3.5 years? 14 Years Was The Maximum That Could Have Been Given
He will be out in less than 2. An insult to the victim, who was 9 just and is now 16 (and it was TWO sexual assaults). Not one. As the headline suggests. Edward White (48 years the victim's senior) put his young victim through the extreme stress of giving evidence and being cross examined and was also allowed (after being convicted) to stand up and say the victim and her family lied again and again. Her age in court was stressed as being "9 and a half" as though the extra six months in age made the crime lesser somehow.
Because this vile monster has some seemingly benign health issues, such as tinnitus, he got a lighter sentence. The female judge also deemed the attacks were brief and, therefore, less serious (as though it takes more than a second of inappropriate touching to destroy a child's life).
Additionally, his advancing age was taken into consideration when deciding on a sentence (he was well capable of sexually assaulting, threatening, and intimidating a child, and no doubt still is). Mr White committed the acts in the child's home and then told her he would do bad things to her family if she called out for help or told anyone. He said it was egregious to send him to jail given his health issues.
He will be out in less than 2. An insult to the victim, who was 9 just and is now 16 (and it was TWO sexual assaults). Not one. As the headline suggests. Edward White (48 years the victim's senior) put his young victim through the extreme stress of giving evidence and being cross examined and was also allowed (after being convicted) to stand up and say the victim and her family lied again and again. Her age in court was stressed as being "9 and a half" as though the extra six months in age made the crime lesser somehow.
Because this vile monster has some seemingly benign health issues, such as tinnitus, he got a lighter sentence. The female judge also deemed the attacks were brief and, therefore, less serious (as though it takes more than a second of inappropriate touching to destroy a child's life).
Additionally, his advancing age was taken into consideration when deciding on a sentence (he was well capable of sexually assaulting, threatening, and intimidating a child, and no doubt still is). Mr White committed the acts in the child's home and then told her he would do bad things to her family if she called out for help or told anyone. He said it was egregious to send him to jail given his health issues.
Tusla Says It Is NOT Responsible For Verifying Age!
Tusla said it was “necessary and important to clarify” it does not conduct age assessment in the strict statutory sense”. Tusla said its role was “confined” to determining if someone referred to it was eligible for services under the Child Care Act 1991....
Surely to be eligible though you have to ACTUALLY BE A CHILD??
Tusla went on to say "Therefore, the appropriate authority for determining age for international protection purposes is the International Protection Office,”
The Department of Justice was "forced to clarify" last week that the International Protection Office (IPO) is "ultimately responsible for determining the age of an applicant being treated as an unaccompanied minor in the system. This is despite the fact that in practice, Tusla was the agency assumed to be responsible for determining The Department of Justice had previously “allowed” the PAC to believe that age verification was Tusla’s responsibility."
Additionally, there have been 14 cases in which legal proceedings were taken against Tusla over age verification but it is not clear what the specifics were of these cases.
There are "three ongoing cases and six where no damages or costs were issued against Tusla. In two cases, the legal costs against Tusla were €45,675.17 and €6,460. In three other cases, the damages awarded against Tusla ranged from €2,500 to €6,460."
Also last week, Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan told the Dáil that “in practice, and for many years,” Tusla’s assessment has been the one that has been “taken as being determinative of age for the purposes of both eligibility for services and for the processing of an international protection application”.
Tusla said it was “necessary and important to clarify” it does not conduct age assessment in the strict statutory sense”. Tusla said its role was “confined” to determining if someone referred to it was eligible for services under the Child Care Act 1991....
Surely to be eligible though you have to ACTUALLY BE A CHILD??
Tusla went on to say "Therefore, the appropriate authority for determining age for international protection purposes is the International Protection Office,”
The Department of Justice was "forced to clarify" last week that the International Protection Office (IPO) is "ultimately responsible for determining the age of an applicant being treated as an unaccompanied minor in the system. This is despite the fact that in practice, Tusla was the agency assumed to be responsible for determining The Department of Justice had previously “allowed” the PAC to believe that age verification was Tusla’s responsibility."
Additionally, there have been 14 cases in which legal proceedings were taken against Tusla over age verification but it is not clear what the specifics were of these cases.
There are "three ongoing cases and six where no damages or costs were issued against Tusla. In two cases, the legal costs against Tusla were €45,675.17 and €6,460. In three other cases, the damages awarded against Tusla ranged from €2,500 to €6,460."
Also last week, Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan told the Dáil that “in practice, and for many years,” Tusla’s assessment has been the one that has been “taken as being determinative of age for the purposes of both eligibility for services and for the processing of an international protection application”.
Babysitting Holiday Advert Worth Noting..
This is welcome news. The parents may still get away with burying his little body on wasteland (after he died in God knows what manner), but at least little Daniel's death is being taken seriously. Because he had been buried so long, there were no conclusive results as to how he died. So who knows where this investigation will go. Hopefully, there are incriminating communications and other evidence of wrongdoing. It is worthy to note that Tusla dropped the ball on this child. He was put up for adoption and then given back to the parents and then closed off his file prematurely (as they did with over 45,000 cases during those lockd*wn times).
It's also worth noting that his mother put up an ad online looking for a total stranger to mind the little boy for a week while she and her boyfriend went away on holidays for a week. That ad was not answered, and the post was not fulfilled. I often wonder if they went on holiday anyway. In any case something is not right. No one buried their little child like this and then claims social welfare for them (in the case of the mother) or flees to Brazil (in the case of the father) if they are innocent. We can say my views on that as this case is not subjudice/pre trial/trial phase yet (and may never be depending on what case the Gardaí can put together and depending then on what file they send for the attention of the DPP).
Note what the Journal image says. DANIEL AS A BABY. He was still just a baby when he died, he was only 3.
Rest In peace, Daniel.
This is welcome news. The parents may still get away with burying his little body on wasteland (after he died in God knows what manner), but at least little Daniel's death is being taken seriously. Because he had been buried so long, there were no conclusive results as to how he died. So who knows where this investigation will go. Hopefully, there are incriminating communications and other evidence of wrongdoing. It is worthy to note that Tusla dropped the ball on this child. He was put up for adoption and then given back to the parents and then closed off his file prematurely (as they did with over 45,000 cases during those lockd*wn times).
It's also worth noting that his mother put up an ad online looking for a total stranger to mind the little boy for a week while she and her boyfriend went away on holidays for a week. That ad was not answered, and the post was not fulfilled. I often wonder if they went on holiday anyway. In any case something is not right. No one buried their little child like this and then claims social welfare for them (in the case of the mother) or flees to Brazil (in the case of the father) if they are innocent. We can say my views on that as this case is not subjudice/pre trial/trial phase yet (and may never be depending on what case the Gardaí can put together and depending then on what file they send for the attention of the DPP).
Note what the Journal image says. DANIEL AS A BABY. He was still just a baby when he died, he was only 3.
Rest In peace, Daniel.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HAPPENED JUST NOW: MAN RANDOMLY ATTACKS CHILD & WOMAN IN ONGAR CAFE, DUBLIN
This morning we came across several police cars, ambulances and fire brigade in Ongar Village and several police and paramedics surrounding a cuffed male who has a contusion to his forehead and an injury begins his right ear (someone must have intervened in the attack). What is known at this time is that a man hit and smashed a glass over the heads and faces of a mother and her young child in Rendevouz Cafe. It is ot yet known what their I buried are. The man is large white male in his late thirties or early forties, with a beard. It's not obvious from the video but at least two ambulances, one firebrigade, four police cars and one police van were present at the scene as well as at least 10 Gardaí.
This morning we came across several police cars, ambulances and fire brigade in Ongar Village and several police and paramedics surrounding a cuffed male who has a contusion to his forehead and an injury begins his right ear (someone must have intervened in the attack). What is known at this time is that a man hit and smashed a glass over the heads and faces of a mother and her young child in Rendevouz Cafe. It is ot yet known what their I buried are. The man is large white male in his late thirties or early forties, with a beard. It's not obvious from the video but at least two ambulances, one firebrigade, four police cars and one police van were present at the scene as well as at least 10 Gardaí.
ON FULL TERM ABORTION IN IRELAND 🇮🇪....
Full lunacy on display. @ciaranahern thinks a fully developed 9 month old baby (and yes, a baby IS 9 months in existence if it is full term) is worth nothing, but has an issue with fox hunting. I also have an issue with the latter, but we are not calling for the last shred of humanity to be stripped from our already morally defunct society.
Quite staggering to be talking about human rights in the same breath as being disappointed at infants not being ripped from limb to limb, especially when you object to foxes being ripped from limb to limb. We don't know who needs ro be convinced of this but parties like @labour are anti human and so is our precious beloved president Catherine Connolly. We are so fed up hearing what a wonderful human being she is. She keeps the company of Labour and other parties who are clearly anti children. These aren't good people.
They don't even care about women. Can you imagine the psychological and even physical harms that can be caused to a woman who goes through with a procedure like this?
Full lunacy on display. @ciaranahern thinks a fully developed 9 month old baby (and yes, a baby IS 9 months in existence if it is full term) is worth nothing, but has an issue with fox hunting. I also have an issue with the latter, but we are not calling for the last shred of humanity to be stripped from our already morally defunct society.
Quite staggering to be talking about human rights in the same breath as being disappointed at infants not being ripped from limb to limb, especially when you object to foxes being ripped from limb to limb. We don't know who needs ro be convinced of this but parties like @labour are anti human and so is our precious beloved president Catherine Connolly. We are so fed up hearing what a wonderful human being she is. She keeps the company of Labour and other parties who are clearly anti children. These aren't good people.
They don't even care about women. Can you imagine the psychological and even physical harms that can be caused to a woman who goes through with a procedure like this?
RTE WON'T TELL YOU THIS SHOCKING TRUTH, BUT WE WILL
On the 17th of December 2025, the following elected representatives voted to ban foxhunting but they ALSO voted in favour of reintroducing the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy - Amendment Bill 2023), which would (if the yes voters were successful) effectively have led to legalised abortion to term (9 months/full gestation).
The media was, of course, quiet about the vote, and the vote itself was held one week before Christmas, seemingly in an attempt to surreptitiously pass it under the noses of a distracted and busy public. MOST OF THE NATION IS UNAWARE THIS VOTE TOOK PLACE.
The attempt to reintroduce the bill was defeated by just two votes (and no doubt those who voted yes won't accept permanent or indefinite defeat). Over 70 TDs and Government Ministers voted in favour of the bill. Including Minister Jack Chambers and Minister Helen McEntee. Members of Sinn Fein, Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and some independents voted in favour (as well as the parties and independents listed in the video). We will post a screenshot of all 70 TDs voted in favour of the bill. Those who abstained or didn't show to vote are no better and we will include them also.
REMEMBER many of these politicians also voted AGAINST The Foetal Pain Relief Bill 2021 which means they are ALSO AGAINST babies receiving pain relief during or after the abortion process (President Catherine Connolly also voted against it). So far in Ireland it is known that at least 12 babies have survived the abortion process and have been left to die alone in sluice rooms without any medication to ease them through the transition from life to death.
Please SHARE this video. Don't just hit like. Be courageous for these babies.You have the power to make others aware of the barbaric and nightmarish nature of what our so called elected representatives wish to make legal. Next time you see a newborn baby, ask yourself are you OK with making it legal to end its life in a painful and protracted way.
The only difference between a fully developed baby in the womb and a newborn is the time it takes to be birthed into the world.
On the 17th of December 2025, the following elected representatives voted to ban foxhunting but they ALSO voted in favour of reintroducing the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy - Amendment Bill 2023), which would (if the yes voters were successful) effectively have led to legalised abortion to term (9 months/full gestation).
The media was, of course, quiet about the vote, and the vote itself was held one week before Christmas, seemingly in an attempt to surreptitiously pass it under the noses of a distracted and busy public. MOST OF THE NATION IS UNAWARE THIS VOTE TOOK PLACE.
The attempt to reintroduce the bill was defeated by just two votes (and no doubt those who voted yes won't accept permanent or indefinite defeat). Over 70 TDs and Government Ministers voted in favour of the bill. Including Minister Jack Chambers and Minister Helen McEntee. Members of Sinn Fein, Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and some independents voted in favour (as well as the parties and independents listed in the video). We will post a screenshot of all 70 TDs voted in favour of the bill. Those who abstained or didn't show to vote are no better and we will include them also.
REMEMBER many of these politicians also voted AGAINST The Foetal Pain Relief Bill 2021 which means they are ALSO AGAINST babies receiving pain relief during or after the abortion process (President Catherine Connolly also voted against it). So far in Ireland it is known that at least 12 babies have survived the abortion process and have been left to die alone in sluice rooms without any medication to ease them through the transition from life to death.
Please SHARE this video. Don't just hit like. Be courageous for these babies.You have the power to make others aware of the barbaric and nightmarish nature of what our so called elected representatives wish to make legal. Next time you see a newborn baby, ask yourself are you OK with making it legal to end its life in a painful and protracted way.
The only difference between a fully developed baby in the womb and a newborn is the time it takes to be birthed into the world.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RTE WON'T TELL YOU THIS SHOCKING TRUTH, BUT WE WILL
On the 17th of December 2025, the following elected representatives voted to ban foxhunting but they ALSO voted in favour of reintroducing the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy - Amendment Bill 2023), which would (if the yes voters were successful) effectively have led to legalised abortion to term (9 months/full gestation).
Read on below...
On the 17th of December 2025, the following elected representatives voted to ban foxhunting but they ALSO voted in favour of reintroducing the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy - Amendment Bill 2023), which would (if the yes voters were successful) effectively have led to legalised abortion to term (9 months/full gestation).
Read on below...
🎵 _My Girl is Far Right🇮🇪 is now live on Spotify! 🎉 Add it to your playlists and share it far and wide, and let’s make it a hit! The more streams, the more we raise for local soup run charities. 🎄 Plus, stay tuned for the full video release! Let’s make this a Far Right Christmas to remember! 🎅
https://open.spotify.com/track/5WUPT6aDORq6hFX32lmRoD?si=_g6OeYawQS-4RkjUKdu2ww&nd=1&dlsi=b512182e4112456f
https://open.spotify.com/track/5WUPT6aDORq6hFX32lmRoD?si=_g6OeYawQS-4RkjUKdu2ww&nd=1&dlsi=b512182e4112456f
FAIRYTALES: GARDAÍ & MEDIA LIED TO PUBLIC ABOUT ASYLUM SEEKER RAPE OF A CHILD?
BY SUSANNE DELANEY
Next time you hear Gardaí and the media say that an alleged crime didn't happen; don't trust them. Discernment and cynicism are vital in this time of deception and danger.
This week, a so-called asylum seeker was convicted of "defiling" a child. But this was a crime the Gardaí and media claimed never happened. It was supposedly a made-up tale, designed to scare the public.
On February 17th, 2025, rumours swirled online: a schoolgirl had been raped in Athlone while on her way home. Very quickly, the Westmeath Independent reported that Gardaí claimed no such incident happened.The headline screamed, "No Report Of Female Being Assaulted On The Athlone Road" with the subheading "Gardai Are Not Aware Of Any Such Incident."
That article appeared on February 20th, 2025, and this week it disappeared. You can find the headline. But when you click on it, the article has been deleted.
Deleted because the story was not only true, but was much worse than described (as far as I can recall the article talks of claims a woman was raped, when in fact it was a child). A 23 year old asylum seeker has now been convicted in relation to the incident that we were told DID NOT OCCUR.
The charge in this case was originally rape but was downgraded to a lesser statutory charge to which the accused pled guilty. This statutory charge bases the wrongdoing on the complainants inability to legally consent to a sexual act.
While this downgrading likely would have been easier to prove (and therefore securing a conviction was more likely), it implies that the child was a willing participant in a sexual act, albeit one that she could not legally consent to.
In reality, the victim was not a willing participant. The victim was making her way home from a shopping trip at 5.30 pm on the day in question. She was approached at a bus stop by some men. One asked her age (she was 16 at the time). She was plied with alcohol and assaulted while unconscious, in what appears to have been a calculated and premeditated attack.
The convicted man engaged in an illegal sexual act with the unconscious child. Then, he left her. Without seeking medical help. She woke up in a hospital and attended a sexual assault treatment unit. Her mother reported her missing the night before at 10.30pm.
We can presume that by the 18th of February Gardaí knew an assault had taken place.
Surely, they would have been notified of an unconscious child being brought to the hospital, devoid of parents. One that needed to attend the SATU? So why did they say there was no crime?
For his actions in this case, the convicted man received just four years in prison. Despite the aggravating factors. In mitigation, Judge Melanie McGreally took his age and guilty plea into consideration (apparently 23 is not old enough to know better than to sexually attack a girl whose young age he had been sure to establish).
The judge said in court that the unnamed convicted man would be"very lonely" in prison (his family lives in South Africa) in what was a very insensitive comment for the victim. Perhaps do not sexually assault children, and then you won't experience such "loneliness"?
The man has "consented" to deportation on his release, but that could mean he will be directed to self deport, and no one will ensure he left. This is a problem, not least because no one knows his name (why wasn't he identified, given he was unknown to the victim?)
So there you have it. That's the case that simply never happened.
You're being told again and again that the wolf is not at the door, sniffing around your children, when in fact the wolf is sitting at the table, licking it's lips and laughing, content in the knowledge that the state is making prey of its people and a fool of us all.
BY SUSANNE DELANEY
Next time you hear Gardaí and the media say that an alleged crime didn't happen; don't trust them. Discernment and cynicism are vital in this time of deception and danger.
This week, a so-called asylum seeker was convicted of "defiling" a child. But this was a crime the Gardaí and media claimed never happened. It was supposedly a made-up tale, designed to scare the public.
On February 17th, 2025, rumours swirled online: a schoolgirl had been raped in Athlone while on her way home. Very quickly, the Westmeath Independent reported that Gardaí claimed no such incident happened.The headline screamed, "No Report Of Female Being Assaulted On The Athlone Road" with the subheading "Gardai Are Not Aware Of Any Such Incident."
That article appeared on February 20th, 2025, and this week it disappeared. You can find the headline. But when you click on it, the article has been deleted.
Deleted because the story was not only true, but was much worse than described (as far as I can recall the article talks of claims a woman was raped, when in fact it was a child). A 23 year old asylum seeker has now been convicted in relation to the incident that we were told DID NOT OCCUR.
The charge in this case was originally rape but was downgraded to a lesser statutory charge to which the accused pled guilty. This statutory charge bases the wrongdoing on the complainants inability to legally consent to a sexual act.
While this downgrading likely would have been easier to prove (and therefore securing a conviction was more likely), it implies that the child was a willing participant in a sexual act, albeit one that she could not legally consent to.
In reality, the victim was not a willing participant. The victim was making her way home from a shopping trip at 5.30 pm on the day in question. She was approached at a bus stop by some men. One asked her age (she was 16 at the time). She was plied with alcohol and assaulted while unconscious, in what appears to have been a calculated and premeditated attack.
The convicted man engaged in an illegal sexual act with the unconscious child. Then, he left her. Without seeking medical help. She woke up in a hospital and attended a sexual assault treatment unit. Her mother reported her missing the night before at 10.30pm.
We can presume that by the 18th of February Gardaí knew an assault had taken place.
Surely, they would have been notified of an unconscious child being brought to the hospital, devoid of parents. One that needed to attend the SATU? So why did they say there was no crime?
For his actions in this case, the convicted man received just four years in prison. Despite the aggravating factors. In mitigation, Judge Melanie McGreally took his age and guilty plea into consideration (apparently 23 is not old enough to know better than to sexually attack a girl whose young age he had been sure to establish).
The judge said in court that the unnamed convicted man would be"very lonely" in prison (his family lives in South Africa) in what was a very insensitive comment for the victim. Perhaps do not sexually assault children, and then you won't experience such "loneliness"?
The man has "consented" to deportation on his release, but that could mean he will be directed to self deport, and no one will ensure he left. This is a problem, not least because no one knows his name (why wasn't he identified, given he was unknown to the victim?)
So there you have it. That's the case that simply never happened.
You're being told again and again that the wolf is not at the door, sniffing around your children, when in fact the wolf is sitting at the table, licking it's lips and laughing, content in the knowledge that the state is making prey of its people and a fool of us all.
Daniel should be waiting for Santy. Instead, the 3 year old waited for years in cold hard waste ground. Waiting for his body to be discovered. Waiting to be noticed as missing. The state and The ChiId and FamiIy Agency TusI@ let this child down in the worst possible way. His file was closed prematurely (as were the files of over 42,500 children during l○ckd○wns).
For a time, it looked as though this was being viewed as a natural death, but the chances a 3 year old boy died of natural causes and was buried innocently in secret by his parents were minute.
The fact his mother claimed social welfare for Daniel for four years and his father fled to Brazil (and regused to return for his son's funeral) has, thankfully, raised suspicions. Unfortunately, the skeletal remains yielded no apparent cause of death. But hopefully Gardaí have other damning evidence to go on.
Time will tell.
Thoughts and prayers with Daniel's foster family at this time. I believe they are devastated at losing him in what is the most horrific way possible. Rest In peace, little boy.
For a time, it looked as though this was being viewed as a natural death, but the chances a 3 year old boy died of natural causes and was buried innocently in secret by his parents were minute.
The fact his mother claimed social welfare for Daniel for four years and his father fled to Brazil (and regused to return for his son's funeral) has, thankfully, raised suspicions. Unfortunately, the skeletal remains yielded no apparent cause of death. But hopefully Gardaí have other damning evidence to go on.
Time will tell.
Thoughts and prayers with Daniel's foster family at this time. I believe they are devastated at losing him in what is the most horrific way possible. Rest In peace, little boy.
🎵 My Girl is Far Right 🇮🇪
Please like ,share and subscribe.
Full song available on Spotify, (add it to your playlist), link is in post below 🇮🇪 🇮🇪
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icP3-gn8A3Q
Please like ,share and subscribe.
Full song available on Spotify, (add it to your playlist), link is in post below 🇮🇪 🇮🇪
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icP3-gn8A3Q
YouTube
Cat & Cal – My Girl Is Far Right (Official Music Video)
QUESTION EVERYTHING, EVEN THE LABELS.
🎧 LISTEN / STREAM THE TRACK
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/track/5WUPT6aDORq6hFX32lmRoD
🎧 LISTEN / STREAM THE TRACK
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/track/5WUPT6aDORq6hFX32lmRoD
Ireland 🇮🇪 is (OF COURSE) only one of two countries taking people from Afghanistan 🇦🇫 (including through family reunification) ALL other countries bar one refuse. Citing SERIOUS SECURITY CONCERNS, VETTING FAILURES, and HIGH PROFILE TERRORIST AND OTHER "INCIDENTS". But YOUR government and media want you to accept that the above does not matter or apply, and they want you to accept that every person from Afghanistan is a victim rather than a perpetrator. This is NOT stupidity or naivety. It's by design and for a reason. Would you agree?
A solutions-driven public conference with host Eddie Hobbs and guests speaking on the issues Ireland faces today. It’s time to pivot to solutions; we know the problems and challenges. This is the beginning of a comprehensive new discussion about what to do.
https://irlforum.com/
https://irlforum.com/
IRL FORUM
A solutions-driven public conference with host Eddie Hobbs and guests speaking on the issues Ireland faces today.