Keely’s Three Systems
"My first system is the one which requires introductory mediums of different gravities, air and water, to induce disturbance of equilibrium on the liberation of vapor, which only reached the interatomic position and was held there by the submersion of the molecular and atomic leads in the "generator" I then used. It was impossible with these mediums to go beyond the atomic with this instrument and I could not dispense with the water until my liberator was invented, nor reach maximum of the full line of vibration. My first system embraces generator, engine and gun.
"My second system of dissociation I consider complete, as far as the liberation of the ether is concerned, but not sufficiently complete, as yet, in its devices for indicating and governing the vibratory etheric circuit, to make it a safe medium.
"My third system embraces aerial and submarine navigation. The experimental sphere intended to test the combination of the positive and negative rotation is nearly completed.
"The work on the vibratory engine is progressing ... The safety arrangements which I am having attached to my liberator will greatly improve it. Its operation will now be conducted with a gum bulb instead of a violin bow, the pressure of which gives the introductory chord of impulse that vitalizes the whole ma chine. The chords will all be set in progressive sympathy from the first octave to the fortieth…" https://svpwiki.com/KEELYS-THREE-SYSTEMS---Snell

Three Kinds of Electricity
"There are three kinds of electricity, the harmonic and enharmonic, which, with their leader, the dominant, form the first triple. Their sympathetic associations evolve the energy of matter. The dominant is electricity luminous or propulsive positive. The harmonic, or the magnetic, which is the attractive, with its wonderful sympathetic outreach, is the negative current of the triune stream. The enharmonic, or high neutral, acts as the assimilative towards the reinstatement of sympathetic disturbance. In electric lighting, the velocity of the dynamos accumulates only the harmonic current - by atomic and interatomic conflict - transferring one-two hundred thousandth (1/200,000) of the light that the dominant current would give, if it were possible to construct a device whereby it could be concentrated and dispersed. But this supreme portion can never be handled by any finite mode. Each of these currents has its triple flow, representing the true lines of the sympathetic forces that are constantly assimilating with the polar terrestrial envelope. The rotation of the earth is one of the exciters that disturbs the equilibrium of these sensitive streams. The alternate light zone being ever followed by the dark zone, holds the sympathetic polar wave constant in its fluctuations. This fact may be looked upon as the foundation of the fable that the world rests upon a tortoise. The rotation of the earth is controlled and continued by the action of the positive and negative sympathetic celestial streams. Its pure and steady motion, so free from intermitting impulses, is governed to the most minute mathematical nicety by the mobility of the aqueous portion of its structure, i.e., its oceans and oceans' anastomosis. There is said to be a grain of truth in the wildest fable, and herein we have the elephant that the tortoise stands on. The fixed gravital centers of neutrality, the sympathetic concordants to the celestial outreach, that exist in the interatomic position, are the connective sympathetic links whereby the terrestrial is held in independent suspension. We cannot say that this corresponds to what the elephant stands upon but we can say "This is the power whereby the elephant is sympathetically suspended." [Keely, Snell Manuscript] https://svpwiki.com/16.29---Triple-Currents-of-Electricity

KEELY ON LIFE
"Life begets life; the celestial life begets the terrestrial life; the God-life begets the man-life. Celestial Radiation is the pure soul of all matter, both earthy and gaseous. Thus we are linked in all our environments to the divine, our cerebral aggregations being the highest medium whereby celestial sympathetic reflection associates with our organisms, and is our only source of knowledge of ourselves. We have, with our mental and physical forces, a duality of action which, when combined with the celestial, makes up the triplet or trinity. With the mental, the superficial visible, or outward sight; with the inward, or spiritual invisible, we have the spiritual link connecting mind and matter, the order of transfer being:
"First. Celestial Radiation, or etheric.
"Second. Mental impregnation, or interatomic.
"Third. Physical movements, or intermolecular.
"Or again:
"Ninths. Sympathetic transfer from the celestial luminous.
"Sixths. Sympathetic impregnation of matter.
"Thirds. Physical movements." [Newton of the Mind]
https://svpwiki.com/celestial-sympathetic-reflection

Electricity from Vibration
So far as can be ascertained from his writings, Keely never produced the electric flow by his vibrations. However, he has the following to say regarding its possibility, reasoning from the laws that had already been revealed to him. [Editor's Note: Mr. Snell again stands corrected - Keely did create electricity from space: Keely - Electricity from Space]
"When electrical experts can construct a mechanical device whereby the low frequencies of the enharmonic can be assimilated to the harmonic undulatory by thirds, their dynamos will run without extraneous power. A concordant introductory impulse to the enharmonic (giving it the relation of true thirds to the dominant) would more effectually operate the dynamo than any number of steam engines, allowing the harmonic stream to be the governor. This concordance with the dominant would alter the ruling conditions of the harmonic and enharmonic by only exciting the sympathetic action of the dominant without arousing its destructive effects. Many lives will probably be lost before this mechanical adjustment is obtained. Tesla has left all electrical explorers far behind and has reached ALMOST to the crest of the harmonic wave. However, I do not believe the present methods of handling electricity will be changed for hundreds of years. My failures of the past decade will be redeemed by one position, that is, my control of the polar forces through the polar sympathetic harness I have invented." https://svpwiki.com/ELECTRICITY-FROM-VIBRATION---Snell

That's enough Keely to keep you all busy. Next up on the agenda is a Projective Geometry collection then a Goethean Science Collection which a lot of the Projective Geometry content is a subset.

If you have enjoyed the previous content on this channel PLEASE SHARE with your friends. There are so many goodies about to be uploaded so stay tuned.

https://t.me/aetherforceposts
https://aetherforce.energy

Here is a collection of Literature on Counterspace & Projective Geometry. Included are very rare texts from Anthroposophical researchers like George Adams, Olive Whicher, John Blackwood, Lawrence Edwards, & Nick Thomas. Many of these books related the rhythms and processes of the formative forces mapped through path curve projective geometry and their role in guiding morphology of plant life.

You can also download the collection on icedrive and odysse:
Icedrive: https://icedrive.net/s/ZS5PCYhyXuYA3YVB4FTBwXj2PbTz
Odysse/ LBRY: https://open.lbry.com/@AetherForce:3/Projective-Geometry:6

Several of these texts you WILL NOT find anywhere else as they have been personally scanned by yours truly. Also included are some texts on Dynamic Symmetry and more standard texts from the likes of Whitehead, Coxeter, and other.

Also on the main Aether Force website you can find many more additional articles with many more to be published soon. https://www.aetherforce.energy/?s=projective+geometry

I also have around a dozen more texts to scan & OCR for this subject so will post those when I get around to it this summer.

pictured: Dayton Clarence Miller
"The effect [of ether-drift] has persisted throughout. After considering all the possible sources of error, there always remained a positive effect." — Dayton Miller (1928, p.399)
* 1928: Dayton Miller, untitled lecture in "Conference on the Michelson-Morley Experiment", Astrophysical Journal, LXVIII:341-402, Dec. 1928; also in Contributions From the Mount Wilson Observatory, No.373, Carnegie Institution of Washington.

sampled from
Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift
Experiments: A Fresh Look*
James DeMeo
http://orgonelab.org/miller.htm

Shankland Team's 1955 Critique of Miller
pictured, Robert Shankland
https://t.me/orgonecontinuum/88
excerpted from
Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift
Experiments: A Fresh Look*
James DeMeo
http://orgonelab.org/miller.htm

As previously pointed out by Swenson, Shankland's 1955 critique of Miller's work was undertaken with "extensive consultations" with Einstein, who like Newton and others before him had assumed only a static or stagnant ether, through which the Earth passed without material affect and, hence, without entrainment close to the Earth's surface. Shankland in fact was Miller's student for many years, and only emerged to become a professional advocate of Einstein's relativity after the death of Miller in 1941. Shankland became Chairman of the Physics Department at Case following Miller's retirement and death, building his professional career upon publications misrepresenting the Michelson-Morley experiments as the most solid evidence on the question, and publishing widely-read interviews with Einstein (Shankland 1963, 1964, 1973a, 1973b). Shankland later took up administrative positions within government agencies developing nuclear energy — he rarely discussed Miller's positive ether-drift measurements in any of these papers except in the 1955 paper under discussion here. In this sense, it is legitimate to view Shankland, and other members of his team (all Einstein advocates from Case) as very biased reviewers of Miller's work.

The very first sentence in the Shankland team's 1955 paper began with the falsehood, now widely parroted in nearly every physics textbook, that the Michelson-Morley experiments had a "null" result. The third sentence in the Shankland paper was similarly false, claiming that "All trials of this experiment except those carried out at Mount Wilson by Dayton C. Miller yielded a null result within the accuracy of the observations." This kind of chronic misrepresentation of the slight positive results of many interferometer experimenters, including Michelson-Morley, Morley-Miller, Sagnac, Michelson-Gale, and Michelson-Pease-Pearson, suggests an extreme bias and deliberate misrepresentation. The fact that this is a very popular bias does not excuse it. By redefining all the positive results observed by what may in fact have been the majority of ether-drift researchers, as mere expressions of "observational inaccuracy", Shankland narrowed his task considerably.

These and other sentences in the Shankland paper revealed its bias from the get-go, and gave it the spirit of an autopsy, where Miller was dissected without careful concern, and certainly where no advocate of ether theory appeared to be involved in the process. It is possible, by the 1950s, there was nobody left who could fill Miller's shoes to make an adequate defense. Ether-theory was then being compared to "the search for perpetual-motion machines" (Swenson 1972, p.239), and such ridicule surely must have had a silencing effect upon the entire fields of physics and astronomy. Swenson also suggests that, during his later years, Miller was largely ignored and isolated. This appears to be correct, as according to an interview with Shankland made in 1981, shortly before Miller died he gave all of his interferometer data sheets — hundreds of pages of measurements —to his one-time student Shankland, with the somewhat bitter statement that he should "either analyze the data, or burn it" (Kimball 1981, p.2). In that same interview, Shankland also blamed Miller for having blocked the awarding of a Nobel Prize to Einstein for his relativity theory — clearly, Miller's work was a major obstacle to the Einstein theory of relativity, and for that reason may have given Einstein and his followers sleepless nights.

The title of the Shankland paper, and its overall representation suggests the authors had made a serious review of "the interferometer observations" of Miller, to include some kind of comprehensive and inclusive evaluation — but this was not the case.

Shankland Team's Evaluation for Random-Statistical variations

The Shankland paper did present a statistical analysis of a portion of Miller's published 1925-1926 Mt. Wilson data, concluding that his observations "...cannot be attributed entirely to random effects, but that systematic effects are present to an appreciable degree" and that "the periodic effects observed by Miller cannot be accounted for entirely by random statistical fluctuations in the basic data". (p.170) Also, the Shankland team admitted they "...did not embark on a statistically sound recomputation of the cosmic solution, but rather [looked for]...local disturbances such as may be caused by mechanical effects or by nonuniform temperature distributions in the observational hut." (p.172) In short, they admitted the harmonic patterns in Miller's data could not be due to any systematic measurement error, nor result from any mechanical flaws in the interferometer apparatus itself — while simultaneously admitting a disinterest in computation of any potentially validating ether-drift axis ("cosmic solution") from his data. These were important admissions, as the suggestion is, unless they could find some other fatal flaw in his data, Miller had really got it right, and measured a real Earth-entrained ether drift.

Of interest from the perspective of the politics of science, is the fact that this statistical analysis was not undertaken by any of the four members of the Shankland team listed as authors of the paper! The analysis was in fact undertaken by Case physics student Robert L. Stearns, for his Master's Thesis (Stearns 1952) — Stearns was given only a footnote credit in the Shankland paper.

Stearns, who performed the analysis, informs us about the large amount of data gathered by Miller. He mentions (Stearns 1952, p.15-17) the existence of "316 sets of data...by Miller in 1925-26" for the centrally-important Mt. Wilson experiments. Each data set was composed of 20 turns of the interferometer, with sixteen data points per turn (a total of 320 data points per data set). Miller noted his work at Mt. Wilson was undertaken at four different seasonal "epochs", each of which encompassed a period of around ten days, centered on the following dates: April 1st, August 1st, and September 15th, 1925 and February 8th 1926 (Miller 1926, 1933). It must be kept in mind, that these Mt. Wilson data from 1925 and 1926 provided the most conclusive and foundational observations for Miller's ether-drift calculations and conclusions, as presented most clearly in his 1933 paper. As detailed below, the Shankland team mentions these Mt. Wilson data, but in a manner which confuses them with his earlier and less significant efforts, including various control experiments conducted at Case School. The significance of this confusion of dates will be highlighted momentarily.

It is clear Miller had been deeply engaged on the problem of temperature effects, and worked hard to know exactly how they might be produced, and how to eliminate them. The Shankland paper, however, seized upon Miller's open acknowledgment fringe-shifts from air heating by powerful radiant heaters during control experiments, and a few other sentences written in his lab book, and tried to claim thermal anomalies were probably the source of whatever periodic effects were subsequently measured by Miller at Mt. Wilson, when no radiant heaters were used, and when the empirically-developed control procedures were put in place. Without some kind of independent experimental evidence to support such a claim of a thermal influence, their dismissal was illogical.

The Shankland paper also went through a series of arguments about the interferometer house, how the wall materials, roof angles, interferometer glass housing, etc., might result in a definable effect upon the air temperature in the light beam path, concluding only they could not rule out such an influence — that it "...is not in quantitative contradiction with the physical conditions of the experiment". (p.175) Given their ignoring the sidereal nature of the periodicities, this statement could hardly be taken seriously, and certainly did not constitute a rebuttal of Miller's data.

The Shankland paper finally attempted to correlate several selected daytime interferometer runs with temperature measurements made at the same time. They acknowledged difficulty in correlating low fringe-shift values with low temperature differentials, but found one set of high fringe-shift values correlated with slightly higher temperatures, even while noting another set where high values correlated with lower temperatures. Finally, they complain that "...no temperature data are available to reveal thermal conditions at the roof, which may be responsible for the large fringe displacements at the times of highest altitudes of the Sun." (p.176) If this sounds confusing, a reading of the full original text provided little clarification.

Failing to show anything damning from daytime data sets, when temperature gradients inside the interferometer house might be expected to be at a maximum, they turned their focus to nighttime data sets. Once again, only a few of Miller's data sheets were selected out to prove their case. Data from two nights (30 Aug. 1927 and 23 Sept.1925) with stable air temperatures were reviewed — these nights showed very clear and systematic fringe variations (Fig.4, p.176), but because the azimuth of the fringes changed minimally over the approximate 5 hours of observation, the critics complained "it would be extremely unlikely if the fringe shifts were due to any cosmic effect" (p.177). Apparently, the Shankland team was so locked into the older "static ether" assumptions of the original Michelson-Morley experiment, they were unclear about what they should have seen in Miller's data. In 1927, at a Conference on the Michelson-Morley Experiment held at Mt. Wilson Observatory, where Michelson, Lorentz, Miller and others made presentations and engaged in open debate, Miller addressed this question: "Observations were made for verifying these [static ether] predictions ...but it did not point successively to all points of the compass, that is, it did not point in directions 90° apart at intervals of six hours. Instead of this, the direction merely oscillated back and forth through an angle of about 60°..." (Miller 1928, p.356-357) The reason for this is, Miller's detected axis of ether-drift is oriented reasonably close (within 60°) to both the Earth's axis of rotation and the axis of the plane of the ecliptic.

Another important fact which nearly escapes detection in the Shankland paper is that the 30 August data were made in Cleveland, while the 23 Sept. data were from Mt. Wilson, and neither were a part of the published Mt. Wilson data Miller used for calculations of the ether-drift — both dates are well outside of the 10-day epochal periods identified by Miller.

KOVAC FUSION CELL TRANSMUTOR

Plasma Research Unveils Missing Link Element.
Mass 5 in Quartz Tube with 2 Opposing Magnets.
Ron Kovac, Analytical Chemist - TeslaTech (1998)

In 1992 through 1994 a team of researchers catalyzed by Dr. Tim Binder, president of the University of Science and Philosophy, transmuted small amounts of fluorine from water using the concepts of the Russell Cosmogony. Ron Kovac, a member of the original team, later transmuted nitrogen into helium and a solid element of Atomic Mass 5 utilizing vortex shaped electronic plasmas of his own design. Texas A&M University has confirmed the existence of the Atomic Mass 5 element in Mr. Kovac’s test tubes. An Atomic Mass 5 element has been predicted but never before seen in any laboratory. Mr. Kovac’s remarkable breakthrough thus provides irrefutable evidence for the validity of Dr. Walter Russell’s concepts of Creation and establishes the efficacy of transmutation at what is considered ordinary laboratory conditions.

"Goethe believed that the true Theory is contained in the Phenomenon. The phenomena our senses see do not deceive us; they are not unlike the ideal reality which brings them forth. As the Greek origin of the word implies, the Theory is the true seeing of the thing -- the insight that should come with healthy sight. Yet man is so constituted that he does not really see unless he meets what he sees with spiritual activity on his own part." ~ Olive Whicher, The Living Plant