Kennedy says the FDA doesnβt even know how many chemicals are in our foods.
My replyβ¦β¦.
When I was a high school kid I worked at the National Institute of Science and Technology in Maryland.
As a lab tech executing planned mass chromatography experiments for the scientists working there.
In a matter of a few minutes you can know exactly how many chemicals are in any sample. In a matter of months a few labs working together could sample every processed and organic food in America.
Cross off the known spectrum lines, and boom the unknown lines still remaining tell you exactly how many unknown chemicals are in our food. And you can chase every one down to the ingredient that introduced it.
π If they wanted to.
The FDA isnβt ignorant of the chemicals in our food because people donβt know how to solve the problem.
π The problem isnβt being worked.
Permanent career civil servants (aka SES) for some reason were selected who are dumber than a high school kid, or are pretending this is unsolvable.
FDA Headquarters: White Oak Campus at 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD
NIST Main Campus: 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD
Both in corrupt as fuck Montgomery County, just like Gaithersburg High School that I went to while my dad was beating his head against a wall at the Pentagon trying to get anyone there to give a shit about anything.
Bobby! Since it seems nobody showed you how easy it is to catalog all the chemicals in a sample, set up access for a demonstration and Iβll be glad to walk into my old lab at NIST and show you how. Itβs a 17 or 18 mile drive from the FDA office, and only 23 miles from Capitol Hill. Have some in Congress come see the solution to this βimpossible problemβ.
My replyβ¦β¦.
When I was a high school kid I worked at the National Institute of Science and Technology in Maryland.
As a lab tech executing planned mass chromatography experiments for the scientists working there.
In a matter of a few minutes you can know exactly how many chemicals are in any sample. In a matter of months a few labs working together could sample every processed and organic food in America.
Cross off the known spectrum lines, and boom the unknown lines still remaining tell you exactly how many unknown chemicals are in our food. And you can chase every one down to the ingredient that introduced it.
π If they wanted to.
The FDA isnβt ignorant of the chemicals in our food because people donβt know how to solve the problem.
π The problem isnβt being worked.
Permanent career civil servants (aka SES) for some reason were selected who are dumber than a high school kid, or are pretending this is unsolvable.
FDA Headquarters: White Oak Campus at 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD
NIST Main Campus: 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD
Both in corrupt as fuck Montgomery County, just like Gaithersburg High School that I went to while my dad was beating his head against a wall at the Pentagon trying to get anyone there to give a shit about anything.
Bobby! Since it seems nobody showed you how easy it is to catalog all the chemicals in a sample, set up access for a demonstration and Iβll be glad to walk into my old lab at NIST and show you how. Itβs a 17 or 18 mile drive from the FDA office, and only 23 miles from Capitol Hill. Have some in Congress come see the solution to this βimpossible problemβ.
π₯401π76β€38π―30π€¬19π16π10π€‘1π₯±1
There is a tier of personalities on X that really want to be professional βcreatorsβ, and get paid very well for doing it.
These people get pretty mad when the algorithm is changed in a way that redistributes the finite pool of views (viewer attention) and creator pool compensation.
They are convinced X is failing as a platform because it doesnβt listen to them. A lot of them follow me, and others like me. For ideas, or just to see the perspective we represent.
What is the true mission of X? I donβt know, but I have my own bias towards what it should beβ¦ and that is to optimize information velocity and veracity across the whole world.
While trying to figure that out, I donβt think X should treat βcreatorβ contentment as a sacred cow itβs afraid to disrupt.
My frens and I are a wide ranging mashup of citizen information activists who have very different views about particular topics, but mostly agree with our desire to promote the democracy of information, and to tear down the entrenched gatekeepers of narratives (aka βnews outletsβ coincidentally staffed by the 100s of former intelligence agency officials). We have watched as βprofessional citizen journalistsβ constantly pop out of nowhere and get catapulted into the top 100 commentators then inevitably flip against the Trump coalition when the money dries up. So we started calling them grifters.
Most of us donβt care about the money, or being stuck perpetually on the outskirts of Infoville, and even when we are banned over and over for saying things that are later proven true, and never in any way restored to what was taken awayβ¦ we soldier on because we decided long ago that message over messenger would be our motto.
So fuck the money and those who only care about that. Iβve gone from mid 7 figures of wealth to mid 6 because for 8+ years Iβve put this first over making money. Iβve gone from being able to retire whenever, to needing to work until Iβm 70. Whatever, at least we are making progress towards making western civilization once again something worth preserving.
Experiment like hell to make uncontrollable information flow. Penetrate every regime, every country, every culture that thrives on isolation. Tear the algorithms apart and try again and again. Prioritize information flow above creators.
Frankly we do not need, and never needed, the people with big egos, big paychecks, and big audiences. The great awakening does not rest on their shoulders. Digital soldiers and regular people have got this. When one of us burns out, two more take our place.
These people get pretty mad when the algorithm is changed in a way that redistributes the finite pool of views (viewer attention) and creator pool compensation.
They are convinced X is failing as a platform because it doesnβt listen to them. A lot of them follow me, and others like me. For ideas, or just to see the perspective we represent.
What is the true mission of X? I donβt know, but I have my own bias towards what it should beβ¦ and that is to optimize information velocity and veracity across the whole world.
While trying to figure that out, I donβt think X should treat βcreatorβ contentment as a sacred cow itβs afraid to disrupt.
My frens and I are a wide ranging mashup of citizen information activists who have very different views about particular topics, but mostly agree with our desire to promote the democracy of information, and to tear down the entrenched gatekeepers of narratives (aka βnews outletsβ coincidentally staffed by the 100s of former intelligence agency officials). We have watched as βprofessional citizen journalistsβ constantly pop out of nowhere and get catapulted into the top 100 commentators then inevitably flip against the Trump coalition when the money dries up. So we started calling them grifters.
Most of us donβt care about the money, or being stuck perpetually on the outskirts of Infoville, and even when we are banned over and over for saying things that are later proven true, and never in any way restored to what was taken awayβ¦ we soldier on because we decided long ago that message over messenger would be our motto.
So fuck the money and those who only care about that. Iβve gone from mid 7 figures of wealth to mid 6 because for 8+ years Iβve put this first over making money. Iβve gone from being able to retire whenever, to needing to work until Iβm 70. Whatever, at least we are making progress towards making western civilization once again something worth preserving.
Experiment like hell to make uncontrollable information flow. Penetrate every regime, every country, every culture that thrives on isolation. Tear the algorithms apart and try again and again. Prioritize information flow above creators.
Frankly we do not need, and never needed, the people with big egos, big paychecks, and big audiences. The great awakening does not rest on their shoulders. Digital soldiers and regular people have got this. When one of us burns out, two more take our place.
π247β€107π60π―56π21π8π₯±3π₯°2
Some big accounts are gonna unfollow me for posting that. π
Stream of consciousness. I just wrote and posted. Not a piece I care to edit/polish.
Stream of consciousness. I just wrote and posted. Not a piece I care to edit/polish.
π169π77β€16π€·ββ15π€11π₯9π2π₯±2πΏ2
For the record Iβm talking about people who made 6 to 7 figures, but were never even part of this info war back when it really mattered.
Iβm not talking about faithful patriots who sacrificed everything and maybe now are lucky to scrape a couple grand a month to keep the lights on.
Iβm not talking about faithful patriots who sacrificed everything and maybe now are lucky to scrape a couple grand a month to keep the lights on.
π255π71β€24π«‘8π₯±2π€1
From recent posts Iβve made no secret that I like Tulsi. Todayβs post is going to sound like a flip.
I consider her post of scripture she doesnβt believe inβ¦ awkward and pandering. Donβt ask the living God for refuge in an insincere way.
ββββββββ
I like Tulsi, but she has said there should be no religion, and absolutely does not revere the Bible as scripture.
This may be messaging to test response, and measure the gap she faces to win political support for office.
Framework: The looming DNI reports.
I have high hopes for the work she has done as DNI, and the reports she is yet to produce. Produce bangers that hold the traitors accountableβ¦ and the support from MAGA will be a FLOOD. There will be no need to leverage scripture she doesnβt believe in to court our trust.
This casts doubt on the coming reports giving her all the support she needs, and it may mean digging deep for support now to help sell reports many wonβt like.
π± RePOST
I consider her post of scripture she doesnβt believe inβ¦ awkward and pandering. Donβt ask the living God for refuge in an insincere way.
ββββββββ
I like Tulsi, but she has said there should be no religion, and absolutely does not revere the Bible as scripture.
This may be messaging to test response, and measure the gap she faces to win political support for office.
Framework: The looming DNI reports.
I have high hopes for the work she has done as DNI, and the reports she is yet to produce. Produce bangers that hold the traitors accountableβ¦ and the support from MAGA will be a FLOOD. There will be no need to leverage scripture she doesnβt believe in to court our trust.
This casts doubt on the coming reports giving her all the support she needs, and it may mean digging deep for support now to help sell reports many wonβt like.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π131π€126β€25π―13π₯΄8π4π2π₯2π©2π’1π€‘1
I watch powerful people for SIGNAL that their posture has changed.
That is how I noticed people like Tucker & Candace were making a move when I called that out.
But this timeβ¦ I really want to be wrong. π
That is how I noticed people like Tucker & Candace were making a move when I called that out.
But this timeβ¦ I really want to be wrong. π
π176π55π’7β€6π€‘3
Your best guess?
Hammer will end up right or wrong on this one?
Hammer will end up right or wrong on this one?
Anonymous Poll
31%
Right
22%
Wrong
48%
IDK
β€34π₯6π€‘2
To clear up any confusion about what Iβm saying and what Iβm not saying.
Not saying Tulsi is bad. Thereβs nothing evil about wanting to run for office and taking reasonable steps to make that happen.
Am saying her use of scripture she doesnβt believe in is political in nature, and MAY indicate sampling base of support for a run for office, or to mitigate blowback if her reports are disappointing.
Not saying Tulsi is bad. Thereβs nothing evil about wanting to run for office and taking reasonable steps to make that happen.
Am saying her use of scripture she doesnβt believe in is political in nature, and MAY indicate sampling base of support for a run for office, or to mitigate blowback if her reports are disappointing.
π137π€111π―31π12π8β€7π€‘2
Trump is doing that thing again.
But nobody in the entire global media profession will ask him about it.
But nobody in the entire global media profession will ask him about it.
π₯382π83β€βπ₯56π24π23π€£21β€9π₯°4π4π€‘1π―1
So, the topic of Iran's Uranium and theoretical possible ties back to Uranium 1 keep coming up.
This is interesting to me but the strange thing about it is... this convo treats Uranium like it's some precious & rare commodity, instead of something Russia & China can crank out as much as they want of.
Like, if you're a state like Iran, why bother jumping through hoops to get hands on material that came from the U.S.? The only thing significant about it is its unique signature... the traceability back to the U.S.
Two scenarios where that makes sense:
a) Rogue actor wants to set off a nuke or dirty bomb someplace and avoid using their own uranium so the attack can't be traced back to themselves.
b) Rogue actor wants to set off a nuke or dirty bomb someplace and have the world believe the U.S. did it (like with help of UN regulators helpfully identifying the U.S. as origin of material).
I realize those sound almost the same, but they are a little different in execution, and require a very different level of sophistication to pull off.
This is interesting to me but the strange thing about it is... this convo treats Uranium like it's some precious & rare commodity, instead of something Russia & China can crank out as much as they want of.
Like, if you're a state like Iran, why bother jumping through hoops to get hands on material that came from the U.S.? The only thing significant about it is its unique signature... the traceability back to the U.S.
Two scenarios where that makes sense:
a) Rogue actor wants to set off a nuke or dirty bomb someplace and avoid using their own uranium so the attack can't be traced back to themselves.
b) Rogue actor wants to set off a nuke or dirty bomb someplace and have the world believe the U.S. did it (like with help of UN regulators helpfully identifying the U.S. as origin of material).
I realize those sound almost the same, but they are a little different in execution, and require a very different level of sophistication to pull off.
π214π56β€22π€13π€¨3
Paxton win shifts the model on predictions for the AG race. Texas broke hard for Paxton in the Senate nomination race, which means voters may have trusted Paxton's endorsement of Middleton.
Fact: Both Senator Cornyn and Chip Roy have been staunch opponents of Trump at critical times, even though both have tried hard to rebrand and help voters forget that past.
Officially they are still say this race is too early to call, but it would be hard for Roy to turn this around now.
It's interesting that Trump did not endorse a candidate in this race.
Fact: Both Senator Cornyn and Chip Roy have been staunch opponents of Trump at critical times, even though both have tried hard to rebrand and help voters forget that past.
Officially they are still say this race is too early to call, but it would be hard for Roy to turn this around now.
It's interesting that Trump did not endorse a candidate in this race.
π205π87β€23π₯13π4π€2
House Rep Chip Roy has just lost his Congressional seat in Texas. Congratulations Texas on removing another obstacle to the MAGA agenda!
Photo is from Chip Roy's famous condemnation of Trump after J6.
π± RePOST
Photo is from Chip Roy's famous condemnation of Trump after J6.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π321π₯167π116π31β€19π―17πΎ17π©4
Forwarded from MJTruth
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
KABOOMβΌοΈ
21+ Year Democrat Swamp Creature Al Green has LOST his Congressional seat in Texas!
How Trump did it:
Due to 2025 redistricting (which made his original 9th District more Republican-leaning), he ran for the neighboring 18th District but lost the Democratic primary tonight.
Donβt you love when a plan comes together?
21+ Year Democrat Swamp Creature Al Green has LOST his Congressional seat in Texas!
How Trump did it:
Due to 2025 redistricting (which made his original 9th District more Republican-leaning), he ran for the neighboring 18th District but lost the Democratic primary tonight.
Donβt you love when a plan comes together?
β€407πΎ258π110π41π22π₯7π5π©3
Forwarded from Professor Patriot (Professor Patriot)
This story out of Belgium is chilling. Dries Van Langenhove shared the truth in a lecture. The government admits it was the truth. They are sending him to jail anyway.
ββββββββββββ-
βA very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail βto the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free βin a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: βEven if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.β
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus themβ in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and βvibesβ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than β¬420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.β
https://x.com/dvanlangenhove/status/2059275296050741666
ββββββββββββ-
βA very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail βto the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free βin a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: βEven if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.β
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus themβ in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and βvibesβ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than β¬420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.β
https://x.com/dvanlangenhove/status/2059275296050741666
X (formerly Twitter)
Dries Van Langenhove (@DVanLangenhove) on X
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail βto the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previousβ¦
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail βto the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previousβ¦
π232π€¬119β€32π€―15π’5π2π2β‘1π―1