Noetic Aether Part One; Cutting the Einsteinian Knot | Formscapes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzadkHXIUOs

The video discusses the taboo topic of reconciling physics with metaphysics, critiquing the established inferential claims in physics. The speaker aims to create a coherent understanding of the physical world, emphasizing the need to distinguish observable phenomena from theoretical inferences. It critiques Einsteinian relativity, highlighting issues like misplaced concreteness and the problems with special and general relativity's conceptual frameworks. The video suggests that modern physics has strayed from providing genuine explanations, instead relying on mathematical constructs and conventions without empirical coherence. Future discussions will explore alternative metaphysical models by Alfred North Whitehead and Henri Bergson.

Noetic Aether Part Two: The Morphogenetics of Matter | Formscapes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2U-y_gI8Zc

The fundamental nature of physical reality, explain how electrostatic and magnetic forces interplay through destructive and constructive interference. It describes atoms, especially hydrogen, as symbiotic superorganisms and examines processes like neutron-to-proton conversion and electron capture. The model proposes that gravitational phenomena are the result of interactions of mass fields rather than spacetime curvature. It emphasizes that the universe grows through ether density dynamics and interweaves concepts of consciousness, memory, and time dilation to present a holistic understanding of these phenomena.

Noetic Aether Synopsis | Formscapes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ8i7tbZaYU

This Formscapes lecture discusses the interplay between electrostatic and magnetic forces, describing how interference patterns form within circuits and magnetic poles. It explores atomic structures, focusing on the dynamics between protons, neutrons, and electrons. The concept of ether density and vacuity is central, explaining electromagnetic waves, standing waves, and mass fields. It critiques modern physics' interpretations of gravity and space-time, proposing an ether-based model that integrates consciousness and time dilation to present a comprehensive view of physical reality.

Eric Dollard & Peter Lindemann - History, Stories & Science
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37_UdY5GZmk

NOTE: If you know the Aether Force story, this discussion may may make you a little more than curious ss to why there is no mention of Thomas Joseph Brown. Hmmmm.

The conversation revolves around decades of collaboration and experimentation in alternative science and technology, particularly focusing on the Integratron and related projects. They recount their work on various machines, including the cosmic induction generator, and electrostatic motors, highlighting significant experiments such as generating high voltages and observing plasma behavior in bulbs. Challenges such as financial constraints, equipment losses, and personal tragedies are detailed, along with their efforts to sustain their projects often under difficult conditions.

Yantras (Atoms), Mantras (Photons) & Einstein's E=mc2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwX8Zqdhu2Q

"INTRODUCTION
00:00 Yantras are Visual Symbols of Atoms
00:15 Summary of 4 Claims (Why Yantras ~ Atoms)
02:00 Modern Symbols of Atoms
03:24 Creating a criteria to analyze the Sri Yantra as symbolic depiction of an atom
04:25 (Criteria 1)Evaluating if the Sri Yantra intended to depict atoms with Samkhya Philosophy
05:30 Sri Yantra & the Big Bang
05:44 Sri Yantra & the Human Body
06:10 Flexibility of Scales while interpreting the Sri Yantra

ANALYSIS of SRI YANTRA & ATOMS
07:27 (1) NUCLEUS & the BINDU (central point)
08:46 (2) Discrete Energy Levels
09:34 9 SHIVA-SHAKTI TRIANGLES (manifested energy) & DISCRETE ENERGY LEVELS
11:05 2 LAYERS OF LOTUS PETALS & ATOMIC ORBITALS (& rutherford model shape)
12:11 ELECTRONS & 43 SECONDARY TRIANGLES
14:00 (3) ATOM = CIRCULAR SHAPE within BHUPURA (4 outer gates)

ANALYSIS of MANTRAS & Electromagnetic Radiation
15:20 Electromagnetic Radiation
16:35 Mantras are Auditory Symbols of EM Radiation
(Correction: at 16:00 I say "Energy specifically relates to EM Radiation"... This is not true. The "E" in Einstein's equation also refers to other types of energy. I was speaking about Einstein's Equation in terms of Mass-Energy Conversion)
17:20 Yantra-Mantra Equivalence = Mass-Energy Equivalence
18:00 SOUNDS AS SYMBOLS of EM RADIATION
18:52 HIROSHIMA: Modern Symbol of Sounds & EM Radiation
19:25 (1) MEANING OF RITUALS USING YANTRAS & MANTRAS
19:49 (2) ENERGY BASED ON FREQUENCY OF MANTRA & EM RADIATION
20:05 (3) MANTRAS ENERGIZE YANTRAS = EM RADIATION ENERGIZE ATOMS

CONCLUSION
21:13 Sanatana Dharma (Eternal Order) means Physics on a cosmic & atomic scale
23:08 CONNECTING LALITA TRIPURA SUNDARI (PRAKRITI) WITH YANTRAS (ATOMS) & MANTRAS (EM RADIATION)

Discovery Credits:
- The ancient yogis and rishis who conceptualised the nature of an atom & EM Radiation thousands of years ago
- The practitioners of yoga, Sanatana Dharma, & the Shakti tradition who've supported the survival of the Sir Yantra through time and space

Re-discoverers of the Sri Yantra's symbolic meaning
1. Sydney in Osaka: "Bell of Peace, Adam and Eve – Atom and Sri – the Atom and the Sri Yantra"

AUM is the "Cosmic Sound" because Mantras ~ EM Radiation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGsc0aC9pdc

0:00 Is OM a Sound or Auditory Symbol of EM Radiation?
1:02 Introduction
2:01 Mantras are Sounds in Practice & Symbols of EM Radiation in Theory
4:10 Utility of Mantras as Practical Tools vs Conceptual Models of EM Radiation
6:08 Intersection of Properties between Sound and EM Radiation
8:27 Conceptual Models vs Scientific Models
9:47 Example of Modern Auditory Symbol of EM Radiation


Discovery Credits:
- The ancient yogis and rishis who conceptualised the nature of an atom & EM Radiation thousands of years ago
- The practitioners of yoga, Sanatana Dharma, & the Shakti tradition who've supported the survival of the Sir Yantra through time and space

Do not be fooled by the subsensible. Steiner called it out a century ago.

The Myth of Quantum Consciousness - Victor J. Stenger
Published in The Humanist, May/Jume 1992, Vol. 53, Number 3, pp. 13-15.

https://web.archive.org/web/19970611013358/http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/vjs/www/qmyth.txt

The myth of quantum consciousness posits that quantum mechanics assigns a central role to the human mind in shaping the universe, gaining traction in New Age circles and some scientific discussions. However, this idea misinterprets quantum mechanics, which actually supports a reductionist, materialistic view. The Copenhagen interpretation, validated by experiments, does not necessitate human involvement, and quantum mechanics does not allow for faster-than-light signals or holistic interconnectedness. The article argues that the myth is a modern continuation of ancient idealism, lacking scientific basis and promoting unfounded beliefs.

Understanding Nature Without Models?
- Dr. Gopi Vijaya on the DemystifyPod

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dEL8AzAVdw

"Dr. Gopi Vijaya began his scientific career in solar physics but quickly branched out into fields as diverse as projective geometry, Goethean Science, foundations of astronomy, calculus, and the Reciprocal System of physics. Our conversation begins with the relationship between science and technology and moves into the philosophical realm asking seemingly bizarre questions like - can we do science without models? Also - how do we collaborate as thinkers without competing? Along the way we explore outstanding anomalies in light, electromagnetism, gravity and color theory."

Gopi's conference: http://www.renewalofscience.org/

00:05:09 What is the Difference Between Science and Technology?
00:12:23 The Difference Between Humans and Nature
00:18:59 Is tech without collateral damage possible?
00:22:14 The absurdity of an end to science
00:26:02 Can we understand without models?
00:31:20 How to understand Gravity without a model
00:39:30 Throwing mass into the mix
00:48:45 A sea of measurements, but what is measured?
01:00:51 The coherence of an entire field at once
01:10:35 Obscurantism of analogy
01:22:01 The zero sum game of knowledge
01:28:22 The thing about color
01:33:08 Missing Magenta
01:41:39 Why is light so unaffected by electricity and magnetism?
01:48:14 Functionality is just a starting point
01:54:16 Missing cause and effect in plain sight
02:03:41 Closing thoughts
02:07:33 Renewal of Science Conference

Theosophy = Atomism

GA 199. Spiritual Science as a Foundation for Social Forms: Lecture X28 Aug 1920,

"Now, in this regard, even theoretical constructions are extraordinarily interesting. As most of you know, a certain Leadbeater is active in the Theosophical Society. This Leadbeater has written all sorts of books, and a great number of people were particularly charmed when he wrote something like an occult chemistry; I even met scholars who were most delighted by this occult chemistry. What really happened? This Mr. Leadbeater has become acquainted with the materialistic chemistry of the present with its molecules and atoms. This materialistic chemistry of today with its molecules and atoms describes oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, fron oxide, sodium acetate, and so on, building them up from these molecules and atoms. Out of such atoms, Leadbeater builds up the spiritual worlds, the Spirits and the angels. He creates a spiritualism out of materialism I have seen people who went about nearly enchanted when, among many things, the so-called "permanent atom" once swam around like a drop of fat on the soup of the Theosophical Society—such drops of fat sometimes did swim about, didn't they?"

GA 220. Realism and Nominalism27 Jan 1923, Dornach

"You see, in regard to all things, Anthroposophy must really find a new way, and if we really wish to enter into Anthroposophy, it is necessary to change the way of thinking and of feeling in respect to most things. In Anthroposophy, it is not enough if anthroposophists consider on the one hand a more or less materialistic world conception, or a world conception based more or less on ancient traditional beliefs, and then pass on to Anthroposophy, because this appeals to them more than other teachings. But they are mistaken. We must not only go from one conception to the other—from the materialistic monistic conception to the anthroposophical one—and then say that the latter is the best. Instead we must realize that what enables us to understand the monistic materialistic conception does not enable us to understand the anthroposophical conception. You see, theosophists believed that the understanding of the materialistic monistic conception enabled them also to understand the spiritual. For this reason we have the peculiar phenomenon that in the monistic materialistic world conception people argue as follows:—everything is matter; man consists only of matter—the material substance of the blood, of the nerves, etc.

Everything is matter. Theosophists—I mean the members of the Theosophical Society—say instead:—No, this is a materialistic view; there is the spirit. Now they begin to describe man according to the spirit:—the physical body which is dense, then the etheric body somewhat thinner, a kind of mist, a thin mist—these are in reality quite materialistic ideas! Now comes the astral body, again somewhat thinner, yet this is only a somewhat thin material substance, etc. This leads them up a ladder, yet they obtain merely a material substance that grows thinner and thinner. This too is a materialistic view. For the result is always “matter”, even though this grows thinner and thinner. This is materialism, but people call it “spirit”. Materialism at least is honest, and calls the matter “matter”, whereas, in the other case, spiritual names are given to what people conceive materialistically.

When we look at spiritual images, we must realize that we cannot contemplate these in the same way as we contemplate physical images; a new way of thinking must be found.

Things become very interesting at a special point in the history of the Theosophical Society. Materialism speaks of atoms. These atoms were imagined in many ways and strong materialists, who took into consideration the material quality of the body, formed all kinds of ideas about these atoms. One of these materialists built up a Theory of Atoms and imagined the atom in a kind of oscillating condition, as if some fine material substance were spinning round in spirals.

If you study Leadbeater's ideas on atoms, you will find a great resemblance with this theory.

An essay which appeared recently in an English periodical discussed the question of whether Leadbeater's atom was actually “seen”, or whether Leadbeater contented himself with reading the book on the Theory of Atoms and translating it into a “spiritual” language.

These things must be taken seriously. It matters very much that we should examine ourselves, in order to see if we still have materialistic tendencies and merely call them by all kinds of spiritual names. The essential point is to change our ways of thinking and of feeling—otherwise we cannot reach a really spiritual way of looking at things. This gives us an outlook, a perspective, that will help us to achieve the rise from sin as opposed to the fall into sin."

Occult Chemistry Resources

- MG Hocking - http://www.4-d.org.uk/

- Stephen M Phillips: http://www.smphillips.mysite.com/my-books.html

- Chris Illert - https://hpb.narod.ru/tph/TPH_CIAT.HTM#topofdoc

-https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/occult-chemistry-revisited

- https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue36/SrinivasanIE36.pdf

- https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/clairvoyant-chemistry/5984.article

- https://anthroposophy.eu/Occult_atom

- Occult Chemistry for Post Grads: https://hpb.narod.ru/tph/TPH_OCPG.HTM

- Concerning the "Occult Chemistry": https://hpb.narod.ru/tph/TPH_COCR.HTM

- Difficulties with Clairvoynace - https://hpb.narod.ru/tph/TPH_DICL.HTM

- http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/oc/pdfindex.htm

- Occult Chemists: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297516994_THE_OCCULT_CHEMISTS_AND_THEIR_EXTRAORDINARY_JOURNEY_INTO_THE_WORLD_OF_ATOMS

- Donald de Garcia on Phillips & Occult Chemistry: https://123dok.net/article/phillips-occult-chemistry-examples-scientists-using-occult-ideas.zwvm0v6l

- Occult Chemistry Reevaluated: https://www.duchovnipodpora.vzestup.net/_media/projekty/veda/inspirace/jasnovidna/lester_smith_-_occult_chemistry_re-evaluated_-_1982.pdf

Steiner and the Nature of Atoms
A collection of quotes from https://anthroposophy.eu/The_nature_of_atoms

1904-GA011
.. the other kind of ether which brings the elementary chemical substances into being. This ether will be called the chemical ether.

1904-12-16-GA093
makes the link between the physical atom as frozen electricity, and electricity and human thought

1904-12-23-GA093
lecture called: The Atom as Coagulated Electricity

quote A

We are living now in the epoch of evolution that may be called the mineral epoch; and our task is to permeate this mineral world through and through with the spirit within us. Think of what this means. You are building a house. You fetch the stones from a quarry and hew them into the shapes required by the building, and so on.

What are you inculcating into this raw material obtained from the mineral kingdom?

You are inculcating human spirit into the raw material. If you construct a machine, you have laid the spirit that is part of you, into that machine; the actual machine does, of course, perish and become dust; not a trace of it will survive.

But what you have done, what you have achieved, passes into the very atoms and does not vanish without a trace. Every atom bears a trace of your spirit and will carry this trace with it. Whether an atom has at some time been in a machine, or has not been in a machine, is not a matter of indifference. The atom itself has undergone change as a result of having once been in a machine, and this change that you have wrought in the atom will never again be lost to it. Moreover, through your having changed the atom, through the fact that you have united the spirit in you with the mineral world, a permanent stamp has been made upon the general consciousness of mankind; just so much consciousness goes with you into the other world.

Occult science well knows in what way the human being can perform selfless actions and how greatly his consciousness will be enhanced by them.

Certain men, who have been deeply imbued with this knowledge, have been so selfless that they have taken steps to prevent even their names from going down to posterity! An example of this is the work entitled Theologica Deutsch. Nobody knows who wrote it. On the outside there are only the words: The man from Frankfurt. He, therefore, was one who took care that his very name should be unknown. He worked in such a way that he merely added something to the objective world without asking for honour or for the preservation of his name. And here let it be said that the Masters, as a rule, are not personages known in history; they sometimes are embodied in historical personalities — when it is necessary; but in a certain respect this is a sacrifice on their part. The level of their consciousness is incompatible with work for themselves, and preservation of a name does, after all, involve this. It is difficult thoroughly to understand this rule but it will now be clear to you why the aim of the Freemasons is to work in the world in such a way that their deeds are hidden in social organizations or charitable institutions. For selfless deeds are the real foundations of immortality. In the outer world we see the reflex of such deeds. They need not necessarily be of great account. If someone gives a coin to a poor man, this may be an unselfish deed; but only to the extent that it was absolutely selfless does it find its way to the sphere of immortality — and very few deeds are selfless to this degree. An act of charity may be extremely egoistical when, for instance, it gives rise to a comforting feeling. Charity very often springs from selfish motives. If a poor man living among us has no meat at Christmas and we feel bound to give him some in order that we may feel justified in eating our own Christmas dinner — that, after all, is egoism. In the Middle Ages it would have been impossible to say who had built many of the cathedrals or painted many of the pictures.

It is only in our epoch of civilisation that people have begun to attach such value to the human name; in earlier epochs, more spiritual than our own, the individual name was of less importance. Spirituality in those days was directed to reality; whereas our epoch adheres to the delusion of thinking that what is a mere concern of the moment should be preserved.

quote B

All progress is the result of involution and evolution. Involution is the in-taking, evolution the yield, the out-giving. All states and conditions of world-existence alternate between these two processes. When you see, hear, smell or taste, you breathe nature into yourselves. The act of sight does not pass away without leaving a trace behind. The eye itself perishes, the object seen — that too perishes; but what you have experienced in the act of sight, remains. It will not be difficult for you to realise that in certain epochs it is necessary to make such things understood.

We are going forward to an age when, as I indicated recently, men will understand what the atom is, in reality. It will be realised — by the public mind too — that the atom is nothing but coagulated electricity. The thought itself is composed of the same substance.

Before the end of the fifth cultural age, science will have reached the stage where Man will be able to penetrate into the atom itself. When the similarity of substance between the thought and the atom is once comprehended, the way to get hold of the forces contained in the atom will soon be discovered and then nothing will be inaccessible to certain methods of working.

A man standing here, let us say, will be able by pressing a button concealed in his pocket, to explode some object at a great distance — say in Hamburg! Just as by setting up a wave-movement here and causing it to take a particular form at some other place, wireless telegraphy is possible, so what I have just indicated will be within Man's power when the occult truth that thought and atom consist of the same substance is put into practical application.

1905-10-05-GA093
humanity transforms every atom on earth .. in the past, atoms became more and more solidified, now however they are becoming increasingly separated. Radioactivity did not exist in earlier times and could therefore not be discovered. It has only existed for a few thousand years, because now the atoms split up more and more.

1907-12-04-GA098
The first elementary kingdom gives minerals their form, their atomistic forces of attraction and repulsion come from the group-I's (see also L19 of GA094, 94-19)

1911-10-01-GA130
What we call chemical action, is projected into the physical world from the music of the spheres in the spirit world. In the combination of two substances according to their atomic weight, we have a reflection of two tones of the harmony of the spheres. The numerical ratios in chemistry express the numerical rations of the harmony of the spheres.

1913-03-28-GA145
Atoms are simply the forces of Ahriman.

1913-09-03-GA266
The whole of atomism has validity only on the physical plane, and to a limited extent in the elemental world, but none in the spiritual world.

1914-04-17-GA154
If materialistic views continue to persist for several generations more ... people will actually see little grey atoms vibrating as an atomic whirl, not because they exist, but because they will have trained themselves to see them. See also 1922-07-15-GA213

1915-10-16-GA254
The cause of atomism lies in the human nature: atomism is a projection into space of the process that the astral body is touching the nerve-ends, which does not come into consciousness.

1916-06-13-GA169
discusses atomism, the reductionism of the human mind

The world of atoms outside is nothing but a projection of the nervous system. We project ourselves into the world and thus think of it as consisting of atoms, and our nervous system as composed of many individual ganglion-globules. Science will always tend to atomism for it originates in nerve sustance. By contrast, mysticism, religion etc come forth from the blood and do not look for the divide but always for unity.

See also 1920-03-21-GA312 where the atomistic approach in anatomy is described in a scientific-historical context. This is also in 1920-03-02-GA321 where the Florence academy of 1657-1667 is described as the cradle of materialism and phenomena were divested of anything extraterrestrial but only look for explanation of physical phenomena in the things themselves (ai in the forms of atoms and molecules).

1920-03-13-GA073
The fact that allmost no element has an integer atomic weight points to the fact that the atomic weight oscillates or trembles around an average, and with it also the whole periodic system.

1920-03-26-GA312
important

Earthly mineral substances are not to be explained by means of atomic or molecular forces but by the effect of cosmic forces (metals by certain constellations of the planets).

1921-03-22-GA324

is on memory and imagination .. and how the tendency to explain phenomena using sense-perceptible auxiliary constructions such as atoms "destroys the imaginative capability"

1922-07-15-GA213
1922-12-25-GA326
compares Greek atomists such as Democritus and their view of atoms with that of the 19th century (also in GA018)

1922-12-27-GA326
On the necessity that a science of atomitisation, desintegration, reduction to microscopic parts, a science of the dead had to come about .. that now has to advance to the point where the spiritual in nature can be found again.

Also on the infertile quarrel on atomism in Die Drei.

1923-01-06-GA326
It matters little whether or not modern speaks of atoms or not, what matters is that when it does, it speaks of them, it regards them as velocity changes. That is what counts.

1923-01-28-GA220
.. we make the atoms, while we electrify them, the bearers of evil, not only the bearers of the dead. We make them the bearers of the dead, while we allow them to be atoms generally, and imagine matter atomistically.

1923-01-30-GA257
discusses a quarrel concerning atomism (are there atoms or not) settled in the magazine 'Die Drei'.

1923-08-31-GA227

People can be lead by ahrimanic beings out of nature into occult captivity if they form atomistic ideas on nature.

1924-08-16-GA311
Atomism arose as a result of the tendency that arose at the end of the middle ages to build up a whole from single parts, instead of the opposite way

1 - Bubbles in the ether
1917-08-07-GA176
The courage shown today so admirable in regard to external issues must be extended to the inner life. In this respect modern man is far from courageous. He draws back from all aspects of spiritual reality with the consequence that so many human beings experience inner dissatisfaction and insecurity. Very much has to be done it is true, before distorted ideas give way to sound ones. Nowadays there is, for example, still a preoccupation with atomic theories, even though the earlier crude form has given way to ions and electrons.

The modern view is that everything consists of atoms. Many are of the opinion that everything can be traced back to minute atomic structures. Matter is thought to consist of the tiniest of particles; i.e., atoms. And many scientists, in fact most, endow matter with force so that the particles of matter are supposed to attract and repel one another. At this point investigations come to an end. The 19th Century will be seen as a significant period in mankind's evolution: the time when the universe was explained as a structure of matter and force, a view that has been given classical expression in innumerable works. This example shows the extent to which ideas must be readjusted before it is possible to evaluate what is needed now. Let us hold on to the fact that there are those whose speculations are mainly concerned with matter; they imagine that the world consists of atoms.

How does this view compare with what spiritual science has to say? Certainly natural physical phenomena do lead us back to atoms, but what are these atoms?

They reveal what they are at the moment the very first stage of spiritual perception has been attained. At the stage of imaginative perception atoms reveal what they truly are. I have spoken about this in various connections many years ago in public lectures. Those who speculate on matter come to the conclusion that space is empty and atoms whirl around in this empty space. Atoms are supposed to be the most solid entities in existence. That is simply not the case, the whole issue is based on illusion.

To imaginative cognition atoms are revealed as bubbles and the reality is where the empty space is supposed to be. Atoms are blown up bubbles. In other words, in contrast to what surrounds them they are nothing. You know that where bubbles are seen in soda-water there is no water. Atoms are bubbles in that sense; where they are the space is hollow, nothing is there. And yet it is possible to push against it; impact occurs precisely because, in pushing against hollowness, an effect is produced.

How can nothing produce an effect?

Take the case of the space, practically empty of air, within an air-pump; there you see how air streams into nothingness. A wrong interpretation might imagine the empty space in the bulb of the air pump as containing a substance that forced in the air. That is exactly the illusion prevailing in regard to the atom. The opposite is true: atoms are empty — yet again not empty. There is after all something within these bubbles. And what is it? This is also something about which have already spoken: what exists within the atom bubbles is ahrimanic substance. Ahriman is there. The whole system of atoms consists of ahrimanic substantiality. As you see this is a considerable metamorphosis of the ideas entertained by those who theorize about matter. Where in space they see something material we see the presence of Ahriman."

Continued quotes by Steiner on Atoms
https://anthroposophy.eu/The_nature_of_atoms

1905-10-05-GA093
humanity transforms every atom on earth .. in the past, atoms became more and more solidified, now however they are becoming increasingly separated. Radioactivity did not exist in earlier times and could therefore not be discovered. It has only existed for a few thousand years, because now the atoms split up more and more.

1907-12-04-GA098
The first elementary kingdom gives minerals their form, their atomistic forces of attraction and repulsion come from the group-I's (see also L19 of GA094, 94-19)

1911-10-01-GA130
What we call chemical action, is projected into the physical world from the music of the spheres in the spirit world. In the combination of two substances according to their atomic weight, we have a reflection of two tones of the harmony of the spheres. The numerical ratios in chemistry express the numerical rations of the harmony of the spheres.

1913-03-28-GA145
Atoms are simply the forces of Ahriman.

1913-09-03-GA266
The whole of atomism has validity only on the physical plane, and to a limited extent in the elemental world, but none in the spiritual world.

1914-04-17-GA154
If materialistic views continue to persist for several generations more ... people will actually see little grey atoms vibrating as an atomic whirl, not because they exist, but because they will have trained themselves to see them. See also 1922-07-15-GA213

1915-10-16-GA254
The cause of atomism lies in the human nature: atomism is a projection into space of the process that the astral body is touching the nerve-ends, which does not come into consciousness.

1916-06-13-GA169
discusses atomism, the reductionism of the human mind

The world of atoms outside is nothing but a projection of the nervous system. We project ourselves into the world and thus think of it as consisting of atoms, and our nervous system as composed of many individual ganglion-globules. Science will always tend to atomism for it originates in nerve sustance. By contrast, mysticism, religion etc come forth from the blood and do not look for the divide but always for unity.

See also 1920-03-21-GA312 where the atomistic approach in anatomy is described in a scientific-historical context. This is also in 1920-03-02-GA321 where the Florence academy of 1657-1667 is described as the cradle of materialism and phenomena were divested of anything extraterrestrial but only look for explanation of physical phenomena in the things themselves (ai in the forms of atoms and molecules).

1920-03-13-GA073
The fact that allmost no element has an integer atomic weight points to the fact that the atomic weight oscillates or trembles around an average, and with it also the whole periodic system.

1920-03-26-GA312
important

Earthly mineral substances are not to be explained by means of atomic or molecular forces but by the effect of cosmic forces (metals by certain constellations of the planets).

1921-03-22-GA324

is on memory and imagination .. and how the tendency to explain phenomena using sense-perceptible auxiliary constructions such as atoms "destroys the imaginative capability"

1922-07-15-GA213
1922-12-25-GA326
compares Greek atomists such as Democritus and their view of atoms with that of the 19th century (also in GA018)

1922-12-27-GA326
On the necessity that a science of atomitisation, desintegration, reduction to microscopic parts, a science of the dead had to come about .. that now has to advance to the point where the spiritual in nature can be found again.

Also on the infertile quarrel on atomism in Die Drei.

1923-01-06-GA326
It matters little whether or not modern speaks of atoms or not, what matters is that when it does, it speaks of them, it regards them as velocity changes. That is what counts.

1923-01-28-GA220
.. we make the atoms, while we electrify them, the bearers of evil, not only the bearers of the dead. We make them the bearers of the dead, while we allow them to be atoms generally, and imagine matter atomistically.

1923-01-30-GA257
discusses a quarrel concerning atomism (are there atoms or not) settled in the magazine 'Die Drei'.

1923-08-31-GA227

People can be lead by ahrimanic beings out of nature into occult captivity if they form atomistic ideas on nature.

1924-08-16-GA311
Atomism arose as a result of the tendency that arose at the end of the middle ages to build up a whole from single parts, instead of the opposite way

1 - Bubbles in the ether
1917-08-07-GA176
The courage shown today so admirable in regard to external issues must be extended to the inner life. In this respect modern man is far from courageous. He draws back from all aspects of spiritual reality with the consequence that so many human beings experience inner dissatisfaction and insecurity. Very much has to be done it is true, before distorted ideas give way to sound ones. Nowadays there is, for example, still a preoccupation with atomic theories, even though the earlier crude form has given way to ions and electrons.

The modern view is that everything consists of atoms. Many are of the opinion that everything can be traced back to minute atomic structures. Matter is thought to consist of the tiniest of particles; i.e., atoms. And many scientists, in fact most, endow matter with force so that the particles of matter are supposed to attract and repel one another. At this point investigations come to an end. The 19th Century will be seen as a significant period in mankind's evolution: the time when the universe was explained as a structure of matter and force, a view that has been given classical expression in innumerable works. This example shows the extent to which ideas must be readjusted before it is possible to evaluate what is needed now. Let us hold on to the fact that there are those whose speculations are mainly concerned with matter; they imagine that the world consists of atoms.

How does this view compare with what spiritual science has to say? Certainly natural physical phenomena do lead us back to atoms, but what are these atoms?

They reveal what they are at the moment the very first stage of spiritual perception has been attained. At the stage of imaginative perception atoms reveal what they truly are. I have spoken about this in various connections many years ago in public lectures. Those who speculate on matter come to the conclusion that space is empty and atoms whirl around in this empty space. Atoms are supposed to be the most solid entities in existence. That is simply not the case, the whole issue is based on illusion.

To imaginative cognition atoms are revealed as bubbles and the reality is where the empty space is supposed to be. Atoms are blown up bubbles. In other words, in contrast to what surrounds them they are nothing. You know that where bubbles are seen in soda-water there is no water. Atoms are bubbles in that sense; where they are the space is hollow, nothing is there. And yet it is possible to push against it; impact occurs precisely because, in pushing against hollowness, an effect is produced.

How can nothing produce an effect?

Take the case of the space, practically empty of air, within an air-pump; there you see how air streams into nothingness. A wrong interpretation might imagine the empty space in the bulb of the air pump as containing a substance that forced in the air. That is exactly the illusion prevailing in regard to the atom. The opposite is true: atoms are empty — yet again not empty. There is after all something within these bubbles. And what is it? This is also something about which have already spoken: what exists within the atom bubbles is ahrimanic substance. Ahriman is there. The whole system of atoms consists of ahrimanic substantiality. As you see this is a considerable metamorphosis of the ideas entertained by those who theorize about matter. Where in space they see something material we see the presence of Ahriman.

Maximilian Rebholz - The nature of matter
writes in his essay 'The nature of matter' (translated from unpublished typoscript, ca 1948)

version a

In the cycle The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA136), it is shown how a material planet actually arises. From the sun, which in reality emanates space by transferring the cosmic forces from the non-spatial into the etheric spatial, the Spirits of Form work in such a way that each one forms his ether sphere, and these all have their common center in the sun. These ether spheres are in reality the planets of our solar system. But now Ahrimanic Spirits of Form from the cosmos throw themselves against the activity of the normal Spirits of Form that emanates from the sun, and at the periphery of the ether sphere, they produce an invagination, which appears to us as the physical planet. Where we see this planet, there is actually a hole in the ether sphere of the normal Spirits of Form that is filled with Ahrimanic forces.

What is true of the physical planet as a “hole in the ether” on a large scale is equally true of every atom of matter on a small scale. The atoms also appear as “holes in the ether” to the imaginative vision that perceives the ether.

...

version b

In the cycle The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA136), it is shown how a material planet actually arises. The cosmos of the normal Spirits of Form would consist only of variously extended etheric spheres, all centered in the sun. These etheric spheres are really the “planets” of our solar system. But now Ahrimanic Spirits of Form throw themselves against these from outside and cause invaginations on the periphery of the etheric spheres, which appear to us as the physical planets. Where we see these, there are in truth holes in the etheric spheres of the normal Spirits of Form that are filled with Ahrimanic forces.

This description in GA136 is also important because it shows us on a large scale what has to be thought of an “atom” on a small scale.

Dr. Steiner also called atoms “holes in the ether.”

1917-08-07-GA176

How does this view compare with what spiritual science has to say? Certainly natural physical phenomena do lead us back to atoms, but what are these atoms? […]

To imaginative cognition atoms are revealed as bubbles and the reality is where the empty space is supposed to be. Atoms are blown up bubbles […], in contrast to what surrounds them they are nothing. You know that where bubbles are seen in soda-water there is no water. Atoms are bubbles in that sense; where they are the space is hollow, nothing is there. And yet it is possible to push against it; impact occurs precisely because, in pushing against hollowness, an effect is produced.

[… A]toms are empty — yet again not empty. [… W]hat exists within the atom bubbles is ahrimanic substance. Ahriman is there. The whole system of atoms consists of ahrimanic substantiality.

Imaginative clairvoyance first perceives only the supersensible, etheric-astral realm but not yet the subsensible, which, as all matter, is perceived by imaginative clairvoyance as a hollow space in the ether. The comparison with water bubbles is quite valid: for in these, too, is air, which is only not seen.

ETHER DOES NOT MEAN RAREFIED SUBSTANCE
Rudolf Steiner - MAN — HIEROGLYPH OF THE UNIVERSE - GA 201 - Lecture Four

https://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA201/English/RSP1972/19200416p01.html

"We have, on the one hand, our world as it is generally observed; and we have in addition, the materialistic superstition that, for instance, if we gaze upwards, we see the Sun, a ball of gas, as it is described in books. This is nonsense. The Sun is not a ball of gas; but in that place where the Sun is, there is something less than empty space — a sucking, absorbing body, in fact, while all around it is that which exerts pressure. Consequently in that which comes to us from the Sun we have not to do with anything constituting a product of combustion in the Sun; but all that has been transmitted to the Sun from the Universe is rayed back.

Where the Sun is, is emptier than empty space. This can be said of all parts of the Universe where we find Ether. For this reason it is so difficult for the physicist to speak of Ether, for he thinks that Ether is also matter, though more rarefied than ordinary matter. Materialism is still very busy with this perpetual ‘rarefying’, both the materialism of natural science as well as the materialism of Theosophy. It distinguishes first, dense matter; then etheric matter — more rarefied; then astral matter — still more rarefied; and then there is the ‘mental’ and I do not know what else — always more and more rarefied!

The only difference (in this theory of rarefying) between the two forms of materialism is that the one recognises more degrees of rarefaction than the other. But in the transition from ponderable matter to Ether we have nothing to do with rarefaction. Anyone who believes that in Ether we have to do merely with a ‘rarefying’ process is like a man who says: ‘I have here a purse full of money; I repeatedly take from it and the money becomes less and less. I take away still more till at last none remains.’ Nothing is left — but yet he can go on! The ‘nothing’ can become less still; for if he gets into debt, his money becomes less than nothing. In the same way not only does matter become empty space, but it becomes negative, less than nothing — emptier than emptiness; it assumes a ‘sucking’ nature. Ether is sucking, absorbing. Matter presses. Ether absorbs. The Sun is an absorbing, sucking ball, and wherever Ether is present we have this absorbent force.

Here we step over into the other side, the other aspect of three-dimensional space — we pass from pressure to suction. That which immediately surrounds us in this world, that of which we are constituted as physical man and ether man, is both pressing and sucking or absorbing. We are a combination of both; whereas the Sun possesses the power of suction only, being nothing but ether, nothing but suction. It is the undulating wave of pressure and suction, ponderable matter and ether, that forms in its alternation a living organisation. And the living organism continually breathes in the astral; the breathing expresses itself through the Moon's motion or nutation. And here we begin to divine a second member or principle of the world's construction; the one member — pressure and suction, physical and etheric; the other, the second — astral. The astral is neither physical nor etheric but is continually inhaled and exhaled; and the nutation demonstrates this process."