🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷Top-ten US lies about the war with Iran

Since the war between the US, Israel and Iran, statements from American officials, especially President Donald Trump, have increasingly clashed with reports, evidence, and even their own earlier claims.

1️⃣ 'Iran has nuclear weapons'

On 28 February, Trump claimed Iran had developed nuclear weapons threatening US allies, and soon, the US itself.
But in June 2025, he said Iran’s nuclear programme had been “completely destroyed”. So which one is true?

2️⃣ 'Iranian missiles can hit US'

Trump warned Iranian missiles could soon reach American soil.
Yet Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) previously assessed Iran would need years to develop such capability. Iran’s current missile range is just about 2,500 km, while the distance to the US exceeds 11,000 km.

3️⃣ 'Iran bombed a school in Minab'

Trump blamed Iran for a strike that killed 175 people.
However, media investigations and leaked Pentagon information suggested the strike was caused by a US Tomahawk missile—reportedly due to a targeting error.

4️⃣ 'The US can protect oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz'

Trump promised military escorts for commercial shipping.
In reality, multiple reports claim requests were declined, and several vessels that relied on US assurances were later attacked.

5️⃣ 'Footage of attacks on US bases is fake AI'

Trump dismissed videos of strikes on US bases and pro-government rallies in Iran as AI-generated propaganda.
However, similar footage has appeared across international media and independent social media accounts, raising doubts about that claim.

6️⃣ 'US controls the war'

American officials repeatedly claimed the situation was “contained”, despite ongoing strikes, regional escalation, and rising casualties.

7️⃣ 'No US troops are at risk'

Public statements downplayed danger to American forces, even as reports emerged of attacks on bases across the region.

8️⃣ 'Sanctions only target the regime'

US officials insist sanctions are “precision tools”, yet humanitarian groups argue they severely impact civilians, especially access to medicine and essential goods.

9️⃣ 'We’re not seeking regime change'

US officials insist the goal is “stability”, not overthrowing Iran’s leadership.
Yet statements from multiple policymakers, along with long-standing positions in US Congress, have openly discussed weakening or replacing the Iranian government.

🔟 'Civilian casualties are minimal'

Officials often claim strikes are “precise” and avoid civilian harm.
But reports from humanitarian groups and coverage by outlets like Reuters suggest civilian casualties may be higher than officially acknowledged—raising questions about transparency and accountability.

Chat | GG Movies channel | Boost us!