I must admit that I have long been suspicious of the great and significant-sounding task: “know thyself.” It has always seemed to me a deception of a secret order of priests who wished to confuse human beings with unreachable demands, and to divert attention from activity in the outer world to some inner and false contemplation. As human beings, we know ourselves only insofar as we know the world; we perceive the world only in ourselves, and ourselves only in the world. Every new object, clearly beheld, opens up a new organ in us.
Those fellow humans can be most helpful who have the advantage to compare us with the world as they see it from their point of view. They thereby attain a closer knowledge of us than we ourselves are in a position to gain….
Stimulated by these very considerations, I continued in my self-examination, and found that my whole method relies on derivation. I persist until I have discovered a pregnant point from which much may be derived, or rather — since I am careful in my work and observations — one that yields much freely of its own accord. If I discover in experience some phenomenon that I cannot derive, I let it stand as a problem. This approach has proven quite advantageous during my long life. When after a long time I could still not decipher the origin and connections of some phenomena, and I had to put the problem aside, years later at one moment the relationships became clear in the most wonderful way."
👉 Epirrhema (published 1827)
When considering nature
Attend always to the one and to the many;
Nothing is inside, nothing is outside:
Since what is inside is also outside.
So behold without delay
The holy open secret!
Enjoy the true appearance [semblance]
And the serious game;
Nothing alive is a one,
Always it’s a many.
NOTE: Translations by Craig Holdrege. To translate the prose texts, in addition to working carefully with the German essays, Douglas Miller’s translations in Goethe: The Scientific Studies (Princeton U. Press, 1995) were consulted for wording and phrasing.
Those fellow humans can be most helpful who have the advantage to compare us with the world as they see it from their point of view. They thereby attain a closer knowledge of us than we ourselves are in a position to gain….
Stimulated by these very considerations, I continued in my self-examination, and found that my whole method relies on derivation. I persist until I have discovered a pregnant point from which much may be derived, or rather — since I am careful in my work and observations — one that yields much freely of its own accord. If I discover in experience some phenomenon that I cannot derive, I let it stand as a problem. This approach has proven quite advantageous during my long life. When after a long time I could still not decipher the origin and connections of some phenomena, and I had to put the problem aside, years later at one moment the relationships became clear in the most wonderful way."
👉 Epirrhema (published 1827)
When considering nature
Attend always to the one and to the many;
Nothing is inside, nothing is outside:
Since what is inside is also outside.
So behold without delay
The holy open secret!
Enjoy the true appearance [semblance]
And the serious game;
Nothing alive is a one,
Always it’s a many.
NOTE: Translations by Craig Holdrege. To translate the prose texts, in addition to working carefully with the German essays, Douglas Miller’s translations in Goethe: The Scientific Studies (Princeton U. Press, 1995) were consulted for wording and phrasing.
Exercises with Polarity | Henrike Holdrege
- From In Context #46 (Fall, 2021)
- https://www.natureinstitute.org/in-context-46/henrike-holdrege/exercises-with-polarity
"We’re pleased to share an excerpt from Henrike Holdrege's new publication To the Infinite and Back Again, Part II — A Workbook in Projective Geometry, the companion volume to Part I published in 2019.
Building on the first volume, in Part II of this practice-based introduction to projective geometry, Henrike introduces and works extensively and intensively with the fundamental idea of polarity. Through a wealth of exercises, illustrated with Henrike’s drawings, the reader learns to see how every form has, implicitly, a polar opposite form that is related to it. Here we give you an intimation of the expansive tapestry of thought that those who work through the book can enter and begin to weave for themselves:
The blue disk is the “inner” of the growing point-circle. Shading the disk allows me to convey that all points within the circle have taken part in the growth process so far. The “inner” of the point-circle is “filled” with points. The “inside” of the corresponding tangent-circle is filled with lines and cannot be shown as easily. The figure shows only a few of the tangents of the tangent-circle itself. All lines that surround the circle make up its “inside.” All surrounding lines have taken part in the growth process so far.
This imagination exercise allows us to expand our concepts of “inside” and “outside.” We can develop the concept of an “inside” that is centered in the periphery. The peripheral perspective complements the point-centered one. It challenges us in our thinking. The reality of an “inside” centered in the periphery is difficult to express in words.
The characteristics of a curve determine in every detail the characteristics of the polar opposite curve. [The light blue curve inside the inner circle is polar opposite to the yellow curve.] In all of the exercises in this chapter, we realize how important the concepts of point at infinity and line at infinity are. Without them, a geometry of polar opposite curves would not exist. The concept “at infinity” is not a question of distance. It is not a question of something being very far away, something growing infinitely large, something being beyond measure. It is not a question of measurable quantity at all. Rather, it is a question of completeness or wholeness.
Through projective geometry, the wholeness of a parabola or of a hyperbola, for instance, become tangible. Even though we reach the limits of our ability of mental picturing, we can grasp these forms with full inner clarity.
A “whole,” as the saying goes, is more than the sum of the parts. But what does “more” actually mean? Wholeness is not available to us in the way the parts are. Wholeness is in and through the parts, but is not “another part.” Parts we can measure; wholeness we cannot measure. It is of a different nature, and we need to develop a new way of knowing if we wish to catch a glimpse of wholeness."
#goethean #projectivegeometry
- From In Context #46 (Fall, 2021)
- https://www.natureinstitute.org/in-context-46/henrike-holdrege/exercises-with-polarity
"We’re pleased to share an excerpt from Henrike Holdrege's new publication To the Infinite and Back Again, Part II — A Workbook in Projective Geometry, the companion volume to Part I published in 2019.
Building on the first volume, in Part II of this practice-based introduction to projective geometry, Henrike introduces and works extensively and intensively with the fundamental idea of polarity. Through a wealth of exercises, illustrated with Henrike’s drawings, the reader learns to see how every form has, implicitly, a polar opposite form that is related to it. Here we give you an intimation of the expansive tapestry of thought that those who work through the book can enter and begin to weave for themselves:
The blue disk is the “inner” of the growing point-circle. Shading the disk allows me to convey that all points within the circle have taken part in the growth process so far. The “inner” of the point-circle is “filled” with points. The “inside” of the corresponding tangent-circle is filled with lines and cannot be shown as easily. The figure shows only a few of the tangents of the tangent-circle itself. All lines that surround the circle make up its “inside.” All surrounding lines have taken part in the growth process so far.
This imagination exercise allows us to expand our concepts of “inside” and “outside.” We can develop the concept of an “inside” that is centered in the periphery. The peripheral perspective complements the point-centered one. It challenges us in our thinking. The reality of an “inside” centered in the periphery is difficult to express in words.
The characteristics of a curve determine in every detail the characteristics of the polar opposite curve. [The light blue curve inside the inner circle is polar opposite to the yellow curve.] In all of the exercises in this chapter, we realize how important the concepts of point at infinity and line at infinity are. Without them, a geometry of polar opposite curves would not exist. The concept “at infinity” is not a question of distance. It is not a question of something being very far away, something growing infinitely large, something being beyond measure. It is not a question of measurable quantity at all. Rather, it is a question of completeness or wholeness.
Through projective geometry, the wholeness of a parabola or of a hyperbola, for instance, become tangible. Even though we reach the limits of our ability of mental picturing, we can grasp these forms with full inner clarity.
A “whole,” as the saying goes, is more than the sum of the parts. But what does “more” actually mean? Wholeness is not available to us in the way the parts are. Wholeness is in and through the parts, but is not “another part.” Parts we can measure; wholeness we cannot measure. It is of a different nature, and we need to develop a new way of knowing if we wish to catch a glimpse of wholeness."
#goethean #projectivegeometry
The Nature Institute
Exercises with Polarity — The Nature Institute
This sample from Henrike’s second workbook on projective geometry, To the Infinite and Back Again, Part II, demonstrates through illustrations the mind-expanding idea of polarity.
Whitehead and the Free Energy Principle: On the Physics and Metaphysics of Information
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uttC8KbOqws
A dialogue discussing this paper: Di Paolo, E., Thompson, E., & Beer, R. (2022). 'Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle.' In "Philosophy and the Mind Sciences".
This discussion covers a huge range of intellectual and philosophical topics that consider the subtle relationship between sacred geometry, energy, and the essential nature of the cosmos, right through to practical considerations of weather phenomenon and environmental effects. It introduces intricate ideas such as the nature of information structure, the free energy principle, operational closedness, and the importance of realism vs. antirealism, as the concept of operational closure and the importance of realism versus anti-realism. This much interdisciplinary dialogue reaches towards biochemistry and cognitive sciences, through metaphysics and contemporary physics—common in the inspirational expression to touch base with deeper principles holding consciousness and cosmos.
Linked Papers:
- Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle
Paper Abstract: "Several authors have made claims about the compatibility between the Free Energy Principle (FEP) and theories of autopoiesis and enaction. Many see these theories as natural partners or as making similar statements about the nature of biological and cognitive systems. We critically examine these claims and identify a series of misreadings and misinterpretations of key enactive concepts. In particular, we notice a tendency to disregard the operational definition of autopoiesis and the distinction between a system’s structure and its organization. Other misreadings concern the conflation of processes of self-distinction in operationally closed systems and Markov blankets. Deeper theoretical tensions underlie some of these misinterpretations. FEP assumes systems that reach a non-equilibrium steady state and are enveloped by a Markov blanket. We argue that these assumptions contradict the historicity of sense-making that is explicit in the enactive approach. Enactive concepts such as adaptivity and agency are defined in terms of the modulation of parameters and constraints of the agent-environment coupling, which entail the possibility of changes in variable and parameter sets, constraints, and in the dynamical laws affecting the system. This allows enaction to address the path-dependent diversity of human bodies and minds. We argue that these ideas are incompatible with the time invariance of non-equilibrium steady states assumed by the FEP. In addition, the enactive perspective foregrounds the enabling and constitutive roles played by the world in sense-making, agency, development. We argue that this view of transactional and constitutive relations between organisms and environments is a challenge to the FEP. Once we move beyond superficial similarities, identify misreadings, and examine the theoretical commitments of the two approaches, we reach the conclusion that far from being easily integrated, the FEP, as it stands formulated today, is in tension with the theories of autopoiesis and enaction."
#whitehead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uttC8KbOqws
A dialogue discussing this paper: Di Paolo, E., Thompson, E., & Beer, R. (2022). 'Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle.' In "Philosophy and the Mind Sciences".
This discussion covers a huge range of intellectual and philosophical topics that consider the subtle relationship between sacred geometry, energy, and the essential nature of the cosmos, right through to practical considerations of weather phenomenon and environmental effects. It introduces intricate ideas such as the nature of information structure, the free energy principle, operational closedness, and the importance of realism vs. antirealism, as the concept of operational closure and the importance of realism versus anti-realism. This much interdisciplinary dialogue reaches towards biochemistry and cognitive sciences, through metaphysics and contemporary physics—common in the inspirational expression to touch base with deeper principles holding consciousness and cosmos.
Linked Papers:
- Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle
Paper Abstract: "Several authors have made claims about the compatibility between the Free Energy Principle (FEP) and theories of autopoiesis and enaction. Many see these theories as natural partners or as making similar statements about the nature of biological and cognitive systems. We critically examine these claims and identify a series of misreadings and misinterpretations of key enactive concepts. In particular, we notice a tendency to disregard the operational definition of autopoiesis and the distinction between a system’s structure and its organization. Other misreadings concern the conflation of processes of self-distinction in operationally closed systems and Markov blankets. Deeper theoretical tensions underlie some of these misinterpretations. FEP assumes systems that reach a non-equilibrium steady state and are enveloped by a Markov blanket. We argue that these assumptions contradict the historicity of sense-making that is explicit in the enactive approach. Enactive concepts such as adaptivity and agency are defined in terms of the modulation of parameters and constraints of the agent-environment coupling, which entail the possibility of changes in variable and parameter sets, constraints, and in the dynamical laws affecting the system. This allows enaction to address the path-dependent diversity of human bodies and minds. We argue that these ideas are incompatible with the time invariance of non-equilibrium steady states assumed by the FEP. In addition, the enactive perspective foregrounds the enabling and constitutive roles played by the world in sense-making, agency, development. We argue that this view of transactional and constitutive relations between organisms and environments is a challenge to the FEP. Once we move beyond superficial similarities, identify misreadings, and examine the theoretical commitments of the two approaches, we reach the conclusion that far from being easily integrated, the FEP, as it stands formulated today, is in tension with the theories of autopoiesis and enaction."
#whitehead
YouTube
Whitehead and the Free Energy Principle: On the Physics and Metaphysics of Information
another round of dialoging with Tim Jackson. We begin our dialogue discussing this paper: Di Paolo, E., Thompson, E., & Beer, R. (2022). 'Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle.' In "Philosophy and the Mind Sciences…
Awakening Inner Light - Our Enigmatic Visual Ray
by Thomas Joseph Brown
https://www.alkemix.art/p/awakening-inner-light
"Like a lighthouse beam, our visual ray illumines the path where Nature meets our souls, casting its radiance beyond the borders of perception, guiding our organs of cognition through the flowing currents of existence, to the true essence of life."
“This immediate affinity between light and the eye will be denied by none; to consider them identical in substance is less easy to comprehend. It will be more intelligible to assert that a dormant light resides in the eye, and that this light can be excited by the slightest cause from within or from without. In darkness we can, by an effort of imagination, call up the brightest images; in dreams, objects appear to us as in broad daylight; if we are awake, the slightest external action of light is perceptible, and if the organ suffers a mechanical impact light and colours spring forth.” — Goethe
by Thomas Joseph Brown
https://www.alkemix.art/p/awakening-inner-light
"Like a lighthouse beam, our visual ray illumines the path where Nature meets our souls, casting its radiance beyond the borders of perception, guiding our organs of cognition through the flowing currents of existence, to the true essence of life."
“This immediate affinity between light and the eye will be denied by none; to consider them identical in substance is less easy to comprehend. It will be more intelligible to assert that a dormant light resides in the eye, and that this light can be excited by the slightest cause from within or from without. In darkness we can, by an effort of imagination, call up the brightest images; in dreams, objects appear to us as in broad daylight; if we are awake, the slightest external action of light is perceptible, and if the organ suffers a mechanical impact light and colours spring forth.” — Goethe
www.alkemix.art
Awakening Inner Light
Our Enigmatic Visual Ray
👍1
Forwarded from Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)
Question: How are the sun neutrinos gathered/distributed along the earth’s latitude?
A: They are distributed even;y along the latitude but simple geometric considerations suggest that you will get less neutrino input when you are standing at the equator and more when you are lying down. Opposite will be true at the poles. Neutrino exposure will vary mostly at the equator on a daily basis as there is a greater volume of planet to absorb them at night.
Q: If the premise is they are the template for life/the life givers, their quantity will be directly proportional to human health.
A: Not necessarily- it depends how well we have adapted and whether there is a limit on the rate at which we can utilise the energy. Not a template but a neutral and consistent energy source.
How would:
- a lunar eclipse,
- a sun eclipse,
- an increased/ decreased sun activity influence the absorbed by the human body neutrinos?
- is there a “Faraday cage” against them?
- a lense to concentrate them in?
(👆 Kozyrev’s mirror - a special telescope in fact - seems to be the latter)
A: During a solar eclipse, the gravity of the moon acts as a lens and the neutrino stream will be concentrated in some parts of the eclipse footprint and depleted in other parts. Meyl links this to pandemics and earthquakes. No Faraday cage against neutrinos I don't think (you would die quickly anyhow). As far as I can make out, neutrinos are absorbed by water vortices and these are most prevalent in the capillary beds which is why blood flow is driven from the periphery not the heart. To increase energy absorption, keep the blood moving through the capillaries.
In this video 👇 the pupil of Kaznacheev and developer in NovGorodok of the Kozyrev’s legacy Alexandr Trofimov says that
A. beyond the 73’ parallel:
1. human brain activity and abilities get enhanced 10-fold, so an in-place-astronaut voyage could be done (in a Contact like capsule, remote viewing)
2. that there the laws of physics are different (for ex. no limit of speed as the speed of light).
A: Speed of light experiments are misinterpreted. Understanding of Meyl is required for this. There is no time travel with Meyl and the equations are irreversible in contrast to classical physics where things can go backward or forwards with the same laws. This means that there is no unique past for any given present, we have a time-like 'direction' to the universe and 'cause' is only one way.
B. Within the periods of minimal solar activity epidemics and bacteriological and viral (he still buys in this terminology) flair ups are observed.
——
- 1. That reminded me of Karl Von Reichenbach’s mid 19th century research on the “odic force” and somnambulism: in full moon the affected people acted most weirdly. (See link/photo 1)
les.
- 2. That made me think of the parasitic behavior (as being the parasites The driver for depressive and alike states due to the released by those neurotoxins) during full moon - those get more active, since our immune activity is seen decreased. (See photo 2; so that’s why the parasite cleanses are to be done during a full moon)
- 3. Which closes the circle coming back to Meyl’s solar neutrinos as the charge for our ATP batteries and so immune system.
The solar neutrinos are shielded by the opposite side of the Earth for the side from which the moon is observed when full.
A: They are distributed even;y along the latitude but simple geometric considerations suggest that you will get less neutrino input when you are standing at the equator and more when you are lying down. Opposite will be true at the poles. Neutrino exposure will vary mostly at the equator on a daily basis as there is a greater volume of planet to absorb them at night.
Q: If the premise is they are the template for life/the life givers, their quantity will be directly proportional to human health.
A: Not necessarily- it depends how well we have adapted and whether there is a limit on the rate at which we can utilise the energy. Not a template but a neutral and consistent energy source.
How would:
- a lunar eclipse,
- a sun eclipse,
- an increased/ decreased sun activity influence the absorbed by the human body neutrinos?
- is there a “Faraday cage” against them?
- a lense to concentrate them in?
(👆 Kozyrev’s mirror - a special telescope in fact - seems to be the latter)
A: During a solar eclipse, the gravity of the moon acts as a lens and the neutrino stream will be concentrated in some parts of the eclipse footprint and depleted in other parts. Meyl links this to pandemics and earthquakes. No Faraday cage against neutrinos I don't think (you would die quickly anyhow). As far as I can make out, neutrinos are absorbed by water vortices and these are most prevalent in the capillary beds which is why blood flow is driven from the periphery not the heart. To increase energy absorption, keep the blood moving through the capillaries.
In this video 👇 the pupil of Kaznacheev and developer in NovGorodok of the Kozyrev’s legacy Alexandr Trofimov says that
A. beyond the 73’ parallel:
1. human brain activity and abilities get enhanced 10-fold, so an in-place-astronaut voyage could be done (in a Contact like capsule, remote viewing)
2. that there the laws of physics are different (for ex. no limit of speed as the speed of light).
A: Speed of light experiments are misinterpreted. Understanding of Meyl is required for this. There is no time travel with Meyl and the equations are irreversible in contrast to classical physics where things can go backward or forwards with the same laws. This means that there is no unique past for any given present, we have a time-like 'direction' to the universe and 'cause' is only one way.
B. Within the periods of minimal solar activity epidemics and bacteriological and viral (he still buys in this terminology) flair ups are observed.
——
- 1. That reminded me of Karl Von Reichenbach’s mid 19th century research on the “odic force” and somnambulism: in full moon the affected people acted most weirdly. (See link/photo 1)
les.
- 2. That made me think of the parasitic behavior (as being the parasites The driver for depressive and alike states due to the released by those neurotoxins) during full moon - those get more active, since our immune activity is seen decreased. (See photo 2; so that’s why the parasite cleanses are to be done during a full moon)
- 3. Which closes the circle coming back to Meyl’s solar neutrinos as the charge for our ATP batteries and so immune system.
The solar neutrinos are shielded by the opposite side of the Earth for the side from which the moon is observed when full.
Forwarded from Library of Atlantis (Research Channel)
A slow start to the universe?
Meyl explicitly claims that the Big Bang is a Big Fraud. It is a consistent characteristic of scientists that when they can't find an answer to something there will be a big explosion/implosion, bolt of lightning or collapse of a wave function to explain it. Always something that actually stands outside of the laws they are saying control the universe.
Meyl imagines his Field of Objectivity to start from almost nothing and to then build up according to its own rules.
The animation shows a solution to the Shrodinger equation so it is also a solution to Meyl's equation. Things start at almost nothing and build up in a controlled and structured manner.
In Meyl's universe the net amount of energy is always zero and there is no 'matter' as normally thought of so there is no 'creation' of vast amounts of stuff all at once, just a build up of field complexity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wavepacket-a2k4-en.gif
Meyl explicitly claims that the Big Bang is a Big Fraud. It is a consistent characteristic of scientists that when they can't find an answer to something there will be a big explosion/implosion, bolt of lightning or collapse of a wave function to explain it. Always something that actually stands outside of the laws they are saying control the universe.
Meyl imagines his Field of Objectivity to start from almost nothing and to then build up according to its own rules.
The animation shows a solution to the Shrodinger equation so it is also a solution to Meyl's equation. Things start at almost nothing and build up in a controlled and structured manner.
In Meyl's universe the net amount of energy is always zero and there is no 'matter' as normally thought of so there is no 'creation' of vast amounts of stuff all at once, just a build up of field complexity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wavepacket-a2k4-en.gif
Wikipedia
File:Wavepacket-a2k4-en.gif
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work
👍1
The Nature of Energy: Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogue 85
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp3QRl23clI
"Energy is a key organising principle in modern science, the conversation of energy being a grounding and universal law. But what is energy? In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon examine the history of the idea and the word. In science, energy is a relatively recently notion, emerging in its current form in the 19th century, drawing much on mechanics. The word itself was coined by Aristotle, in the 4th century BCE, carrying a sense of vital actuality and living presence. That meaning is still remembered in Orthodox theology, which describes the energeia of God. The conversation ranges over the promiscuity of energy in the natural world to the spiritual notion of energy, including the subtle energies of the body. The implications of shaping the idea of energy through mechanical metaphors also has important ramifications, from the descriptions of economics and the efficacy of psychology to the experience of God. Further, the most recent physics argues that energy is not conserved after all as the universe expands."
#sheldrake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp3QRl23clI
"Energy is a key organising principle in modern science, the conversation of energy being a grounding and universal law. But what is energy? In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon examine the history of the idea and the word. In science, energy is a relatively recently notion, emerging in its current form in the 19th century, drawing much on mechanics. The word itself was coined by Aristotle, in the 4th century BCE, carrying a sense of vital actuality and living presence. That meaning is still remembered in Orthodox theology, which describes the energeia of God. The conversation ranges over the promiscuity of energy in the natural world to the spiritual notion of energy, including the subtle energies of the body. The implications of shaping the idea of energy through mechanical metaphors also has important ramifications, from the descriptions of economics and the efficacy of psychology to the experience of God. Further, the most recent physics argues that energy is not conserved after all as the universe expands."
#sheldrake
YouTube
The Nature of Energy: Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogue 85
Energy is a key organising principle in modern science, the conversation of energy being a grounding and universal law. But what is energy? In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon examine the history of the idea…
Forwarded from Aether Force Community
Build a Low-Cost Base-10 Radionics Machine: Base-10 Radionics (Mastering Radionics)
Pete Radatti just release his fourth book in the Mastering Radionics series.
Book Description: "Readers of my Radionics books are from around the world including Africa, Middle East, India, Pakistan, Asia, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, South America and of course my home of North America (Canada, USA, Mexico). Some of these readers live in countries where they cannot obtain modern electronic radionics devices. This is one of the reasons behind this book but more than that, Radionics is personal power in a world of rapidly decreasing personal power.
Common usage of Radionics in the world: Health (not permitted in USA), agriculture, wealth creation, self-defense, military actions. Radionics can be used for wish fulfillment, thereby a way to fulfill Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Self-actualization, Esteem, Love and Belonging, Safety, Physiological needs.
This, and my other books, explain how to use Radionics. This book focuses on how to easily build and use your own working, powerful, Base-10 style electronic Radionics device at low cost.
A bonus section written by the Radionics pioneer Dr. Ruth Drown (1892 – 1965) included for historical perspective by permission of Borderland Sciences Research Foundation. [Edited to comply with USA Food and Drug Administration regulations.]"
Here is the purchase link for Pete Radatti fourth installment of the Mastering Radionics Series : https://amzn.to/3T5KHGD
#radionics #radatti
Pete Radatti just release his fourth book in the Mastering Radionics series.
Book Description: "Readers of my Radionics books are from around the world including Africa, Middle East, India, Pakistan, Asia, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Australia, New Zealand, South America and of course my home of North America (Canada, USA, Mexico). Some of these readers live in countries where they cannot obtain modern electronic radionics devices. This is one of the reasons behind this book but more than that, Radionics is personal power in a world of rapidly decreasing personal power.
Common usage of Radionics in the world: Health (not permitted in USA), agriculture, wealth creation, self-defense, military actions. Radionics can be used for wish fulfillment, thereby a way to fulfill Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Self-actualization, Esteem, Love and Belonging, Safety, Physiological needs.
This, and my other books, explain how to use Radionics. This book focuses on how to easily build and use your own working, powerful, Base-10 style electronic Radionics device at low cost.
A bonus section written by the Radionics pioneer Dr. Ruth Drown (1892 – 1965) included for historical perspective by permission of Borderland Sciences Research Foundation. [Edited to comply with USA Food and Drug Administration regulations.]"
Here is the purchase link for Pete Radatti fourth installment of the Mastering Radionics Series : https://amzn.to/3T5KHGD
#radionics #radatti
Check out the Radionics Room in the Aether Force Community Chat for more info from Pete Radatti:
https://t.me/aetherforcepubdiscussion/24338/35350
https://t.me/aetherforcepubdiscussion/24338/35350
Walking the Planck - Variable Constants & False Foundations
by Thomas Joseph Brown
https://www.alkemix.art/p/walking-the-planck
"Max Planck's introduction of quantized energy levels in 1900, proposing that energy is emitted or absorbed in discrete packets or "quanta," revolutionized physics by challenging the classical view of energy as a continuous variable, thus laying the groundwork for quantum physics. Despite the initial skepticism, Planck's constant, , became a fundamental component in quantum mechanics, connecting the energy of a photon to its frequency.
However, the assumed constancy of Planck's constant and other fundamental constants has been challenged by researchers like Rupert Sheldrake, who questions the immutability of constants like the speed of light and the gravitational constant, and Pierre-Marie Robitaille, who argues against the universality of Planck’s constant by demonstrating that black body radiation depends on the material of the cavity. Further, Richard Hutchin suggests that Planck's constant may vary with Earth's orbital position, and the Shnoll Effect proposes that cosmic rhythms influence the variability of fundamental constants, including Planck's constant. Lori Gardi offers a bold reinterpretation of Planck's constant, suggesting it represents the energy of one oscillation of an electromagnetic wave, challenging the traditional understanding that energy depends on frequency.
These inquiries not only question the foundational assumptions of modern physics but also suggest a universe where constants may be subject to cosmic influences, requiring a paradigm shift in our understanding of the laws of physics and the nature of reality itself.
#notsoconstant #alkemix #thomasjosephbrown #tjb #borderland #debunkstandardmodel
by Thomas Joseph Brown
https://www.alkemix.art/p/walking-the-planck
"Max Planck's introduction of quantized energy levels in 1900, proposing that energy is emitted or absorbed in discrete packets or "quanta," revolutionized physics by challenging the classical view of energy as a continuous variable, thus laying the groundwork for quantum physics. Despite the initial skepticism, Planck's constant, , became a fundamental component in quantum mechanics, connecting the energy of a photon to its frequency.
However, the assumed constancy of Planck's constant and other fundamental constants has been challenged by researchers like Rupert Sheldrake, who questions the immutability of constants like the speed of light and the gravitational constant, and Pierre-Marie Robitaille, who argues against the universality of Planck’s constant by demonstrating that black body radiation depends on the material of the cavity. Further, Richard Hutchin suggests that Planck's constant may vary with Earth's orbital position, and the Shnoll Effect proposes that cosmic rhythms influence the variability of fundamental constants, including Planck's constant. Lori Gardi offers a bold reinterpretation of Planck's constant, suggesting it represents the energy of one oscillation of an electromagnetic wave, challenging the traditional understanding that energy depends on frequency.
These inquiries not only question the foundational assumptions of modern physics but also suggest a universe where constants may be subject to cosmic influences, requiring a paradigm shift in our understanding of the laws of physics and the nature of reality itself.
#notsoconstant #alkemix #thomasjosephbrown #tjb #borderland #debunkstandardmodel
www.alkemix.art
Walking the Planck
Variable Constants & False Foundations
Phenomenology - Tom van Gelder
https://tomvangelder.antrovista.com/
"On this website you will find information on Observing, Phenomenology (Goethean science), the Twelve senses, Rudolf Steiners Basic exercises, Threefoldness of man and animals and Embryology from an anthroposophical point of view.
After 20 years of teaching at the bio-dynamic agricultural school Warmonderhof in the Netherlands it seemed a good idea to put the things I wrote down during these years on the internet, so that more people can read about these subjects.
The starting point for phenomenology is observing. How to observe, how to make your observations richer, what is important in observing and what are your limitations are discussed. In phenomenology, the seven ways of observing to meet the core of a subject and to come to individual actions are described. You will find many exercises for observing and phenomenology. In the Twelve senses, all twelve are discussed, examples given of their activity and many exercises are given as well.
If you want more exercises, please take a look at het Basic exercises of Rudolf Steiner, they are nice and simple ones and they can enrichen your life.
A page on the Threefoldness of the human was added, too, and some five on threefoldness of mammals. In future some more pages on the threefoldness of mammals will follow, as they will be translated from Dutch.
In Embryology, the development of the plant and a simple animal are given. These illuminate the anthroposophical concepts of them. After that, the development of man during the first eight weeks is described and shown in many drawings.
You can download four books/booklets: Observing with Twelve senses, Phenomenology, Embryology and the Basic exercises."
#goethe #goethean #steiner #ethers #phenomenology
https://tomvangelder.antrovista.com/
"On this website you will find information on Observing, Phenomenology (Goethean science), the Twelve senses, Rudolf Steiners Basic exercises, Threefoldness of man and animals and Embryology from an anthroposophical point of view.
After 20 years of teaching at the bio-dynamic agricultural school Warmonderhof in the Netherlands it seemed a good idea to put the things I wrote down during these years on the internet, so that more people can read about these subjects.
The starting point for phenomenology is observing. How to observe, how to make your observations richer, what is important in observing and what are your limitations are discussed. In phenomenology, the seven ways of observing to meet the core of a subject and to come to individual actions are described. You will find many exercises for observing and phenomenology. In the Twelve senses, all twelve are discussed, examples given of their activity and many exercises are given as well.
If you want more exercises, please take a look at het Basic exercises of Rudolf Steiner, they are nice and simple ones and they can enrichen your life.
A page on the Threefoldness of the human was added, too, and some five on threefoldness of mammals. In future some more pages on the threefoldness of mammals will follow, as they will be translated from Dutch.
In Embryology, the development of the plant and a simple animal are given. These illuminate the anthroposophical concepts of them. After that, the development of man during the first eight weeks is described and shown in many drawings.
You can download four books/booklets: Observing with Twelve senses, Phenomenology, Embryology and the Basic exercises."
#goethe #goethean #steiner #ethers #phenomenology
Antrovista
Introductie - Welkom op de fenomenologie site van Tom van Gelder
Tom van Gelder (1953-2011) over waarnemen, fenomenologie en mens en dier vanuit een antroposofisch gezichtpunt.
👍1
My Tesla scholar friend Don Best described Tesla's findings on radiant matter on a FB post from Novemeber 2023.
"Tesla found there is an anomalous energy when the switch was flipped on for circuits of large load DC energy. He measured more energy in the circuit than what was put in while the first flow of energy was traveling the circuit.
What did he discover? What were his findings, after he did multiple tests, and developed apparatus to clarify results?
Tesla found the back-round atmospheric electrostatic energy, some call zero point, or energy from the vacuum. This was before modern electron theory, and Nikola tesla gave these small spheres, we call electrons, a different name; radiant matter.
radiant matter was defined as spheres that are primary, they could not be broken down any further, and their electrostatic energy were excessive for their size. Radiant matter was not attached to atoms as far as tesla was concerned, mostly it was running free in the atmosphere, local and cosmic.
Tesla surmised radiant matter/electrons were kept from one another by way of an insulating fluid, and from his tests nothing could break this fluid down, except a fairly heavy loaded circuit at the moment it was thrown on. A spark was produced in the circuit, and “that” is a compressional disturbance in the insulating fluid separating the small spheres of radiant matter according to tesla. Once a compression of electrostatic energy, or spark was initiated the charges/radiant matter can combine…it was this phenomena that the first discoverers of DC electricity witnessed when they flipped the switch. In a split second a blue glow would surround the wire(charges combining), and if there was a person too close to the wire, grounded, that person would be killed by way of grounding out the circuit.
Tesla found the longitudinal wave always preceded the transverse wave in the wire. Since the longitudinal wave broke down the insulating fluid, allowing charges to combine, the amount of energy would always be greater than the energy initiated.
While all the electrical engineers were busy finding a way of taking this longitudinal wave out of the circuit, Tesla was busy studying this force.
Tesla discovered an immense amount of energy everywhere, but it wasn’t available unless a compressive shock was initiated. After which, the insulating fluid separating the charge/energy would break down.
One heavy load put into a spark would be akin to one big push against a structure. Tesla likely pondered the results of his 10 pound oscillator on the structures in the vicinity of his laboratory in New York. Only 10 pounds can take down a complete block.
The same should be true of the radiant matter, as long as tesla can find the resonant frequency.
Tesla had a device that over time would magnify the exact frequency of the buildings, and surrounding area. The oscillator worked by recycling the most prevalent frequency through the circuit. Each time the same frequency would get more prevalent, like a microphone feeding back. Everything with that frequency would crumble.
Tesla thought if he could take that “one spark” that had exceptional voltage and current, and replace it with a feeble voltage and current, but use the resonant frequency of the insulating fluid, he could create a dynamic where very little energy would leverage extraordinary energy. Electricity would be created, and available to pull out of the circuit. This is what most everyone calls “free energy”. Of course it isn’t free, but it is creating orders of magnitude more energy, than is used to create that energy.
"Tesla found there is an anomalous energy when the switch was flipped on for circuits of large load DC energy. He measured more energy in the circuit than what was put in while the first flow of energy was traveling the circuit.
What did he discover? What were his findings, after he did multiple tests, and developed apparatus to clarify results?
Tesla found the back-round atmospheric electrostatic energy, some call zero point, or energy from the vacuum. This was before modern electron theory, and Nikola tesla gave these small spheres, we call electrons, a different name; radiant matter.
radiant matter was defined as spheres that are primary, they could not be broken down any further, and their electrostatic energy were excessive for their size. Radiant matter was not attached to atoms as far as tesla was concerned, mostly it was running free in the atmosphere, local and cosmic.
Tesla surmised radiant matter/electrons were kept from one another by way of an insulating fluid, and from his tests nothing could break this fluid down, except a fairly heavy loaded circuit at the moment it was thrown on. A spark was produced in the circuit, and “that” is a compressional disturbance in the insulating fluid separating the small spheres of radiant matter according to tesla. Once a compression of electrostatic energy, or spark was initiated the charges/radiant matter can combine…it was this phenomena that the first discoverers of DC electricity witnessed when they flipped the switch. In a split second a blue glow would surround the wire(charges combining), and if there was a person too close to the wire, grounded, that person would be killed by way of grounding out the circuit.
Tesla found the longitudinal wave always preceded the transverse wave in the wire. Since the longitudinal wave broke down the insulating fluid, allowing charges to combine, the amount of energy would always be greater than the energy initiated.
While all the electrical engineers were busy finding a way of taking this longitudinal wave out of the circuit, Tesla was busy studying this force.
Tesla discovered an immense amount of energy everywhere, but it wasn’t available unless a compressive shock was initiated. After which, the insulating fluid separating the charge/energy would break down.
One heavy load put into a spark would be akin to one big push against a structure. Tesla likely pondered the results of his 10 pound oscillator on the structures in the vicinity of his laboratory in New York. Only 10 pounds can take down a complete block.
The same should be true of the radiant matter, as long as tesla can find the resonant frequency.
Tesla had a device that over time would magnify the exact frequency of the buildings, and surrounding area. The oscillator worked by recycling the most prevalent frequency through the circuit. Each time the same frequency would get more prevalent, like a microphone feeding back. Everything with that frequency would crumble.
Tesla thought if he could take that “one spark” that had exceptional voltage and current, and replace it with a feeble voltage and current, but use the resonant frequency of the insulating fluid, he could create a dynamic where very little energy would leverage extraordinary energy. Electricity would be created, and available to pull out of the circuit. This is what most everyone calls “free energy”. Of course it isn’t free, but it is creating orders of magnitude more energy, than is used to create that energy.
Tesla knew it was “a spark” that broke down the insulating fluid that prevents all these exceptional charges from combining, and he defined “a spark” as a compressional/longitudinal form of electrostatic energy. His only question, at this point, was to find the frequency that would start the breaking down of the insulating fluid on a larger scale. To that end tesla developed two wheels that moved against each other, each with 60-100 tungsten pins at equal distances, and arranged them so the pins would spark once when the pins of each wheel were close enough to initiate a spark. the velocities of the two wheels were adjustable so tesla could take theses sparks up to 2 million per second, or more.
Tesla arranged a grounded small conductive plate next to the two wheels running in contrary motion, and measured the voltage of the grounded small metal plate.
The small plate charged to exceptional levels when the spark was @ around 1 million per second, and this result was the basis of tela’s radiant energy patent. It’s all so simple, but no one gets it."
#tesla #radiantmatter #radiantenergy
Tesla arranged a grounded small conductive plate next to the two wheels running in contrary motion, and measured the voltage of the grounded small metal plate.
The small plate charged to exceptional levels when the spark was @ around 1 million per second, and this result was the basis of tela’s radiant energy patent. It’s all so simple, but no one gets it."
#tesla #radiantmatter #radiantenergy