A note to people who really believe White Hats / Trump orchestrated the assassination attempt on Saturday.
There's nothing I can ever say to convince you that any specific event is real or staged, so I won't try. I will instead just ask you to consider two moral dilemmas.
ONE: Can good people do evil in the name of accomplishing good?
You believe a number of crisis actors put on a show, even to the point of letting 1,000s of normal citizens attending the rally run & scream in fear for their lives. Some of these people told others they were splattered with blood, or injured falling while trying to get away. Many will have PTSD from believing they almost died. This is objectively evil, no matter who did it.
Dilemma 1: If you truly believe Trump & co did this, why do YOU call them white hats and why do you support them? You are morally obligated to oppose them if you believe they are doing evil.
TWO: Why do you keep operating in a way that is counter to the mission YOU believe is going on?
You believe all this is being done because the NEED is so dire... that white hats are risking some collateral damage in the mission to accomplish something bigger. Lets assume for the sake of argument that is the case... If white hats are putting on an event like this, then it is because they need the public to believe certain things, in order for the public to be driven to the required actions or state-of-mind... so why do YOU keep running a counter-op against them by telling the public not to worry about it... it's all fake?
Dilemma 2: You are morally obligated to support them and stop operating counter to the desired effect, if YOU believe these events are essential and being done by people YOU support.
There are two possibilities for these events. They are real and people must act accordingly, or they are staged for effect because the "mission" requires that people think they are real and act accordingly.
Where in all of that is the part where YOU need to keep trying to convince people of the opposite?
Sorry, but a far more logical explanation is YOU are having trouble dealing with reality, and feeding on the emotional validation and support YOU are getting from telling others what they want to hear because this theory of yours makes the world a little less scary for you and them.
You are making us all look like idiots to the people we are still trying to wake up...
There's nothing I can ever say to convince you that any specific event is real or staged, so I won't try. I will instead just ask you to consider two moral dilemmas.
ONE: Can good people do evil in the name of accomplishing good?
You believe a number of crisis actors put on a show, even to the point of letting 1,000s of normal citizens attending the rally run & scream in fear for their lives. Some of these people told others they were splattered with blood, or injured falling while trying to get away. Many will have PTSD from believing they almost died. This is objectively evil, no matter who did it.
Dilemma 1: If you truly believe Trump & co did this, why do YOU call them white hats and why do you support them? You are morally obligated to oppose them if you believe they are doing evil.
TWO: Why do you keep operating in a way that is counter to the mission YOU believe is going on?
You believe all this is being done because the NEED is so dire... that white hats are risking some collateral damage in the mission to accomplish something bigger. Lets assume for the sake of argument that is the case... If white hats are putting on an event like this, then it is because they need the public to believe certain things, in order for the public to be driven to the required actions or state-of-mind... so why do YOU keep running a counter-op against them by telling the public not to worry about it... it's all fake?
Dilemma 2: You are morally obligated to support them and stop operating counter to the desired effect, if YOU believe these events are essential and being done by people YOU support.
There are two possibilities for these events. They are real and people must act accordingly, or they are staged for effect because the "mission" requires that people think they are real and act accordingly.
Where in all of that is the part where YOU need to keep trying to convince people of the opposite?
Sorry, but a far more logical explanation is YOU are having trouble dealing with reality, and feeding on the emotional validation and support YOU are getting from telling others what they want to hear because this theory of yours makes the world a little less scary for you and them.
You are making us all look like idiots to the people we are still trying to wake up...
💯278👍46❤13🤣1🏆1
Did I just get bot scammed??
Darn those bots!
Thought I got a voter out of this! 🤣
Darn those bots!
Thought I got a voter out of this! 🤣
😁153🥴12💯7👍5❤1
Hey FBI,
Did I commit a crime by telling a bot to vote?
Uh oh!
Did I commit a crime by telling a bot to vote?
Uh oh!
🤣209😁12👍4👎1
Hey FBI,
If y'all could stop cheating, that'd be great.
-America
If y'all could stop cheating, that'd be great.
-America
👏221🤣74❤11👍4😁4
TruthHammer 🙏🇺🇸 (DM's & Channel Spam are FAKERS.)
A note to people who really believe White Hats / Trump orchestrated the assassination attempt on Saturday. There's nothing I can ever say to convince you that any specific event is real or staged, so I won't try. I will instead just ask you to consider two…
Zero substantive responses from people committed to the "it's ALL a movie" viewpoint.
None of you want to explain your take on the two moral dilemmas?
1) Why do you believe it's ok to do evil to bystanders in the pursuit of good?
2) If YOU think the scare events are essential to teach the people a lesson, why do YOU act in a way that harms that mission by trying to convince people the events are all fake?
Will people act in the way the event designers intended if you break the 4th wall?
Do you understand why psychological experiments don't tell the subjects what is really being tested?
I'm trying to help you see your own internal reasoning is broken, to help you begin to unwind it.
None of you want to explain your take on the two moral dilemmas?
1) Why do you believe it's ok to do evil to bystanders in the pursuit of good?
2) If YOU think the scare events are essential to teach the people a lesson, why do YOU act in a way that harms that mission by trying to convince people the events are all fake?
Will people act in the way the event designers intended if you break the 4th wall?
Do you understand why psychological experiments don't tell the subjects what is really being tested?
I'm trying to help you see your own internal reasoning is broken, to help you begin to unwind it.
❤108👏64👍13🤔2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏206🤯34😭15❤2👍1
Chess analogy: a game can be lost (or won) well before the last move. Chess masters can see it.
When Q said "Patriots are in control", it likely meant that the game had reached a point where evil had no path to win -- but that doesn't mean they had no nasty moves left, or that patriots were the ones giving them orders at that point.
(edited from https://x.com/mellyrn/status/1813356792463647166?s=46)
When Q said "Patriots are in control", it likely meant that the game had reached a point where evil had no path to win -- but that doesn't mean they had no nasty moves left, or that patriots were the ones giving them orders at that point.
(edited from https://x.com/mellyrn/status/1813356792463647166?s=46)
🔥197👍49👏44🙏6❤5🥰3🤔3💯2
Forwarded from Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸 (Karli Bonne)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don Jr
❤118
Forwarded from Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸 (Karli Bonne)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Unity blah blah Bird Brain - I feel for Trump having to listen to her squeak
🤮192💯66🤪28❤5👍4👏3