⁠#CULTURE #FEATURED #Core #jpegs #Knots #Spam #Taproot_Assets #USDT

source

Open letter to Bitcoin Core: ‘Bitcoin is and must remain censorship resistant’
#Culture #bitcoin #bitcoin_core #Core_vs_Knots #Peter_Todd #Shinobi

Lema Máxima:

My Node. My Rules.

Meu Node. Minhas Regras.

Quer protestar?
Rode o #node que Você defende.

PS.
- Esse artigo está com viés para #BitcoinCore.
- Não apresenta os argumentos do #Knots.
- #DYOR Faça sua própria pesquisa.
- #DTV Não Confie. Verifique.

via Bitcoin (BTC) News | CryptoSlate

The OP_RETURN Debate: A Moral and Existential Imperative for Bitcoin

The technical debate over Bitcoin's OP_RETURN data field is a profound moral and existential crisis for the network. While often framed as a simple conflict between neutrality and censorship, the issue, when viewed through the lens of Objective Morality and the Real Natural Law, reveals a clear path forward—one that safeguards both Bitcoin's ethical standing and its foundational principle of decentralization.

The expansion of OP_RETURN, as championed by Bitcoin Core, creates an immutable platform for arbitrary data. This technically neutral stance has two catastrophic consequences. First, and most severely, it enables the permanent storage of irredeemable evils like CSAM, eternally weaponizing the ledger against its victims and making any form of justice or redress impossible. This alone is an intolerable violation of the Natural Law principle that society's primary duty is to do no harm.

Second, this policy directly attacks Bitcoin's core value: decentralization. A bigger OP_RETURN means a rapidly bloating blockchain. As the chain grows exponentially from storing images, videos, and tokens, the cost and hardware requirements to run a full node surge. This prices out average users, gradually transforming node operation from a widely distributed activity into a pursuit only for those with significant resources. The network centralizes into the hands of a few, becoming more vulnerable to control and censorship—the very antithesis of Bitcoin's purpose.

The argument that preventing this evil starts a "slippery slope" to censorship is a moral and practical failure. Natural Law provides a bright line: the intentional harm of the innocent is an absolute wrong. Prudence is the wisdom to take definitive action against a known atrocity, not inaction for fear of future dilemmas. Choosing to run a node that allows this, as Core does, prioritizes a flawed interpretation of neutrality over both human dignity and the network's decentralized health.

Therefore, the morally and structurally correct choice is unequivocal. Supporting Bitcoin Knots, which seeks to limit OP_RETURN, is an ethical and existential imperative. It is a vote for a Bitcoin that embodies not just freedom, but justice and resilience—a system designed to protect the vulnerable and preserve the distributed power that gives it life.

🧡⚖️

#BTC
#Core
#Knots
#ObjectiveMorality
#TheRealNaturalLaw