizontal sundials using various historical methods. It shows 11 different graphical approaches step-by-step.
2. Build a Sundial by SunEarthTools.com[2] - Enter your location coordinates, select options like orientation and type (vertical or horizontal), and this tool will generate a customized sundial template with instructions that you can download as a PDF and print out. Very straightforward.
3. Make a Sundial by Wildsight[8] - Provides simple instructions for making a human sundial as well as a nature sundial using just a stick and rocks to mark the hours. Good for kids and beginners to understand the basic sundial concept.
4. Digital Sundial by Instructables[11] - Detailed guide on 3D modeling and printing a modern digital-style sundial customized for your latitude. Includes the math and testing steps.
5. Sundial Template Calculator by Blocklayer[14] - Enter your latitude and preferences and this tool will generate a printable horizontal or equatorial sundial template with dimensions for the gnomon. The video explains the difference between the two types.
6. How to Make a Sundial by Teach Starter[12] - Simple illustrated worksheet with step-by-step instructions for making a paper plate sundial. Designed for classroom use to teach kids about sundials.
In summary, these sites provide a range of options, from simple sundials kids can make to generate complex customized templates to 3D printed modern designs. The North American Sundial Society's graphical instructions are the most comprehensive for learning historical methods. For most people, the SunEarthTools and Blocklayer generators will likely be the easiest way to create an accurate sundial for their location.
Citations:
[1] Build A Horizontal Sundial - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14GOFiJSElI
[2] Build a sundial - SunEarthTools.com https://www.sunearthtools.com/solar/build-sundial.php
[3] Human Sundial - Solar Schoolhouse https://solarschoolhouse.org/sundial/
[4] How to Make a Sundial the Simple Way | Sky & Telescope https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/how-to-make-a-sundial/
[5] Sundial Artisans https://sundials.org/index.php/dial-links/sundial-artisans
[6] Sundial projects https://www.sundials.info/projects
[7] Sundial Construction https://www.sundials.org/index.php/teachers-corner/sundial-construction
[8] Make a Sundial - Wildsight https://wildsight.ca/education-resources/make-a-sundial/
[9] Make a Sundial - Raritan Headwaters https://www.raritanheadwaters.org/2020/04/16/make-a-sundial/
[10] Shadows Pro - Create your sundial https://www.shadowspro.com/en/index.html
[11] Digital Sundial- Ancient Tech in Modern Times - Instructables https://www.instructables.com/Time-oclock-shadow/
[12] How to Make a Sundial Activity and Worksheet | Teach Starter https://www.teachstarter.com/us/teaching-resource/sun-and-moon-effects-how-to-make-a-sundial-worksheet-us/
[13] Sundial DIY | Generation Genius https://www.generationgenius.com/activities/earths-orbit-and-rotation-activity-for-kids/
[14] Sundial Template Calculator - Metric - Blocklayer https://www.blocklayer.com/sundial
[15] How to Build the World's Simplest Sundial - The Natural Navigator https://www.naturalnavigator.com/news/2013/09/how-to-build-the-worlds-simplest-sundial/
[16] Make your own sundial - Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery https://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/Planetarium/Learn-astronomy/Make-your-own-sundial
[17] Welcome to "mySundial.ca"! The best sundial web site! https://www.mysundial.ca
Based on the search results, here are some of the best online resources for sundial construction instructions:
1. Sundial Construction by the North American Sundial Society[7] - This page provides detailed graphical instructions from Clem Rutter on how to construct horizontal sundials using various historical methods. It shows 11 different graphical approaches step-by-step.
2. Build a Sundial by SunEarthTools.com[2] - Enter your location coordinates, select options like orientation and type (vertical or horizontal), and this tool will generate a customized sundial template with instructions that you can download as a PDF and print out. Very straightforward.
3. Make a Sundial by Wildsight[8] - Provides simple instructions for making a human sundial as well as a nature sundial using just a stick and rocks to mark the hours. Good for kids and beginners to understand the basic sundial concept.
4. Digital Sundial by Instructables[11] - Detailed guide on 3D modeling and printing a modern digital-style sundial customized for your latitude. Includes the math and testing steps.
5. Sundial Template Calculator by Blocklayer[14] - Enter your latitude and preferences and this tool will generate a printable horizontal or equatorial sundial template with dimensions for the gnomon. The video explains the difference between the two types.
6. How to Make a Sundial by Teach Starter[12] - Simple illustrated worksheet with step-by-step instructions for making a paper plate sundial. Designed for classroom use to teach kids about sundials.
In summary, these sites provide a range of options, from simple sundials kids can make to generate complex customized templates to 3D printed modern designs. The North American Sundial Society's graphical instructions are the most comprehensive for learning historical methods. For most people, the SunEarthTools and Blocklayer generators will likely be the easiest way to create an accurate sundial for their location.
Citations:
[1] Build A Horizontal Sundial - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14GOFiJSElI
[2] Build a sundial - SunEarthTools.com https://www.sunearthtools.com/solar/build-sundial.php
[3] Human Sundial - Solar Schoolhouse https://solarschoolhouse.org/sundial/
[4] How to Make a Sundial the Simple Way | Sky & Telescope https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/how-to-make-a-sundial/
[5] Sundial Artisans https://sundials.org/index.php/dial-links/sundial-artisans
[6] Sundial projects https://www.sundials.info/projects
[7] Sundial Construction https://www.sundials.org/index.php/teachers-corner/sundial-construction
[8] Make a Sundial - Wildsight https://wildsight.ca/education-resources/make-a-sundial/
[9] Make a Sundial - Raritan Headwaters https://www.raritanheadwaters.org/2020/04/16/make-a-sundial/
[10] Shadows Pro - Create your sundial https://www.shadowspro.com/en/index.html
[11] Digital Sundial- Ancient Tech in Modern Times - Instructables https://www.instructables.com/Time-oclock-shadow/
[12] How to Make a Sundial Activity and Worksheet | Teach Starter https://www.teachstarter.com/us/teaching-resource/sun-and-moon-effects-how-to-make-a-sundial-worksheet-us/
[13] Sundial DIY | Generation Genius https://www.generationgenius.com/activities/earths-orbit-and-rotation-activity-for-kids/
[14] Sundial Template Calculator - Metric - Blocklayer https://www.blocklayer.com/sundial
[15] How to Build the World's Simplest Sundial - The Natural Navigator https://www.naturalnavigator.com/news/2013/09/how-to-build-the-worlds-simplest-sundial/
[16] Make your own sundial - Queen Victoria Museum & Art Gallery https://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/Planetarium/Learn-astronomy/Make-your-own-sundial
[17] Welcome to "mySundial.ca"! The best sundial web site! https://www.mysundial.ca
YouTube
Build A Horizontal Sundial
Here's a how -to video about building your own horizontal sundial! Everything you'll need is probably in your home office. Check out the Hack A Week project page for complete instructions and the links mentioned in the video.
http://hackaweek.com/hacks/?p=915…
http://hackaweek.com/hacks/?p=915…