Forwarded from Deleted Account
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What Suppression Order? Why can't Hipkins talk?
I have sent the following Official Information Act request this morning.
"Hi
On 13 August 2025, Chris Hipkins MP, stated in a radio interview with Mike Hoskings that he was under a suppression order.
I request the following information under the Official Information Act 1982:
1. A copy of the suppression order;
2. The details of the legal proceeding that resulted in the suppression order;
3.The name of the party that initiated the court order for the suppression order;
4. The duration of the suppression order.
I require the information for a submission to Parliament which is due on 18 September 2025.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Kind regards
Kirsten Murfitt"
I have sent the following Official Information Act request this morning.
"Hi
On 13 August 2025, Chris Hipkins MP, stated in a radio interview with Mike Hoskings that he was under a suppression order.
I request the following information under the Official Information Act 1982:
1. A copy of the suppression order;
2. The details of the legal proceeding that resulted in the suppression order;
3.The name of the party that initiated the court order for the suppression order;
4. The duration of the suppression order.
I require the information for a submission to Parliament which is due on 18 September 2025.
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Kind regards
Kirsten Murfitt"
Forwarded from Deleted Account
No wonder the famous 5 don't want to appear publicly at the Royal Commission when public funds were used to push the CV19 vaccine to our children. The MOH's brief to an advertising agency stated:
"Benefits of immunisation COVID-19 generally has milder effects in children than adults. Symptoms are usually similar to a cold.
However, some children who have not been immunised can develop severe lung infections, become very sick, and require hospitalisation."
Marketing during a pandemic. They left those scenes out of the pandemic movies.
"Benefits of immunisation COVID-19 generally has milder effects in children than adults. Symptoms are usually similar to a cold.
However, some children who have not been immunised can develop severe lung infections, become very sick, and require hospitalisation."
Marketing during a pandemic. They left those scenes out of the pandemic movies.
Forwarded from COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Leave the cocooning to the caterpillars.”
Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD is sounding the alarm on people pushing policies that require vaccination to see newborn babies, saying the practice is not supported by science.
“There’s a policy that is being advocated by many using the hashtag ‘no vax, no visit.’”
“What I’m talking about is called cocooning.”
“Parents increasingly are saying that grandparents… can’t be around their new grandchild if they haven’t been fully vaccinated.”
“This was a policy promoted by the ACIP historically without any data.”
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD is sounding the alarm on people pushing policies that require vaccination to see newborn babies, saying the practice is not supported by science.
“There’s a policy that is being advocated by many using the hashtag ‘no vax, no visit.’”
“What I’m talking about is called cocooning.”
“Parents increasingly are saying that grandparents… can’t be around their new grandchild if they haven’t been fully vaccinated.”
“This was a policy promoted by the ACIP historically without any data.”
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
👍1
A few years later:
• mass injury & death
• worldwide product withdrawal
Peak 🤡
• mass injury & death
• worldwide product withdrawal
Peak 🤡
Unlike Moderna’s “personalized” cancer vaccine programs, which are said to be tailored to an individual patient’s tumor characteristics, mRNA-4200 is described as an “off-the-shelf” product intended for use across multiple cancer types.
According to Moderna’s public statements, the product works by delivering mRNA instructions that result in the production of seven shared tumor proteins inside the body after injection.
Moderna has not publicly disclosed the identities of those proteins.
As a result, we are currently unable to independently evaluate which proteins are being produced, whether they are full proteins or fragments, whether they are found elsewhere in the body, or what biological effects may accompany their expression.
[Reads like injecting cancer creating toxins....using mrna tech might increase rates of cancer....no.
..they would never do that]
According to Moderna’s public statements, the product works by delivering mRNA instructions that result in the production of seven shared tumor proteins inside the body after injection.
Moderna has not publicly disclosed the identities of those proteins.
As a result, we are currently unable to independently evaluate which proteins are being produced, whether they are full proteins or fragments, whether they are found elsewhere in the body, or what biological effects may accompany their expression.
[Reads like injecting cancer creating toxins....using mrna tech might increase rates of cancer....no.
..they would never do that]
So called shingles 💉 is one of the most reactogenic (serious/ severe adverse immune response to being poisoned) of so called routine recommended 💉
Using make believe retrospective data sets to show a possible association between receiving shingles 💉 and decreased likelihood of developing dementia
Taking the faked association forward into clinical trials will inject 10s thousand of >65y across multiple countries using predetermined endpoints to expand market use of the existing product.
Should recipients become injured disabled sick or dead during the trial the methodology will not capture these events and outcomes as negatives.
It would be biologically implausible for toxins and poisons to decrease likelihood of dementia it is an impossibility and highly probably an inverse association to causal of dementia outcomes.
Injecting already 💉 up elderly and claiming they are an unvaxxed control group is also a lie
There are so few zero 💉 people in the trial nations there is 0.00% possibility any of them could become a trial participant.
So who are the trial participants....>65y injected probably on medication(s) and recipients of state medical care and costs who are listed as a liability on every balance sheet.
When nations need to balance the books it is older cohorts as the primary target.
That's what this is.
It can't readily be known how many 💉of all and any variety the parents have taken even if they do share, it's likely to be inaccurate.
Shingles 💉 and flu are recommended at every opportunity an oldy enters a clinical setting...gp clinic, phsrmacy or hospital whatever....the policy is to always recommend and advise to inject when an opportunity presents itself.
Opportunity is anyone inside premises where 💉 are administered.
Highly unlikely av and probably don have restricted themselves to only cov💉 in fact it should be assumed they've had flu and shingles shots before alongside or since they had cov💉
Cumulative poisoning leads to cognitive decline.
Using make believe retrospective data sets to show a possible association between receiving shingles 💉 and decreased likelihood of developing dementia
Taking the faked association forward into clinical trials will inject 10s thousand of >65y across multiple countries using predetermined endpoints to expand market use of the existing product.
Should recipients become injured disabled sick or dead during the trial the methodology will not capture these events and outcomes as negatives.
It would be biologically implausible for toxins and poisons to decrease likelihood of dementia it is an impossibility and highly probably an inverse association to causal of dementia outcomes.
Injecting already 💉 up elderly and claiming they are an unvaxxed control group is also a lie
There are so few zero 💉 people in the trial nations there is 0.00% possibility any of them could become a trial participant.
So who are the trial participants....>65y injected probably on medication(s) and recipients of state medical care and costs who are listed as a liability on every balance sheet.
When nations need to balance the books it is older cohorts as the primary target.
That's what this is.
It can't readily be known how many 💉of all and any variety the parents have taken even if they do share, it's likely to be inaccurate.
Shingles 💉 and flu are recommended at every opportunity an oldy enters a clinical setting...gp clinic, phsrmacy or hospital whatever....the policy is to always recommend and advise to inject when an opportunity presents itself.
Opportunity is anyone inside premises where 💉 are administered.
Highly unlikely av and probably don have restricted themselves to only cov💉 in fact it should be assumed they've had flu and shingles shots before alongside or since they had cov💉
Cumulative poisoning leads to cognitive decline.